Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Tiger" data-source="post: 120646" data-attributes="member: 353">For context of Jambo’s latest bout of idiocy, here’s the actual link to the debate which he decided to copy and paste someone else’s interpretation of. Being an unemployed alcoholic, this is all we can really expect in terms of his level of debate. [MEDIA=youtube]L-KPfFPIaVU[/MEDIA]<a href="https://youtu.be/L-KPfFPIaVU?feature=shared" target="_blank">View: https://youtu.be/L-KPfFPIaVU?feature=shared</a>For anyone who listens to this, you will see that the interpretation he posted is horses gockey. James, posting someone else's biased rant about a 15-year-old debate that went poorly for your side doesn’t help your case—it just highlights that you don’t really understand the subject at all. Prothero’s account is riddled with ad hominem attacks, emotional rhetoric, and strawman arguments rather than substantive points. If you had actually listened to the debate you would see that he spends more time insulting his opponents, complaining about the moderator, and patting himself on the back than actually addressing any of the scientific issues. You obviously never listened to a single word of the 2 hour debate (as you clearly don't have the attention span capable of lasting that long)  so lazily reposting Don Prothero’s 15-year-old tirade about a debate does nothing to help your case—it just highlights how out of touch you are with the subject. Prothero’s account is riddled with emotional bluster, ad hominem attacks, and smug self-congratulation, but it’s remarkably light on substantive science. Instead of addressing core issues like the origins of specified information or irreducible complexity, he resorts to mocking his opponents and appealing to his own authority—a hallmark of someone defending a crumbling paradigm. In fact it's very similar to your level of argumentation. No science, just childish ad homs. What’s even more damning is your failure to recognize how much the landscape of microbiology and genetics has advanced in the last 15 years. Discoveries in epigenetics, molecular machines, and information theory have only deepened the challenges to Neo-Darwinism while providing strong support for Intelligent Design. By clinging to Prothero’s outdated rhetoric, you’re showing that your grasp of this topic is stuck in the past, ignoring the significant body of new evidence that has emerged. If anything, this just underscores your unwillingness to engage with the real science at play.</blockquote>

Name

Verification: Does Doxxie know his real father.

Latest Threads

J
Varadkar "confronted by far right" while walking down street inDublin
- Started by Jay Homer Simpson
- Yesterday at 8:02 AM
- Replies: 6
Public Chat and Announcements
B
BIG FAT HOOR TO SHRINK.
- Started by BIG FAT HOOR
- Wednesday at 2:54 PM
- Replies: 39
Health
B
RAW NAKED TRUTH FROM PASTOR RICK WILES
- Started by BIG FAT HOOR
- Tuesday at 10:51 AM
- Replies: 6
USA
Food price inflation in Ireland rose to a 20-month high of 5%
- Started by Anderson
- Tuesday at 8:29 AM
- Replies: 1
Economy
46% of Irish population now have health insurance
- Started by Anderson
- Tuesday at 8:27 AM
- Replies: 1
Health

Popular Threads

Ukraine.
- Started by Declan
- Feb 21, 2022
- Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
- Started by jpc
- Nov 7, 2022
- Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
- Started by Anderson
- Feb 26, 2023
- Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
- Started by Charlene
- Sep 14, 2021
- Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
- Started by Declan
- Dec 30, 2024
- Replies: 3K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
- Started by Anderson
- Jul 29, 2022
- Replies: 2K
Climate Change