Could Iran v Israel turn nuclear? A possible indication from the Occult/Masonic world


BROCKLESBY, Australia (Reuters) — Justin Everett is planting 50 per cent less wheat this year than he thought he would.

Standing in muddy brown boots and jeans by his tractor and (36-foot-wide seeding rig in a bare field, the 44-year-old said a lack of rainfall and rapid increases in fuel and fertilizer prices due to the war in Iran had ripped up his seeding plans.

He is one of thousands of farmers across Australia deciding to plant less wheat and spread less fertilizer.

Their choices, and the likelihood of a dry growing season for many, mean Australia, the third-largest wheat exporting nation, may have as much as 10 million tonnes less to ship in the upcoming season, an amount equivalent to five per cent of annual global exports.
 
So let’s look at the way the US lost the most recent round of its war with Iran:

  1. Regime change failed
  2. Nuclear prevention failed
  3. Defense of Arab bases failed
  4. Defense of Israel failed
  5. Destruction of military capabilities failed
  6. Strait of Hormuz blocked
About the only thing the US did successfully was to not lose any warships. Which, one notes, could have much more easily been accomplished by not sending them to the Persian Gulf in the first place. And not only did the USA fail in its objectives, but it ended the conflict worse off than when it began.

That is, by every historical measure, a defeat. It’s not an existential one, nor is it necessarily the last word on the international conflict. But the history books will record this as being a defeat of the USA by Iran.

DISCUSS ON SG
 
So let’s look at the way the US lost the most recent round of its war with Iran:

  1. Regime change failed
  2. Nuclear prevention failed
  3. Defense of Arab bases failed
  4. Defense of Israel failed
  5. Destruction of military capabilities failed
  6. Strait of Hormuz blocked
About the only thing the US did successfully was to not lose any warships. Which, one notes, could have much more easily been accomplished by not sending them to the Persian Gulf in the first place. And not only did the USA fail in its objectives, but it ended the conflict worse off than when it began.

That is, by every historical measure, a defeat. It’s not an existential one, nor is it necessarily the last word on the international conflict. But the history books will record this as being a defeat of the USA by Iran.

DISCUSS ON SG
All very true, but how bad did Israel and the US bases get whacked and did Israel influence Trump's capitulation?
 
I must be forgiven the source as it appears that search engines don't like drawing attention to this and this is the first confirmation that appeared of the story, but anyway -

"This effort resulted in more than 100 million barrels of oil making its way through the Strait and into the free market. More than 200 Commercial Ships have safely traveled through the Strait. This hugely successful effort was made possible because the US controls the Strait of Hormuz, not Iran."

 
The latest peace treaty was announced to get space x IPO through today imho
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpc
This whole thing has been the greatest sell out in American history
 
This whole thing has been the greatest sell out in American history
Except for the US claiming that it is now in charge of the Straits of Hormuz. It is not regime change as promised to them by Israel, but it keeps the oil flowing, even to the point that Saudi Arabia is now reducing its prices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpc
This whole thing has been the greatest sell out in American history
Trump sold out to the Israelis.
This war occurred because an idiot incompetent grifter is in the White House. The crap he has gotten away with in real estate doesn't work with people who are ready for it.
And the consequences will be felt for the next half decade at least.
He was OK in the first term because he didn't start any war.
Should have stuck to that policy.
But he's fatally compromised by the Israelis and his backers.
Narcissists are like that.
He doesn't give a toss about the US citizenry.
 
There will be no peace deal, if Iran stipulates that Isreal withdraw from Lebanon, and cease operations in Gaza/west Bank, does anyone really believe Israel will comply? Short term perhaps, but give it a week and Israel will be on the March, especially if Hezbollah keep sending missiles into isreal.
 
Trump sold out to the Israelis.
This war occurred because an idiot incompetent grifter is in the White House. The crap he has gotten away with in real estate doesn't work with people who are ready for it.
And the consequences will be felt for the next half decade at least.
He was OK in the first term because he didn't start any war.
Should have stuck to that policy.
But he's fatally compromised by the Israelis and his backers.
Narcissists are like that.
He doesn't give a toss about the US citizenry.
Nah, everythings fine.


View: https://www.cbsnews.com/video/president-trump-hosts-surreal-ufc-fights-at-white-house/
 
I agree with you Perry, short term who knows but medium/long term this is definitely starting up again.
 
I assume it will be, All Quiet On This Front, at least until Iran are out of the World Cup ! ! !

Funny ( if very highly un-likely ) if the Iranians won the World Cup ! :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
Many main media outlets are announcing the end of the the ceasefire, that its the US v Iran full back on. This brings back the whole energy squeeze...
 
That was likely the plan from the start. I still believe there is a high probability of Iran getting nuked
 
That was likely the plan from the start. I still believe there is a high probability of Iran getting nuked
We can all kiss our asses goodbye if that happens. Nuclear war is a different game altogether, it cannot be constrained either politically or geographically, the bombs were always there as a deterant, not an offensive weapon.
 
I would go so far as to say that the huge monies given to Iran in the 'deal', from both the US and the Gulf States, was actually designed to enable Iran to fight a long war. Thats how arrogant the Globalists are, they hide their intentions and activities in plain sight convinced that anybody who points them out will be dismissed as a 'conspiracy theorist'.
 
I would go so far as to say that the huge monies given to Iran in the 'deal', from both the US and the Gulf States, was actually designed to enable Iran to fight a long war. Thats how arrogant the Globalists are, they hide their intentions and activities in plain sight convinced that anybody who points them out will be dismissed as a 'conspiracy theorist'.
A long conventional war that is, nukes would make it a very short term affair.
 
I happened to talk to a retired British Army General a few days ago, just by accident at a history talk, and I pressed him on the possibility of nuclear war. He said there was an 80% chance of a nuclear bomb going off, a tactical one hopefully, within the next two years, and he thought we would all be at war with Russia within the next 6 years. Obviously tactical is a smaller bomb, but actually he also openly speculated about a Russian strategic nuclear weapon attack, which is just too scary to think about.
 
Well actually I was asking about Freemasons in the history thing, and anyway he said he attained high rank in the British Army without being one.
About Russia he gave me the whole propaganda bit, mad and evil etc, still I wouldn't want to be dominated by them, or by the British or Americans either.
 
I happened to talk to a retired British Army General a few days ago, just by accident at a history talk, and I pressed him on the possibility of nuclear war. He said there was an 80% chance of a nuclear bomb going off, a tactical one hopefully, within the next two years, and he thought we would all be at war with Russia within the next 6 years. Obviously tactical is a smaller bomb, but actually he also openly speculated about a Russian strategic nuclear weapon attack, which is just too scary to think about.
I'd say he is stuck in a cold war mindset. The British services spend most of the time justifying their existence and he hasn't adjusted yet, probably never will.

Next time ask him how he calculates these figures, or what he bases them upon, it's all guesswork
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom