World Health Organisation officials have published a new document about the JN.1 Coronavirus strain, and it makes for some very grim reading as UK death figures rise again
www.dailystar.co.uk
Most likely affecting the jabbed.
'World Health Organisation officials have published a new document about the JN.1 Coronavirus strain, and it makes for some very grim reading as UK death figures rise again
Medical experts are panicking after confirming that the latest strain of Coronavirus taking over the world is “fast growing” and has “increased immune evasion”.
The JN.1 strain of Covid has been sweeping the world for the last month, becoming the dominant strain in many countries – including the UK. And in the World Health Organisation's latest report into it, officials have also reclassified the strain as its own separate variant, rather than being a variant of interest connected to others.'
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/uk-covid-deaths-surge-officials-31740773
Here's Dr. Vanden Bossche talking about this - he explains the mechanism behind what has made this JN.1 strain so alarming. The Dr McMillan guy is not someone I'm so sure of but he provides a platform I suppose. JN.1 isn't too bad, it's the evidence of the mechanism that has Bossche worked up.
Bossche has been warning about using vaccines during a pandemic as this will produce a multitude of variants. Vaccines should be applied (and processed by the body) prior to exposure otherwise they invite immune escape (the viral equivalent of superbugs).
https://philipmcmillan.substack.com/p/geerts-concern-about-the-new-covid
McMillan discusses it with Dr. Rennebohm who has to steer the explanation against eddies and cross currents but the gist of it from what I understand is below - try about 53:35. I think these discussions are principally useful for those in the medical profession
https://philipmcmillan.substack.com/p/understanding-geerts-covid-predictions
---
the primary antibodies produced by the vaccines are for the original wuhan strain
there has been significant changes in the strains since which makes these antibodies ineffective
pnnba antibodies are second line less specialised antibodies that flag but do not clog up the virus - these were produced especially after the second shot and in lower quantities after an intitial boom in them
there are general policing immune dendretic cells that can snag the virions (individual viral cells) on their "arms" in the upper respiratory tract
these dendretic cells travel up and down the respiratory tract (from the nose to the lungs)
the virions can unsnag from these dendretic cells (unknown reason but could be to communicate new viruses to the immune cells in the lungs)
the covid virus is much more dangerous in the lungs as it can create sharp inflammation, blood clots and cytokine storms (where immune cells go on the rampage)
the pnnba antibodies that bind to virions on the arms of the dendretic cells stop the virion detaching when the dendretic cell travels to the lungs and so reduce the virulence (challenge) of an infection
this means that most of the infection stays in the upper respiratory tract. while there is still an infection, it means that the bulk of the viral load stay in the area that is less susceptible to serious reactions and is better equipped to deal with it.
the covid vaccines are only partially effective, with gives space for the virus to adapt. they also confuse the natural immune system
as the mRNA originated antibodies become more and more ineffective another type of immune cell is sent into fight the infection - cytokine cells
these are very effective but this mobilisation causes a transfer of resources so B Cells (which normally develop and manufacture antibodies) are inactive
the virus then changes to adapting to the cytokline attacks which are directed at proportions of the virus that is not prone to mutation
mutations have been observed in the stable areas in the virus
as a result Bossche expects that there will be another outbreak of covid with a novel strain that the population is unprepared for - it will affect both vaccinated and unvaccinated although the vaccinated immune systems are in worse condition given the chaos produced by the mRNA technology
military analogy:
heavy artillery becomes ineffective as enemy digs in. airburst shells are used which are less effective but suppress enemy attacks. the enemy gets steel helmets and these become less effective over time as they only work against big clumps of troops. the soldiers used as spotters are sent in on a ground attack. this means the artillery no longer has targetting information. this works well for a time but the enemy changes uniform and the soldiers begin to attack friend and foe. the enemy infiltrates into the lines further and these begin to collapse as command receives garbled messages and cannot direct a coherent reponse.
---
There's missing bits above (these are long discussions) but the overall impression I get (although it's never said) is that this mRNA technology is a gain of function technique.
Basically, they put a load of biological warfare scientists into immunology and they have this cool discovery that they want to see what happens when it's used on a large scale.
After all, why would we want to create new dangerous diseases for our own good? Why accelerate and engineer the evolution of hazards? Who does this? Do we want more zombie deer or something?
'What does gain of function mean?
Any organism can acquire a new ability or property, or "gain" a "function." This can happen through natural selection or a researcher's experiments. In research, many different types of experiments generate functions, and some pose certain safety and security concerns.
Scientists use a variety of techniques to modify organisms depending on the properties of the organism itself and the end goal. Some of these methods involve directly making changes at the level of genetic code. Others may involve placing organisms in environments that select for functions linked to genetic changes.'
What is 'gain-of-function' and why does it matter in the search for SARS-CoV-2's origins? - Phys.org
It'll probably all be fine though.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
kirschsubstack.com
delingpole.podbean.com
newsaddicts.com
