Ukraine.

bormotello

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2023
Messages
823
Reaction score
1,286
You know the primary purpose of the Maginot line was to slow down any invading German forces in those sectors so that the French had time to mobilise forces.
Actually not. The main purpose of the Maginot line was to force Germans to invade through Belgium where allies could give them a battle.
Even attack on Fort Eben-Emael where 80 German paratroopers captured the most heavily fortified fort in Europe with 1500 troops inside, was only to convince French that Germany was following Schlieffen's plan and force them to move their main forces to Belgium leaving most of France unprotected
Avdeevka had a similar purpose to force the Russian army to go through a deadly trap between Avdeevka and Opytnoe

And the Germans avoided those fixed defenses by attacking at Sedan, cutting off British and French armies and assuring the defeat of France.
And to that Germans had to break through Maginot Line. In France, you can still see remains of Fort La Ferte which have been destroyed by the German Army on the way to France. This is a problem of defense lines - you don't need to break all of them, one-two could be enough to make the whole defense line useless.
Because attacking fixed defences ensures very high casualties on the attackers, slows down the advance so that defenders have time to bring up their own reserves and defend in depth. In short, its dumb.

Actually I'm wrong. You're right. Russia really should do more Avdiivkas (y)(y)(y):cool:
Russia lost in Avdeevka much less men than Ukraine in poorly fortified Rabotino and the Ukrainian defense line collapsed mostly because Russian Army didn't have a shortage of shells and bombs
Plus Ukrainians cannot shell Donetsk easily
 

bormotello

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2023
Messages
823
Reaction score
1,286

I wonder where the RU reserve is? :unsure:
Any photos or videos to prove such a claim about 1000's killed or it is just usual Western propaganda
BTW, so far I couldn't find a report from the Russian side that Krasnogorovka has been taken by the Russian army, only reports that some units are close to the outskirts
This is video from today that Krasnogorovka is still under heavy shelling

View: https://t.me/nm_dnr/11854
 

jpc

Moderator
Staff member
Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2022
Messages
3,294
Reaction score
4,570
I read a good observation wrt Macrons and now the Dutch defence ministers EU troops in the Ukraine.
None of these effete pricks have lived in the real world.
Haven't experienced physical danger.
They simply don't have a fucking clue personally about the consequences.
And the consequences for all the people they want to send.
Moron middle management.
Soundbites aren't going to cut it against a street fighter.
 

Mad as Fish

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
4,318
Reaction score
5,907
I read a good observation wrt Macrons and now the Dutch defence ministers EU troops in the Ukraine.
None of these effete pricks have lived in the real world.
Haven't experienced physical danger.
They simply don't have a fucking clue personally about the consequences.
And the consequences for all the people they want to send.
Moron middle management.
Soundbites aren't going to cut it against a street fighter.
Remember how all those coffins were paraded before us during the covid event? I bet we won't see the same when a much larger number of soldiers are in them.
 

nobody knows I'm a dog

Well-known member
New
Joined
Jan 26, 2024
Messages
260
Reaction score
306
I find this odd, really.

I can right this very minute buy a set of thermal/night vision goggles with a solid IP rating for under 1K AUD$. It's the sort of tech that should be affordable.
That's good how one can buy such useful equipment cheaply in Ozzyland. I could have taken this up wrong, but I believe such things can't be bought by Joe and Mary Civillian here in Eire.
 

bormotello

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2023
Messages
823
Reaction score
1,286
I was only speculating that they are using missiles rather than guns. The use of Harriers suggest that guns are an option. Missiles would be used to thin a large mob of drone with the remainder being shot down. These are V1s remember.
British used spitfires against V1, which had a similar speed range and a lot of guns.
For jets using cannons is a challenge due fast approach from the back on shooting distance
Ukraine lost 2 jets when engines from an exploded drone simply flew into a jet

