Andrew Gold Tackles The Taboo Topic Of Race Realism

Please note that Dawkins is a renowned biologist and @Haven is a care in the community case.
 
Whats the context?
Ah would you ever cop yourself on, troll.

You said:

"There is no biological backing for the ideas of races or human subspecies."

You also posted a video of Dawkins contradicting your statement.

I'm asking you why you did that (the latter). Is it because you're retarded?
 
Its pseudoscience.

If races were a "real" biological thing, you'd expect them to work kind of like animal breeds.....clear categories where members of one group share a specific set of traits that clearly separate them from another group. Like how a Chihuahua and a Great Dane are pretty obviously different "types" of dog. Remember your German Shepard AI post?

When human DNA is examined however they see no clear lines. If you traveled slowly from, say, Nigeria to Egypt to Turkey to Germany, the DNA of people along that path changes little by little the whole way. There's no spot where you can say "okay, HERE is where one race stops and the next one starts." It's all one long gradual blend, not separate chunks.
Even then, people in the same "race" can be more different from each other than people in different "races." Two people who'd both get called "White" could actually have more genetic differences between them than one of them has compared to someone called "Asian." That breaks the whole idea of race being a tight genetic package.
I always find it hilarious that race deniers use the reality of race to deny the reality of race 🤣

Specific big boxes labeled "race" don't match how genes are actually organized. It's more like humanity is one long, blended spectrum, and race is a label people put on top of it — not something built into the DNA itself.

Lets discuss something real instead.

Derrick Bell is a great place to restart the thread.
 
Ah would you ever cop yourself on, troll.

You said:

"There is no biological backing for the ideas of races or human subspecies."

You also posted a video of Dawkins contradicting your statement.

I'm asking you why you did that (the latter). Is it because you're retarded?
Woah.

I'm asking the context as you have repeatedly done before.
 
Woah.

I'm asking the context as you have repeatedly done before.
Yes, because there wasn't any context to your questions. Which was actually subsequently confirmed.

Here, the context is clear as day, troll.
 
You were given the opportunity to provide some context, you didn't, you're just brainfarting.
You're just repeating the truths I've told about you as lies about me. This is low IQ, spastic behaviour that I'm quite familiar with (Gowl).

Once again, I ask for the troll to be removed from the thread.
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom