The Climate Change scam

Mad as Fish said:
Just on the above I came across this brief resume, issued by the UK Government, of its latest thoughts on the urgency of protecting London from the rising sea levels which are, we are told, about to engulf us all,

Not once is climate changed mentioned, nor any forecasts given of sea levels going forward. It is more concerned about the design life of the feature and when it might need renewing rather than reinforcing or raising.

www.govwire.co.uk

| GovWire Government News

www.govwire.co.uk www.govwire.co.uk
Click to expand...
:D

www.gov.uk

Thames Estuary 2100 (TE2100)

How the Environment Agency and its partners are protecting the Thames Estuary from flooding caused by climate change.
www.gov.uk www.gov.uk

www.gov.uk

Thames Estuary 2100: why we need it

The purpose of Thames Estuary 2100 (TE2100) and the challenges it aims to address.
www.gov.uk www.gov.uk
 
Wolf said:
I wonder how much of a whooping Zitler is going to get today in Mar-A-Lago?🤔
I'd reckon it's bad when the online shill army has been told to abandon ship.😁
Click to expand...
There is a very strong impression that Tank has been instructed/decided/advised that the Ukraine thingy is dead, best move on to the next lost cause and since UFOs and aliens are unlikely to get traction it's gonna have to be that old faithful, climate change, until the next big scam comes along.
 
Haven said:
:D

www.gov.uk

Thames Estuary 2100 (TE2100)

How the Environment Agency and its partners are protecting the Thames Estuary from flooding caused by climate change.
www.gov.uk www.gov.uk

www.gov.uk

Thames Estuary 2100: why we need it

The purpose of Thames Estuary 2100 (TE2100) and the challenges it aims to address.
www.gov.uk www.gov.uk
Click to expand...
The Thames Estuary needs action to adapt to climate change. Sea levels are rising. Tidal flooding from the River Thames is a real risk in future if we don’t act now. As summers get hotter, residents and workers will need more green space cooled by river breezes. Well-designed walking and cycling routes along the Thames could encourage sustainable transport, reducing carbon emissions and air pollution.

What total BS!

Let's just look at it a little more carefully -

1. What sea levels are rising exactly, and why. The south coast of England is still gradually sinking as the north is rising due to melting of the vast, and very heavy ice sheets that covered most of the UK during the last ice age. It's known as the Post Glacial Rebound. No mention of that I see.

2. What complete and utter waffle! Summers getting hotter, who says so? The Met Office of course who have been exposed as the biggest fiddlers of the records going, and not only do they fiddle the existing data but they've also been making it up!

3. How the hell is a 'well designed cycle route' going to encourage sustainable transport along the Thames Estuary? It's the stuff of cloud cuckoo land!

Come back when you start thinking for yourself, you're worse than AI!
 
Mad as Fish said:
The Thames Estuary needs action to adapt to climate change. Sea levels are rising. Tidal flooding from the River Thames is a real risk in future if we don’t act now. As summers get hotter, residents and workers will need more green space cooled by river breezes. Well-designed walking and cycling routes along the Thames could encourage sustainable transport, reducing carbon emissions and air pollution.

What total BS!

Let's just look at it a little more carefully -

1. What sea levels are rising exactly, and why. The south coast of England is still gradually sinking as the north is rising due to melting of the vast, and very heavy ice sheets that covered most of the UK during the last ice age. It's known as the Post Glacial Rebound. No mention of that I see.

2. What complete and utter waffle! Summers getting hotter, who says so? The Met Office of course who have been exposed as the biggest fiddlers of the records going, and not only do they fiddle the existing data but they've also been making it up!

3. How the hell is a 'well designed cycle route' going to encourage sustainable transport along the Thames Estuary? It's the stuff of cloud cuckoo land!

Come back when you start thinking for yourself, you're worse than AI!
Click to expand...
The Met office who.place their measuring equipment at airports surrounded by black tarmac and roaring hot jet engines....😂
 
He's talking through his arse.

Why don't you check out the group of Irish Scientists who don't believe man is changing the Climate?
 
Haven said:
Did you understand any of it? Did you get the point about C12 and the other carbon isotope ratios?
Click to expand...
Don't mind you and your isotopes and all your other tropes.

We are 43 years into that 100 year Scientific forecast that Clarke's video above made.

Half of Florida and most of low lying parts of the World were said to be underwater.

You gonna cling to the hope that that will happen within the next 57 years?
 
Myles O'Reilly said:
Don't mind you and your isotopes and all your other tropes.
Click to expand...
Wow. You really didnt understand any of it.

If you dont understand it, why do you think you can talk about natural causes now, or 9000 years ago?

You cant. You were just spoofing all along.
Myles O'Reilly said:
We are 43 years into that 100 year Scientific forecast that Clarke's video above made.

Half of Florida and most of low lying parts of the World were said to be underwater.
Click to expand...
It says, if you watch it says "...25% of Florida could be flooded in the next century". We have 75 years to go based on that prediction.

Is there an effect already?

Sea Level Rise - Florida Climate Center

The Florida Climate Center (FCC) is a public service unit of the Florida State University Institute of Science and Public Affairs. Home of the State Climatologist, the Florida Climate Center provides climate data and information for the state of Florida.
climatecenter.fsu.edu climatecenter.fsu.edu

Myles O'Reilly said:
You gonna cling to the hope that that will happen within the next 57 years?
Click to expand...
Since you dont know a single thing about how climate changes, I'm not going to cling to any hope about you.
 
Myles O'Reilly said:
He's talking through his arse.

Why don't you check out the group of Irish Scientists who don't believe man is changing the Climate?
Click to expand...
Even Bill Gates, the gowl who the army of online establishment bootlickers bow down to, has basically said climate change is a scam.
This is the same gowl, along with the WEF/Schwab bastards, who pushed the ConVid shite, the tranny shite, the race wars shite etc etc.
Bootlickers take Gates' word for everything and only trolls continue to push what he has said isn't a threat.
Ya just gotta laugh at these morons because they're quite obviously mentally ill. :)

 
Haven said:
It says, if you watch it says "...25% of Florida could be flooded in the next century". We have 75 years to go based on that prediction.
Click to expand...
How would you have 75 years if that prediction was made in 1982? Its 57 years. Time to go back to your 10 times tables.

So if we're 43 years into that 100 year prediction of 25% of Florida and all similar low lying parts of the World, wouldn't we have seen a significant percentage under water already?
 
Myles O'Reilly said:
How would you have 75 years if that prediction was made in 1982? Its 57 years. Time to go back to your 10 times tables.

So if we're 43 years into that 100 year prediction of 25% of Florida and all similar low lying parts of the World, wouldn't we have seen a significant percentage under water already?
Click to expand...
It's all going to happen on the final day of that 100 years! :)
 
Myles O'Reilly said:
He's talking through his arse.

Why don't you check out the group of Irish Scientists who don't believe man is changing the Climate?
Click to expand...

Time to get back to basics.

What really kicked off the whole global warming scam was a paper presented in 1967 by Manabe and Wetherald who concluded that energy received by the earth as shortwave radiation from the sun should equal the amount of energy radiated from the earth as long wave radiation, any difference in this would warm or cool the planet.

Sounds all good and simple, but things that sound good and simple are very often ultra complex when examined below the surface, and so it is with this simple climate model.

The basic problem is this overarching assumption of equilibrium. The earth is a dynamic system and there are many chemical and mechanical processes going on within it that alter this assumed perfection. The increase in organic matter is one example. To build organic matter such as humans, plants and coal, energy is absorbed from the sun and incorporated into the carbon-hydrogen bonds in organic matter. The result is that less energy is radiated out into space

The original authors also averaged out the water vapour content of the atmosphere rather than take note of its variations and they assumed the specific heat capacity of the earths surface to be zero.

The 1967 paper is heavily criticised a rather heavy going publication here -


It was written in 2023 by Roy Clarke PhD who basically concluded that "Physical reality was abandoned in favour of mathematical simplicity." Yet it has been incorporated into all subsequent climate models.
 
So if the Manabe and Wetherauld climate model is plain wrong is there any other explanation? Well yes, there is -

Our analysis revealed that the observed decrease of planetary albedo along with reported variations of the Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) explain 100% of the global warming trend and 83% of the GSAT interannual variability as documented by six satellite- and ground-based monitoring systems over the past 24 years. Changes in Earth’s cloud albedo emerged as the dominant driver of GSAT, while TSI only played a marginal role.

In other words the relative difference between the earths reflectivity and the sun's output can explain the warming trend.

 
Wolf said:
Now that Zitler's war is almost done we'll see the usual establishment bootlickers jumping off that particular bandwagon and onto the 'climate change' one.
They really are so predictable.😂
Click to expand...
Well the elite, need to keep enriching themselves, if they can't squander billions of tax payers money on Ukraine, well there's always the environment....
 
Sigh.

A lot of the garbage posted above is discussed here:

skepticalscience.com

Arguments from Global Warming Skeptics and what the science really says

Examines the science and arguments of global warming skepticism. Common objections like 'global warming is caused by the sun', 'temperature has changed naturally in the past' or 'other planets are warming too' are examined to see what the science really says.
skepticalscience.com
 
Haven said:
Sigh.

A lot of the garbage posted above is discussed here:

skepticalscience.com

Arguments from Global Warming Skeptics and what the science really says

Examines the science and arguments of global warming skepticism. Common objections like 'global warming is caused by the sun', 'temperature has changed naturally in the past' or 'other planets are warming too' are examined to see what the science really says.
skepticalscience.com
Click to expand...
A heap of tabloid level unvalidated crap, have you nothing better?
 
Last edited:
Haven said:
"What the Science really says"
Click to expand...
But didn't you put your full trust in what the Science really says during the C19 "pandemic"?

And could you answer my previous question please. I'll post it once more below.

Myles O'Reilly said:
So if we're 43 years into that 100 year prediction of 25% of Florida and all similar low lying parts of the World, wouldn't we have seen a significant percentage under water already?
Click to expand...
 
Myles O'Reilly said:
But didn't you put your full trust in what the Science really says during the C19 "pandemic"?

And could you answer my previous question please. I'll post it once more below.
Click to expand...
He labours under the idiotic and quite ignorant notion that 'science' is somehow a fixed and monolithic body of law that is beyond question. How does one even try to explain the fallacy of this belief?
 
Haven said:
You dont understand the garbage you are posting, or who wrote it, or what they already had to retract.
Click to expand...
Err...no. you find yourself totally out of your depth so start projecting. All part of your normal toxic methodology.
 
Mad as Fish said:
So if the Manabe and Wetherauld climate model is plain wrong is there any other explanation? Well yes, there is -

Our analysis revealed that the observed decrease of planetary albedo along with reported variations of the Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) explain 100% of the global warming trend and 83% of the GSAT interannual variability as documented by six satellite- and ground-based monitoring systems over the past 24 years. Changes in Earth’s cloud albedo emerged as the dominant driver of GSAT, while TSI only played a marginal role.

In other words the relative difference between the earths reflectivity and the sun's output can explain the warming trend.

Click to expand...
Havent figured it out yet?

:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
Haven I was going to ask you to take a look at this Site but the second sentence says "disseminating the latest climate science to all with an open and enquiring mind" so I figure I probably shouldn't bother.

www.icsf.ie

Irish Climate Science Forum

The Irish Climate Science Forum (ICSF) is committed to identifying and disseminating the latest climate science. Its members are characterized by an open and enquiring mind on climate science, driven by the imperative of objectivity without any vested interests.
www.icsf.ie www.icsf.ie
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom