Andrew Gold Tackles The Taboo Topic Of Race Realism

Here’s my honest answer so.

Whichever way I answer gives you what you’re looking for.

And I very much don’t like what you’re looking for, whichever way I answer is intended to feed a poison that you have in you, a viciousness, a hatred, a paranoia of type.

So I’m not going to give you what you want from me. I have a revulsion to you.
 
Surprise, surprise, Myles wants it too.

I answer white woman and I corroborate your racism. I answer black woman and I am a black lover.

I know how you morons work. Always that type of “question”, it’s about the height of any argument you are capable of.

My answer to it is as always, go fuck yourselves.
 
I'm not a racist Sir. And I couldn't give a fiddlers who or what you find attractive. In fact I don't even know what you guys are talking about.

I just don't like cowardice in a man. I've never refused a question in my life.
 
IMG_20260616_212056_142.jpg
 
Shitlib mob go after World Cup referee for innocuous hand gesture.

www.theguardian.com

World Cup official cleared by Fifa and says gesture was ‘subconscious twitch’

Fifa found no evidence Shaun Evans had breached Fifa’s ethics code and he clarified: ‘The movement was an involuntary, subconscious twitch’
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

Anti-discrimination group Fare called for him to be removed from the World Cup.

Advice from our experts is that the gesture used clearly resembles an upside down ‘OK’ hand symbol used as a white power symbol in global far-right circles
 
Roc. said:
Here’s my honest answer so.

Whichever way I answer gives you what you’re looking for.

And I very much don’t like what you’re looking for, whichever way I answer is intended to feed a poison that you have in you, a viciousness, a hatred, a paranoia of type.

So I’m not going to give you what you want from me. I have a revulsion to you.
Click to expand...
Roc. said:
I answer white woman and I corroborate your racism. I answer black woman and I am a black lover.
Click to expand...
If you said you preferred black women I'd think you're lying or you just have a fetish, which is possible. If you said white women, my point would have been to say that you are more attracted to white women because that is in your nature as a heterosexual white man. It totally okay for you to say "I am more attracted to white women than black women." Hatred is not implicit in this preference.

In the same way, it is natural that people prefer to live in a society of people that are like them, of the same ethnicity. People attracted to their own kind is why we have separate races and cultures in the first place. It's also why immigrants in Ireland form their own local community groups exclusively for their own kind.

Current NCP Members | New Communities Partnership

Current NCP Member Organisations Scroll down to learn more about each of our member organisations. Would you like to register your group as a member of NCP? Then click here to be taken to a sign-up …
www.newcommunities.ie
India.jpg

Roc. said:
I know how you morons work. Always that type of “question”, it’s about the height of any argument you are capable of.

My answer to it is as always, go fuck yourselves.
Click to expand...
This is the Socratic method. Ask a simple question which should yield a simple answer, but you attempt to pre-empt my follow-up and run away because you're afraid your answer will expose a weakness in your position.

Here's another one for you. Think of the top 10 most beautiful women you ever saw in your life. I bet NONE of them are black. Think of your top 100. I just want to rub it in your face that white women are more attractive, or one could say aesthetically superior to black women, and that your own biology agrees, which hopefully annoys you.
 
Hermit said:
If you said you preferred black women I'd think you're lying or you just have a fetish, which is possible. If you said white women, my point would have been to say that you are more attracted to white women because that is in your nature as a heterosexual white man. It totally okay for you to say "I am more attracted to white women than black women." Hatred is not implicit in this preference.

In the same way, it is natural that people prefer to live in a society of people that are like them, of the same ethnicity. People attracted to their own kind is why we have separate races and cultures in the first place. It's also why immigrants in Ireland form their own local community groups exclusively for their own kind.

Current NCP Members | New Communities Partnership

Current NCP Member Organisations Scroll down to learn more about each of our member organisations. Would you like to register your group as a member of NCP? Then click here to be taken to a sign-up …
www.newcommunities.ie
View attachment 9070

This is the Socratic method. Ask a simple question which should yield a simple answer, but you attempt to pre-empt my follow-up and run away because you're afraid your answer will expose a weakness in your position.

Here's another one for you. Think of the top 10 most beautiful women you ever saw in your life. I bet NONE of them are black. Think of your top 100. I just want to rub it in your face that white women are more attractive, or one could say aesthetically superior to black women, and that your own biology agrees, which hopefully annoys you.
Click to expand...
Yes, @Roc. did say that being more attracted to members of your own race, if you're white, is indeed "racism".

He's a sick puppy, that fella, very much a 'progressive'.
 
The Equalizer said:
Yes, @Roc. did say that being more attracted to members of your own race, if you're white, is indeed "racism".
Click to expand...
I said,

"I answer white woman and I corroborate your racism."

Big difference.

To clarify even further, a dogmatist by definition seeks out that which "proves" his dogma.

A dogmatist never looks for that which disproves it.

So that is always the underlying subtext dealing with you chaps. You try to evoke what your dogma requires as "proof", you filter it out of the world, and you leave behind everything which might cause your dogma to collapse.
 
Roc. said:
I said,

"I answer white woman and I corroborate your racism."
Click to expand...
lol WTF is the difference..

If a white man says that they find white women more attractive, or you say it, then that's "racism"? Why do you consider it "racism"? Have you just decided that the (white) person is a racist and whatever they say and think is racism? What kind of an extremist, far left progressive r u?

Roc. said:
Big difference.

To clarify even further, a dogmatist by definition seeks out that which "proves" his dogma.

A dogmatist never looks for that which disproves it.

So that is always the underlying subtext dealing with you chaps. You try to evoke what your dogma requires as "proof", you filter it out of the world, and you leave behind everything which might cause your dogma to collapse.
Click to expand...
 
Returning to Tilly🌹

AS BLABBER mouth @Roc. has been talking about race realism quite a lot lately, I thought it might be a good idea to revisit English rose Tilly's appearance on the Andrew Gold show.

I think there's a few things worth talking about from the section on race realism (timestamped below) -


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QnoMSNSD5R0&t=1h6m30s

To be continued...
 
Btw, if you want to know why @Roc. is so brain dead regarding his retarded "jargon" argument, then I think that you probably need to look no further than the paranoid Jewish shit from his gurus and high priests that he consumes 24/7. And it's the same with everything, really #onetrackmind

Here's a funny one I saw recently -


View: https://t.me/realblaircottrell/7212
 
The Equalizer said:
Returning to Tilly🌹

AS BLABBER mouth @Roc. has been talking about race realism quite a lot lately, I thought it might be a good idea to revisit English rose Tilly's appearance on the Andrew Gold show.

I think there's a few things worth talking about from the section on race realism (timestamped below) -
Click to expand...
The Equalizer said:


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QnoMSNSD5R0&t=1h6m30s

To be continued...
Click to expand...

So, I think the first thing to notice about the clip above is that Tilly says that a multiracial society is objectively good <ends>. No reason given (I can think of a few reasons off the top of my head for why it isn't).

When Gold says that he doesn't actually agree with that, Tilly responds with - Oh yes, the reason being white racists.

Then she moves on to what race deniers think is their killer fact. Here is @Roc. talking about it most recently -

Roc. said:
She's not talking about "whites" (video above was spliced in to try and obscure this).

She's talking about you chaps, specifically.

And she's bloody bang on.

As Jambo likes to say, "on average" you chaps are vastly shown up by black and brown "races". Reason being, obviously, you chaps on here, and those involved in the same type of "activism" - on average, are the dregs of the "white race".
Click to expand...
Roc. said:
This is a nice illustration of what Dawkins means when he says there are more differences within races, than between races.
Click to expand...
Here is a reminder of what Dawkins has said about this -


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=d6SQ3mXzZeI&t=124
 
The Equalizer said:
So, I think the first thing to notice about the clip above is that Tilly says that a multiracial society is objectively good <ends>. No reason given (I can think of a few reasons off the top of my head for why it isn't).

When Gold says that he doesn't actually agree with that, Tilly responds with - Oh yes, the reason being white racists.

Then she moves on to what race deniers think is their killer fact. Here is @Roc. talking about it most recently -



Here is a reminder of what Dawkins has said about this -


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=d6SQ3mXzZeI&t=124
Click to expand...

So, hopefully we've established the following facts:

1. Race is a biological reality meaning there are genetic differences between the races.

2. Most of the genetic variation of the species is contained within the races.

A derivation of that being, as both Tilly and roc agree upon is -

"There are more differences within races, than between races."

Tilly's conclusion is that that tells her that race is "wildly unimportant" <ends>.

Perhaps @Roc_ could share his conclusion here, in the appropriate thread.

Please stick to the facts and avoid repeating the derivation as proof of anything.
 
The Equalizer said:
So, hopefully we've established the following facts:

1. Race is a biological reality meaning there are genetic differences between the races.

2. Most of the genetic variation of the species is contained within the races.

A derivation of that being, as both Tilly and roc agree upon is -

"There are more differences within races, than between races."

Tilly's conclusion is that that tells her that race is "wildly unimportant" <ends>.
Click to expand...
The Equalizer said:
Perhaps @Roc_ could share his conclusion here, in the appropriate thread.

Please stick to the facts and avoid repeating the derivation as proof of anything.
Click to expand...
So I see that @Roc_ occasionally knows when he's a busted flush :)

Of course, denying race on the face of it is rather absurd. We're told not to believe our lying eyes. Even @Haven admitted (let slip) that he could only think of an Asian (speaking with an Irish accent) as Irish (White) if he was to wear a blindfold.

Obviously race deniers tend to be incurious types who don't explore reality or seek explanations and I guess that the derivation allows them to simply sit back and smugly say - "See guys, race is only skin deep", or something like that.

Anyway, I will address one final point from brainwashing victim Tilly* in the video but for now I'll leave it with - RIP roc 😁

*Who, sadly, will almost certainly go on to brainwash others after she leaves university (as a student).
 
The Equalizer said:
... Of course, denying race on the face of it is rather absurd. We're told not to believe our lying eyes.
Click to expand...
Quoting Dawkins verbatim on this point:

"... if you take two chimpanzees from the same forest in Africa, they are likely to be more different from each other genetically than any two humans in the whole world... As surprising as this may be to people who consider that races look so different to our eyes...."
 
