Is the Left the only resistance against the Jews?

Hermit said:
The Left don't oppose Jews, they oppose Israel and worship Palestine. They love Jews in any context outside that conflict. Their whole worldview and political ideology is based on WWII where the ultimate act of evil was the holocaust, which they believe happened and they strongly condemn anyone who questions if it did happen, and the ultimate act of righteousness is to oppose Nazis and anti-semitism. If Israel stopped bombing the shit of Palestine then the Left would stop all their protests.
Click to expand...

French Leftists Pierre-Joseph Proudhon and Charles Baudelaire publicly called for the genocide of Jews long before the state of Israel existed.
 
Roc_ said:
Here's an article from seven years ago even talking about the central point of this thread (that that moron Collett is pretending he only just discovered):

We are now way past the time when it was possible to say that the far right is the sole source of threat to American Jews. There’s been an ongoing string of attacks against Jews in New York City whose perpetrators are not white supremacists. Some attackers seem to have been influenced by the rhetoric of Louis Farrakhan, showing — as if we still needed proof of that! — a direct link between anti-Semitic words and actions.

And then there is another uncomfortable fact: appreciation that some anti-Semitic far-right figures heap on far-left “anti-Zionists.” Holocaust denier David Irving famously referred to the UK Labour Party Leader Jeremy Corbyn as “impressive” and “a fine man” in the context of a discussion about the Party’s crisis over anti-Semitism. For the “resistance to ZOG” (Zionist occupied government, a far-right conspiracy theory), white supremacist David Duke called Omar the most important member of US Congress.

What this shows us — as if we still needed proof of that too! — is that anti-Semitism is anti-Semitism, no matter where on the political spectrum it resides. Once it’s out, particularly when expressed by a high-profile political figure, it isn’t confined to some clearly defined space. It resonates across the entire spectrum. And when there is no push back, it loosens taboos against anti-Semitism throughout the entire society.

True, thus far the deadly synagogue shootings have been executed by white supremacists. But who is to say that the New York Times cartoon, published right on the eve of the Poway Chabad shooting, didn’t play into the shooter’s mindset? And who is to say that the Latuff cartoon Omar and Tlaib circulated isn’t going to contribute to a future mass shooter’s decision to take action?

When it comes to anti-Semitism, it is time for the left to do some serious soul-searching. Pointing to the right as a worse offender is hardly a convincing strategy; surely, the left has better benchmarks than that.


HMdzrZNXkAA6FrK
Click to expand...

However understood egalitarianism is at the core of Leftist ideology and that makes it intrinsically anti-Political Judaism unless you are going to create a self-reliant homogeneously Jewish society.
 
Agobard Admirer said:
However understood egalitarianism is at the core of Leftist ideology and that makes it intrinsically anti-Political Judaism unless you are going to create a self-reliant homogeneously Jewish society.
Click to expand...
Blabbermouth is a submoron but it's really rather obvious what's going on here, take a look at the Venn diagram that Dave Rubin (a Jew) posted -

Post in thread 'Is the Left the only resistance against the Jews?' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.co...-resistance-against-the-jews.1223/post-165396

The idea is that every white goy will have a group that they don't like on that list, and what do they all have in common?

It's very similar to the recent thing of 'woke right', which is basically a term for nationalists, white, that is, and what do people on the right not like?, 'woke'. What you're really looking at here is typical Jewish tricks, whether Blabbermouth realises it or not.


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MoJQbPPFEHw

PS. The counter-Jihad is also Jewish.
 
The Equalizer said:
Blabbermouth is a submoron but it's really rather obvious what's going on here, take a look at the Venn diagram that Dave Rubin (a Jew) posted -

Post in thread 'Is the Left the only resistance against the Jews?' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.co...-resistance-against-the-jews.1223/post-165396

The idea is that every white goy will have a group that they don't like on that list, and what do they all have in common?

It's very similar to the recent thing of 'woke right', which is basically a term for nationalists, white, that is, and what do people on the right not like?, 'woke'. What you're really looking at here is typical Jewish tricks, whether Blabbermouth realises it or not.


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MoJQbPPFEHw

PS. The counter-Jihad is also Jewish.
Click to expand...


For a period in the 19 th and 20 th centuries Jews were associated with the Left but now and historically they have been very much bound up with the establishment so that increasingly an attack on the establishment is seen as an attack on Jews. A difference with the past is while Jews had often considerable power and privilege relative to the general population they did not have honor socially and were considered for reasons of both race and religion as civilizational outsiders. Jews now have more social honor than the Pope and are considered by many the defining group of the Western spirit. If Jews were kicked out of the establishment than Blabbermouth would stop defending them I suspect.
 
Agobard Admirer said:
For a period in the 19 th and 20 th centuries Jews were associated with the Left but now and historically they have been very much bound up with the establishment so that increasingly an attack on the establishment is seen as an attack on Jews. A difference with the past is while Jews had often considerable power and privilege relative to the general population they did not have honor socially and were considered for reasons of both race and religion as civilizational outsiders. Jews now have more social honor than the Pope and are considered by many the defining group of the Western spirit. If Jews were kicked out of the establishment than Blabbermouth would stop defending them I suspect.
Click to expand...
Blabbermouth will never stop defending the Jews because that's what he's all about, completely.

Secondly, in my previous post I told what the subject matter is.
 
Agobard Admirer said:
For a period in the 19 th and 20 th centuries Jews were associated with the Left but now and historically they have been very much bound up with the establishment so that increasingly an attack on the establishment is seen as an attack on Jews. A difference with the past is while Jews had often considerable power and privilege relative to the general population they did not have honor socially and were considered for reasons of both race and religion as civilizational outsiders. Jews now have more social honor than the Pope and are considered by many the defining group of the Western spirit. If Jews were kicked out of the establishment than Blabbermouth would stop defending them I suspect.
Click to expand...
Aaand you're straight back to pulling discriminatory, babbling, incoherent, made up evil fucking nonsense, straight out of your decrepit and wrinkled old hole.
 
Roc_ said:
Aaand you're straight back to pulling discriminatory, babbling, incoherent, made up evil fucking nonsense, straight out of your decrepit and wrinkled old hole.
Click to expand...

“My office was created by law and designed to protect the Jewish people throughout the world. Think about that. The world’s greatest power is focused, by law and design, on protecting the Jews.”

Elan Carr, U.S. State Department Envoy on Anti-Semitism.

I agree people should think about that. If it wasn't would you care about Jews?
 
Yes, civilised democracies with civilised people living in them, focus on protecting minority rights.

An illustration from this article that comes to mind:

Rule 13: Our first priority is democracy, but the Arabs' first priority is "justice." The oft-warring Arab tribes are all wounded souls, who really have been hurt by colonial powers, by Jewish settlements on Palestinian land, by Arab kings and dictators, and, most of all, by each other in endless tribal wars. For Iraq's long-abused Shiite majority, democracy is first and foremost a vehicle to get justice. Ditto the Kurds. For the minority Sunnis, democracy in Iraq is a vehicle of injustice. For us, democracy is all about protecting minority rights. For them, democracy is first about consolidating majority rights and getting justice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom