The Climate Change scam

Mad as Fish

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
4,123
Reaction score
5,646
An interesting take on the west's dependence on China for rare earth metals published in the Wall Street Journal, three main points stand out.

1. China played hardball over tariffs and Trump had to go cap in hand to get things moving again.

2. Ford actually halted production because of China's reaction.

3. Europe's dependence upon China for rare earths is far greater than its dependence upon Russia for energy.



Gideon Rachman writes in the WSJ, Trump’s brutally realist approach to int'l relations now seems to include the realization that China holds all the cards when it comes to the production of rare earths and other critical minerals.

China began to play its hand in earnest just after liberation day, Apr 2, when Trump announced punishing tariffs on most of the world, with China hit particularly hard. Two days later, China announced export controls on seven types of rare earths.

The effect on the world’s motor industry was dramatic and felt within weeks. Jim Farley, the CEO of Ford, admitted in early June that a shortage of rare earths used in magnets had forced his company to “shut down factories” temporarily. European manufacturers had similar problems.

Faced with this crisis, the Trump admin had to plead for the restrictions to be eased. A temporary agreement was reached in June. But if Trump raises tariffs to stratospheric levels again, Beijing will almost certainly reimpose strict export controls.

Beijing’s grip on critical inputs for western industry gives China a uniquely powerful hand in any trade war with the US. A Chinese threat to block the export of rare earths is a much more powerful card than a European threat to block the export of Gucci handbags. Even some of the weapons systems the US would rely upon in the event of a war with China rely on Chinese rare earths.

Europe’s green transition would also grind to a halt without a steady supply of Chinese critical minerals and rare earths. One prominent European politician confided, “Our dependence on Russia for energy is very mild compared to our dependence on China for critical minerals. We’ve bet everything on the green economy and China could shut us down.”

Rare earths are found all over the world. But it is China’s willingness to commit to the often filthy business of mining and processing critical minerals—and the rare earths that are a vital subset of them—that has given Beijing its near monopoly. As a result, the country is thought to mine around 60-70% of the world’s rare earths and control around 90% of their processing and refining.

There are signs of increased urgency in Washington and Brussels. Trump has also put pressure on Ukraine to hand over mineral rights, in return for US support. The EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act, which came into force last year, has set targets for reducing dependence on China. But, so far, the EU has no operational rare earth mines and only two major processing plants.

Overcoming environmental objections to processing could be even harder than gaining access to the mineral. A Solvay facility in France is set to expand. But following EU rules will raise production costs considerably.

One western security official says, “it’s taken more than 20 years to become this dependent on China. And it will take another 20 years to break the dependency.”
 

willows68

Well-known member
New
Joined
Jun 25, 2024
Messages
788
Reaction score
1,081
An interesting take on the west's dependence on China for rare earth metals published in the Wall Street Journal, three main points stand out.

1. China played hardball over tariffs and Trump had to go cap in hand to get things moving again.

2. Ford actually halted production because of China's reaction.

3. Europe's dependence upon China for rare earths is far greater than its dependence upon Russia for energy.



Gideon Rachman writes in the WSJ, Trump’s brutally realist approach to int'l relations now seems to include the realization that China holds all the cards when it comes to the production of rare earths and other critical minerals.

China began to play its hand in earnest just after liberation day, Apr 2, when Trump announced punishing tariffs on most of the world, with China hit particularly hard. Two days later, China announced export controls on seven types of rare earths.

The effect on the world’s motor industry was dramatic and felt within weeks. Jim Farley, the CEO of Ford, admitted in early June that a shortage of rare earths used in magnets had forced his company to “shut down factories” temporarily. European manufacturers had similar problems.

Faced with this crisis, the Trump admin had to plead for the restrictions to be eased. A temporary agreement was reached in June. But if Trump raises tariffs to stratospheric levels again, Beijing will almost certainly reimpose strict export controls.

Beijing’s grip on critical inputs for western industry gives China a uniquely powerful hand in any trade war with the US. A Chinese threat to block the export of rare earths is a much more powerful card than a European threat to block the export of Gucci handbags. Even some of the weapons systems the US would rely upon in the event of a war with China rely on Chinese rare earths.

Europe’s green transition would also grind to a halt without a steady supply of Chinese critical minerals and rare earths. One prominent European politician confided, “Our dependence on Russia for energy is very mild compared to our dependence on China for critical minerals. We’ve bet everything on the green economy and China could shut us down.”

Rare earths are found all over the world. But it is China’s willingness to commit to the often filthy business of mining and processing critical minerals—and the rare earths that are a vital subset of them—that has given Beijing its near monopoly. As a result, the country is thought to mine around 60-70% of the world’s rare earths and control around 90% of their processing and refining.

There are signs of increased urgency in Washington and Brussels. Trump has also put pressure on Ukraine to hand over mineral rights, in return for US support. The EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act, which came into force last year, has set targets for reducing dependence on China. But, so far, the EU has no operational rare earth mines and only two major processing plants.

Overcoming environmental objections to processing could be even harder than gaining access to the mineral. A Solvay facility in France is set to expand. But following EU rules will raise production costs considerably.

One western security official says, “it’s taken more than 20 years to become this dependent on China. And it will take another 20 years to break the dependency.”
Solvay. There is that name again. It's a big club and we ain't in it.
 

jpc

Moderator
Staff member
Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2022
Messages
3,163
Reaction score
4,400
Read through the guff.
These things are essentially unreachable.
Making a nonsense of the whole point of EVs.

Researchers make surprising discovery while working with scrap EV batteries: 'This demands a paradigm shift' https://share.google/sWNCljz8Yga0I5EE7
 

Wolf

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2023
Messages
8,515
Reaction score
7,690
Read through the guff.
These things are essentially unreachable.
Making a nonsense of the whole point of EVs.

Researchers make surprising discovery while working with scrap EV batteries: 'This demands a paradigm shift' https://share.google/sWNCljz8Yga0I5EE7
In 10 years the gowls will be lecturing us about how bad these fucking things are for the environment and how it's the plebs fault for buying them.
EV owners are in for a serious shock too as the gowls think of ways to replace the revenue they scab off us for diesel and petrol.
 

Mad as Fish

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
4,123
Reaction score
5,646
In 10 years the gowls will be lecturing us about how bad these fucking things are for the environment and how it's the plebs fault for buying them.
EV owners are in for a serious shock too as the gowls think of ways to replace the revenue they scab off us for diesel and petrol.
I've been saying for a long time now that they will end up being a huge environmental disaster in their own right. Don't get laughed at quite so much nowadays.
 

willows68

Well-known member
New
Joined
Jun 25, 2024
Messages
788
Reaction score
1,081
I'm in a touristy area. They all have these huge heavy - very heavy - ev boxes. After the summer our already dreadful roads are in an even sorrier state than normal. No doubt the required road repairs will come out of regular serfs' road tax contributions. If the data centres allow us enough leccie to log on😡
It's all a scam. Remember: we are the carbon they want to get rid of.
 

Mad as Fish

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
4,123
Reaction score
5,646
Found this excellent summation of the science behind the climate alarmism industry over on Linked in -

What’s left in too many cases is a conveyor belt of incremental papers, optimized for funding renewals and media attention, but divorced from the kind of hard-nosed skepticism that defines real science…

If climate science is to regain credibility, it has to break its addiction to dressing up trivialities as existential threats, otherwise, scientists are not doing science, they're doing marketing.
 

Mad as Fish

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
4,123
Reaction score
5,646
I'm in a touristy area. They all have these huge heavy - very heavy - ev boxes. After the summer our already dreadful roads are in an even sorrier state than normal. No doubt the required road repairs will come out of regular serfs' road tax contributions. If the data centres allow us enough leccie to log on😡
It's all a scam. Remember: we are the carbon they want to get rid of.
It has long been my contention that EVs should pay a higher road tax to fund the repair of the damage they do to the roads.
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Top Bottom