Andrew Gold Tackles The Taboo Topic Of Race Realism

[The Equalizer]

The only one I recognise there is Francis Galton.

Known as the pioneer of modern statistics who famously "started out to find causation and ended up discovering correlation".

He couldn't find the answer to causation, so he shifted his focus away from measuring causal links to measuring numerical association and correlation.

Of course he did not begin Jambo's cult movement - rather his scientific ideas were adopted by the Nazis to transform their ideology about "race" into an apparently objective, state-backed science.

This was years after Galton's death (in 1911).

The Nazis adopted his ideas to establish the pseudoscientific framework of eugenics.

And they adopted his dogma that human intelligence, health, and moral traits were entirely fixed by heredity.

They drew on his biometric "methodologies" to measure human bodies on a massive scale, tracking skull sizes, nose shapes, eye colors, and hair textures - plotting them in bell curves.

I.e. That was their method to draw the "dividing line" between "whites" and non-whites (that I sometimes ask Jambo about how he would do it). Basically the Jambo science of "averages" that he sometimes bangs on about.

I don't know what the "Jambo science of "averages"" means, so you couldn't possibly be talking about me

So Galton provided the "science" we see today in the American successor movewment to the twentierth century European movement.

That does not change that the centre of today's movement is in America.

Only that when you fully trace back the origins of the catchphrases and jargon of this movement you ultimately come to men like Galton and the then scientific ideas promoted by some of them a hundred and fifty years ago.

 

[Roc_]

Look at this Jew rat bastard.

The child abuser thinks he's simultaneously living in the Jim Crowe South, Nazi Germany and a Catholic Theocracy.

clearly in the grip of some kind of mania (probably as a result of prolonged drug use)?

Well, we'll have to come up with a new term then. I would say it's an adequate term for adult men posting photos of young children and showering them with all kinds of lewd abuse, but fair enough.

I think it was around the time you were boasting about farming the mother of your children (who must be in their teens now) out to other to other men while you attended rave parties in the George that I took an interest in your background and found your photo online.
Yeah, nothing to write home about. I suppose you should be given some credit for somehow convincing a nice lady to marry you and bear your children given your sexual proclivities.

Baldy talking to himself again.

Okay, you want to go another round, let's give you what you're looking for.

First, let's be clear - the only thing anyway obscure is whether you "Aldo" are in fact Dave or Anthony.

It's easy enough for someone in tune to tell from the manner you conduct yourself - there is a lying, a slyness, a viciousness, a root essence of political views, a certain character of discrimatory outlook that I 100% recognise from extended interaction and prior conversations. No doubt.

A two-facedness, an air that you get off someone who uses multiple personalities.

The manner that is in the furious lying denials, etc.

The only thing that is actually confusing is telling apart father from son. I guess you are the son. That is the only thing I am not 100% sure of. Hereditory I guess. But let's assume it is so for convenience.

Second, let's remember the manner "some innocent fella" as you call your Da reacted after that left wing guy exposed him after the online attacks your Da orchestrated and facilitated on that chap's girlfriend, and on other colleagues of his.

I.e. He spent 24 hours on the internet frantically wiping all trace of his prior activity and presence. Pulled down all his sites. In fact I have a live record of the whole frantic 24 hours.

Are those the actions of "some innocent fella"?!

Or does it tell us something about what he really thought himself about his own doings?

Third, let us talk about underhand tactics like those your family was targeted with. The point is that they were a reaction to opposing underhand tactics.

I.e. You and your Da misused internet technology towards despicable ends.

Not only to assemble a group of low down and half witted racists who you platformed to attack people, and feed with syndicated American far right content, etc.

But you used it to personally shut down and misrepresent individual opinion.

Now what does someone do who is on the receiving end of that?

Just take it?

Well most people do. They are powerless. There is nothing they can do.

But just once, someone hit back against it. And yes, they fought dirty. Exceedingly dirty.

Again, what else do you do? Take it, or fight back the only way you can in the face of you hideous little currs sitting smug in your own perceived power, behind your online adminstrative controls, and plague of websites?

You can furiously deny the above all you like, as usual, and parade all your indignant self righteousness, and pretend you're just wearing a cape like your "Irish Crusader" shlock, only concerned about de "innocent children" etc.

But I have your number, "Aldo". The only question here is whether you want to start this up again? Do you want to fuck around again and find out as you and your goons like to say, and find out if your enemies have anything left in their arsenal?

Just let me know, wank face (literally).

 

[The Equalizer]

First of all, please explain how heritable traits are "fixed", or changed?

Of course, the average IQ of "African Americans" is considered to be about one SD below white Americans.

The average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans is considered to be about two SDs below (catastrophic).

How is that possible? Well, many people put it down to "African Americans" having European admixture (DNA). Which when you think about it, is a form of eugenics.

Race realists don't completely dismiss the environment, or "atmosphere", as the black social scientist idiot called it in the video I posted of him interviewing Jared Taylor. It's just that it doesn't count for a lot.

 

[Aldo3]

First, let's be clear - the only thing anyway obscure is whether you "Aldo" are in fact Dave or Anthony.

You fucking idiot. You've been told a million times that I've no idea who those people are - and don't particularly want to know.

Second, let's remember the manner "some innocent fella" as you call your Da reacted after that left wing guy exposed him after the online attacks your Da orchestrated and facilitated on that chap's girlfriend, and on other colleagues of his.

Yet again I've no idea what you're shiteing on about. I was referring to you, the autist in Leixlip and the faggot expat posting photos of young children online, you fucking mong.

I think it's obvious to anyone reading these boards that you're a very unstable person. I hope the Gardaí are monitoring your activity. I did alert them on a number of occasions to your activity online involving young children but the pricks weren't interested.

One thing I'll leave you with: I sent some very lengthy correspondence to the mother of the autist in Leixlip, and the day after his site was pulled. Amazing what a bit of initiative can do, eh?

Tell him I was asking for him, would you? xxx

 

[The Equalizer]

"Feeney", the girl with the golden machine gun, Dylann Roof..

Everyone has to be a caricature in @Roc_'s paranoid mind. He can't deal with reality. He's like @Haven, care-in-the-community (I don't know what that's actually called in the Middle East)

 

[Roc_]

You fucking idiot. You've been told a million times that I've no idea who those people are - and don't particularly want to know.

Yet again I've no idea what you're shiteing on about. I was referring to you, the autist in Leixlip and the faggot expat posting photos of young children online, you fucking mong.

I think it's obvious to anyone reading these boards that you're a very unstable person. I hope the Gardaí are monitoring your activity. I did alert them on a number of occasions to your activity online involving young children but the pricks weren't interested.

One thing I'll leave you with: I sent some very lengthy correspondence to the mother of the autist in Leixlip, and the day after his site was pulled. Amazing what a bit of initiative can do, eh?

Tell him I was asking for him, would you? xxx

The expected furious denials. "I know nothing, Mr. Fawlty". Actually you're reminding me now the way you isolated and targeted the person you perceived as weakest and the manner in which you targeted him. That kind of rubbed me up the wrong way, you know. I perceived a certain bullying manner in it that I absolutely loathe. I'd almost forgotten. You're reminding me of it. Actually a very lengthy similar "correspondence" on yourselves could be put together if one was inclined. I recall for instance a Facebook post before it was scrubbed, with John, Ciaran, Cathal, Alison, Thomas, Joshua, Sheila, Helen, Joseph, and yourself and your Da, gathered around the table. Of course someone might send a lengthy "correspondence" to all of them in the same way. The same way you did, and that now you're even boasting about it. You know there's a wealth of material on you and your Da too, as you probably suspect. Did you ever ask yourself why no one did the same to you? I.e. Where was the line to be crossed, between what went on on these shitty fora, and outside of them? And non-members' awareness of what went on? Go on, the more you deny it, the more I'll hammer you. You see you're rubbing me up the wrong way boasting about that. If you think it's so clever that you go around boasting about it, would you like if your enemies did the same to you? Do you see the difference, wank face? Never mind the impetus, that I already covered in the previous post.

 

[Haven]

@The Equalizer

You clown.

 

[Aldo3]

The expected furious denials. "I know nothing, Mr. Fawlty". Actually you're reminding me now the way you isolated and targeted the person you perceived as weakest and the manner in which you targeted him. That kind of rubbed me up the wrong way, you know. I perceived a certain bullying manner in it that I absolutely loathe.

Yeah, well we probably won't take lectures from a grown man who, in tandem with other grown men, posted photos of young children online. That's a very sick thing to do, baldy. Are you pissed that that's what you'll be remembered for?

The weak fella you used when it suited you? Yeah he was a right cunt. You know his parents had him forcibly removed from the family home and sent to live in one of Ireland biggest dumps, Athy? Now he's living in some sheltered accommodation in Celbridge down the road from his ma.

Once again, I've no idea who any of those people are that you've mentioned, you fucking lunatic. The Equalizer summed you up well in his previous post.

 

[The Equalizer]

Yeah, well we probably won't take lectures from a grown man who, in tandem with other grown men, posted photos of young children online. That's a very sick thing to do, baldy. Are you pissed that that's what you'll be remembered for?

The weak fella you used when it suited you? Yeah he was a right cunt. You know his parents had him forcibly removed from the family home and sent to live in one of Ireland biggest dumps, Athy? Now he's living in some sheltered accommodation in Celbridge down the road from his ma.

Once again, I've no idea who any of those people are that you've mentioned, you fucking lunatic. The Equalizer summed you up well in his previous post.

You have a beef with that site. Okay.

I don't hold it against you, but you were instrumental in getting me, Sword (@Agobard Admirer), Gowl & Dave banned on Discussions. And, I presume, you remain there.

 

[Aldo3]

You have a beef with that site. Okay.

I don't hold it against you, but you were instrumental in getting me, Sword (@Agobard Admirer), Gowl & Dave banned on Discussions. And, I presume, you remain there.

I think for a bit of craic I posted some screenshots of posts the other two mongs had made on the now defunct site slagging off the site owner. Apologies if you and that other person got caught in the crosshairs.

No, I don't post there any longer. It's one of the stranger discussion forums, where the vast majority of content consists of the idiot site owner starting a new thread about some technology news that nobody cares about - and English football. Dull as dishwater.

I'll bow out of this thread now.

 

[The Equalizer]

I think for a bit of craic I posted some screenshots of posts the other two mongs had made on the now defunct site slagging off the site owner. Apologies if you and that other person got caught in the crosshairs.

No, I don't post there any longer. It's one of the stranger discussion forums, where the vast majority of content consists of the idiot site owner starting a new thread about some technology news that nobody cares about - and English football. Dull as dishwater.

Okay. Cool.

I'll bow out of this thread now.

No need to bow out of this thread unless you're not interested in the subject matter, like @Just Think isn't.

We can spend all day shaking our fists at anecdotes, but that's not really it.

You talk about loitering "unvetted military aged men" and so on i.e. the asylum racket all the time, which I would agree is a particularly reckless form of immigration that our traitorous politicians should be held accountable for, but why not talk about the bigger picture stuff, as I do. Such as race realism or the Great Replacement/White Genocide. Which includes legal immigration, in fact, it's the biggest part of it, by far.