Could Iran v Israel turn nuclear? A possible indication from the Occult/Masonic world

U.S. Central Command says six U.S. service members have been killed in action as of 4 pm ET, March 2, after forces recovered the remains of two previously unaccounted troops from a facility struck during Iran’s initial attacks.
 
Anyhow, the fact that Iran managed to force the US-Israeli alliance to burn a year’s supply of interceptors in a single day means that the proposed four-to-five weeks that Fake Trump is now promising to replace the original plan of a five-day war suggests there are no reasonable prospects of an Israeli victory. That’s why I think Israel is now looking at a ground invasion of Lebanon; they have to do something to try to change the equation that now appears to be favoring the Iranians in order to try to force a ceasefire and an Iranian return to the negotiating table.

UPDATE: Iran just ratcheted up the economic pressure. Qatar’s natural gas production has been shut down and Saudi Arabia’s largest oil production facility has been halted as well. At this point, it already appears that the Israeli war strategy has failed.

UPDATE: You know it’s not going well when they’re blatantly lying. After his offer to reopen talks were shut hard down by the Iranians, Fake Trump tried to convince the world that his plan to win the war over the weekend never existed. ‘It’s always been a four-week process. We figured it will be four weeks or so. It’s always been about a four-week process so – as strong as it is, it’s a big country, it’ll take four weeks – or less.’

The thing is, at their current burn rate, US-Israeli interceptor stocks will probably run out within four days. If this goes on for four weeks, it’s not impossible that the US would be forced by the Israelis to beg for surrender without even losing a carrier.

UPDATE: According to multiple media reports, US officials, through Italian mediation, proposed a swift ceasefire to de-escalate tensions and potentially return to negotiations. This was framed as an attempt to end the military campaign quickly after initial strikes achieved key objectives (e.g., degrading leadership and capabilities).

UPDATE: I’m not the only one who thinks Israel has badly misplayed its US military card. Larry Johnson thinks the USA will be on the verge of surrender in less than two weeks.

I believe that by March 15, the US and Israel will be pleading — at least privately — for an end to the Iranian missile barrages. The death of Khamenei has removed a moderate from the Iranian chain of command. The agreement that Iranian authorities made on June 25, 2025 to end the missile attacks on Israel had the blessing of the Ayatollah. There were many in the IRGC leadership that opposed that decision, but they obeyed the decision of Khamenei. Now they have been vindicated.
 


—❗️🇮🇷/🇺🇸/🇯🇴 WATCH: An interceptor missile misfires at Muwaffaq Salti Airbase, Jordan
 
1772490276502.png
 
By the way Khamenei was against nuclear weapons, now with him gone...

Anyway its obviously descended into a pounding match between the US and Israel v. Iran, much like the former conflict, with the former crisscrossing Iranian airspace at will and taking out targets via their airforce and missiles from their naval assets while Iran is reponding with drones and missiles, initially with poorish quality of both and without a lot of success.

Initially you could say it was all US/Israel because they killed the Supreme leader and a lot of other highups, because the Iranian navy and airforce seem to be already sunk, but I think, at this point anyway, it might be reverting back to Iran a little, because:

Looking at it from the point of view of attacks on Iran:

1. It is after all a huge country with many massive but spread out cities and enormous infrastructure. You just cannot cripple a country of that size very quickly or easily.
2. The Iranian population and army might be used to, a little anyway, these attacks and privations in general, because they have been under sanctions for so long.
3. The US/Israel might be caught between two stools in their attacks anyway, because they have high hopes of an Iranian uprising against their government, and hence widescale attacks, which would lead to widespread civilian casualties, could be counter productive for them.

Now look at the attacks against Israel:

1. Israel is a very small country, with their population packed into high rise units in only a few cities. Say for example if you wanted to knock out power supply infrastructure or ports or water desalination or transport facilities, there are only a few key targets you need to hit, totally unlike the situation in Iran.
2. The Israeli population, in this first world country with all conveniences etc might not be ready for all of this, unlike Iranians under sanctions for so long. Some might panic and flee now.
3. There is no love lost towards the Israeli population by the Iranians, now that they assassinated the leaders, and anyway there are a lot of others dissolusioned with Israel right now, so no holds barred in any attacks.

So even exclusive of this talk of US and Israeli missiles running out, I think it is swinging towards Iran right now.
 
I am not on either side, but if I have to pick the winner = = It will be American and Israel ~ Some might say Israel and America ! !

Never give Islamic Nutters an even break = = Just Kill them for their own happiness ! ! !
 
SeekTheFairLand said:
At the current consumption rate of 600-900 interceptors per day, the remaining stock covers roughly 1-2 more days of defense at this intensity before reaching levels that would be considered operationally catastrophic — meaning commanders would have to begin rationing, choosing what to defend and what to leave exposed.

This is exactly the scenario analysts warned about. If Iranian forces sustain high-volume launches, coalition planners may confront zero-sum decisions in which defending one theater necessarily increases exposure in another. Defence Security Asia We’re now looking at that scenario playing out in real time.

Iran has spent perhaps 1,500 projectiles out of a combined drone and missile inventory of 80,000+. The coalition has spent perhaps 1,500 interceptors out of a total inventory of 2,500. Iran has consumed roughly 2% of its available munitions. The coalition has consumed roughly 60% of its available interceptors.
Click to expand...
The above two posts sum it all up for me, the US has gone in guns, bravado and high tech, and got a bloody nose for its troubles. Taking the idea that America is Israel's pet hound then it appears that it might be more of a terrier than an Alsation, all teeth and snap rather than a substantial attack capability.

America will not be committing any land forces so is trying to get the Iranian population to finish the job and establish anew government, with the FBI trying to steer events of course, but is that really feasible? I'm not sure that it is.
 
Last edited:
SeekTheFairLand said:
At the current consumption rate of 600-900 interceptors per day, the remaining stock covers roughly 1-2 more days of defense at this intensity before reaching levels that would be considered operationally catastrophic — meaning commanders would have to begin rationing, choosing what to defend and what to leave exposed.

This is exactly the scenario analysts warned about. If Iranian forces sustain high-volume launches, coalition planners may confront zero-sum decisions in which defending one theater necessarily increases exposure in another. Defence Security Asia We’re now looking at that scenario playing out in real time.

Iran has spent perhaps 1,500 projectiles out of a combined drone and missile inventory of 80,000+. The coalition has spent perhaps 1,500 interceptors out of a total inventory of 2,500. Iran has consumed roughly 2% of its available munitions. The coalition has consumed roughly 60% of its available interceptors.
Click to expand...
Have you a source for those figures at all?
 
Mad as Fish said:
Only snatched a couple of minutes of the first video but the point I made recently about the assassination of foreign leaders applies as equally to Zelensky as it does any other.
Click to expand...
I started one of the videos by pointing out that there is no winner yet, but there certainly is a loser, Zellensky
 
SeekTheFairLand said:
At the current consumption rate of 600-900 interceptors per day, the remaining stock covers roughly 1-2 more days of defense at this intensity before reaching levels that would be considered operationally catastrophic — meaning commanders would have to begin rationing, choosing what to defend and what to leave exposed.

This is exactly the scenario analysts warned about. If Iranian forces sustain high-volume launches, coalition planners may confront zero-sum decisions in which defending one theater necessarily increases exposure in another. Defence Security Asia We’re now looking at that scenario playing out in real time.

Iran has spent perhaps 1,500 projectiles out of a combined drone and missile inventory of 80,000+. The coalition has spent perhaps 1,500 interceptors out of a total inventory of 2,500. Iran has consumed roughly 2% of its available munitions. The coalition has consumed roughly 60% of its available interceptors.
Click to expand...
great post
 
scolairebocht said:
By the way Khamenei was against nuclear weapons, now with him gone...

Anyway its obviously descended into a pounding match between the US and Israel v. Iran, much like the former conflict, with the former crisscrossing Iranian airspace at will and taking out targets via their airforce and missiles from their naval assets while Iran is reponding with drones and missiles, initially with poorish quality of both and without a lot of success.

Initially you could say it was all US/Israel because they killed the Supreme leader and a lot of other highups, because the Iranian navy and airforce seem to be already sunk, but I think, at this point anyway, it might be reverting back to Iran a little, because:

Looking at it from the point of view of attacks on Iran:

1. It is after all a huge country with many massive but spread out cities and enormous infrastructure. You just cannot cripple a country of that size very quickly or easily.
2. The Iranian population and army might be used to, a little anyway, these attacks and privations in general, because they have been under sanctions for so long.
3. The US/Israel might be caught between two stools in their attacks anyway, because they have high hopes of an Iranian uprising against their government, and hence widescale attacks, which would lead to widespread civilian casualties, could be counter productive for them.

Now look at the attacks against Israel:

1. Israel is a very small country, with their population packed into high rise units in only a few cities. Say for example if you wanted to knock out power supply infrastructure or ports or water desalination or transport facilities, there are only a few key targets you need to hit, totally unlike the situation in Iran.
2. The Israeli population, in this first world country with all conveniences etc might not be ready for all of this, unlike Iranians under sanctions for so long. Some might panic and flee now.
3. There is no love lost towards the Israeli population by the Iranians, now that they assassinated the leaders, and anyway there are a lot of others dissolusioned with Israel right now, so no holds barred in any attacks.

So even exclusive of this talk of US and Israeli missiles running out, I think it is swinging towards Iran right now.
Click to expand...
when the intellectual input governing this madness is partnership of a blackmailed pedophile twice bankrupted very elderly and visually ill property developer and his psychopath genocidal blackmailer --- what could possibly go wrong.
 
Declan said:
I started one of the videos by pointing out that there is no winner yet, but there certainly is a loser, Zellensky
Click to expand...
and the price of the only free flowing oil magically and very justly in Russian hands is now climbing just as our insane leadership in this country gave 150 million to buy arms to murder Russians --what fucking brilliant timing just before a known war in the middle east was about to break out .
head rotted druggies --patents in our mental hospitals would not do it but fianna fail under this weirdo meihal did it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpc
I was sent a video by a family member in Dubai. It showed a building on fire across the street. Another video showed a missile hit. A photo showed many missiles in the sky. A lot of bombs are falling. Also reported by this person was the US Embassy was hit. Many are going out to the suburbs/countryside.

So I am left to assume that the iranians are firing at will!!!! And have a lot of missiles
 
Last edited:
 
I gave all that was given me, above.

Plus, nobody can get out and there are bombs going off all the time
 
Declan said:
I gave all that was given me, above.

Plus, nobody can get out and there are bombs going off all the time
Click to expand...
Where is it ?

Would be the kind of minimum information needed ;)(y)

Edit = = Just reading your post above it now ! ! !
 
Declan said:
I was sent a video by a family member in Dubai. It showed a building on fire across the street. Another video showed a missile hit. A photo showed many missiles in the sky. A lot of bombs are falling. Also reported by this person was the US Embassy was hit. Many are going out to the suburbs/countryside.

So I am left to assume that the iranians are firing at will!!!! And have a lot of missiles
Click to expand...

Declan said:
I was sent a video by a family member in Dubai. It showed a building on fire across the street. Another video showed a missile hit. A photo showed many missiles in the sky. A lot of bombs are falling. Also reported by this person was the US Embassy was hit. Many are going out to the suburbs/countryside.

So I am left to assume that the iranians are firing at will!!!! And have a lot of missiles
Click to expand...
Yep, if Usrael had been winning we would hear a lot more about it, but we are not, probably one good reason for that......
 
Yes, my supercar is sorely tested with potholes
 
Actually I dont give them much thought, it is ad lib and always forget something


A doozy coming tonight, hopefully.
 
Declan said:
Yes, my supercar is sorely tested with potholes
Click to expand...
it is a supercar it has almost the same engine and gearbox as a rolls .
all you are missing is the Citroen struts fitted in the middle of the coil spring to keep it level regardless of the load on the modern rolls .
the old phantoms had a lever at each wheel and when it was fully loaded the chauffeur moved the lever to line up two marks on each wheel -- and off you go .
there is as far as i know a air suspension kit for a suburban.
these kits are not a big deal to fit.
kids sometimes got sea sick in the rear of a rolls if their eyes were not on the road as it would wallow around bends like a punt in a wind.
its hard to get it right .
i drove porche 911 turbos and they had extra wide wheels on the rear to try and keep its rear engine/pendulum from killing you if you took your foot off the throttle on a bend .
this set up had tyres with only 2 inches of side profile on the tyre and almost no suspension with leather seats that were hard as a rock- i thought it was a highly dangerous joke of a car --yes it would go in a straight line -but that was the end of the fun.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom