Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe

[willows68]

Declan, this was a response to Diarmuïd.

You still think its ridiculous?

It's too hot to scroll back up, Sir. I'm melting and it's only 9am. Can't get to beach til tea time - a beach where everyone leaves their stuff unattended, everyone looks after the little ones and the deepest colour saturation is latte because they just back from 2 weeks in the Canaries. Heaven. Have a great weekend

 

[Just Think]

Stop replying to my posts then.

Do you moderate this discussion board? If the answer is no then I suggest you quit your nonsense trolling, grow up and stop directing people as to how they respond and what they should type.
It looks like you think you're some big shot or something here but in reality you add nothing to the place except ad hominem emotional retorts that make you look like an absolute idiot.
Now, in your own style, I suggest you get back to discussing the topic of 'Mass Migration Into Ireland and Europe' and stop trying to troll and drag folk down your stupid and childish rabbit holes, ok?
BTW, call everyone Alice if it makes you feel better, old man!

 

[Haven]

Do you moderate this discussion board? If the answer is no then I suggest you quit your nonsense trolling, grow up and stop directing people as to how they respond and what they should type.
It looks like you think you're some big shot or something here but in reality you add nothing to the place except ad hominem emotional retorts that make you look like an absolute idiot.
Now, in your own style, I suggest you get back to discussing the topic of 'Mass Migration Into Ireland and Europe' and stop trying to troll and drag folk down your stupid and childish rabbit holes, ok?
BTW, call everyone Alice if it makes you feel better, old man!
View attachment 9198

Quit stalking me you fucking fat cunt.

 

[Haven]

That wasn’t what I asked you about.

I didn’t ask whether the date is correct. I asked if she posted the image on her Facebook page.

You are clearly trolling.

I don't give a shit what you asked.

Its up to you to prove the datestamp is correct, that the photo was taken on that specific day.

 

[Diarmuid]

One of Our Orange Guys, 56 yrs old, is in court today for the alleged Moygashel mosque on the bonfire incident. Let us pray that the judge will show mercy.

SF Fermanagh/South Tyrone whoor, Gildernew is complaining about fascist bonfires.

They lit the fire while the peelers were attempting to take down the mosque. Can anyone find footage of that?

 

[Mad as Fish]

No. Thats entirely on you to prove the date is correct.

Have you any evidence or reason to believe it is incorrect?

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Quit stalking me you fucking fat cunt.

Fat shaming now.

What next?

 

[Mad as Fish]

H

Do you moderate this discussion board? If the answer is no then I suggest you quit your nonsense trolling, grow up and stop directing people as to how they respond and what they should type.
It looks like you think you're some big shot or something here but in reality you add nothing to the place except ad hominem emotional retorts that make you look like an absolute idiot.
Now, in your own style, I suggest you get back to discussing the topic of 'Mass Migration Into Ireland and Europe' and stop trying to troll and drag folk down your stupid and childish rabbit holes, ok?
BTW, call everyone Alice if it makes you feel better, old man!

View attachment 9198

Hey JT, less of the old man, I'm older than that little fecker!

 

[Tiger]

I don't give a shit what you asked.

Its up to you to prove the datestamp is correct, that the photo was taken on that specific day.

No it isn't ya fag.

If she's posted it on her own Facebook page, then it's logical that it's legit. It makes absolutely no sense that she would post an altered image on her own profile. None at all.

Your digging a hole that you can't get out of.

 

[SeekTheFairLand]

Catholic and Protestant church leaders have said the placing of a replica mosque on a loyalist bonfire is “grossly offensive”.
Catholic Archbishop of Armagh Eamon Martin and Archbishop John McDowell, Church of Ireland Archbishop of Armagh, were speaking before the pyre in Moygashel was set alight early.
Read more: https://tinyurl.com/yc33r663
See less

 

[clarke-connolly]

Catholic and Protestant church leaders have said the placing of a replica mosque on a loyalist bonfire is “grossly offensive”.
Catholic Archbishop of Armagh Eamon Martin and Archbishop John McDowell, Church of Ireland Archbishop of Armagh, were speaking before the pyre in Moygashel was set alight early.
Read more: https://tinyurl.com/yc33r663
See less

Islamists have No Sense of Humour = = Fierce Insecure altogether.

All in All there is no way that you could go on the Beer with Allah and take the piss out of him ! ! !

 

[Haven]

No it isn't ya fag.

If she's posted it on her own Facebook page, then it's logical that it's legit. It makes absolutely no sense that she would post an altered image on her own profile. None at all.

Your digging a hole that you can't get out of.

People constantly messed up setting dates in SLRs and Point-and-shoots in those days.

Replacing the battery often completely reset the battery settings.

Or people just set up the dates wrong.

Its up to you to prove your case. End of.

"Your digging a hole that you can't get out of.": if I am, why not just let me do it? When I see stuff like this, I see it as bullshitty, defensive, tactic...pure projection. No one knowing winning an argument is going warn the other person off. Instead, you are losing it.

 

[SeekTheFairLand]

One of Our Orange Guys, 56 yrs old, is in court today for the alleged Moygashel mosque on the bonfire incident. Let us pray that the judge will show mercy.

SF Fermanagh/South Tyrone whoor, Gildernew is complaining about fascist bonfires.

They lit the fire while the peelers were attempting to take down the mosque. Can anyone find footage of that?

 

[SeekTheFairLand]

One of Our Orange Guys, 56 yrs old, is in court today for the alleged Moygashel mosque on the bonfire incident. Let us pray that the judge will show mercy.

SF Fermanagh/South Tyrone whoor, Gildernew is complaining about fascist bonfires.

They lit the fire while the peelers were attempting to take down the mosque. Can anyone find footage of that?

 

[SeekTheFairLand]

 

[Tiger]

People constantly messed up setting dates in SLRs and Point-and-shoots in those days.

Replacing the battery often completely reset the battery settings.

Or people just set up the dates wrong.

Its up to you to prove your case. End of.

"Your digging a hole that you can't get out of.": if I am, why not just let me do it? When I see stuff like this, I see it as bullshitty, defensive, tactic...pure projection. No one knowing winning an argument is going warn the other person off. Instead, you are losing it.

The photograph, as presented, is a piece of prima facie evidence. It was uploaded by the person who took or possessed it, with a visible timestamp.

You're misunderstanding where the burden of proof lies. The photograph, with its visible timestamp, is the evidence currently before us. You're proposing that the timestamp is wrong because the battery might have been replaced, the clock might have reset, or the date might have been entered incorrectly. Those are speculative alternative hypotheses. In logic, the person advancing an alternative explanation bears the burden of producing evidence for it.

What proof do you have?

 

[Mad as Fish]

Catholic and Protestant church leaders have said the placing of a replica mosque on a loyalist bonfire is “grossly offensive”.
Catholic Archbishop of Armagh Eamon Martin and Archbishop John McDowell, Church of Ireland Archbishop of Armagh, were speaking before the pyre in Moygashel was set alight early.
Read more: https://tinyurl.com/yc33r663
See less

Oh good!

 

[Haven]

The photograph, as presented, is a piece of prima facie evidence. It was uploaded by the person who took or possessed it, with a visible timestamp.

You're misunderstanding where the burden of proof lies. The photograph, with its visible timestamp, is the evidence currently before us. You're proposing that the timestamp is wrong because the battery might have been replaced, the clock might have reset, or the date might have been entered incorrectly. Those are speculative alternative hypotheses. In logic, the person advancing an alternative explanation bears the burden of producing evidence for it.

What proof do you have?

Its up to you to prove your assertions. End of.

 

[Mad as Fish]

People constantly messed up setting dates in SLRs and Point-and-shoots in those days.

Replacing the battery often completely reset the battery settings.

Or people just set up the dates wrong.

Its up to you to prove your case. End of.

"Your digging a hole that you can't get out of.": if I am, why not just let me do it? When I see stuff like this, I see it as bullshitty, defensive, tactic...pure projection. No one knowing winning an argument is going warn the other person off. Instead, you are losing it.

Oh stop it would you!

What the feck do you mean by 'battery settings'?

You are grasping at straws that don't even exist.

 

[Tiger]

Its up to you to prove your assertions. End of.

And the winner of the title - "Worst debater on Sarsfield's' goes to....

Haven!

Lads........I think we can put this one to bed. Haven has clearly lost the debate.

 

[Mad as Fish]

The photograph, as presented, is a piece of prima facie evidence. It was uploaded by the person who took or possessed it, with a visible timestamp.

You're misunderstanding where the burden of proof lies. The photograph, with its visible timestamp, is the evidence currently before us. You're proposing that the timestamp is wrong because the battery might have been replaced, the clock might have reset, or the date might have been entered incorrectly. Those are speculative alternative hypotheses. In logic, the person advancing an alternative explanation bears the burden of producing evidence for it.

What proof do you have?

Once again his stupidity and ignorance has shunted him down a dead end.

 

[Tiger]

Once again his stupidity and ignorance has shunted him down a dead end.

And to think that this level of argumentation is coming from a man in his 50's/60's.

Proper hopeless shite.

 

[Haven]

And the winner of the title - "Worst debater on Sarsfield's' goes to....

Haven!

Lads........I think we can put this one to bed. Haven has clearly lost the debate.

Utter failure from Tiger to prove the case.

I'll take the win!

 

[Tiger]

Utter failure from Tiger to prove the case.

I'll take the win!

You don't overturn evidence with hopeless speculative hypotheticals.

Loser.

 

[Just Think]

Quit stalking me you fucking fat cunt.

Do you just repeat everything other people post then claim it as your own?

At 8.18am today I instructed you to quit stalking me and within 12 minutes you post the exact same thing back.
A fucking 63 year old child.

BTW, 'fucking fat cunt'?
How is it possible to describe anyone's physical features by reading a post?
Fuck me, you really are retarded.

 

[Just Think]

Fat shaming now.

What next?

Well if being 6'2" and 14 stone is classed as a 'fat cunt' then I'm guilty, yer honour.
But what's more likely is roc/haven is looking in a mirror and describing him/herself to us, a 63 year old fat cunt who sits on his/her arse in some Middle Eastern shithole trawling X.com for his establishment propaganda and throwing it up on here.

 

[Diarmuid]

Brian Conrad Neal was remanded in custody until August 4th.

Obviously a descendant of the O'Neills.

A police chopper filmed him unmasked on top of the bonfire. He said in court he didn't know what was under the tarp, but they claimed they filmed up him looking underneath the tarp.

Have these judges no sense of humour?

Three weeks in jail for looking at a model of a mosque.

For that price, the Orangemen should put a synagogue on top next time.

 

[Just Think]

And the winner of the title - "Worst debater on Sarsfield's' goes to....

Haven!

Lads........I think we can put this one to bed. Haven has clearly lost the debate.

A Master 'bater, if you like.

 

[Hermit]

No. Thats entirely on you to prove the date is correct.

No, you're claiming the date is or might be incorrect so the burden is on you to provide evidence.

I have provided evidence that the 8th August 2010 date corresponds with the date Helen Ogbu posted the photo on her Facebook page and the date of her husband's election campaign launch. I also linked a second photo with that date. This particular date of 8th August 2010 is obviously significant to her which is why she posted those photos on 8th August in 2024.

The photos show her and others wearing a t-shirt with her husband's image for his election campaign. Her husband did not run for election prior to 2010, so the photos must have been taken some time in 2010 before he died on 24th October.

 

[Just Think]

GalwayBeo is still claiming the coon's husband was killed in 2006.

"Born and raised in Nigeria, Councillor Ogbu’s life was irrevocably altered in 2006 by the murder of her husband, Sunny Orji-Ogbu."

Helen Ogbu private life from personal tragedy to political plans

The city councillor has targeted several key issues

www.galwaybeo.ie

 

[Haven]

You don't overturn evidence with hopeless speculative hypotheticals.

Loser.

You are the one making or supporting the accusations, not me.

You have to prove it. Not me.

I see "Facebook", "photo", "datestamp", a story in one of the worst rag tabloids, and I see red flags.

I see posters on this forum blindly following a narrative cos it suits their bias, ironically while bemoaning others who they think are following a narrative cos it suits their bias.

I ask simple questions that no one can answer.

I'll take the win and move on.

 

[Tiger]

You are the one making or supporting the accusations, not me.

Nope, just looking at the prima facie evidence for what it is, and not making up anything.

You have to prove it. Not me.

I've already shown this to be incorrect.

That's like me saying, 'I know the timestamp is correct, but an invisible time traveller changed the camera settings afterwards so we can't see the real date.' You can't disprove that either; but it would be ridiculous to treat it as a serious argument.

You don't have an argument. None.

I see "Facebook", "photo", "datestamp", a story in one of the worst rag tabloids, and I see red flags.