View: https://twitter.com/THEEURASIATIMES/status/1642127191835303936



In any case, the Americans have a large inventory of sidewinders and a smaller inventory of ship air defense missiles which are more appropriate to anti-ship missiles.
In the age of 5th Gen fighters active radar missiles (or Fox-3s, Amrams) are mostly used with Fox-2s only used in extremis as engagements are long range and evasive manoeuvres against infrared tech are more effective. Of course I'm not a military aviation expert or anything.
Regarding IR-guided missiles drones can be easily modified to reduce IR footprint and you don't need any super technology or massive investment to do that
First, take exhaust into pipes going under the bottom of the wing to cool down gases
Second, make a thermal shield around the engine and spread hot air into sides
It will reduce power output and range, but the jets will have to go close to the drone to lock IR seeker warhead and if it will be minimal shooting range, then missile won't be able to fire
See how it is done on Israeli Hermes UAV and compare it to Houthis drones with open engine from lawnmowers
3356966115_c7d2fb47e0_c.jpg

Note the rapid reply when you saw that I was online. What sort of software are you using? How's the desk job treating you?
If 12 hours between your post and my reply is a rapid response
dntknw.gif
 
Last edited:

Mad as Fish

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
4,318
Reaction score
5,907
British used spitfires against V1, which had a similar speed range and a lot of guns.
For jets using cannons is a challenge due fast approach from the back on shooting distance
Ukraine lost 2 jets when engines from an exploded drone simply flew into a jet

View: https://twitter.com/THEEURASIATIMES/status/1642127191835303936




Regarding IR-guided missiles drones can be easily modified to reduce IR footprint and you don't need any super technology or massive investment to do that
First, take exhaust into pipes going under the bottom of the wing to cool down gases
Second, make a thermal shield around the engine and spread hot air into sides
It will reduce power output and range, but the jets will have to go close to the drone to lock IR seeker warhead and if it will be minimal shooting range, then missile won't be able to fire


If 12 hours between your post and my reply is a rapid response View attachment 4514

I believe that being hit by debris was also a problem for the Spitfires, so the RAF developed the habit of flying alongside and tipping them over with their wingtips, this upset their gyroscopes and they would plunge groundwards before reaching their target.
 
A

A Man Called Charolais

Guest
British used spitfires against V1, which had a similar speed range and a lot of guns.
For jets using cannons is a challenge due fast approach from the back on shooting distance
Ukraine lost 2 jets when engines from an exploded drone simply flew into a jet

View: https://twitter.com/THEEURASIATIMES/status/1642127191835303936




Regarding IR-guided missiles drones can be easily modified to reduce IR footprint and you don't need any super technology or massive investment to do that
First, take exhaust into pipes going under the bottom of the wing to cool down gases
Second, make a thermal shield around the engine and spread hot air into sides
It will reduce power output and range, but the jets will have to go close to the drone to lock IR seeker warhead and if it will be minimal shooting range, then missile won't be able to fire
See how it is done on Israeli Hermes UAV and compare it to Houthis drones with open engine from lawnmowers
View attachment 4515

If 12 hours between your post and my reply is a rapid response View attachment 4514


Interesting reply, thank you.

The tweet is from this report that Mad as Fish referred to above. Looks like the aircraft was speeding through the object it destroyed as it had to be close to fix on the target.

Aircraft that perform better at lower speeds (ca. 100 mph) appear to be a better option than high speed jets - that's why I suggested AT-802U Sky Wardens as they could be landed and resupplied anywhere (the Americans also have a few spare). Maybe attack helicopters would also work. The objective here is to defend cities from random bombardment by flying bombs.

As for the missiles - I don't know much about their capabilities. The design of the nozzles on the newer jets do shield the exhausts, which apparently is effective, so what you suggest sounds plausible. Missiles that are guided onto the target by the attacking aircraft (Fox-1s, an Aim-7 Sparrow for example) would overcome this shielding. That said, I'm no expert. The Russians do have a sophisticated military aerospace industry so you'd have better sources to refer to than I do.

Just a note on bombing cities - this was tried during WW2 in order to break civilian morale. It never worked and V1s were only deployed as a Wunderwaffe once it wasn't possible to conduct bombing raids on Britain anymore, and only served to soothe the nerves of command rather than effect any useful military advantage. The Ukrainians have gotten through another winter, albeit with a bleak spring and summer ahead of them.

I'd prefer a reasonable peace was agreed, I've no wish to see the further death or maiming of either Russians or Ukrainians.
 

bormotello

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2023
Messages
823
Reaction score
1,286
Interesting reply, thank you.

The tweet is from this report that Mad as Fish referred to above. Looks like the aircraft was speeding through the object it destroyed as it had to be close to fix on the target.

Aircraft that perform better at lower speeds (ca. 100 mph) appear to be a better option than high speed jets - that's why I suggested AT-802U Sky Wardens as they could be landed and resupplied anywhere (the Americans also have a few spare). Maybe attack helicopters would also work. The objective here is to defend cities from random bombardment by flying bombs.
You cannot put radar on single-engine aircraft and twin-engine interceptors like Me-110 are not produced anymore
Attack helicopters are more promising, but Ukraine will need a few hundred of them to cover all directions
Russia is using attack helicopters to destroy Ukrainian drones
looks like the armor on them, designed to withstand .50cal, is enough to protect from debris

View: https://twitter.com/narrative_hole/status/1698687298265628795

But is a very expensive option to keep enough of them in the air
Plus Ukraine doesn't have such types of helicopters, Mi-24 is too big, and Apache or Tiger hardly will be shipped to Ukraine

As for the missiles - I don't know much about their capabilities. The design of the nozzles on the newer jets do shield the exhausts, which apparently is effective, so what you suggest sounds plausible. Missiles that are guided onto the target by the attacking aircraft (Fox-1s, an Aim-7 Sparrow for example) would overcome this shielding. That said, I'm no expert. The Russians do have a sophisticated military aerospace industry so you'd have better sources to refer to than I do.
Aim-7 Sparrow doesn't guide from the plane - it has semi-active radar homing system which means that lightning radar is placed on the plane and the missile has only a receiver with antenna. This approach saves a lot of power required for missile, but doesn't solve the main problem - the small footprint of drones on radar because only the engine can reflect something back. The rest of the drone is made from plastic and invisible to radar
So far S-300 which also has semi-active homing system wasn't very successful against cheap drones despite more powerful radar

Just a note on bombing cities - this was tried during WW2 in order to break civilian morale. It never worked and V1s were only deployed as a Wunderwaffe once it wasn't possible to conduct bombing raids on Britain anymore, and only served to soothe the nerves of command rather than effect any useful military advantage. The Ukrainians have gotten through another winter, albeit with a bleak spring and summer ahead of them.

I'd prefer a reasonable peace was agreed, I've no wish to see the further death or maiming of either Russians or Ukrainians.
It is nothing about morale, Russia is targeting mostly ammo storages within cities
Most of the damage you see in Western propaganda is the result of ground-to-air missiles losing their targets and hitting residential buildings
This is a price what Ukrainian pays for hiding launchers inside residential areas
 

Mad as Fish

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
4,318
Reaction score
5,907
I'm not sure French troops would go and fight Russians in Ukraine for dirty little macron
Perhaps the French generals might explain to him that sending troops to fight an army with two years experience on the ground, which has learnt to blow up the much hyped MIA2 tank, can recapture the most fortified towns and has an industry already geared up for arms production is not the brightest idea. Just how many troops does he intend to commit and just what is it that they are supposed to achieve?

The usual political spin, bluster and bullshit won't cut it with the top brass.
 
Last edited:
A

A Man Called Charolais

Guest
You cannot put radar on single-engine aircraft and twin-engine interceptors like Me-110 are not produced anymore
Attack helicopters are more promising, but Ukraine will need a few hundred of them to cover all directions
Russia is using attack helicopters to destroy Ukrainian drones
looks like the armor on them, designed to withstand .50cal, is enough to protect from debris

View: https://twitter.com/narrative_hole/status/1698687298265628795

But is a very expensive option to keep enough of them in the air
Plus Ukraine doesn't have such types of helicopters, Mi-24 is too big, and Apache or Tiger hardly will be shipped to Ukraine


Aim-7 Sparrow doesn't guide from the plane - it has semi-active radar homing system which means that lightning radar is placed on the plane and the missile has only a receiver with antenna. This approach saves a lot of power required for missile, but doesn't solve the main problem - the small footprint of drones on radar because only the engine can reflect something back. The rest of the drone is made from plastic and invisible to radar
So far S-300 which also has semi-active homing system wasn't very successful against cheap drones despite more powerful radar


It is nothing about morale, Russia is targeting mostly ammo storages within cities
Most of the damage you see in Western propaganda is the result of ground-to-air missiles losing their targets and hitting residential buildings
This is a price what Ukrainian pays for hiding launchers inside residential areas


These would be relatively inexpensive aircraft that would be guided onto the target by air control, it would require skill alright but they could probably swing it. The debris question was undoubtedly an issue when propeller driver aircraft were the standard fare and I'm not sure that it's not a red herring given the numerous dogfights in those days. The significant problem with the jet aircraft is that they're moving so fast that they zip through the debris field - a Harrier or Sky Warden wouldn't have that problem as they could loiter at lower speeds.

Running a few attack helicopters near large urban areas would be cheaper than expending patriot missiles on drones; propeller driven aircraft could be used further out to reduce numbers of incoming. It's about running an effective air defense on a tight budget. I realise that there's a lot of graft involved so there's pressure to run it like the RHI scheme but needs must given constraints. An alternative is to shrug their shoulders and let them through.

It would also keep some Ukrainian pilots alive and doing something useful. There's a habit in Eastern Europe of needing the fill the numbers of killed and injured for the monthly report that might be diverted into a more constructive management of field assets.

I take your point about the Sparrow (Fox 1) but the aircraft has to keep its radar on and directed at the target so it plays an indispensable role. It essentially guides the missile onto the target like a laser designator for smart munitions. This makes it a less desirable armament on the contemporary battlefield for engagements other than those relating to the shooting down of crippled or soft targets. The Americans also have a lot of these in storage and I'm pretty certain that, if they're within 10 miles, they have a firm lock on them. One USMC pilot managed to get seven intercepts so it must be feasible.

In any case, there still is a Ukrainian air force and, given the pressure they're under to make irrational decisions to maximise the skim for the "bosses" (in the same manner that operates in the Russian forces) they've done very well. The more I elaborate on this subject, the more likely I am to propose something that would be evidently ridiculous to them. I'll leave it to them to figure out. The only benefit I could make is to coax the politicals to take a more creative approach and it's unlikely that this conversation is going to be picked up by the international press so it's more of an exercise in curiosity than anything else.

As for the "firing rockets from power stations in Kiev" line - is that something like the bridge you have for sale?
 

Wolf

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2023
Messages
8,859
Reaction score
7,960
The terrorists in Washington are determined to bring us to WW3, they'll push Russia to the brink.
Pedo Biden needs a serious war in this election year.

 
Z

Zipporah's Flint

Guest

Wolf

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2023
Messages
8,859
Reaction score
7,960
Should he ever have the misfortune to stumble across your wittering he might well reconsider that assessment.
One really has to wonder why Comical Jarry continues to post his bullshit on our site.
There's definitely a want in that pedo.
After banning all accounts and almost destroying our site the question should be asked as to why @Declan has allowed it to return.
Are things that desperate that he allows a saboteur who continues to slate him and this site on the shitsite with Gowl & Co back to pollute this place with its inane scutter?
 

valamhic

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2022
Messages
1,828
Reaction score
811
The cocaine addicted transvestite is off on another begging tour this week.:p

I reckon they are firing small and large guns just to make noise. Bank away whether there is a target or not.
Wasting ammo. Like if I fire the gun at nothing to kill grey crows.
 

valamhic

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2022
Messages
1,828
Reaction score
811

Wolf

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2023
Messages
8,859
Reaction score
7,960
Your idea of reality hardly accords with how the majority of the population experiences it.
Even 'Sparks' on the shitsite has told it where to go. :ROFLMAO:

Meanwhile, even the American puppets in Europe have told The Frog where to go too......


What's with the surrender monkeys getting all uppity these days? They weren't long putting up the white flag when the German Nazis were advancing back in the day, now they're supporting Uki Nazis too.:ROFLMAO:
 

Mad as Fish

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
4,318
Reaction score
5,907
The delusions continue.

RTE appear to be adopting a bunker mentality, the more its favourite toys are knocked the harder it doubles down on them. It's not at all a healthy situation, but that is the consequence of crawling up their own arses beyond the point of no return.
 
Last edited:

Myles O'Reilly

Well-known member
New
Joined
Feb 3, 2022
Messages
7,108
Reaction score
5,474
We don't need Putin for that

Putin plans to flood West with migrants​


Russia is using private militias to control and “weaponise” immigration into Europe, The Telegraph can reveal.

The Kremlin has influence over a number of the main routes into the continent and border police are warning that, with the arrival of spring, Russia is likely to “intensify” its efforts to move migrants.

It has been widely feared that Vladimir Putin is using the tactic to destabilise Europe.

 

Wolf

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2023
Messages
8,859
Reaction score
7,960
We don't need Putin for that

Putin plans to flood West with migrants​


Russia is using private militias to control and “weaponise” immigration into Europe, The Telegraph can reveal.

The Kremlin has influence over a number of the main routes into the continent and border police are warning that, with the arrival of spring, Russia is likely to “intensify” its efforts to move migrants.

It has been widely feared that Vladimir Putin is using the tactic to destabilise Europe.

Yep.
Russia isn't going to destroy itself by allowing the importation of the feral dregs of humanity.
Fair play to them.
The goons who support the Uki Nazis and the Israeli Jew Nazis continually fail to understand the consequences of that support, i.e the displacement of human dirt into the west.
 

Mad as Fish

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
4,318
Reaction score
5,907

Err... What's your point?

Russia was indeed worried about an expanding NATO presence to its west, and rightly so, as confirmed by Merkel, NATO has since shot its load all over Ukraine while not formally getting involved and now stands impotent.

In a way Putin has done the West a favour, demonstrating that it is not to be messed with before the Yanks tried it on, via NATO, and getting a proper beating.
 
Last edited:

Wolf

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2023
Messages
8,859
Reaction score
7,960
Its incredible how scared the mods are here.
Even your buddy 'Sparky', or 'David has been banned', detests odious little tosspots like you, Wank, as can be seen by this reply to you this morning on the shitsite.

"lol.. Let me guess, your kid has frizzy hair and a eh, all-year tan, doesn't look anything like you?

So not only do you want her to be a tranny (because gay is "boring").. you want her to have multiple identity crises.. You people (self-loathing, white) leftards truly are the most fucked-up people on the planet."


Even the Gowl detests you....and that's really saying something.:ROFLMAO:

The moderators here are well wise to your goal of shutting down our site. You tried before and got sitebanned for it, why you're allowed back is beyond all of us here.
 
Last edited:

Wolf

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2023
Messages
8,859
Reaction score
7,960
LOL. Surely the Uki's need all they can harvest to feed their own?



Are EU member states calling for embargo's and sanctions on Ukraine now?:unsure:
 
Last edited:

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Top Bottom