Origins Thread (Uncensored)

[David has been banned]

 

[David has been banned]

Sadly, this thread was deemed necessary because of the actions of the intolerant bigoted theist and OPer of the original thread.

More to follow...

 

[Tiger]

How we got here

Yesterday I posted a video of evolutionary biologist, Richard Dawkins, interviewing flat Earth creationist, Wendy Wright -


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Vno1lAydv-8&t=33

Description
Interview with Richard Dawkins In 2009, Richard Dawkins interviewed Wendy Wright at her office at the Concerned Women for America for his documentary, The Genius of Charles Darwin. This is one of the most frustrating interviews Dawkins gave with evolution deniers - if not the most frustrating interview to watch in the history of the origins debate. Wright, while adopting a patronizing tone, argues that evolution is wrong with tired creationist canards, misconceptions, and inaccuracies (e.g., suggesting that Haeckel's drawings are still in textbooks today, that there are no transitional forms, that evidence for evolution is nothing but hoaxes), but even after Dawkins corrects her misconceptions repeatedly, she continues to repeat the same claims and denies that there is any evidence that evolution is the means by which new species of lifeforms develop. Even when asked to look at examples of transitional forms in the form of casts of fossils in any respectable museum, she repeatedly states that she has been to the museums' and asserts that she has 'never seen the physical evidence'. Wright accuses Dawkins of personal attacks while employing ad hominem attacks against him, accusing him of being controlled by evil and deception. She proposes that Christian morality results in a better environment (as opposed to a Darwinian society) and therefore a literal interpretation of the Bible must be true while modern scientific explanations must be false. Dawkins responds (on several accounts) that he would not want to live in a Darwinian society because of ruthlessness of such a system, largely to no effect. Wright talks to Dawkins as if she has answers that he doesn't, most strikingly on the subject in which Dawkins is an established expert. She argues that it shouldn't only be scientists doing science, but that even the uneducated should be empowered to debate scientific facts and flatly deny evidence. Wright claims that 'evolutionists' are 'oppressive' because 'they won't let other ideas through', presumably ideas that are not backed up by evidence. Wright's responses rely upon logical fallacies and subjectively induced neoromantic pathos claims to 'prove' that 'we should love each human being therefore the Bible is true'. The debate actually got so absurd that, in an attempt to make even the slightest dent in Wright's titanium-plated cranium, Richard Dawkins, the great crusader for reason and against religion and superstition, began trying to explain that Evolution itself is not per se incompatible with (Christian) faith!
--

More to follow...

This hopeless post was responded to.

 

[Tiger]

 

[Tiger]

70 IQ

Poor James’s addict response.

 

[Tiger]

 

[Tiger]

 

[Tiger]

Then what?

I made this entertaining post, expressing myself musically and replying to the latest garbage from Mad as a Tiger, including the OP -

Post in thread 'Origins Thread' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.com/threads/origins-thread.639/post-76567

(Mad as a Tiger would not have got it)

More to follow...

Is this an attempt at the ‘worst response of 2024’ award?

That’s how it looks.

 

[Tiger]

View attachment 4158

Why are you photoshopping various posts together you utter weirdo?

 

[Coal Gas and peat]

Why are you photoshopping various posts together you utter weirdo?

Go back to your own origins thread pal don't be startin it here

 

[Tiger]

Post in thread 'Origins Thread' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.com/threads/origins-thread.639/post-76797

Einstein didn't believe in your God, Mad as a Tiger.

You miss the point, as per usual.

Religion is not scientific, it's unscientific. There is no compatibility, whatsoever.

Your ignorance knows no bounds. You clearly didn’t watch the videos that triggered you.

Thank God you are contained on your own zoo here.

 

[Tiger]

So, I make two points:

Einstein didn't believe in Mad as a Tiger's God (Jesus of Nazareth)

Nobody claimed he did. That wasn’t the point.

Religion is incompatible with science

This is a retarded statement which makes no sense. You offered zero evidence to back it up. So there was nothing to refute.

In return? Nothing

You’re a time waster (often intoxicated) who doesn’t deserve replies

 

[Tiger]

I'm going to start calling Mad as a Tiger from now on - Wendy (because it's easier to type)

 

[Tiger]

It's difficult 4 me to understand an intellect so deficient.

I can imagine

 

[Tiger]

Now listen here Wendy. You ain't in your Catholic spewing anti-atheist censorship thread now, what was your point? Einstein believed in God? Define "God", write any or all of your evidence for Einstein's believe in "God" here -

*glug glug, 70 IQ glug glug*

_______________________________________________


Religion is unscientific, you fucking tard. Everything supernatural is, you bimbo.

James, do you have a form of ADHD?

You seem like the kid in class who can never follow discussions properly. You always get hyper focused on one word and get lost down your own interpretation path.

Why don’t you go back and listen to Huberman, Collins and Lennox, (people with significantly more skin in the game than you do) and try to learn something new.

 

[Tiger]

I mean, this is just fucking hilarious

This is the same person (Mad as a Tiger AKA 'Wendy') whose head finally exploded when I, ostensibly, left out "On the" -

Wrong (as always) you were spamming the thread by going around in circles with MAF and I pointed out the obvious to put a stop to it. You’d still be at it now if I hadn’t intervened.

 

[Tiger]

lol You're such as brazen liar.

Tell us why me not saying "On the" was in any way meaningful, you total fucking spoofer*.

*Now hang on a second, I actually believe that in your dim brain that it did have some meaning.

Tell us why me saying - It's origin of species not origin of life.. had some meaning, because I left out "on the", write it here, embarrass yourself -


_____________________________________________

I couldn’t have given 2 shits about it you weirdo, however, you were doing your usual pestering routine with MAF so I stepped in to put a stop to it ( which worked btw)

 

[Tiger]

No one said that there aren't scientists who believe in "God", you total thicko

View attachment 4166

Dim Jim, have a sit down and I’ll explain like you are 5 years of age….

A ‘fun fact’ is an interlude. It is not an answer to anything.

It’s a spontaneous ejaculation of information that some folk might find interesting…..and others might be triggered by. Both are a worthwhile reason for their inclusion.

You seem tense, like it’s been a while since you’ve had an ejaculation of any kind. Funny that.

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

EVOLUTIONARY Biologist and pedophilia apologist Richard Dawkins...

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

Dawkins and Dennett connected to Epstein​

Now we have a pretty good idea why Richard Dawkins was arguing that sexual abuse in childhood is harmless:

Dawkins and Dennett connected to Epstein - Vox Popoli

Now we have a pretty good idea why Richard Dawkins was arguing that sexual abuse in childhood is harmless: On FEB 20, 2002 Epstein Flew from JFK to MRY (Monterey, CA) with the following people: (Many names misspelled and or omitted corrected and noted by italic emphasis) Jeffrey Epstein SK –...

voxday.net