The Equalizer said:
Perhaps @Roc_ could share his conclusion here...
Click to expand...
I already explained to you at least once the conclusion that Dawkins presents (and that everyone else with an ounce of intelligence easily recognises as the right answer):

roc_ said: "... there are differences. We agree. But the much bigger question is do they make a difference.

And to answer that we have to hold these differences up beside the differences within human races. Or the “races” in other animals etc.

And then we see how these genetic differences between what are referred to as human “races” are small.

Much much much smaller than the genetic variation in the things we are holding it up beside.

So small in fact that then the question becomes - is it actually of any value to hold to the idea of racial categories when they are such very weak proxies for genetic diversity?..."
 
To move onto something more real and substantial, have a read of this article to understand something important about IQ today.

The average IQ of the world population – important​

Relating to questions around how come Jambo can only express himself in memes and repeating Collet, Morgoth, Woods. etc.

How come he can't express any of of his own ideas if he had them (and the article goes into explaining why he doesn't have any of his own ideas).

I.e. Here is a factor a thousand times more influential on IQ than these pseudo scientific ideas about "race", that are unable to grasp anything about the molecular magnitudes involved.

There's some actual realism for you.
 
BLABBER mouth, I said:

"Please stick to the facts and avoid repeating the derivation as proof of anything."

Furthermore, please stick to the human species and not include your "What Dawkins means.." bullshit
 
If you are a fan of this model Jambo I wonder where in Ireland we could find 10,000 hectares that would become its own black-only community, a state in itself, with its own agriculture sector, own construction and services, own currency and financial institutions, etc.

Where in the country would you suggest?

Well in truth I personally like this model - you probably remember I have talked of reverting Ireland to autonomous "city states" along lines of the old Irish provinces each with their own governance, resurrecting their own distinct dialects of Irish, and distinct provincial customs and culture, etc.

That would be my own variety of nationalism.
 
Roc_ said:
If you are a fan of this model Jambo I wonder where in Ireland we could find 10,000 hectares that would become its own black-only community, a state in itself, with its own agriculture sector, own construction and services, own currency and financial institutions, etc.

Where in the country would you suggest?

Well in truth I personally like this model - you probably remember I have talked of reverting Ireland to autonomous "city states" along lines of the old Irish provinces each with their own governance, resurrecting their own distinct dialects of Irish, and distinct provincial customs and culture, etc.

That would be my own variety of nationalism.
Click to expand...
Did I say anything about building an Orania in Ireland? No, I didn't, blabbermouth.

You have utterly failed to defend your race denialism and you remain the Soapbox Dunce. Quit while you're behind.
 
The Equalizer said:
Did I say anything about building an Orania in Ireland? No, I didn't...
Click to expand...
So just to clarify here, you're saying you're a fan of the model of the white man doing this in Africa but not the reciprocal, i.e. a community of black gentlemen and their lady-folk setting something similar up in Ireland? Can you explain your logic? Actually on second thoughts better you don't, I can pretty well surmise it and have had more than my fill of your Mark Collett memes for one day.
 
Roc_ said:
So just to clarify here, you're saying you're a fan of the model of the white man doing this in Africa but not the reciprocal, i.e. a community of black gentlemen and their lady-folk setting something similar up in Ireland? Can you explain your logic? Actually on second thoughts better you don't, I can pretty well surmise it and have had more than my fill of your Mark Collett memes for one day.
Click to expand...
This is what I said, verbatim -

"I've always thought that one of the most black-pillng things is that there are still WSA libtards."

WSA stands for White South Africans, to be completely clear.
 
PS Just in case readers don't know who I'm referring to, talking of Mark Collett and his memes, he is a chap who Jambo adores (and I think may actually be in love with). If you click play on the below you will get a brief introduction to who this white nationalist/supremacist "guru" is.

 
No, I don't "adore" Collett. He isn't one of my "high priests", "gurus", "cult leaders" etc. etc. etc.
 
The Equalizer said:
No, I don't "adore" Collett.
Click to expand...
Jambo you’re like a twelve year old boy denying he is in love with the girl next door. “No, I’m not in love”, and stamps his little foot and flings his spaghetti bowl. Jambo you were sussed out a long time ago. First, no woman is gonna want to sleep with a guy who's worried about saving the huwhite race or whatever. That’s obvious. So what’s left for poor Jambo? Well then the way you creamed your little pants day in and day out over Mark Collett and his memes told everyone the answer to that question, so obvious.
 
Roc_ said:
PS Just in case readers don't know who I'm referring to, talking of Mark Collett and his memes, he is a chap who Jambo adores (and I think may actually be in love with). If you click play on the below you will get a brief introduction to who this white nationalist/supremacist "guru" is.

Click to expand...

LOL - "I'm Jewish, by the way." -


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q442zpZfQz4&t=47m23s

roc, your catchcries (antisemitism) don't work on me, or anyone else on the far right today.

Perhaps you'd be better off trying someone else like @SeekTheFairLand.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom