September 11th 2001 - Never Forget

PlunkettsGhost

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2023
Messages
3,363
Reaction score
3,132
The Pillars also represent the dualism of left and right,, the old order. Thesis and antithesis must be made one , the synthesis of the new order.

The Georgia guide-stones were symbolically destroyed for similar reasons I suspect
 

PlunkettsGhost

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2023
Messages
3,363
Reaction score
3,132
Regardless of the true or false rumors behind the Twin Towers, the history can’t be denied. Whatever the reasons for their being constructed and whatever the reasons for their being destroyed, their destruction DID spark a Global War On Terrorsim. Whether or not Yamasaki was an “asset”, the construction of the Twin Towers DID give pretext to another asset, Osama bin Laden, to publicly declare war against the USA; giving credence to the Official Story that al Qaeda jihadists were responsible for 9/11. And finally, the destruction of the Twin Towers gave pretext to the US Military to invade the world. The whole tinny, tawdry, thirty-year tale, fairly screams, “Hegelian dialectic!”

 

PlunkettsGhost

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2023
Messages
3,363
Reaction score
3,132
The Towers are often referred to as the North and South towers, respectively:

Pillars - Boaz in the north and Jachin or Jakin in the south. The King James version references solely left and right for their placement (Boaz left and Jachin right). We are left with the problem of determining the authors’ perspective of “left” and “right” for the Temple in the King James version

 

Professor

Too Good for the Too Bad
Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2023
Messages
2,498
Reaction score
1,847
Location
Very ScaryTown

One of the prime fundamental requirements of building design is H&S and in that the building will remain standing after it has been bombed, planed, earth quaked, fired and baked.
That's why they never collapse until they've first been prepared for demolition. Flame 'em white hot till they're burnt black and they're all still standing completely rigid without any collapse - Until the Thermate is "Pulled"
 

valamhic

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2022
Messages
1,583
Reaction score
700
Just on a point of information, I was in the Twin Towers on the 16th August 2001. I came up from the train station
below, Viewed the ground floor, noticed all the security guards were black from the Balooba tribe, walked out
on the street and it was raining. Looked up and left the area. It was all marble interior.
 

AUL LAD

Well-known member
New
Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2023
Messages
554
Reaction score
687
One of the prime fundamental requirements of building design is H&S and in that the building will remain standing after it has been bombed, planed, earth quaked, fired and baked.
That's why they never collapse until they've first been prepared for demolition. Flame 'em white hot till they're burnt black and they're all still standing completely rigid without any collapse - Until the Thermate is "Pulled"
from a architects viewpoint it math and physics not style will allow the building to function and to stand for 50 or more years without any drama . when you are told you are going to build 2 of the greatest towers in the greatest city with the most expensive real estate and these buildings will be iconic and the rents are tax deductible and companies will queue to have as their address WTC then the cost is almost irrelevant .
therefore the design specified that the building would have for its spine 50 huge steel core columns surrounding the elevator shafts which themselves were also stress columns adding to the strength of the building , further the outer skin was composed of STEEL panels inches thick and each floor was pinned and attached to these steel skin s making the entire building bullet proof and the crucial expression is REDUNDANCY it was way way more powerful than required and the excess strength was "redundant" strength built in to be sure to be sure to be sure it would never have a structural defect and would remain standing when all others fell even if struck by MULTIPLE AIRCRAFT .
this was visible when the planes struck and the windows above and below were unbroken as the building had not suffered enough stress to break them and staff were told to return to their desks and continue their work until told otherwise .
the buildings remained standing without glass breaking on the surface for a long time after the incident however many people jumped to their death after hanging outside the windows in the cool air but no smoke came out the windows they jumped from -- this anomaly has never been addressed however the steel the building was composed continued to burn underwater for 5 months after the collapse and the 2000 degree heat measured from the orbiting space station has never been explained .
this building became the worlds longest burning fire a fire brigade tried to extinguish in history while burning underwater .
the math you must rembember in all of this is the calculation that a good gust of wind was in pounds per square inch many times more in real terms that the impact of an aircraft .
the building was built to survive hurricanes for the next 50 years or more and the impact of 10 airliners would be less than a hurricane on a 110 story building the size of 110 Croke parks .
the truth is that they claim WTC7 which was not hit by any plane collapsed because of an office fire -- this development would have changed all the building codes of every skyscraper worldwide as it could now fall due to an office fire .
no codes were changed as this is total bullshit and MOST IMPORTANT the new tower was built exactly like the one which fell - exactly .
 

Declan

Administrator
Staff member
New
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Sep 11, 2021
Messages
7,367
Reaction score
5,112
In in very simple terms. What caused the elevator shafts to just turn to dust. Obviously there was no extra vertical load on them at all.
 

AUL LAD

Well-known member
New
Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2023
Messages
554
Reaction score
687
In in very simple terms. What caused the elevator shafts to just turn to dust. Obviously there was no extra vertical load on them at all.
They turned to dust because they were subject to energy which reduced concrete steel and marble and phone systems to 1 micron dust .
the firemen said it was incredible none of the office equipment survived as in other fires they would have assorted rubbish in the debris except for these buildings ,
for the first time in the world the contents of the buildings were reduced to dust also .
 

Mad as Fish

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
2,813
Reaction score
3,689
They turned to dust because they were subject to energy which reduced concrete steel and marble and phone systems to 1 micron dust .
the firemen said it was incredible none of the office equipment survived as in other fires they would have assorted rubbish in the debris except for these buildings ,
for the first time in the world the contents of the buildings were reduced to dust also .
Except for the one passport that just happened to belong to one of the alleged hijackers. Amazing that....
 

Declan

Administrator
Staff member
New
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Sep 11, 2021
Messages
7,367
Reaction score
5,112
They turned to dust because they were subject to energy which reduced concrete steel and marble and phone systems to 1 micron dust .
the firemen said it was incredible none of the office equipment survived as in other fires they would have assorted rubbish in the debris except for these buildings ,
for the first time in the world the contents of the buildings were reduced to dust also .
That is the only explaination
 

Mad as Fish

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
2,813
Reaction score
3,689
They turned to dust because they were subject to energy which reduced concrete steel and marble and phone systems to 1 micron dust .
the firemen said it was incredible none of the office equipment survived as in other fires they would have assorted rubbish in the debris except for these buildings ,
for the first time in the world the contents of the buildings were reduced to dust also .
I'm not sure all was turned to dust. Photos of the rubble doing the rounds weeks after the event showed some aircraft landing gear which, it was claimed at the time, was not from the model of plane that was said to have hit the building.
 

AUL LAD

Well-known member
New
Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2023
Messages
554
Reaction score
687
I'm not sure all was turned to dust. Photos of the rubble doing the rounds weeks after the event showed some aircraft landing gear which, it was claimed at the time, was not from the model of plane that was said to have hit the building.
Also the photos of the 737 combustion chamber exist .
no 767 was ever fitted with a 737 engine as not alone would it not be certified to take off it could never take off as it could not generate the thrust to fly a much bigger plane .
the figures are as follows a 767 weighs more than twice a 737 and the maximum thrust from a 737 is 26,000 lbs thrust and the required and max of a 767 is 62,000 lbs thrust which proves the 767 could never take off with a 737 engine --SO WHAT HIT THE TWIN TOWERS.
why a 737 engine is in the twin towers has never been explained as both aircraft were 767 according to the 911 report..
See Rense .com """ missing jet engine identified "" who spent 2 years and eventually got official photos of the engine at the pentagon -- this engine has been identified as a JT80 PRATT AND WHITNEY again never fitted to a Boeing 757 or 767.
every where you look there are miracles and impossibilities .
entire jet engines go missing --supposedly dumped in landfills -- missing missing gone somewhere as are the photos and in minutes there were dozens of FBI men confiscating all the 62 CCTV cameras footage which despite court cases has never been released .
how they keep a lid on this is by fear -- you run a story on this your job is gone your business is gone you are unemployable.
 
Last edited:

Mad as Fish

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
2,813
Reaction score
3,689
Also the photos of the 737 combustion chamber exist .
no 767 was ever fitted with a 737 engine as not alone would it not be certified to take off it could never take off as it could not generate the thrust to fly a much bigger plane .
the figures are as follows a 767 weighs more than twice a 737 and the maximum thrust from a 737 is 26,000 lbs thrust and the required and max of a 767 is 62,000 lbs thrust which proves the 767 could never take off with a 737 engine --SO WHAT HIT THE TWIN TOWERS.
why a 737 engine is in the twin towers has never been explained as both aircraft were 767 according to the 911 report..
See Rense .com """ missing jet engine identified "" who spent 2 years and eventually got official photos of the engine at the pentagon -- this engine has been identified as a JT80 PRATT AND WHITNEY again never fitted to a Boeing 757 or 767.
every where you look there are miracles and impossibilities .
entire jet engines go missing --supposedly dumped in landfills -- missing missing gone somewhere as are the photos and in minutes there were dozens of FBI men confiscating all the 62 CCTV cameras footage which despite court cases has never been released .
how they keep a lid on this is by fear -- you run a story on this your job is gone your business is gone you are unemployable.
Same with pilots who question as to whether if it is really possible to fly a passenger jet at 500mph at ground level. It ain't, so what actually did hit the Pentagon? It was a missile, no doubt about it, so any engine photos from the site must be fake.
 

AUL LAD

Well-known member
New
Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2023
Messages
554
Reaction score
687
Same with pilots who question as to whether if it is really possible to fly a passenger jet at 500mph at ground level. It ain't, so what actually did hit the Pentagon? It was a missile, no doubt about it, so any engine photos from the site must be fake.
The speed of the aircraft was tracked by radar and its the official radar used to track all flights and it shows the decent of the aircraft and the speed in the last few seconds .
Boeing were contacted and they stated this speed exceeded the design limitations of their aircraft .
this means that the engines on the aircraft do not have the power required to push the aircraft at ground altitude at 550 mph .
its simple physics and also the American airlines pilots who flew this particular aircraft for years also stated they could not perform the maneuver required and did not know of a pilot who could.
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Top Bottom