Is the Left the only resistance against the Jews?

Do you think people are stupid, your "race realism" is obviously a modern rebrand of scientific racism.
Race realism is the truth about race.

The only overlap with scientific racism is race denialism, race realism being the opposite.

Race realism has nothing to do with the Nazis or any policy forthcoming.

Your "race realism" relies on the same fundamental premises that underpinned the Nazi era of scientific racism, i.e. biological determinism, claiming that human "races" are fixed, biologically distinct sub-species.
You both put these "races" in hierarchical ranking, claimimg that genetic differences dictate disparities in intelligence, behaviour, and civilization-building capabilities, etc.

True or false?
Of course it's true. How else can you explain it?
 
Yes, the measure of your "truth" being "science", just the same as Nazis claimed the same. I.e. It was (pseudo) "science" that "proved" it for them.

In other news, that David Miller stuff is old news, he's doing a circuit, getting paid for "lawfare". E.g. The below from October 2024.


Granted here again we see the UK state leading the way, corroborating a guy who dresses up antisemitism as "scholarship" for pay - paid by the very same people who also paid a man to slice a knife through Salman Rushdie's throat. A mediocrity whose academic forte is dressing up classic antisemitic conspiracy tropes as critical research and academic sociology and getting paid for it.

Ask yourself who this is really a win for. Is it a win for the UK and the values they once upheld?

"The truth" etc. etc.
 
Yes, the measure of your "truth" being "science", just the same as Nazis claimed the same. I.e. It was (pseudo) "science" that "proved" it for them.
Race as a biological reality is science. And that is obviously based on genetic difference.

Are you saying that someone like Richard Dawkins is a pseudoscientist?

In other news, that David Miller stuff is old news, he's doing a circuit, getting paid for "lawfare". E.g. The below from October 2024.


Granted here again we see the UK state leading the way, corroborating a guy who dresses up antisemitism as "scholarship" for pay - paid by the very same people who also paid a man to slice a knife through Salman Rushdie's throat. A mediocrity whose academic forte is dressing up classic antisemitic conspiracy tropes as critical research and academic sociology and getting paid for it.

Ask yourself who this is really a win for. Is it a win for the UK and the values they once upheld?

"The truth" etc. etc.
 
Are you saying that someone like Richard Dawkins is a pseudoscientist?
Again, Jambo, read this slowly this time, Richard Dawkins does not posit racial categories as useful proxies for genetic diversity. He continually strives to communicate to the layman the fact that racial categories are extremely weak proxies for genetic diversity in humans.

Have you not heard him say for instance that when you move from visual differences to biological differences that you are moving from a defensible proxy to dealing with a very weak proxy?

Can you not grasp with that tiny binary mind of yours that the fact genetic differences between races are swamped by an order of magnitude by the genetic diversity that occurs within races, sounds the death knell for your rebranded theory?
 
Again, Jambo, read this slowly this time, Richard Dawkins does not posit racial categories as useful proxies for genetic diversity. He continually strives to communicate to the layman the fact that racial categories are extremely weak proxies for genetic diversity in humans.

Have you not heard him say for instance that when you move from visual differences to biological differences that you are moving from a defensible proxy to dealing with a very weak proxy?

Can you not grasp with that tiny binary mind of yours that the fact genetic differences between races are swamped by an order of magnitude by the genetic diversity that occurs within races, sounds the death knell for your rebranded theory?
Good God, you're so tiresome..

Dawkins says that race is a biological reality -

Post in thread 'Andrew Gold Tackles The Taboo Topic Of Race Realism' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.co...-taboo-topic-of-race-realism.1152/post-167563

And that reality can only be based on genetic difference.
 
FFS. Yes it is tiresome, Jambo.

How about a picture, maybe that would help?

POPULATION A (e.g., European) └───■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■───┘
POPULATION B (e.g., East Asian) └───■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■───┘
POPULATION C (e.g., African) └───■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■───┘
..................................................◄───────────────────────────►
..................................................Total Human Genetic Space
 
Again we should get back on topic.

@The Equalizer on another thread said that the "Counter-Jihad" movement is a Jewish one, I would not say that, what I would say is that it is a movement dominated by people I believe to be Jewish Supremacists. Similarly if we look at the anti-Jewish politics of most of the 20 th century they were driven by the fact the early Bolshevik government of the USSR was dominated by people from Jewish backgrounds, that wealthy Jewish capitalists were counter-intuitively willing to help the Bolsheviks financially and the incredibly brutal way that Trotsky, one of the most Jewish of the early Bolsheviks from Jewish backgrounds, as head of the Red Army waged the Russian civil war.

People have become so used to calling the Left "antisemitic" that this whole chapter of history has been largely forgotten not least amongst many types of Jews themselves.

However according to files recently released from James Angleton who US Intelligence between 1954 and 1975- "According to Angelton, his Jewish assets were responsible for 22,000 reports on the USSR, generating several intelligence masterstrokes. Chief among them was the publication of Soviet Prime Minister Nikita Kruschev’s famous 1956 secret speech denouncing Stalin, which the spymaster boasted “practically created revolutions in Hungary and Poland.” Elsewhere, Angleton bragged that his arrangement with Israel had produced “500 Polish intelligence officers who were Jewish” who “knew more about Polish intelligence than the Poles.” ( https://thegrayzone.com/2025/08/15/cias-angleton-israeli-spy-ring-files/ ).
 
So now the antisemitic morons are now trying to breathe new life back into the old "Judeo-Bolshevism" conspiracy theories.

Conspiracy theories that formed part of the rationale for what was done to them last century and since clearly shown up as having been spurious.

I.e. They were never a majority or in control of the Bolshevik party (while being somewhat disproportionately represented among certain left-wing intellectual circles due to other factors which also need to be considered carefully).

Anyway this antisemitic conspiracy falsely claimed that Jewish people engineered the 1917 revolution, controlled the Soviet Union, were using communism as a tool to attack the West, that Bolshevism was not a political movement, but a racial and religious Jewish design aimed at global domination, involving global Jewish cabals, along lines of the Protocols, etc.

And quelle surprise, we hearing again the same type of stuff, from the same quarters.

Well at least the Jews have Israel this time round and are ready to fight and protect themselves from it.
 
I.e. They were never a majority or in control of the Bolshevik party (while being somewhat disproportionately represented among certain left-wing intellectual circles due to other factors which also need to be considered carefully).

No one ever claimed that they were a majority in the Party. Jews and people from Jewish backgrounds were though a significant majority of the leadership- and even Yuri Slezkine admitted this. For some of them such as Trotsky their Jewish identity was both formative and important to them, others might well have actually been "self-hating Jews" (which were a real phenomena at a juncture of history but which really do not exist anymore unless you are going to count Gilad Atzmon).

I would not interpret the facts in the manner that Professor Revilo Oliver, Professor Herman de Vries de Heekelingen and Louis-Ferdinand Celine to name but three however I do believe that the traditional Jewish attitudes between peasants, particularly Christian ones, coloured the manner in which Trotsky conducted the Civil War. Also I would argue that this early dominating position did not last (though the USSR never became anti-Jewish) and it was people like Vadim Kisin who came to benfit most from the suicide of the Soviet Union.

You are correct though that the Jewish participation in the leadership of the October Revolution and early Soviet Union played a large role in anti-Jewish sentiment during the 20 th century.

Do you have any thoughts on the topic of Jews and the Left? My understanding is that you hold to a similar position to Rabbi Meir Kahane that the association of Jews with the Left was a historical anomaly and that intrinsically the Left is anti-Jewish?
 
Boy George taken down by Islamist Nutters ! ! !

Boy George splits from label manager over pro-Israel song​




https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.zenfs.com%2Fen%2Fthe_telegraph_818%2F4cf6103c425125d10967e6f697bf5720


 
Interesting that Green Party types are now publicly noticing double standards and hypocrisy that previously were only pointed out by people like Justin Barrett.

"Interesting" yeah.

"Interesting", that they're now "noticing" the same things that idiot dwarf far right Nazis notice?

Of course the likes of Roderic O'Gorman and Hazel Chu have long been the yin to Justin Barrett's yang.

Sure didn't the Irish Green party only recently send its senior figures including Chu and O'Gorman to help the UK Green party in that Manchester by-election?

Where they helped them to come up with a campaign featuring "a major alliance with The Muslim Vote"...

And with the bright idea of Muslim ‘family voting.’ (Involving umbrella groups linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and 'Mend' - Muslim Engagement and Development).

Then up in Scotland you have Manivannan, another he/her trans Green, going all in on Muslim ethics and publicly saying that serial rapists are "demonised" in society and that rape is a "spectrum" etc.

Other Green councillors trying to launch yet another twenty first century "Zionism is Racism" political motion, and calling for Hamas not to be proscibed etc.

