US Politics.

Wolf

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2023
Messages
8,855
Reaction score
7,953
Terrorist America needs to be dismantled.

US set to use ‘new tool’ to meddle in Georgian elections – Russian spy agency​

Washington and the OSCE’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights are seeking to trigger mass protests, the SVR claims
US set to use ‘new tool’ to meddle in Georgian elections – Russian spy agency

FILE PHOTO: A protest in Tbilisi, Georgia in May 2024. © Mirian Meladze / Anadolu via Getty Images


The US wants to use a European election monitor to kickstart mass protests in Georgia after the upcoming parliamentary election, the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) has claimed.
Washington is seeking to oust the ruling Georgian Dream party and is using the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in its plan, the Russian agency stated on Tuesday.
One of ODIHR’s key activities is monitoring elections, and it intends to do this during voting in the former Soviet republic, when Georgians will choose a new parliament on October 26. An advance team visited Tbilisi in May to assess the situation.
The SVR expects the body to release a critical preliminary report ten to 20 days prior to the vote, in which the ODIHR will declare that there are “no conditions in the country to hold free and fair elections.”
US threatens to hit NATO applicant with sanctions
Read more
US threatens to hit NATO applicant with sanctions

“After the first results of the ballot are published, it would issue a statement to declare the electoral process not to be up to democratic norms,” the Russian agency claims.
The US Department of State sees the ODIHR as “a tool” and has pre-arranged the content of its statements, the SVR claimed. Georgian opposition forces will cite its criticism to justify “mass protests aimed at seizing power in the country,” the message predicted. The purported arrangement clearly violates the OSCE’s stated mission, the Russian agency added.
”Under the circumstances, the reduction of Russian funding for the OSCE in a bid to at least weaken the destructive activities of this formerly respectable international structure appears justified,” the SVR suggested.
The Georgian government and its ruling party came into Washington’s crosshairs earlier this year due to the passage of a law, which required political and media organizations that receive foreign funding to publicly declare their affiliations. Tbilisi says the legislation was modeled on a similar American law, the 1938 Foreign Agents Registration Act.
READ MORE: US preparing another ‘color revolution’ – Russian spy agency
US officials have stated that Georgia is walking down “the wrong path,” and that Washington is preparing sanctions against people whom it deems responsible for that.
The SVR previously warned that the Georgian government was facing a “color revolution” similar to the one that brought former president Mikhail Saakasvili to power in the early 2000s, or a violent coup, similar to what happened in Ukraine in 2014.
 

bormotello

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2023
Messages
823
Reaction score
1,286
Have you seen Russia?

BS
Of course, because since 2022 prices for cocaine and heroin have skyrocketed demand for affordable locally produced synthetic drugs also increased
But still, Russia is in a better position than many European countries
Untitled.jpg
 

Wolf

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2023
Messages
8,855
Reaction score
7,953
BS
Of course, because since 2022 prices for cocaine and heroin have skyrocketed demand for affordable locally produced synthetic drugs also increased
But still, Russia is in a better position than many European countries
View attachment 6279
TBF, Cameltoe and Hunter drove the demand and because of that the price skyrocketed for cocaine in sick America.
Plus they were supplying Zitler and his family of goons. :)
 

SwordOfStZip

Moderator
Staff member
Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2024
Messages
1,580
Reaction score
871
Of course The Degenerate Party imports don't eat cats....right?


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MxC8VQrH54


The thing is not the question of them eating cats which is to my mind less disgusting than eating pigs but fact that cat and dog sacrifices play a significant enough part in Haitian Witchcraft/Voodoo which actually I have been reliably informed draws up more on French 17 th and 18 th century black magic than it does anything integrally West African. Hilary Clinton by the way has had an intense interest in Voodoo.
 

Myles O'Reilly

Well-known member
New
Joined
Feb 3, 2022
Messages
7,103
Reaction score
5,469
Of course the incompetent bastard was wearing a wire :)
Do you think Kamala Harris is a Tranny? 😲
Despite being an Ulster woman (NE Ulster aka Belfast) you don't know that in the south of your Province a really nasty woman is often called a bastard as opposed to a bitch.

Hear it in a Monaghan tone and you'll know why ;)
 

Declan

Administrator
Staff member
New
Joined
Sep 11, 2021
Messages
8,983
Reaction score
6,423
Haitians in Haiti are actually eating other Haitians.
 

clarke-connolly

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2023
Messages
5,355
Reaction score
4,798

Wolf

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2023
Messages
8,855
Reaction score
7,953
Will Tampon Tim let us know why he's so passionate about boys having access to tampons?
And why Kangalese are so passionate about little boys?:unsure:
 
Last edited:

Wolf

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2023
Messages
8,855
Reaction score
7,953
They are "White Identitarians" and not "Nazis" (the use of that term implies that they are into Hitler).
Only kangalese type leftards idolise Nazis these days.
Look.....


Of course these same perverts also back Zitler, the puppet who overseen the AZOV Neo-Nazi battalion as they used civilian women and children as human shields in the early part of the yank proxy war against Russia.
 

Wolf

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2023
Messages
8,855
Reaction score
7,953
Yep.(y)

The US presidential debate was a degenerate political show, and Harris won​

In a political culture where rational arguments hardly get you anywhere, what’s the value of a rhetorical square-off?
Graham Hryce is an Australian journalist and former media lawyer, whose work has been published in The Australian, the Sydney Morning Herald, the Age, the Sunday Mail, the Spectator and Quadrant.

The US presidential debate was a degenerate political show, and Harris won

People watch the presidential debate during a debate watch party at Penn Social on September 10, 2024 in Washington, DC. © Alex Wong / Getty Images



The outcome of American presidential elections rarely turns on the performance of candidates in televised debates – Kennedy’s victory over Nixon in 1960, and Bush’s win over Dukakis in 1988 were very much the exceptions that prove the general rule.
Equally exceptional was Joe Biden’s disastrous campaign – ending with the performance in his debate with Donald Trump a few months ago.
Debates are far less important now than they were in the past.
In fact, contemporary American politics has become so irrational and celebrity-focused that the very notion of a ‘debate’ seems like a quaint relic from a bygone era – in which rational argument was still an integral part of the political process.
Those days are long gone, and Donald Trump – the celebrity politician par excellence – has done more than anyone to expunge rationality from American politics and transform it into a tawdry and debauched branch of celebrity culture.
American voters are currently divided into two opposing camps – both of which eschew rationality and espouse views that are emotionally based and lack a firm grounding in reality.
Each camp believes that the other is the personification of ‘evil’ and poses a grave existential threat to America’s future. Within such a deeply divided and irrational polity – where ‘magical thinking’ prevails – there is little room for rational debate.
Swing states that matter: The real reasons behind Trump and Harris VP picks
Read more
Swing states that matter: The real reasons behind Trump and Harris VP picks

American political culture is unique in this regard – and commentators in other Western democracies often have difficulty in appreciating its distinctiveness and, as a consequence, understanding Trump’s continuing popularity and effectiveness as a politician.
Trump is sui generis – and he could never have attained high office in any other Western democracy.
Notwithstanding some superficial similarities, Trump differs qualitatively from other populist politicians in the West – like Nigel Farage and Marine Le Pen.
No convicted felon and fomenter of insurrection who refused to accept an election defeat, even after unsuccessfully challenging it in the courts, could seriously aspire to become prime minister or president in Britain or France.
Trump is both cause and symptom of the decline of the American Republic.
At the conclusion of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in September 1787 – at which the American constitution was drafted – Benjamin Franklin was asked how long he thought the new American Republic would last. Franklin replied that it would last as long as the American people deserved it, and prophesised that it may “end in despotism ……. if the people become so corrupted as to need despotic government.”
Kamala Harris was the clear winner in last night's debate at the National Convention Centre in Philadelphia – viewed by 100 million Americans – but the election race remains close, with Harris marginally ahead in most credible polls.
How did the candidates perform?
Harris used the debate to raise her profile with voters – something she needed to do – and let them know precisely what she stands for in terms of policy issues. She appeared tough, intelligent, and handled Trump as well as any mainstream politician has done in the past.
Somewhat surprisingly, Harris directly attacked Trump in respect of his contempt for liberal democracy and the rule of law. On a number of occasions she asserted that Trump was “unfit to be president.”
Harris also managed to convey to voters a positive vision of America’s future – “I represent a new generation of leadership in our country that offers optimism” – that contrasted dramatically with Trump’s divisiveness, crassness and pessimism.
Trump constantly asserted that “we are a failing nation” did not explain how he would “make America great again” – his famous slogan, which he never even used during the entire debate.
What Donald Trump should beware of in the debate with Kamala Harris
Read more
What Donald Trump should beware of in the debate with Kamala Harris

Harris and the Democrats will no doubt be pleased with her performance.
In typical fashion, Trump sought to undermine the legitimacy of the debate process in advance, by attacking the ABC host network earlier this week: “The ABC is, I think, the worst of everybody.”
Trump also spent little time preparing for the debate – telling Fox News this week that “Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face,” apparently a saying of ageing former heavyweight boxer Mike Tyson.
Trump performed much as expected – rather than debate policy issues on the merits he resorted to endless lies and insults, replete with stream of consciousness tirades and non sequiturs.
Trump also sought to deflect debate on policy issues by referring constantly to illegal immigration.
This was also predictable – for weeks he has ignored advice from his advisors to focus directly on policy issues, like the economy and cost of living, where Harris and the Democrats are vulnerable.
Nevertheless, Trump appeared quite assured and coherent – more so than in recent rally appearances.
What were the highlights for each candidate?
For Harris, they include the following:
  • she accused Trump of having perpetrated “the worst attack on democracy since the Civil War” and having “incited a violent mob to attack our nation’s capital”;
  • she accused Trump of “selling out America to China”;
  • she described Trump’s policy on abortion as “immoral’ and “insulting to the women of America”;
  • she accused Trump as “having no respect for the rule of law”;
  • she said that “world leaders were laughing at Trump” and that “dictators could manipulate him”;
  • she alleged that America’s military elite held Trump in contempt;
  • she said that “Trump has used race to divide the American people.”
In conclusion, Harris asserted that the candidates represented “two very different versions of our country – one based on the future, one based on the past”. She was committed to “bringing America together” and “turning the page.”
All Trump, no Harris: A look at the Democratic Party’s puzzling new platform
Read more
All Trump, no Harris: A look at the Democratic Party’s puzzling new platform

Trump made the following points about Harris:
  • she is a Marxist;
  • she has “destroyed the economy”;
  • she has allowed 21 million illegal immigrants to enter America; which has “destroyed the fabric of the country” by creating widespread “migrant crime’ and creating unemployment;
  • she had “weaponised the Justice Department” against him;
  • she had supported the Black Lives Matter rioters;
  • he asserted that “Biden hates her”;
  • he asserted that she “hated Israel” and would provoke “World War III.”
Trump also staunchly defended his “stolen election” claim and maintained that he “had nothing to do with “the January 6 insurrection" – even though he has been indicted for encouraging it. He also alleged that the American judiciary – excluding the Supreme Court on those few occasions when it had ruled in his favour – and the FBI were corrupt.
More controversially he alleged that illegal immigrants were “eating pets in Springfield.”
In short, it was a typical bravura Trump performance.
Notwithstanding Harris’ victory in the debate, this year’s presidential election will be decided by a few hundred thousand voters in half a dozen battleground states – Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada.
Biden won all of these states in 2020, and polls suggest that Harris and Trump are neck and neck in most of them at the moment. Harris has one clear advantage over Trump – her campaign is spending twice as much as the Trump campaign.
Yesterday's debate may have marginally improved Harris’ prospects of becoming president in November – but the outcome, at the end of the day, will turn on how effectively the two candidates campaign in the battleground states over the next two months.
 

Mad as Fish

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
4,311
Reaction score
5,896
There is no doubt , Kangal is losing this election :sneaky: he made the fatal mistake of celebrating too early and him supporting the most incompetent fool ever to seek the oval office ......even more incompetent than piss pants Biden
It’s what it is paid to do. We used to call them spin doctors, they are there to interpret events to support a narrative, truth, honesty and integrity just don’t come into it.
 
Last edited:

Mad as Fish

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
4,311
Reaction score
5,896

While others have raised concerns that Trump violated the Logan Act — a federal law that bans private citizens from engaging in unauthorized foreign diplomacy — Olson contextualized the comment in relationship to the former president's recently dismissed Espionage Act violations case.
Ooooh... Lots of big words there, have you any idea about the stuff your handlers are passing you?
 

Mad as Fish

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
4,311
Reaction score
5,896
Is it true that cat tastes like pike?

Here you go, a recipe for pike from no less an authority than Izaak Walton, author of the Complete Angler -

"First, open your Pike at the gills, and if need be, cut also a little slit towards the belly. Out of
these, take his guts; and keep his liver, which you are to shred very small, with thyme, sweet
marjoram, and a little winter-savoury; to these put some pickled oysters, and some anchovies,
two or three; both these last whole, for the anchovies will melt, and the oysters should not; to
these, you must add also a pound of sweet butter, which you are to mix with the herbs that are
shred, and let them all be well salted. If the Pike be more than a yard long, then you may put
into these herbs more than a pound, or if he be less, then less butter will suffice: These, being
thus mixt, with a blade or two of mace, must be put into the Pike's belly; and then his belly so
sewed up as to keep all the butter in his belly if it be possible; if not, then as much of it as you
possibly can. But take not off the scales. Then you are to thrust the spit through his mouth, out
at his tail. And then take four or five or six split sticks, or very thin laths, and a convenient
quantity of tape or filleting; these laths are to be tied round about the Pike's body, from his head
to his tail, and the tape tied somewhat thick, to prevent his breaking or falling off from the spit.
Let him be roasted very leisurely; and often basted with claret wine, and anchovies, and butter,
mixt together; and also with what moisture falls from him into the pan. When you have roasted
him sufficiently, you are to hold under him, when you unwind or cut the tape that ties him, such
a dish as you purpose to eat him out of; and let him fall into it with the sauce that is roasted in his belly; and by this means the Pike will be kept unbroken and complete. Then, to the sauce which was within, and also that saucein the pan, you are to add a fit quantity of the best butter, and to squeeze the juice of three or four oranges. Lastly, you may either put it into the Pike, with the oysters, two cloves of garlick, and take it whole out, when the Pike is cut off the spit; or, to give the sauce a haut goût, let the dish into which you let the Pike fall be rubbed with it: The using or not using of this garlick is left to your discretion. M. B."

This dish of meat is too good for any but anglers, or very honest men; and I trust you will prove
both, and therefore I have trusted you with this secret.
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Top Bottom