Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Members Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Tiger Blog
Origins Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tiger" data-source="post: 132175" data-attributes="member: 353"><p>Presumably you think he does do a good job of explaining the conundrum, which says a lot.</p><p></p><p>So, in this exchange, Alex O’Connor, though a secularist, plays the part of performing a useful service by invoking the idea of fine-tuning—not because he believes in intelligent design, but because he dares to hold the priesthood of scientism to account. He presents the eerie precision of the universe’s physical constants as a challenge: if this isn’t the product of design, then where is the scientific explanation? </p><p></p><p>Enter Brian Greene, a <strong>high priest of theoretical physics</strong>, who promptly <strong>evades</strong> the question with the kind of metaphysical obfuscation masquerading as science that has become the hallmark of this new academic Gnosticism. Rather than engaging with the heart of the issue—<strong><em>why</em> the conditions for life are so mathematically improbable</strong>—Greene spins a fairy tale of <strong>unseen universes and speculative equations</strong>. This is not science; it is a modern mythology for the credentialed class, who fear what the implications of fine-tuning might mean for their materialist dogma. </p><p></p><p>Greene has<strong> no empirical foundation</strong> for his multiverse musings. What he offers is a cosmic sleight of hand, designed to distract the laity from recognizing that his religion of numbers and probabilities cannot escape the philosophical consequences of a universe ordered in such a way as to point beyond itself. O’Connor, likely without intending to, reveals that when confronted with real metaphysical questions, the modern physicist has nothing to offer but a <strong>fog of jargon </strong>and <strong>untestable theories</strong>. It’s not the theist who is retreating to faith here—it’s Greene.</p><p></p><p>Particularly telling is Greene’s attempt to <strong>sidestep the fine-tuning problem</strong> by proposing that if we changed <strong><em>many</em> parameters</strong> of physics at once, rather than just one or two, we might still get a viable universe (notice how the camera suddenly zooms in on him when he starts speculating, to give some unwarranted legitimacy to his claims) . <strong>This is not science. It is pure, undisciplined speculation.</strong> Greene provides<strong> no evidence, no predictions, no concrete models</strong> to support this idea. He simply suggests that somewhere, in the vast unknown of imaginary parameter space, different physical laws could produce alternative forms of life. </p><p></p><p>This is a magician's misdirection. He wants his audience to marvel at theoretical possibilities while ignoring that they are, at present, untestable and entirely unconstrained. </p><p></p><p>There is no scientific model showing how multiple constant shifts could result in life-supporting physics; there is only the assumption that such a model <em>might</em> exist.</p><p></p><p>Greene <strong>shifts the burden of proof from explaining <em>this</em> universe to conjuring fantasies of others</strong>. But science is not supposed to be about what <em>might</em> be true in a thousand invisible realities—it is about what <em>is</em>, here and now. And on that ground, Greene offers <strong>nothing but speculation dressed up in the vestments of physics</strong>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tiger, post: 132175, member: 353"] Presumably you think he does do a good job of explaining the conundrum, which says a lot. So, in this exchange, Alex O’Connor, though a secularist, plays the part of performing a useful service by invoking the idea of fine-tuning—not because he believes in intelligent design, but because he dares to hold the priesthood of scientism to account. He presents the eerie precision of the universe’s physical constants as a challenge: if this isn’t the product of design, then where is the scientific explanation? Enter Brian Greene, a [B]high priest of theoretical physics[/B], who promptly [B]evades[/B] the question with the kind of metaphysical obfuscation masquerading as science that has become the hallmark of this new academic Gnosticism. Rather than engaging with the heart of the issue—[B][I]why[/I] the conditions for life are so mathematically improbable[/B]—Greene spins a fairy tale of [B]unseen universes and speculative equations[/B]. This is not science; it is a modern mythology for the credentialed class, who fear what the implications of fine-tuning might mean for their materialist dogma. Greene has[B] no empirical foundation[/B] for his multiverse musings. What he offers is a cosmic sleight of hand, designed to distract the laity from recognizing that his religion of numbers and probabilities cannot escape the philosophical consequences of a universe ordered in such a way as to point beyond itself. O’Connor, likely without intending to, reveals that when confronted with real metaphysical questions, the modern physicist has nothing to offer but a [B]fog of jargon [/B]and [B]untestable theories[/B]. It’s not the theist who is retreating to faith here—it’s Greene. Particularly telling is Greene’s attempt to [B]sidestep the fine-tuning problem[/B] by proposing that if we changed [B][I]many[/I] parameters[/B] of physics at once, rather than just one or two, we might still get a viable universe (notice how the camera suddenly zooms in on him when he starts speculating, to give some unwarranted legitimacy to his claims) . [B]This is not science. It is pure, undisciplined speculation.[/B] Greene provides[B] no evidence, no predictions, no concrete models[/B] to support this idea. He simply suggests that somewhere, in the vast unknown of imaginary parameter space, different physical laws could produce alternative forms of life. This is a magician's misdirection. He wants his audience to marvel at theoretical possibilities while ignoring that they are, at present, untestable and entirely unconstrained. There is no scientific model showing how multiple constant shifts could result in life-supporting physics; there is only the assumption that such a model [I]might[/I] exist. Greene [B]shifts the burden of proof from explaining [I]this[/I] universe to conjuring fantasies of others[/B]. But science is not supposed to be about what [I]might[/I] be true in a thousand invisible realities—it is about what [I]is[/I], here and now. And on that ground, Greene offers [B]nothing but speculation dressed up in the vestments of physics[/B]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Does Doxxie know his real father.
Post reply
Latest Threads
Is Irish Literature inherently Left-Wing?
Started by céline
Today at 1:58 PM
Replies: 0
Ireland
Ideas to broaden the appeal of Sarsfields and get it noticed.
Started by Anderson
Thursday at 5:52 PM
Replies: 14
Public Chat and Announcements
The Tiger Challenge
Started by AN2
Wednesday at 2:03 PM
Replies: 53
Public Chat and Announcements
B
THE EFFECT ON IRELAND OF THE IMPENDING COLLAPSE OF THE UK ECONOMY.
Started by BIG FAT HOOR
Tuesday at 6:41 PM
Replies: 50
Economy
Do you feel the change?
Started by Anderson
Monday at 4:41 PM
Replies: 3
Nationalist Politics
Popular Threads
Ukraine.
Started by Declan
Feb 21, 2022
Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
Started by jpc
Nov 7, 2022
Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
Started by Anderson
Feb 26, 2023
Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Started by Charlene
Sep 14, 2021
Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Started by Declan
Dec 30, 2024
Replies: 3K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
Started by Anderson
Jul 29, 2022
Replies: 2K
Climate Change
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Tiger Blog
Origins Thread
Top
Bottom