The Climate Change scam

Simon Harris says the planet is on fire:

Touching on the issue of climate change, Harris said yesterday that “the science doesn’t lie”.

“We live through a climate emergency… The planet is on fire, the climate emergency is real, and the next generation will never forgive us if we don’t step up.
 
Simon Harris says the planet is on fire:
It is in some locations sometimes while it's flooding and drowning in other locations sometimes.
Australia has some crazy weather these days compared to what was reported up to ten years ago . . .
The extremes occur more often and flip around very quickly inho
 
Climate models & Hockey sticks, CO2 & Global warming = Red Herrings

So now, about those climate engineers we see daily in the skies, the ones Tennessee have recently banned, the ones who are changing the climate to suit their needs & requirements.

Atmospheric rivers, record rainfall, record drought year after year in recent years and this year is starting of the same trend.

But you consider the above does not exist or is down to natural forces?
Despite climate-mans clear ability and schedule to override and manipulate nature.

For you, ignorance maybe bliss but it's taking the piss.:geek:
As I have asked of another poster, please explain to us how just one climate model, of your own choosing, actually works and pick one variable that it uses and explain how that variable will alter the outcome of the forecast.

There are only a very few folk who understand these models, and I am certainly not one of them, however, rubbish in means rubbish out is an accepted truism that we can all relate to. It would be very foolish indeed to trust these models for that requires a great deal of trust to be placed in those running them and science, unfortunately, can be as corrupt as any other activity nowadays.

There has been an ongoing court case in America where the originator of the infamous hockey stick graph, Michael Mann, has been challenged by other scientists to produce the data upon which it is based, so far he has refused.

The recent win for Mann is being heralded as a victory for global alarmists, but it is no such thing, the case was one of defamation and did not involve any science, despite what his legal team tries to imply.

Nobody denies that climate change exists, of course it does, which is why we have ice ages and warm periods, we may well be heading into another warm period but that is not due to a very minor increase in CO2 levels.

Nature is just being nature and the whole global warming idea once again underlines mankind's vanity in thinking we are bigger than nature, we are not, and she will remind us of that again sooner or later.
 
It is in some locations sometimes while it's flooding and drowning in other locations sometimes.
Australia has some crazy weather these days compared to what was reported up to ten years ago . . .
The extremes occur more often and flip around very quickly inho
There are more platforms and news channels seeking content nowadays, which is why we see a lot more reporting of everything.
 
It is in some locations sometimes while it's flooding and drowning in other locations sometimes.
Australia has some crazy weather these days compared to what was reported up to ten years ago . . .
The extremes occur more often and flip around very quickly inho
Australia Never Had Weather Before ! 😲 ;) 😲
 
Simon Harris says the planet is on fire:
The poor kid is stuck with this idea that science is some sort of fixed entity when it is in fact an ongoing debate.

We can have no faith in the eejit.
 
Australia Never Had Weather Before ! 😲 ;) 😲
Not the same flip flopping changes in weather as recorded in the recent years :cool:

ETA:- Let's ask @Fishalt what he thinks? I've not even been to Australia but have seen that Sydney got it real bad from fire then flood then fire again.
And people died in floods in his region where normally there are not floods as were seen, either that or
Maybe I'm tripping on MSM hype??? Which is a possibility too.
 
The Guardian is freaking out


‘Simply mind-boggling’: world record temperature jump in Antarctic raises fears of catastrophe


On 18 March, 2022, scientists at the Concordia research station on the east Antarctic plateau documented a remarkable event. They recorded the largest jump in temperature ever measured at a meteorological centre on Earth. According to their instruments, the region that day experienced a rise of 38.5C above its seasonal average: a world record.

This startling leap – in the coldest place on the planet – left polar researchers struggling for words to describe it. “It is simply mind-boggling,” said Prof Michael Meredith, science leader at the British Antarctic Survey. “In sub-zero temperatures such a massive leap is tolerable but if we had a 40C rise in the UK now that would take temperatures for a spring day to over 50C – and that would be deadly for the population.”

This amazement was shared by glaciologist Prof Martin Siegert, of the University of Exeter. “No one in our community thought that anything like this could ever happen. It is extraordinary and a real concern,” he told the Observer. “We are now having to wrestle with something that is completely unprecedented.”

 
The Guardian is freaking out


‘Simply mind-boggling’: world record temperature jump in Antarctic raises fears of catastrophe


On 18 March, 2022, scientists at the Concordia research station on the east Antarctic plateau documented a remarkable event. They recorded the largest jump in temperature ever measured at a meteorological centre on Earth. According to their instruments, the region that day experienced a rise of 38.5C above its seasonal average: a world record.

This startling leap – in the coldest place on the planet – left polar researchers struggling for words to describe it. “It is simply mind-boggling,” said Prof Michael Meredith, science leader at the British Antarctic Survey. “In sub-zero temperatures such a massive leap is tolerable but if we had a 40C rise in the UK now that would take temperatures for a spring day to over 50C – and that would be deadly for the population.”

This amazement was shared by glaciologist Prof Martin Siegert, of the University of Exeter. “No one in our community thought that anything like this could ever happen. It is extraordinary and a real concern,” he told the Observer. “We are now having to wrestle with something that is completely unprecedented.”

Two years ago, what's happened since?

Mind boggled scientists are probably not very bright scientists.
 
I thought of a new game...Google "warmest April" and "coldest April", "wettest March" and "driest March" etc.

2012: Ireland's warmest March in 50 years
Warmest March 2012.png

2013: Ireland's coldest March
Coldest March 2013.png



2022: Britain's coldest April in 70 years:
Coldest April 2022.png


2022: Earth's 5th warmest April:
Warmest April 2022.png




2023: Iceland's coldest March:

Coldest March 2023.png


2023: Earth's second-warmest March:

Second warmest March.png
 
I thought of a new game...Google "warmest April" and "coldest April", "wettest March" and "driest March" etc.

2012: Ireland's warmest March in 50 years
View attachment 4974
2013: Ireland's coldest March
View attachment 4976


2022: Britain's coldest April in 70 years:
View attachment 4978

2022: Earth's 5th warmest April:
View attachment 4979



2023: Iceland's coldest March:

View attachment 4975

2023: Earth's second-warmest March:

View attachment 4977
Indeed, that shows just how drastic is the climate changing when a single month it's both the warmest and coldest on record.

Like it starts of normalish then southerly winds blow real hot. . . 5-6 days later a NW'erly blows feckin freezing snow and ice from greenland then the south blows up again but this time it's roasting for two days . . . Geddit?

It's of little surprise these days:geek:
 
Indeed, that shows just how drastic is the climate changing when a single month it's both the warmest and coldest on record.

Like it starts of normalish then southerly winds blow real hot. . . 5-6 days later a NW'erly blows feckin freezing snow and ice from greenland then the south blows up again but this time it's roasting for two days . . . Geddit?

It's of little surprise these days:geek:
Maybe the same happened in the early 1800's, who knows?
 
Maybe the same happened in the early 1800's, who knows?
Maybe it did, but the thing is, it's happening again, it's been observed that massive volcanic eruptions tend to screen out the sunlight for a while leading to cooling and reduced crops - that's ancient science there so . . .

Imagine if fleets of jets are spraying tons of cloud expander foam out of their arshes to block the light??

It's gonna be Krakatoa every day🌋🌋🌋 🌨️🌨️🌨️🥶
 
France's worst drought since records began has turned lush vegetation into arid fields of brown crops, shrivelling under what is now the fourth heatwave of the year.

In Vincent Favreau's vegetable farm, where he produces food for a hundred families in the area, the parched earth has stunted the growth of the cabbages. His potato plants are burnt out, producing just half the crop of a normal year.

"Either the vegetables will die of thirst, or they won't develop enough during this crucial period of growth," he said, sifting through the dry soil, which he hasn't been able to water since restrictions came in two weeks ago.

"With this heat and wind, we can't compensate for what the sun is evaporating. I've never seen something like this in my twenty-two years here. If it doesn't rain within two months, it'll be a disaster."

french corn.jpg


green corn.jpg


French drought alert after driest winter since 1959​


 
It was close to record drought for two years in a row and then overnight . . .

‘Record rainfall’​

Weather forecaster Météo-France said that between mid-October and mid-November, France had record rainfall.

During these dates, there was an average cumulative rainfall of 237.3 millimetres, far above the previous winter record of 187.1 millimetres, which happened between January 13 and February 11, 1988, it said.

. . . And is ongoing 😲
 

skynews-sentinel-morzine-france_6014097.jpg


Many resorts are relying on artificial snow but this is an expensive, energy intensive way to keep skiers happy.

It's a situation that will only get worse. The University of Grenoble found that since 1951, almost half of the 169 ski resorts that have closed in France, have done so because of a lack of snow—and statistics show that many alpine resorts could lose up to 70% of snow cover by 2100.

 
France's worst drought since records began has turned lush vegetation into arid fields of brown crops, shrivelling under what is now the fourth heatwave of the year.

In Vincent Favreau's vegetable farm, where he produces food for a hundred families in the area, the parched earth has stunted the growth of the cabbages. His potato plants are burnt out, producing just half the crop of a normal year.

"Either the vegetables will die of thirst, or they won't develop enough during this crucial period of growth," he said, sifting through the dry soil, which he hasn't been able to water since restrictions came in two weeks ago.

"With this heat and wind, we can't compensate for what the sun is evaporating. I've never seen something like this in my twenty-two years here. If it doesn't rain within two months, it'll be a disaster."

View attachment 5002

View attachment 5003

French drought alert after driest winter since 1959​


Weather.
 
It was close to record drought for two years in a row and then overnight . . .

‘Record rainfall’​

Weather forecaster Météo-France said that between mid-October and mid-November, France had record rainfall.

During these dates, there was an average cumulative rainfall of 237.3 millimetres, far above the previous winter record of 187.1 millimetres, which happened between January 13 and February 11, 1988, it said.

. . . And is ongoing 😲
Weather.
 
If all human beings ceased to exist in the morning = = I would say that in 200 years after that = = You would need Archaeologists and quite extensive digging to find much evidence of human activity = = We are of little or No consequence on this planet and some humility to acknowledge that would be a good thing.
 
If all human beings ceased to exist in the morning = = I would say that in 200 years after that = = You would need Archaeologists and quite extensive digging to find much evidence of human activity = = We are of little or No consequence on this planet and some humility to acknowledge that would be a good thing.

Well, that's a grand outlook. I'm happy to acknowledge the knowledge, your knowledge - Where is it?

Our presence has transformed the countries and terrain that we populate, look at Ireland, no trees (like the old days, still haven't grown back) the oaks were turned into ships and the stone walls are hundreds of years old and not fallen.

I don't believe in CO2 but there's loads of other things going on that need to be acknowledged.

We're of a huge consequence and can destroy 90% of life with nuclear power - Bombs and power station spills which could poison the oceans if enough of them cracked up and the bombs flew - You Knew?
 
Maybe it did, but the thing is, it's happening again, it's been observed that massive volcanic eruptions tend to screen out the sunlight for a while leading to cooling and reduced crops - that's ancient science there so . . .

Imagine if fleets of jets are spraying tons of cloud expander foam out of their arshes to block the light??

It's gonna be Krakatoa every day🌋🌋🌋 🌨️🌨️🌨️🥶
If there was some obligation for commercial jets to spray foam as they roam around the globe I think we would have heard about it by now. That nice Mr Lowery would be noting the extra expense incurred and the hassle of refilling the tanks on his Boeings, an activity I have never knowingly witnessed and I write this from Terminal One as we speak.
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom