Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Members Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Tiger Blog
Origins Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AN2" data-source="post: 145743" data-attributes="member: 3556"><p>So, I googled about this this morning and stumbled upon this on Reddit of Dawkins talking about the interview himself. The original page doesn't exist anymore (I'm sure it's a real transcription).. </p><p></p><p>I don't think that it's particularly "deceptive editing" btw, it's just Tiger-tier level dumb and anyone with a clue (which excludes [USER=5542]@Sound Man[/USER]) would have known what Dawkins was talking about.. </p><p></p><p>I think the main thing you should note regarding deceptiveness with <strong>ID</strong>iots, from Tiger to Stephen C. Meyer, is that they won't just come out and say that the "intelligent designer" is their God </p><p></p><p>13y ago</p><p>It is the result of deceptive editing.</p><p></p><p>Dawkins writes at <a href="http://old.richarddawkins.net/articles/2394" target="_blank">http://old.richarddawkins.net/articles/2394</a></p><p></p><p>Toward the end of his interview with me, Stein asked whether I could think of any circumstances whatsoever under which intelligent design might have occurred. It's the kind of challenge I relish, and I set myself the task of imagining the most plausible scenario I could. I wanted to give ID its best shot, however poor that best shot might be. I must have been feeling magnanimous that day, because I was aware that the leading advocates of Intelligent Design are very fond of protesting that they are not talking about God as the designer, but about some unnamed and unspecified intelligence, which might even be an alien from another planet. Indeed, this is the only way they differentiate themselves from fundamentalist creationists, and they do it only when they need to, in order to weasel their way around church/state separation laws. So, bending over backwards to accommodate the IDiots ("oh NOOOOO, of course we aren't talking about God, this is SCIENCE") and bending over backwards to make the best case I could for intelligent design, I constructed a science fiction scenario. Like Michael Ruse (as I surmise) I still hadn't rumbled Stein, and I was charitable enough to think he was an honestly stupid man, sincerely seeking enlightenment from a scientist. I patiently explained to him that life could conceivably have been seeded on Earth by an alien intelligence from another planet (Francis Crick and Leslie Orgel suggested something similar -- semi tongue-in-cheek). The conclusion I was heading towards was that, even in the highly unlikely event that some such 'Directed Panspermia' was responsible for designing life on this planet, the alien beings would THEMSELVES have to have evolved, if not by Darwinian selection, by some equivalent 'crane' (to quote Dan Dennett). My point here was that design can never be an ULTIMATE explanation for organized complexity. Even if life on Earth was seeded by intelligent designers on another planet, and even if the alien life form was itself seeded four billion years earlier, the regress must ultimately be terminated (and we have only some 13 billion years to play with because of the finite age of the universe). Organized complexity cannot just spontaneously happen. That, for goodness sake, is the creationists' whole point, when they bang on about eyes and bacterial flagella! Evolution by natural selection is the only known process whereby organized complexity can ultimately come into being. Organized complexity -- and that includes everything capable of designing anything intelligently -- comes LATE into the universe. It cannot exist at the beginning, as I have explained again and again in my writings.</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=reddit]TrueAtheism/comments/11punm[/MEDIA]</p><p><em><span style="font-size: 10px"><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueAtheism/comments/11punm/ben_stein_interviews_richard_dawkins_who_admits/" target="_blank">View: https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueAtheism/comments/11punm/ben_stein_interviews_richard_dawkins_who_admits/</a></span></em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AN2, post: 145743, member: 3556"] So, I googled about this this morning and stumbled upon this on Reddit of Dawkins talking about the interview himself. The original page doesn't exist anymore (I'm sure it's a real transcription).. I don't think that it's particularly "deceptive editing" btw, it's just Tiger-tier level dumb and anyone with a clue (which excludes [USER=5542]@Sound Man[/USER]) would have known what Dawkins was talking about.. I think the main thing you should note regarding deceptiveness with [B]ID[/B]iots, from Tiger to Stephen C. Meyer, is that they won't just come out and say that the "intelligent designer" is their God 13y ago It is the result of deceptive editing. Dawkins writes at [URL]http://old.richarddawkins.net/articles/2394[/URL] Toward the end of his interview with me, Stein asked whether I could think of any circumstances whatsoever under which intelligent design might have occurred. It's the kind of challenge I relish, and I set myself the task of imagining the most plausible scenario I could. I wanted to give ID its best shot, however poor that best shot might be. I must have been feeling magnanimous that day, because I was aware that the leading advocates of Intelligent Design are very fond of protesting that they are not talking about God as the designer, but about some unnamed and unspecified intelligence, which might even be an alien from another planet. Indeed, this is the only way they differentiate themselves from fundamentalist creationists, and they do it only when they need to, in order to weasel their way around church/state separation laws. So, bending over backwards to accommodate the IDiots ("oh NOOOOO, of course we aren't talking about God, this is SCIENCE") and bending over backwards to make the best case I could for intelligent design, I constructed a science fiction scenario. Like Michael Ruse (as I surmise) I still hadn't rumbled Stein, and I was charitable enough to think he was an honestly stupid man, sincerely seeking enlightenment from a scientist. I patiently explained to him that life could conceivably have been seeded on Earth by an alien intelligence from another planet (Francis Crick and Leslie Orgel suggested something similar -- semi tongue-in-cheek). The conclusion I was heading towards was that, even in the highly unlikely event that some such 'Directed Panspermia' was responsible for designing life on this planet, the alien beings would THEMSELVES have to have evolved, if not by Darwinian selection, by some equivalent 'crane' (to quote Dan Dennett). My point here was that design can never be an ULTIMATE explanation for organized complexity. Even if life on Earth was seeded by intelligent designers on another planet, and even if the alien life form was itself seeded four billion years earlier, the regress must ultimately be terminated (and we have only some 13 billion years to play with because of the finite age of the universe). Organized complexity cannot just spontaneously happen. That, for goodness sake, is the creationists' whole point, when they bang on about eyes and bacterial flagella! Evolution by natural selection is the only known process whereby organized complexity can ultimately come into being. Organized complexity -- and that includes everything capable of designing anything intelligently -- comes LATE into the universe. It cannot exist at the beginning, as I have explained again and again in my writings. [MEDIA=reddit]TrueAtheism/comments/11punm[/MEDIA] [i][size=2][url=https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueAtheism/comments/11punm/ben_stein_interviews_richard_dawkins_who_admits/]View: https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueAtheism/comments/11punm/ben_stein_interviews_richard_dawkins_who_admits/[/url][/size][/i] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Does Doxxie know his real father.
Post reply
Latest Threads
An Open Letter to SwordOfStZip
Started by AN2
Yesterday at 5:01 PM
Replies: 3
Public Chat and Announcements
athletics
Started by céline
Wednesday at 10:47 AM
Replies: 4
Public Chat and Announcements
S
The real agenda in this Presidential Election?
Started by scolairebocht
Monday at 7:35 AM
Replies: 8
Scholairebochts Blog.
J
Varadkar "confronted by far right" while walking down street inDublin
Started by Jay Homer Simpson
Oct 2, 2025
Replies: 6
Public Chat and Announcements
B
BIG FAT HOOR TO SHRINK.
Started by BIG FAT HOOR
Oct 1, 2025
Replies: 62
Health
Popular Threads
Ukraine.
Started by Declan
Feb 21, 2022
Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
Started by jpc
Nov 7, 2022
Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
Started by Anderson
Feb 26, 2023
Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Started by Charlene
Sep 14, 2021
Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Started by Declan
Dec 30, 2024
Replies: 3K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
Started by Anderson
Jul 29, 2022
Replies: 2K
Climate Change
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Tiger Blog
Origins Thread
Top
Bottom