Your low IQ is showing againNo answers all usual.
‘Other people this and other people that’. Nothing about yourself though.
So, presumably we have to wait for Skippy to come along and answer on your behalf again.
Pathetic.
Your low IQ is showing againNo answers all usual.
‘Other people this and other people that’. Nothing about yourself though.
So, presumably we have to wait for Skippy to come along and answer on your behalf again.
Pathetic.
Deflection isn’t an answer.Your low IQ is showing again
I am? What makes you say that?Deflection isn’t an answer.
Let’s try again as a demonstration…
James, as someone with mixed heritage
can you talk us through your nationalistic views? Are they Anglo/Irish or do you consider yourself a full Irish nationalist?
When you speak of ethnicity, do you mean British or Irish?
I am? What makes you say that?
What makes you say that?Your Dad is English.
One of your parents is a Protestant from England or Scotland. Given that your surname isn’t Irish, it’s probably your Dad.What makes you say that?
Well, both of my parents are dead but how many people do you think you exclude from being Irish based on their surname or religion* do you think, ballpark?One of your parents is a Protestant from England or Scotland. Given that your surname isn’t Irish, it’s probably your Dad.
Yes, I'm related to this woman, which is why my middle name is StuartYou bragged about your ancestry before and how it goes back to Mary Queen of Scots (or someone like that).
Well, both of my parents are dead but how many people do you think you exclude from being Irish based on their surname or religion* do you think, ballpark?
Yes, I'm related to this woman, which is why my middle name is Stuart
![]()
*My father was an atheist
How would you define someone being from England or Scotland? Both of my parents were born in Ireland so that's not itI exclude people from being Irish, who are not Irish. Like people from England and Scotland.
Depends on where their parents are from.How would you define someone being from England or Scotland? Both of my parents were born in Ireland so that's not it
Their parents, do you mean the grandparents of the individual you are assessing as being Irish, or not?Depends on where their parents are from.
I'll tell you what I think that is, are you good at cryptic crosswords?Do you think ‘anchor babies’ are Irish?
Your argument completely misses the elephant in the room: it’s precisely the modern, Godless worldview you and so many others here espouse that has led to Irish people selfishly turning away from family life. The modern, secular individual seems trapped in a state of perpetual adolescence, living at home with their parents well into their 30s, binge-watching Netflix, and playing video games, all while bemoaning the state of the nation. This isn’t "well-meaning" childlessness—it’s a choice driven by immaturity, lack of direction, and obsession with comfort over responsibility.
Contrast this with the work I’ve seen in the trenches of real Irish communities. I’ve worked alongside Pro-Life groups helping young Irish girls who feel they have no one to turn to. These groups provide genuine support, showing them that abortion—(chopping a baby into pieces and throwing it in a bin, or worse, selling its remains to feed the international abortion industry's sick black market on body parts)—is not their only option. Because of this work, there are now delightful Irish children this weekend playing GAA and football, preparing for Christmas, and looking forward to bright futures. None of that would have been possible without Catholic values of love and sacrifice guiding such efforts.
In my professional life, I’ve worked as a Director in my company, actively pushing back against the growing trend of overseas recruitment. In an industry that relies on rare specialized skills, it would’ve been easy to tap into international talent pools, but I persuaded the leadership to invest in local Irish talent instead. This isn’t just about jobs—it’s about preserving our community and providing young Irish workers with the opportunity to thrive in their own country. How many so-called secular 'nationalists' mocking Catholicism can say they’ve done anything even remotely as practical to protect and preserve Irish sovereignty and culture?
What’s your contribution? Spending endless hours on 4Chan or James, drinking and smoking at home playing online chess and arguing about ethno-nationalism? That's not building a nation; that’s a hobby. As I said before, atheists like you make terrible nationalists because nationalism requires real, tangible action, not keyboard pontificating.
And let’s not forget, the last person to truly galvanize Irish public opinion and defeat an overwhelming political and media establishment was Declan Ganley—a practicing Catholic. Ganley, nearly single-handedly, led the charge to defeat the Lisbon Treaty, standing firm against the might of the EU and every major Irish political party.
It's economics and successive bad governments that are responsible for the social phenomena you describe, not lack of faith. Japan is still quite socially conservative, traditional and gendered and in case you have noticed, it's not a catholic nation. Conservatism does not require Catholicism or indeed any form of Christianity to flourish.
I'm not going to throw shit at young people for staying at home longer than my generation (or yours) because they inherited a world in which owing property, and creating and maintaining a family is exponentially more difficult and requires, comparably, significantly more resources. They must also assume far more risk due to different sociological and legal conditions which make cohabitating and marriage far less appealing.
If it was your company, you were obviously the director, and unless you had a board, you shouldn't have needed to convince the leadership of anything. I don't smoke, don't do drugs (anymore) and only drink socially. You've literally spent upwards of 40% of your time on Sarsfields arguing with James about everything. A stone thrown in a glass house, Tiger. If you must know, I'm currently overseeing a macro-scale ecological restoration project. The budget is quite large, and it is extremely complicated. Nationalism, to me, includes not just people but the soil, plants and animals also.
I'm not especially interested in what you think does and does not make a good nationalist. Your version of Catholic nationalism has no future and will never be implemented at any meaningful level whatsoever, because it is outdated and has no consensus. Nor will it ever have any. Ditto Brocht's bullshit. It's all just snow on the edge of spring. The best either of you can hope for is to make the evening news, in which you will predictably be derided and written-off as antiquated, mean-spirited, stale Mick farts. Which of course you both are. The archdioceses will likely release a public statement denouncing both of you, the movement, and you will then have to live with the embarrassment of having been betrayed by the very institution you've spent your lives defending and advocating for.
Another fucking essay
Spew your Catholic bigotry elsewhere and stop pretending that you're a nationalist
Another fucking essay
Spew your Catholic bigotry elsewhere and stop pretending that you're a nationalist
Ah listen here, ya fucking moronYou seem think that people who are from foreign nations being born in Ireland and claiming to be Irish is a 'red herring'.
That's a strange position for a chap who claims to be more of an 'Ethno-Nationalist' than Padraig Pearse whom you claimed 'Nah'......to the suggestion that he was an 'Ethno-nationalist'. I'm pretty sure I know that Pearse didn't think of English and Scottish people as being Irish, and he'd be right. They're English and Scottish.
The paradox of self-proclaimed 'ethno-nationalists' of mixed heritage who imagine themselves as heirs to Padraig Pearse, the man who gave his life for a vision of Irishness steeped in culture, language, and sacrifice. Let’s untangle this.
Irishness, as Pearse understood it, was not a mere accident of geography or a legal technicality—it was a cultural, spiritual, and historical identity, forged in the crucible of centuries-long resistance and nourished by faith, language, and tradition. To claim to surpass Pearse while standing on a foundation of diluted heritage and a hollow conception of identity that ignores these elements is, frankly, laughable.
Mixed heritage doesn't disqualify someone from Irishness per se, but it demands honesty about what one is. If your identity is genuinely Irish, it will be expressed in your loyalty to its traditions, your reverence for its martyrs, and your commitment to preserving the Irish soul—not in trying to outdo those whose blood, faith, and sacrifices built the nation in the first place.
If your 'ethno-nationalism' is just a badge to wear in online debates, untethered from the faith, values, and culture that define the true Irish ethos, you're not more Pearse than Pearse—you’re simply appropriating his legacy while contributing nothing to its continuation.
What?I'm not surprised you're fed upafter all, it's not easy being confronted with your own anti-nationalist, anti-Irish agenda.
What's that, write it here -The problem here is your inability to grasp the essence of true nationalism
Yes Mowl, and your apparent indifference to it. You’ve never lifted a finger to actually help the cause you claim to espouse. Instead of doing anything constructive, you’re content with whining and deflecting.
It’s easy to throw around insults and criticisms, but when it comes time to put in the work and actually contribute to the movement, all you’ve got is empty rhetoric and a refusal to engage in meaningful action. You're just a spectator, criticizing from the sidelines, while those who are serious about nationalism get down to business.
Oh for the love of fucking God..
I don't have an issue with posts more than one sentence long. You could make your point, if there even is one, in about 1% percent of the words you type and the filler (99%) becomes nauseatingIs it a coincidence that both you and Myles, both known alcoholics have an issue with posts of more than 1 sentence long and videos more than 10 seconds long?
I think not.
You need to start reading books James.
What the fu*k are you talking about???More bullshit slogans from the myopic, insular, ignorant US white supremacist doctrine.Nationalism in the past messed up Greece/Turkey, and it was nationalism, mainly in the guise of Arabism destroyed such cities as Alexandria, Saloniki, Aleppo, Smyrna, Constantinople, by attacking their multicultural make up.PS Don't conflate nationalism with localism either. E.g. you can be a Maronite, or Shiite, or Armenian "nationalist" without imposing your preferences on others, and without others imposing their preferences on you.
You don’t like short posts either…I don't have an issue with posts more than one sentence long. You could make your point, if there even is one, in about 1% percent of the words you type and the filler (99%) becomes nauseating
You're basically a leftist.You don’t like short posts either…
Let me demonstrate….
If two Indians come to Ireland and live here for several years and eventually have a kid in Ireland, is the child Irish?
I'm not sure anyone here even knew Clarke was a Catholic extremist until you kept mentioning him in that regard.Skippy, it’s astonishing (or maybe not that astonishing) how your interpretation of my reference to Thomas Clarke manages to miss the point entirely, revealing not just ignorance but an apparent inability to comprehend what’s being discussed. The mention of Clarke wasn’t an appeal to resurrect his precise methods or transplant 1916 nationalism wholesale into 2024.
FishalHow would you define someone being from England or Scotland? Both of my parents were born in Ireland so that's not it
i deleted the personal attacks from your reply and what is left is quite decent and worth reading --many of your very good posts are destroyed byYour fixation on economics as the sole cause of Ireland’s social collapse is a lazy excuse to dodge the real issue: moral and cultural decay. Yes, Japan is conservative and socially cohesive, but that’s because they’ve held on to their traditions and sense of national identity—unlike modern Ireland, which has gutted itself by trading Catholic values for secular hedonism and consumerism. You’ve never set foot Ireland, what the fuck do you know. You can’t even compare the two. Ireland’s problem isn’t a lack of money; it’s a lack of soul.
Your argument about young Irish adults staying at home and avoiding families reeks of condescension. It’s not housing prices alone that keep them from growing up; it’s the fact that the modern atheist mindset has sold them a lie. They’ve been told that personal pleasure is paramount, that family is a burden, and that commitment is optional. This has led to a nation of perpetual adolescents, obsessed with escapism and unwilling to embrace adulthood. You’re defending a system that’s robbed an entire generation of direction and purpose.
Meanwhile, I’m out here doing something. I’m part of a group of businesspeople, military leaders, doctors, scientists and others who work behind the scenes (meeting several times a year in hotels around the country for the past 11 years) to build practical solutions for Ireland’s problems. One of our projects is creating a public banking system to free Irish people from the predatory clutches of global financial institutions—something Germany already does successfully, and we are trying to mimic despite the states objections. Another focus has been supporting young women in crisis pregnancies, giving them real alternatives to abortion. Thanks to those efforts, there are children alive today—playing GAA, enjoying Christmas, and bringing joy to their communities—who would otherwise have been dismembered and sold for parts by the monstrous international abortion industry, something that you support based on the canard of pregnancies being the result of 'gang rapes'.
yourself on the back. Nationalism, you say, includes “soil, plants, and animals.” Admirable sentiment, but what about the people? Or do you see them as expendable?
. Meanwhile, the last Irish nationalist to capture the public imagination and make a real impact was Declan Ganley—a practicing Catholic who single-handedly defeated the Lisbon Treaty and the entire Irish political establishment. Where’s your secular equivalent? Nowhere. Because atheists make terrible nationalists, and your lot has yet to prove otherwise.
I'm not sure anyone here even knew Clarke was a Catholic extremist until you kept mentioning him in that regard.
In fact I recall studying the man years ago and never came to that conclusion.
My abiding memory is of Gen Tom Barry calling him the toughest man in Ireland's history.
You keep citing him with your Catholic fanaticism. Why!???
Fishal
i deleted the personal attacks from your reply and what is left is quite decent and worth reading --many of your very good posts are destroyed by
calling the person you are writing to a cunt .
because you mentioned a public banking system i am going to refer you to the works of a great German economist called Richard Werner .
Richard was the only economist in Ireland who required the point depot to accommodate the amount of people who wished to hear him speak .
he is truthful and unafraid of the powers that be to tell the truth .
i have his most famous book PRINCES OF THE YEN .
you can watch a very good video of princes of the yen narrated by Richard on u tube --you will be impressed and see the wisdom of the Japanese to do most of their banking in the post office .
the enemy of the Japanese are the same enemy we have and the Germans have and both have a community bank system impossible to control as it is community based and not traded on the stock exchange .
deutsche bank has been destroyed and owes trillions .
what you may not know as it is too inc readable for people to get their heads around that one person could have such wealth --- Odette Bishoffshein ( lady Desart irelands most famous Jewish woman and senator ) came to Ireland with her sister Amile both were given we are told 35 million pounds EACH as their dowery in 1890 worth a lot more today.
Emile married sir Michael Fitzgearld knight of Kerry and Ellen Odette married William Cuffe of Cuffsgrange kilkenny.
their father increadably founded 3 of the worlds giant banks AT THE SAME TIME BY ONE MAN .
DEUTSCHE BANK + PARIBAS BANK + SOCIETIE GENERAL.
When you are attending your next meeting of bankers you should bring with you the manifesto of Gottfreid Feder free online --he was an amature economist and WW2 was fought to extinguish his banking ideas and the people who adopted them were destroyed .
during this time Germany went from starvation and suicide to the wealthiest t country in the world --but today nobody is allowed to study how this happened and why did it take the combined world economies to defeat a country with no gold and not allowed to trade internationally since 1933.
Myles the only person who can answer questions on why you are ignorant of something is you. I can’t help you there.
Also, you seem to think any practicing Catholic is a "fanatic," which says more about their own biases than anything else.
One of the few decent people putting themselves forward as a nationalist candidate is Malachy Steenson, a practicing Catholic who spoke at this year's Pro-Life march—a reminder that genuine nationalists in Ireland often draw strength from their faith. Do you think Malachy is a ‘fanatic’?
You have introduced your religion now to nationalism itself to criticise "secular nationalism" yet no one here is a secular nationalist. A secular nationalist would not be a nationalist who's atheist, like a Christian nationalist would not be a nationalist who's Christian. Secularism has nothing to do with my nationalism, zip, zero, nadaWe are now 16 pages into this discussion, and nobody has explained why post-Catholic Ireland has produced precisely zero nationalist figureheads or movements of any note. Skippy claims Catholics should be nowhere near nationalist movements, and yet, without them, there would be nothing to speak of whatsoever.
You have introduced your religion now to nationalism itself to criticise "secular nationalism" yet no one here is a secular nationalist. A secular nationalist would not be a nationalist who's atheist, like a Christian nationalist would not be a nationalist who's Christian. Secularism has nothing to do with my nationalism, zip, zero, nada
You also lump us all in as being anti-Catholic, pro-abortion etc. yet I've written posts in this thread about being the opposite
If @Fishalt thinks that nationalism would be better off without the likes of you, then I'm sure it would be with the caveat - likes of you and not Catholics in general. And I would tend to agree with him, you're not a nationalist, you are a fanatical Catholic bigot
lol UnfuckingbelievableMulling over the definition of terms is a distraction
lol Unfuckingbelievable
I think your best hope in this thread is that people will come to the conclusion that you've been trolling for page after page (but I think that's highly unlikely, you're too stupid to troll)
You have turned nationalism into an attack vector on atheism, you're obsessedAnother hopeless retort devoid of substance.
Reminder…. We are now 16 pages into this discussion, and nobody has explained why post-Catholic Ireland has produced precisely zero nationalist figureheads or movements of any note.
Once again, not the sharpest tool in the shed.You have turned nationalism into an attack vector on atheism, you're obsessed
I do wonder if you're actually more obsessed with atheism than you are Catholicism