Andrew Gold Tackles The Taboo Topic Of Race Realism

Here’s my honest answer so.

Whichever way I answer gives you what you’re looking for.

And I very much don’t like what you’re looking for, whichever way I answer is intended to feed a poison that you have in you, a viciousness, a hatred, a paranoia of type.

So I’m not going to give you what you want from me. I have a revulsion to you.
 
Surprise, surprise, Myles wants it too.

I answer white woman and I corroborate your racism. I answer black woman and I am a black lover.

I know how you morons work. Always that type of “question”, it’s about the height of any argument you are capable of.

My answer to it is as always, go fuck yourselves.
 
I'm not a racist Sir. And I couldn't give a fiddlers who or what you find attractive. In fact I don't even know what you guys are talking about.

I just don't like cowardice in a man. I've never refused a question in my life.
 
IMG_20260616_212056_142.jpg
 
Shitlib mob go after World Cup referee for innocuous hand gesture.

www.theguardian.com

World Cup official cleared by Fifa and says gesture was ‘subconscious twitch’

Fifa found no evidence Shaun Evans had breached Fifa’s ethics code and he clarified: ‘The movement was an involuntary, subconscious twitch’
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

Anti-discrimination group Fare called for him to be removed from the World Cup.

Advice from our experts is that the gesture used clearly resembles an upside down ‘OK’ hand symbol used as a white power symbol in global far-right circles
 
Roc. said:
Here’s my honest answer so.

Whichever way I answer gives you what you’re looking for.

And I very much don’t like what you’re looking for, whichever way I answer is intended to feed a poison that you have in you, a viciousness, a hatred, a paranoia of type.

So I’m not going to give you what you want from me. I have a revulsion to you.
Click to expand...
Roc. said:
I answer white woman and I corroborate your racism. I answer black woman and I am a black lover.
Click to expand...
If you said you preferred black women I'd think you're lying or you just have a fetish, which is possible. If you said white women, my point would have been to say that you are more attracted to white women because that is in your nature as a heterosexual white man. It totally okay for you to say "I am more attracted to white women than black women." Hatred is not implicit in this preference.

In the same way, it is natural that people prefer to live in a society of people that are like them, of the same ethnicity. People attracted to their own kind is why we have separate races and cultures in the first place. It's also why immigrants in Ireland form their own local community groups exclusively for their own kind.

Current NCP Members | New Communities Partnership

Current NCP Member Organisations Scroll down to learn more about each of our member organisations. Would you like to register your group as a member of NCP? Then click here to be taken to a sign-up …
www.newcommunities.ie
India.jpg

Roc. said:
I know how you morons work. Always that type of “question”, it’s about the height of any argument you are capable of.

My answer to it is as always, go fuck yourselves.
Click to expand...
This is the Socratic method. Ask a simple question which should yield a simple answer, but you attempt to pre-empt my follow-up and run away because you're afraid your answer will expose a weakness in your position.

Here's another one for you. Think of the top 10 most beautiful women you ever saw in your life. I bet NONE of them are black. Think of your top 100. I just want to rub it in your face that white women are more attractive, or one could say aesthetically superior to black women, and that your own biology agrees, which hopefully annoys you.
 
Hermit said:
If you said you preferred black women I'd think you're lying or you just have a fetish, which is possible. If you said white women, my point would have been to say that you are more attracted to white women because that is in your nature as a heterosexual white man. It totally okay for you to say "I am more attracted to white women than black women." Hatred is not implicit in this preference.

In the same way, it is natural that people prefer to live in a society of people that are like them, of the same ethnicity. People attracted to their own kind is why we have separate races and cultures in the first place. It's also why immigrants in Ireland form their own local community groups exclusively for their own kind.

Current NCP Members | New Communities Partnership

Current NCP Member Organisations Scroll down to learn more about each of our member organisations. Would you like to register your group as a member of NCP? Then click here to be taken to a sign-up …
www.newcommunities.ie
View attachment 9070

This is the Socratic method. Ask a simple question which should yield a simple answer, but you attempt to pre-empt my follow-up and run away because you're afraid your answer will expose a weakness in your position.

Here's another one for you. Think of the top 10 most beautiful women you ever saw in your life. I bet NONE of them are black. Think of your top 100. I just want to rub it in your face that white women are more attractive, or one could say aesthetically superior to black women, and that your own biology agrees, which hopefully annoys you.
Click to expand...
Yes, @Roc. did say that being more attracted to members of your own race, if you're white, is indeed "racism".