Yet another Green Party councillor charged with assaulting five people including three police officers.

So yeah, isn't it "interesting" that they're "noticing" all the same fucking bullshit that you and freaks the likes of Barrett tend to "notice".

The progressive-Islamist alliance of the Greens...


Now would you ever fuck off you horrible little freak.
 
"Interesting" yeah.

"Interesting", that they're now "noticing" the same things that idiot dwarf far right Nazis notice?
They are not doing that at all.

Moron.

Of course the likes of Roderic O'Gorman and Hazel Chu have long been the yin to Justin Barrett's yang.

Sure didn't the Irish Green party only recently send its senior figures including Chu and O'Gorman to help the UK Green party in Manchester by-election?

Where they helped them to come up with a campaign featuring "a major alliance with The Muslim Vote"...

And with the bright idea of Muslim ‘family voting.’ (Involving umbrella groups linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and 'Mend' - Muslim Engagement and Development).

Then up in Scotland you have Manivannan, another he/her trans Green, going all in on Muslim ethics and publicly saying that serial rapists are "demonised" in society and that rape is a "spectrum" etc.

Other Green councillors trying to launch yet another twenty first century "Zionism is Racism" political motion, and calling for Hamas not to be proscibed etc.

Yet another Green Party councillor charged with assaulting five people including three police officers.

So yeah, isn't it "interesting" that they're "noticing" all the same fucking bullshit that you and freaks the likes of Barrett tend to "notice".

The progressive-Islamist alliance of the Greens...


Now would you ever fuck off you horrible little freak.
 
"Interesting" yeah.

"Interesting", that they're now "noticing" the same things that idiot dwarf far right Nazis notice?

Of course the likes of Roderic O'Gorman and Hazel Chu have long been the yin to Justin Barrett's yang.

Sure didn't the Irish Green party only recently send its senior figures including Chu and O'Gorman to help the UK Green party in that Manchester by-election?

Where they helped them to come up with a campaign featuring "a major alliance with The Muslim Vote"...

And with the bright idea of Muslim ‘family voting.’ (Involving umbrella groups linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and 'Mend' - Muslim Engagement and Development).

Then up in Scotland you have Manivannan, another he/her trans Green, going all in on Muslim ethics and publicly saying that serial rapists are "demonised" in society and that rape is a "spectrum" etc.

Other Green councillors trying to launch yet another twenty first century "Zionism is Racism" political motion, and calling for Hamas not to be proscibed etc.

Yet another Green Party councillor charged with assaulting five people including three police officers.

So yeah, isn't it "interesting" that they're "noticing" all the same fucking bullshit that you and freaks the likes of Barrett tend to "notice".

The progressive-Islamist alliance of the Greens...


Now would you ever fuck off you horrible little freak.

It should be noted here that the Green Party in England is led by a man who strongly identifies as Jewish and is a militant homosexualist. On some issues I strongly agree with the Green Party but on other things I strongly disagree with them. I would not vote for them because their drawbacks are too large. The fact that so many Muslims are willing to compromise and vote for the Green Party shows that they are far from being militant Islamists.
 
A perfect example of an anti-white anti-semite..

The term anti-Semite only makes sense if you are using it for someone who has a racial and/or ethnic animus against Jews as such. I would assume she has no problem with Jews like Rivkah Brown and Barnaby Raine. Is she anti-White? I do think that a person can be against the group they belong to, for instance you have women who are anti-women like Pearl Davis and a lot of Blacks will claim that characters like Jesse Lee Peterson are anti-Black (not without reason but I do not want to get dragged into that debate); but does she go obsessively about Whites as Whites in a negative manner? Also just because someone is anti-White does not mean that they have necessarily nothing valid to say about Whites, same goes with people who are anti-Black in regards to Blacks.
 
Indeed.

And we've been here before, many times.

Remember in twentieth century antisemitism, that Michael Davitt and John Redmond stood alone - they were the only two figures of political standing in Ireland to speak out against what was happening:

‘I protest as an Irishman and as a Catholic against the barbarous malignancy of antisemitism which is being introduced into Ireland under the pretended regard for the welfare of the Irish people.’ (Davitt).

Note in the above too, that idiot Irish antisemites even back then were using their catholicism as cover, and their "patriotism".

Just like the idiots on this site and further afield.

But as I've said before, antisemitism is a mass stupidity, a mass psychosis.

In this regard I have studied the route of viral transmission that has infected the likes of yourself (through internet carriers like Morgosh, Collet, Woods).

Not forgetting it was ultimately the USSR that presented "Zionism" as a global conspiracy—imperialist, colonialist, Nazi-like, racist, and genocidal, where Zionists were depicted as both subhuman and all-powerful - as parasitic, predatory perpetrators of atrocities, violent vermin who possessed the ability to control the world and hold Western societies in their grip.

But you are right, it has spread further.

We see for instance on our streets today open support for terrorism, disguised as a protest for “human rights.”

We witness everyday tolerance and normalising of antisemitism. Even "normies" now are listening to the disgraceful Hamas propaganda that Owen Jones puts out, with his token Jews as "evidence".

And the dumb students are joined by those old enough to know better, all proudly and loudly intoning thehir chant that <Israel commits genocide>.

No doubt either that self righteousness is currently turning to overt hatred.

I would say that's because they notice for instance that the Lancet papers claiming hundreds of thousands dead, the IPC and UN panels loaded with anti-Israel activists claiming famine and genocide, have now been conclusively disproven.

They notice that the population of Gaza actually increased since the war began, and that only a comparatively tiny proportion of non-combatants died.

They are disturbed by the fact that all the made-up testimony and faked x-rays by doctors taken to Gaza by Hamas charities, the staged vids, AI images and beheaded doll photos, put out by Hamas, was all obviously bullshit.

They are realising that the “Gaza genocide” was the greatest fucking hoax of all time, enabled by social media, antisemitism, and their own gullibility.

So they have moved onto hatred to protect their fragile egos. The alternative is to face up to their own sheer fucking idiocy:

Sunday Times | How Iran is spreading disinformation in Britain

Written evidence submitted by the Community Security Trust | Iran promotes antisemitism as a component of its foreign policy. This includes conspiratorial definition of Zionists


The Propaganda of Iran and its Proxies | A study on the cross-group cohesion of Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas



higgins.jpg


That prick is no Michael Davitt or John Redmond.

In fact such is the state of our Irish civilisation that we don't even have one like them.

So here we are.

Again.
 
That prick is no Michael Davitt.
What because he's not a racist?


Nevertheless, of all his writings, The Boer Fight for Freedom (1902) has aged the least well; despite Davitt's concern for other indigenous peoples, he accepted the Boer narrative that Black Africans were "savages". - Wiki
 
What because he's not a racist?


Nevertheless, of all his writings, The Boer Fight for Freedom (1902) has aged the least well; despite Davitt's concern for other indigenous peoples, he accepted the Boer narrative that Black Africans were "savages". - Wiki

He was also deeply racist against Christian Russians- discovering that was a real black pill for me.
 
In Davitt's time todays "anti-racism" was not the cover for left antisemitism as it is today.

I.e. That is the left's cover today. - They are "anti-racists" and that is what we must focus on, etc.

Whereas in the prior antisemitism in Ireland it was much different.

The following flyer for instance gives a good idea of how antisemites were able to think well of themselves back then:

GJLpOBfXAAAfinK


It was a much different social and political context.

Antisemitism always bases itself precisely within the prevailing social and political context.
 
In Davitt's time todays "anti-racism" was not the cover for left antisemitism as it is today.
You're pathetic

I.e. That is the left's cover today. - They are "anti-racists" and that is what we must focus on, etc.

Whereas in the prior antisemitism in Ireland it was much different.

The following flyer for instance gives a good idea of how antisemites were able to think well of themselves back then:

GJLpOBfXAAAfinK


It was a much different social and political context.

Antisemitism always bases itself precisely within the prevailing social and political context.
 
The term anti-Semite only makes sense if you are using it for someone who has a racial and/or ethnic animus against Jews as such. I would assume she has no problem with Jews like Rivkah Brown and Barnaby Raine. Is she anti-White? I do think that a person can be against the group they belong to, for instance you have women who are anti-women like Pearl Davis and a lot of Blacks will claim that characters like Jesse Lee Peterson are anti-Black (not without reason but I do not want to get dragged into that debate); but does she go obsessively about Whites as Whites in a negative manner? Also just because someone is anti-White does not mean that they have necessarily nothing valid to say about Whites, same goes with people who are anti-Black in regards to Blacks.
I think anyone of her ideology is anti-white. She doesn't care if whites are genocided in their own lands, I'd call that pretty anti-white.

But here's the thing, who made her that way? And now @Roc_ is wailing because she's applying the same to them 🤣
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom