Origins Thread (Uncensored)

PlunkettsGhost

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2023
Messages
3,525
Reaction score
3,297
You can say what you want here,
All well and good, but that's not what I'm interested in. Please tell us why we should take a public apologist for pedophilia (Dawkins) seriously on matters of morals?

Morals, by the way, makes no sense for the atheistic materialist. Yours is an accidental state of being, after all. There is no morality. This is why Dawkins said the odious things he did. He is, at least, an honest atheist. AmIright?
 

PlunkettsGhost

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2023
Messages
3,525
Reaction score
3,297
Jambo, why should we be listening to a pedo, on this or any other matter? Do you want us to just look the other way ?
 

PlunkettsGhost

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2023
Messages
3,525
Reaction score
3,297
Jambo, you like to play word games in order to avoid direct and difficult answers.

Please define 'alleged' for us. There's a good chap.
 

PlunkettsGhost

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2023
Messages
3,525
Reaction score
3,297
Even Sam Harris acknowledges the pedo problem in atheism:

Dr. Sam Harris is a founder of the New Atheism movement. Sam Harris is quite aware of the stigma surrounding atheism and has even advocated that atheists no longer call themselves atheists.[12] In fact, Dr. Harris has said concerning the label of atheist, "It's right next to child molester as a designation."
 

PlunkettsGhost

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2023
Messages
3,525
Reaction score
3,297
There is nothing alleged about you claiming that Richard Dawkins is a paedophile
More dissembling as usual from you James. Imagine our shock.

Now, instead of making this about me, please tell us all why you believe Dawkins' own public statements constitute 'allegations' ?

We can't wait for a straight answer from you. Are we going to get one? Like fuck we will
 

PlunkettsGhost

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2023
Messages
3,525
Reaction score
3,297
Richard Dawkins claims sexual abuse is less damaging than religious instruction. Doth he protest too much? :unsure:

For what kind of evidence is there for Dawkins’s controversial assertion of the greater long-term psychological damage inflicted upon children who are raised Catholic than upon those who are sexually abused? He first provides anecdotal information from one woman who was raised Catholic, was sexually abused by a priest, and later had nightmares about Hell. And in the unlikely event that one woman’s bad dreams are not enough to completely convince the reader, Dawkins goes on to mention an apocryphal story about Alfred Hitchcock driving through Switzerland, a Protestant haunted house, a letter from a woman seeking a therapist, an American comedienne’s routine, and a letter from an upset American medical student whose girlfriend is breaking up with him. Despite posing the proposition as a comparison, Dawkins does not bother to consider what, if any, the negative effects of childhood sexual trauma might happen to be in order to compare them with this comprehensive list of Catholic horrors.

 

Popular Threads

Top Bottom