Whatever you're 'seeing' is irrelevant. You have no proof of it. Not a smidgen.

I see posters on this forum blindly following a narrative cos it suits their bias, ironically while bemoaning others who they think are following a narrative cos it suits their bias.

Nope. It's not a narrative. It's evidence which the person being questioned provided to the world themselves, through their own stupidity.

I ask simple questions that no one can answer.

You haven't asked questions that no one can answer; you've asked questions that assume your conclusion and then demanded others disprove it.
Like a nutter.

I'll take the win and move on.

Loser.

 

[Tiger]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSRaa91lBb0

 

[Haven]

Nope, just looking at the prima facie evidence for what it is, and not making up anything.

I've already shown this to be incorrect.

That's like me saying, 'I know the timestamp is correct, but an invisible time traveller changed the camera settings afterwards so we can't see the real date.' You can't disprove that either; but it would be ridiculous to treat it as a serious argument.

You don't have an argument. None.

Whatever you're 'seeing' is irrelevant. You have no proof of it. Not a smidgen.

Nope. It's not a narrative. It's evidence which the person being questioned provided to the world themselves, through their own stupidity.

You haven't asked questions that no one can answer; you've asked questions that assume your conclusion and then demanded others disprove it.
Like a nutter.

Loser.

Nope.

The burden of proof is all on you.

 

[Tiger]

Nope.

The burden of proof is all on you.

@mods - Can we take a look at this trolling

 

[The Equalizer]

FreePress.ie reckon the whole Jamey Carney murder is fake.

He says that they all are. Every atrocity committed by an invader is fake.

He also, ostensibly, believes in the stupidest conspiracy theory of them all - Flat Earth.

To be honest I think he (Mickey) might be a psyop himself.

It is certainly the case that it is getting lots of MSM publicity, in sharp contrast to other murders. Kelly Lynch was found dead in a Monaghan canal over a year ago with fifty injuries. No MSM headlines, the Gardai sneered at the grieving parents and the evil useless bastards still haven't started a murder investigation.

Some murder victims are more important than others?
Can anyone confirm that Jamey ever existed in real life?

REPOST

Jamey Carney, AI character. Killed by an imaginary Killarney by an Arab genie. Created by Irish state security traitors.

Note the unnatural movements. Unnatural speech. Inorganic movements. ICE Politicisation to hook targets in. Speech out of sync at tricky 'venn diagram' part, intonation off. From New York, so ok if no one knows her. Arab who escaped country conveniently. Garda forensic suit actors all over the scene on news. Mini production. I have explained why they do these things many times, search 'psyop' in this channel for lots more. Here's another one of their comedy acts for reference, the ICA clowns. Parnell square was a much larger and expensive division operation

People really need to wake the f*ck up at this stage. Fake pandemics are nothing to these people, psyops even less.

The other image is her dog again, with a surprised comedy shocked face.

This is the contempt that the Irish state and Garda upper echelons have for the Irish people, along with their freemason media nonce minions.

 

[Haven]

@mods - Can we take a look at this trolling

Its not trolling. You are trying to "win" by shutting me down.

Its very simple. You have to back yourself up. Thats how it works.

No one tells the defense in court they have the prove anything. The burden is always on the side making the accusation.

 

[The Equalizer]

Its not trolling.

What if it's all true? What would you think then?

If you're not going to answer then shut up and quit your trolling.

You are trying to "win" by shutting me down.

Its very simple. You have to back yourself up. Thats how it works.

No one tells the defense in court they have the prove anything. The burden is always on the side making the accusation.

 

[Just Think]

@mods - Can we take a look at this trolling

There are obviously no moderators on this site because if there were, responses of the autistic type we see from roc/haven would be shut down and he/she would be banned from the site for mental health reasons.
There is very obviously something incredibly wrong with the way he/she responds to people and that is obviously a mental health issue.
A friend of mine has a 24 year old son with autism and the way roc/haven responds is exactly how he responds to things.
There is no other explanation.

 

[Just Think]

Its not trolling. You are trying to "win" by shutting me down.

Its very simple. You have to back yourself up. Thats how it works.

No one tells the defense in court they have the prove anything. The burden is always on the side making the accusation.

All you do is run down rabbit holes, you are incapable of rational discussion becaues you are a mentally unwell 63 year old fat man living in the Middle East.
The Danny DiVito of this site, without the comedic talent.