Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Members Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Tiger Blog
Origins Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fishalt" data-source="post: 64891" data-attributes="member: 228"><p>Whales do have nipples. They are contained under kind of skin flaps which keeps everything hydrodynamic. The design hoqwever is not amazing as you seem to believe. For example, whale calves actually can't even suckle milk properly because their mouths simply don't function this way, and they cannot create any suction. What you're seeing is a kind of 'Jerry-Rigging'; a kind of ersatz nipple-feeding system that is a remnant from their ancestors. No engineer would design such a system, because it is cumbersome, inefficent, problematic and somewhat retarded.</p><p></p><p>The primary mistake you keep making is thinking that EBNS 'knows' anything. It doesn't, and it doesn't need to. Evolution by natural selection works by throwing out random mutations in a given species population, and if these accrue some kind of survival benefit in a practical, real-world setting, they persist in the gene pool simply as a matter of due process.These changes might make no difference at all and still persist in the gene pool, however.</p><p></p><p>For example, I get a snake here called the Coastal Taipan. Its venom is so potent that one bite is enough to kill 100,000 mice. It is also notorious for never dry-biting; that is, whenever it strikes, it hits its prey with everything it's got. Now I ask you, Mr Intelligent design, what exactly is the point of that? The largest thing it ever eats are bandicoots, which are very small mammals, and rats and mice. It only needs to feed once every 1-2 months, also. Venom is extremely energy-intensive to produce. There is absolutely no logical reason for this venom to be as potent as it is. It makes absolutely no sense at all.</p><p></p><p></p><p>And that's because nature is blind design. The Taipan doesn't even know it is venomous at all, let alone how venomous it is. The reason its venom is so potent is because...well, there was no reason for it not to get stronger and stronger over time, because this didn't impact its survival rate. Conversely, there was no enviornmental pressure augmenting it to get weaker, either. Millions of years later we end up with an animal pointlessly packing a nuclear weapon; an animal so deadly, for so little reason that it is equivalent to using an ICBM to kill a cockroach.</p><p></p><p>You're going from A to Z without considering everything inbetween. Whales/porpoises would have existed in an intermediary stage of evolution that was markedly different from their current forms. It's possible their common ancestor(S) were something like modern Hippopotamus, a sem-squatic mammal. Something about their environment made them evolve to become fully aquatic over an enormous expanse of time.</p><p></p><p>This article explains quite a lot.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s12052-009-0135-2" target="_blank">https://evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s12052-009-0135-2</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fishalt, post: 64891, member: 228"] Whales do have nipples. They are contained under kind of skin flaps which keeps everything hydrodynamic. The design hoqwever is not amazing as you seem to believe. For example, whale calves actually can't even suckle milk properly because their mouths simply don't function this way, and they cannot create any suction. What you're seeing is a kind of 'Jerry-Rigging'; a kind of ersatz nipple-feeding system that is a remnant from their ancestors. No engineer would design such a system, because it is cumbersome, inefficent, problematic and somewhat retarded. The primary mistake you keep making is thinking that EBNS 'knows' anything. It doesn't, and it doesn't need to. Evolution by natural selection works by throwing out random mutations in a given species population, and if these accrue some kind of survival benefit in a practical, real-world setting, they persist in the gene pool simply as a matter of due process.These changes might make no difference at all and still persist in the gene pool, however. For example, I get a snake here called the Coastal Taipan. Its venom is so potent that one bite is enough to kill 100,000 mice. It is also notorious for never dry-biting; that is, whenever it strikes, it hits its prey with everything it's got. Now I ask you, Mr Intelligent design, what exactly is the point of that? The largest thing it ever eats are bandicoots, which are very small mammals, and rats and mice. It only needs to feed once every 1-2 months, also. Venom is extremely energy-intensive to produce. There is absolutely no logical reason for this venom to be as potent as it is. It makes absolutely no sense at all. And that's because nature is blind design. The Taipan doesn't even know it is venomous at all, let alone how venomous it is. The reason its venom is so potent is because...well, there was no reason for it not to get stronger and stronger over time, because this didn't impact its survival rate. Conversely, there was no enviornmental pressure augmenting it to get weaker, either. Millions of years later we end up with an animal pointlessly packing a nuclear weapon; an animal so deadly, for so little reason that it is equivalent to using an ICBM to kill a cockroach. You're going from A to Z without considering everything inbetween. Whales/porpoises would have existed in an intermediary stage of evolution that was markedly different from their current forms. It's possible their common ancestor(S) were something like modern Hippopotamus, a sem-squatic mammal. Something about their environment made them evolve to become fully aquatic over an enormous expanse of time. This article explains quite a lot. [URL]https://evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s12052-009-0135-2[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Does Doxxie know his real father.
Post reply
Latest Threads
How Dangerous is Israel?
Started by Anderson
Today at 4:04 AM
Replies: 1
Nationalist Politics
Charlie Kirk Shot Dead ~ RIP
Started by Anderson
Yesterday at 3:29 PM
Replies: 112
Nationalist Politics
J
Has anyone else kinda lost the will to live ?
Started by Jay Homer Simpson
Yesterday at 12:30 PM
Replies: 4
Public Chat and Announcements
The 2023 National Party Coup D'état or Split: My Understanding of it
Started by BelfastRatepayer
Saturday at 12:59 PM
Replies: 28
Nationalist Politics
RTE and Virgin - 2 Cheeks of the same.....
Started by Anderson
Friday at 3:46 AM
Replies: 11
Nationalist Politics
Popular Threads
Ukraine.
Started by Declan
Feb 21, 2022
Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
Started by jpc
Nov 7, 2022
Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
Started by Anderson
Feb 26, 2023
Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Started by Charlene
Sep 14, 2021
Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Started by Declan
Dec 30, 2024
Replies: 2K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
Started by Anderson
Jul 29, 2022
Replies: 2K
Climate Change
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Tiger Blog
Origins Thread
Top
Bottom