- Joined
- Jan 11, 2023
- Messages
- 3,925
- Reaction score
- 3,765
Still here?? WeirdWhat's the "one factor", go on, give us a laugh..
Still here?? WeirdWhat's the "one factor", go on, give us a laugh..
If he has any sense, your inane questioning will go unansweredI'm going to ask @tldr why the f*ck did he
There were reports that the ingredients in various batches were not consistent. This might explain these trail-offs. There first and second rounds may not have been as lethal, although there are horrific accounts of injury after the first jab. It does seem jab 3 was the charmThere is a big difference in the mortality rates between the unvaccinated and the vaccinated (though those with only one or two shots have trailed off now). But are these explained by different age cohorts?
From you? Yes, obviously. Inanity is baked into the Jambo cake, on this and other matters.It's inane to ask you what the "one factor" is?
What race are the Scottish?
It seems that Kriel is a better analyst than Steve Kirsch, who may or may not be compromised.Kriel is debunking the 20% mortality rate of the vaccine in New Zealand which was a misreading.
Kriel is interesting - especially critical of the vaccine's effects on reproduction and heart health. He thinks that there are 51,000 deaths resulting from vaccine complications in the UK as reported in a paper from Fenton and Neil.
'One of the most interesting and least understood papers on this subject was produced by Professors Fenton and Neil who arrived at a jaw-dropping estimate of 51,000 vaccine-related deaths in the UK from a total of 120,000 excess deaths. Of these 51,000, they calculated that 16,000 were directly attributable to the vaccine and 35,000 were attributable to underlying conditions which were worsened by the vaccine.'
Is the New Zealand leaked vaccine data of any use at all? - TCW
He maintains that Kirsch et al are running interference on the data to discredit it. The issue is excess mortality and this has been recorded in the official numbers in the UK
I downloaded the file and had a look through just to check that it was real. It looked like it to me. Sometimes these sort of claims are untrue so I do have a look if it seems very significant.
Correction - You are a simpleton asking inane questions. You are clearly too simple to know the differenceI'm asking you simple questions
Correction - You are a simpleton asking inane questions. You are clearly too simple to know the difference
Just a chronic thread derailer. Never heard a smart word from himSeriously PG, the guy is special needs. There's nothing you can do for him. He's a broken record.
It seems that Kriel is a better analyst than Steve Kirsch, who may or may not be compromised.
If you think 'it was all theater', how can there be excess deaths?You're a Covidian, plain as day.
If you haven't figured out that it was all theatre..
Excess deaths? Do you think that there is "one factor", like Plonker does? No, you don't.
You said it's all theater. Are there historic excess deaths or not?Wha?
You said that there is "one factor" in excess deaths - the injection.
Nobody was talking about that you nitwit . Once again, you are having one-way convos with yourself.I meant the scamdemic, not excess deaths
Lol. Like I said: One way conversations with himself. LooperOf course somebody was talking about that - me, you fucking imbecile
![]()
You don't believe in excess deaths. How could you? It's all theater! AmIright?How many posts are you going to make in this thread refusing to say what the "one factor" for excess deaths is?
What sort of a looper gets his knickers twisted about something he doesn't even accept as real? A very bored and boring one I suspectI've asked you, time and again, what the "one factor" for excess deaths is?
I'm asking you what the "one factor" for excess deaths is?![]()
Myles.Information can only be condensed so much.
Well, my effort at a breakdown was a stream of thought job and badly written. The military analogy was from the second conversation with Rennebohm that McMillan botched and was my attempt to have another go at it.When other text is quoted it's generally to provide an accepted definition or to present a relevant portion of a news article that otherwise wouldn't be clicked on.Is the virus real? Is the flu real? Are colds real? They provide a viral protein map generated from genetic analyses in the above discussions.The point is that there's another wave predicted by Bossche and the fact that this phenomenon is real was confirmed by the news article reporting on the WHO.Bossche is predicting that there will be a more virulent version of the virus this time, rather than one that is more easily spread like Omicron. He also says that there is a source of these new versions outside the lab, so not necessarily from more virus research - thus it's been loosed in nature. Bossch isn't just some random guy with a pretty intro - he's a serious scientist.One of the features of this message board is that news that we wouldn't otherwise see is reported here. It also gives us an opportunity to discuss it - something we wouldn't have if we were just sitting at home watching the nightly news.So, it's encouraged to link to articles that we see. They may be of little importance or misleading but among them may be important information. Would any of us known about the developments in COVID if we weren't online?Perhaps one day you can raise yourself above the condition of a pest. Why don't you start today? Ask me about something that was written above rather than making it all about a competition for attention.
That's honesty and endeavour.
Of course somebody was talking about that - me, you fucking imbecile
You first, Plonks!
"One factor" fucking idiot
He just can't say it, even though I've said it for him, utter spa![]()
Maybe experimental jab 9 will do the trick :
View: https://twitter.com/ichudov/status/1739350895131873401
View: https://t.me/irishquislings/2075?single
Does anyone here understand what this lad is talking about?????
You need to click on the link to get the rest of what he posted.
I believe so......swab was front and centre for all of it when he confidently stated "you will own nothing" the beast system has these pricks marked and they walked into it.......in fact they called us gobshytes and morons for not going with it ......this technology is also in airports , the prick s can be scannedSo you can buy a gadget like a guitar counter and detect these pricks, and with so.e sort of unique ip address???
That's for his Doctors in St Pats to figure out.Does anyone here understand what this lad is talking about?????
I would guess that lockdowns are the primary cause of excess deaths.
That's for his Doctors in St Pats to figure out.
They'll be limiting his internet access after this.
I refused to answer YOUR inane questions. Always will. Get used to it bucko . lololYou refused to answer a basic question,
You refused to answer a basic question, choosing instead to write twenty spam posts dodging it.
The fact is, no one agrees with you, not even the person who liked your post (@tldr).
But you're far too clever a conspiracy theorist (goofball) for us all. Lockdowns (result of) being a reason for excess deaths is just far too pedestrian for your giant intellect.
Plonkers, you're the biggest, most narcissistic, spamming conspiracy theorist abject moron on Irish political fora.
@David has been banned cannot or will not acknowledge excess deaths for some reason. Amazing stupidity
View attachment 3875
lol Another fucking idiot, classic Dunning-Kruger case.
I remain unconvinced that you're not roc, the fundamental similarities are blinding