A
A Man Called Charolais
Guest
Yeah of course it's a problem. While it seems to be mostly confined to the social sciences I'm not going to pretend it's not a problem elsewhere.
But that's the point in a way....the scientific process has helped to shed light on this.
There is additional self correcting aspects - anything that has potential commercial applications will have an attempt at replication. Hence the comments on the video about cancer research.
The problem is that there really is nowhere enough money going into research, so they really only get one shot to run their research or experiment once.(I have a cousin who is a PhD researcher now in Australia, and she struggles with cost of living. She should have gone into investment banking).
If its interesting they publish. And why not? If its really interesting someone will attempt to replicate. If the result can't be replicated, that's the end of the road.
There's a definite distinction then between the soft and hard sciences. Hard science is really something that can be monetised and comes with risk, it's going to get checked at some point. Cos someone WILL pay if its badly wrong. And yes, sometimes it does.
The scientific method is nothing more than to try to put some fail safes around the fact we are human, with bias, limited resources, massive egos and prone to group think. It's value is always evident in the medium to long term.
It's not cheating, it's "exploration".
Climate science can be monetised through government grants, subsidies, retooling mandates and confiscations. Bet there's a lot of regret for the whole COVID thing now - lifted the lid really.
'Data strongly indicates that other natural and social sciences are affected as well.[5]'
ibid