He's a sick puppy, that fella, very much a 'progressive'.
 
The Equalizer said:
Yes, @Roc. did say that being more attracted to members of your own race, if you're white, is indeed "racism".
Click to expand...
I said,

"I answer white woman and I corroborate your racism."

Big difference.

To clarify even further, a dogmatist by definition seeks out that which "proves" his dogma.

A dogmatist never looks for that which disproves it.

So that is always the underlying subtext dealing with you chaps. You try to evoke what your dogma requires as "proof", you filter it out of the world, and you leave behind everything which might cause your dogma to collapse.
 
Roc. said:
I said,

"I answer white woman and I corroborate your racism."
Click to expand...
lol WTF is the difference..

If a white man says that they find white women more attractive, or you say it, then that's "racism"? Why do you consider it "racism"? Have you just decided that the (white) person is a racist and whatever they say and think is racism? What kind of an extremist, far left progressive r u?

Roc. said:
Big difference.

To clarify even further, a dogmatist by definition seeks out that which "proves" his dogma.

A dogmatist never looks for that which disproves it.

So that is always the underlying subtext dealing with you chaps. You try to evoke what your dogma requires as "proof", you filter it out of the world, and you leave behind everything which might cause your dogma to collapse.
Click to expand...
 
Returning to Tilly🌹

AS BLABBER mouth @Roc. has been talking about race realism quite a lot lately, I thought it might be a good idea to revisit English rose Tilly's appearance on the Andrew Gold show.

I think there's a few things worth talking about from the section on race realism (timestamped below) -


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QnoMSNSD5R0&t=1h6m30s

To be continued...
 
Btw, if you want to know why @Roc. is so brain dead regarding his retarded "jargon" argument, then I think that you probably need to look no further than the paranoid Jewish shit from his gurus and high priests that he consumes 24/7. And it's the same with everything, really #onetrackmind

Here's a funny one I saw recently -


View: https://t.me/realblaircottrell/7212
 
The Equalizer said:
Returning to Tilly🌹

AS BLABBER mouth @Roc. has been talking about race realism quite a lot lately, I thought it might be a good idea to revisit English rose Tilly's appearance on the Andrew Gold show.

I think there's a few things worth talking about from the section on race realism (timestamped below) -
Click to expand...
The Equalizer said:


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QnoMSNSD5R0&t=1h6m30s

To be continued...
Click to expand...

So, I think the first thing to notice about the clip above is that Tilly says that a multiracial society is objectively good <ends>. No reason given (I can think of a few reasons off the top of my head for why it isn't).

When Gold says that he doesn't actually agree with that, Tilly responds with - Oh yes, the reason being white racists.

Then she moves on to what race deniers think is their killer fact. Here is @Roc. talking about it most recently -

Roc. said:
She's not talking about "whites" (video above was spliced in to try and obscure this).

She's talking about you chaps, specifically.

And she's bloody bang on.

As Jambo likes to say, "on average" you chaps are vastly shown up by black and brown "races". Reason being, obviously, you chaps on here, and those involved in the same type of "activism" - on average, are the dregs of the "white race".
Click to expand...
Roc. said:
This is a nice illustration of what Dawkins means when he says there are more differences within races, than between races.
Click to expand...
Here is a reminder of what Dawkins has said about this -


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=d6SQ3mXzZeI&t=124
 
The Equalizer said:
So, I think the first thing to notice about the clip above is that Tilly says that a multiracial society is objectively good <ends>. No reason given (I can think of a few reasons off the top of my head for why it isn't).

When Gold says that he doesn't actually agree with that, Tilly responds with - Oh yes, the reason being white racists.

Then she moves on to what race deniers think is their killer fact. Here is @Roc. talking about it most recently -



Here is a reminder of what Dawkins has said about this -


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=d6SQ3mXzZeI&t=124
Click to expand...

So, hopefully we've established the following facts:

1. Race is a biological reality meaning there are genetic differences between the races.

2. Most of the genetic variation of the species is contained within the races.

A derivation of that being, as both Tilly and roc agree upon is -

"There are more differences within races, than between races."

Tilly's conclusion is that that tells her that race is "wildly unimportant" <ends>.

Perhaps @Roc_ could share his conclusion here, in the appropriate thread.

Please stick to the facts and avoid repeating the derivation as proof of anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom