Is the Left the only resistance against the Jews?

Hermit said:
The Left don't oppose Jews, they oppose Israel and worship Palestine. They love Jews in any context outside that conflict. Their whole worldview and political ideology is based on WWII where the ultimate act of evil was the holocaust, which they believe happened and they strongly condemn anyone who questions if it did happen, and the ultimate act of righteousness is to oppose Nazis and anti-semitism. If Israel stopped bombing the shit of Palestine then the Left would stop all their protests.
Click to expand...

French Leftists Pierre-Joseph Proudhon and Charles Baudelaire publicly called for the genocide of Jews long before the state of Israel existed.
 
Roc_ said:
Here's an article from seven years ago even talking about the central point of this thread (that that moron Collett is pretending he only just discovered):

We are now way past the time when it was possible to say that the far right is the sole source of threat to American Jews. There’s been an ongoing string of attacks against Jews in New York City whose perpetrators are not white supremacists. Some attackers seem to have been influenced by the rhetoric of Louis Farrakhan, showing — as if we still needed proof of that! — a direct link between anti-Semitic words and actions.

And then there is another uncomfortable fact: appreciation that some anti-Semitic far-right figures heap on far-left “anti-Zionists.” Holocaust denier David Irving famously referred to the UK Labour Party Leader Jeremy Corbyn as “impressive” and “a fine man” in the context of a discussion about the Party’s crisis over anti-Semitism. For the “resistance to ZOG” (Zionist occupied government, a far-right conspiracy theory), white supremacist David Duke called Omar the most important member of US Congress.

What this shows us — as if we still needed proof of that too! — is that anti-Semitism is anti-Semitism, no matter where on the political spectrum it resides. Once it’s out, particularly when expressed by a high-profile political figure, it isn’t confined to some clearly defined space. It resonates across the entire spectrum. And when there is no push back, it loosens taboos against anti-Semitism throughout the entire society.

True, thus far the deadly synagogue shootings have been executed by white supremacists. But who is to say that the New York Times cartoon, published right on the eve of the Poway Chabad shooting, didn’t play into the shooter’s mindset? And who is to say that the Latuff cartoon Omar and Tlaib circulated isn’t going to contribute to a future mass shooter’s decision to take action?

When it comes to anti-Semitism, it is time for the left to do some serious soul-searching. Pointing to the right as a worse offender is hardly a convincing strategy; surely, the left has better benchmarks than that.


HMdzrZNXkAA6FrK
Click to expand...

However understood egalitarianism is at the core of Leftist ideology and that makes it intrinsically anti-Political Judaism unless you are going to create a self-reliant homogeneously Jewish society.
 
Agobard Admirer said:
However understood egalitarianism is at the core of Leftist ideology and that makes it intrinsically anti-Political Judaism unless you are going to create a self-reliant homogeneously Jewish society.
Click to expand...
Blabbermouth is a submoron but it's really rather obvious what's going on here, take a look at the Venn diagram that Dave Rubin (a Jew) posted -

Post in thread 'Is the Left the only resistance against the Jews?' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.co...-resistance-against-the-jews.1223/post-165396

The idea is that every white goy will have a group that they don't like on that list, and what do they all have in common?

It's very similar to the recent thing of 'woke right', which is basically a term for nationalists, white, that is, and what do people on the right not like?, 'woke'. What you're really looking at here is typical Jewish tricks, whether Blabbermouth realises it or not.


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MoJQbPPFEHw

PS. The counter-Jihad is also Jewish.
 
The Equalizer said:
Blabbermouth is a submoron but it's really rather obvious what's going on here, take a look at the Venn diagram that Dave Rubin (a Jew) posted -

Post in thread 'Is the Left the only resistance against the Jews?' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.co...-resistance-against-the-jews.1223/post-165396

The idea is that every white goy will have a group that they don't like on that list, and what do they all have in common?

It's very similar to the recent thing of 'woke right', which is basically a term for nationalists, white, that is, and what do people on the right not like?, 'woke'. What you're really looking at here is typical Jewish tricks, whether Blabbermouth realises it or not.


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MoJQbPPFEHw

PS. The counter-Jihad is also Jewish.
Click to expand...


For a period in the 19 th and 20 th centuries Jews were associated with the Left but now and historically they have been very much bound up with the establishment so that increasingly an attack on the establishment is seen as an attack on Jews. A difference with the past is while Jews had often considerable power and privilege relative to the general population they did not have honor socially and were considered for reasons of both race and religion as civilizational outsiders. Jews now have more social honor than the Pope and are considered by many the defining group of the Western spirit. If Jews were kicked out of the establishment than Blabbermouth would stop defending them I suspect.
 
Agobard Admirer said:
For a period in the 19 th and 20 th centuries Jews were associated with the Left but now and historically they have been very much bound up with the establishment so that increasingly an attack on the establishment is seen as an attack on Jews. A difference with the past is while Jews had often considerable power and privilege relative to the general population they did not have honor socially and were considered for reasons of both race and religion as civilizational outsiders. Jews now have more social honor than the Pope and are considered by many the defining group of the Western spirit. If Jews were kicked out of the establishment than Blabbermouth would stop defending them I suspect.
Click to expand...
Blabbermouth will never stop defending the Jews because that's what he's all about, completely.

Secondly, in my previous post I told what the subject matter is.
 
Agobard Admirer said:
For a period in the 19 th and 20 th centuries Jews were associated with the Left but now and historically they have been very much bound up with the establishment so that increasingly an attack on the establishment is seen as an attack on Jews. A difference with the past is while Jews had often considerable power and privilege relative to the general population they did not have honor socially and were considered for reasons of both race and religion as civilizational outsiders. Jews now have more social honor than the Pope and are considered by many the defining group of the Western spirit. If Jews were kicked out of the establishment than Blabbermouth would stop defending them I suspect.
Click to expand...
Aaand you're straight back to pulling discriminatory, babbling, incoherent, made up evil fucking nonsense, straight out of your decrepit and wrinkled old hole.
 
Roc_ said:
Aaand you're straight back to pulling discriminatory, babbling, incoherent, made up evil fucking nonsense, straight out of your decrepit and wrinkled old hole.
Click to expand...

“My office was created by law and designed to protect the Jewish people throughout the world. Think about that. The world’s greatest power is focused, by law and design, on protecting the Jews.”

Elan Carr, U.S. State Department Envoy on Anti-Semitism.

I agree people should think about that. If it wasn't would you care about Jews?
 
Yes, civilised democracies with civilised people living in them, focus on protecting minority rights.

An illustration from this article that comes to mind:

Rule 13: Our first priority is democracy, but the Arabs' first priority is "justice." The oft-warring Arab tribes are all wounded souls, who really have been hurt by colonial powers, by Jewish settlements on Palestinian land, by Arab kings and dictators, and, most of all, by each other in endless tribal wars. For Iraq's long-abused Shiite majority, democracy is first and foremost a vehicle to get justice. Ditto the Kurds. For the minority Sunnis, democracy in Iraq is a vehicle of injustice. For us, democracy is all about protecting minority rights. For them, democracy is first about consolidating majority rights and getting justice.
 
Roc_ said:
Yes, civilised democracies with civilised people living in them, focus on protecting minority rights.
Click to expand...

He did not say anything about protecting minority rights or democracy. He talked about Jews. The word civilized is just a fancy term for urban so your Chicago gang bangers are highly civilized. Frankly I prefer the rural.
 
Agobard Admirer said:
He did not say anything about protecting minority rights or democracy. He talked about Jews. The word civilized is just a fancy term for urban so your Chicago gang bangers are highly civilized. Frankly I prefer the rural.
Click to expand...
Who didn't, Thomas L. Friedman? 🤣
 
Back to the important topic of the thread. There are people in this life who will always side with the underdog or victim no matter their moral or otherwise worth, lets call those folks the "Left". There are also probably more people who will always side with the powerful again with no regard for the ethical quality of lack thereof of those elites, lets call these lads the "Right".

The thing about Jews at least in today's Western world is that by siding with them people can give themselves the feeling that they are being morally courageous by defending an underdog minority from mob attacks while at the same time in enjoying the vicarious thrills people get from identifying themselves with powerful elites, especially cruel ones. This is what leads plenty of non-Jews to eagerly adopt as their own the most colourful and lacking in rational substance Jewish apologetics and positions.

So whatever about the Left, the Right as things stand is not going to offer any resistance against against the organized Jewish community and it's partisans. Instead you can rest assured that we will be fed a lot more of the below as time goes on;


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=878KE56XaV4
 
Last edited:
Agobard Admirer said:
Back to the important topic of the thread. There are people in this life who will always side with the underdog or victim no matter their moral or otherwise worth, lets call those folks the "Left". There are also probably more people who will always side with the powerful again with no regard for the ethical quality of lack thereof of those elites, lets call these lads the "Right".

The thing about Jews at least in today's Western world is that by siding with them people can give themselves the feeling that they are being morally courageous by defending an underdog minority from mob attacks while at the same time in enjoying the vicarious thrills people get from identifying themselves with powerful elites, especially cruel ones. This is what leads plenty of non-Jews to eagerly adopt as their own the most colourful and lacking in rational substance Jewish apologetics and positions.
So whatever about the Left, the Right as things stand is not going to offer any resistance against against the organized Jewish community and it's partisans. Instead you can rest assured that we will be fed a lot more of the below as time goes on;


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=878KE56XaV4
Click to expand...

The fake and gay right is Zionist pretty much everywhere, so here, think of John McGuirk.

The left only care about Israel/Palestine, as Hermit pointed out (other than that they're quite philosemitic).
 
clarke-connolly said:
Is Liam Gallagher the Conor McGregor of Pop / Rock / What ever that is ? !

The money the Gallaghers have made out of that " Warbling " has to be Lauded ! ! !

Maybe they should do a ~ Box / MMA fight / Song / Song & Dance ~ Collaboration ( McGregor and the Gallaghers ) ? ! ;) :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
I remember when I was younger, much younger, we would play the guitar and this song was one of my party pieces.. People would ask me to play it but most of the time I couldn't.

I play the guitar left-handed (I'm not really) you see and most of the time there wasn't a left-handed guitar lying around in the house to play.. So I couldn't play it, even though I was known for playing it 😂


View: https://m.youtube.com/shorts/GYakXYmzXUE


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qBt6GKBKed0
 
The Equalizer said:
I remember when I was younger, much younger, we would play the guitar and this song was one of my party pieces.. People would ask me to play it but most of the time I couldn't.

I play the guitar left-handed (I'm not really) you see and most of the time there wasn't a left-handed guitar lying around in the house to play.. So I couldn't play it, even though I was known for playing it 😂


View: https://m.youtube.com/shorts/GYakXYmzXUE
Click to expand...

The Equalizer said:

View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qBt6GKBKed0
Click to expand...

That's ^ a twelve-string btw.

Sounds beautiful doesn't it, @clarke-connolly?
 
The Equalizer said:
Noel Gallagher is actually left-handed (I'm not) but he learned to play the guitar right-handed.

I kinda wish I had done that :) but I just did what felt natural.
Click to expand...
A door lock can be right-handed or left-handed ~ ~ Some-one smart, came up with a system where the " latch " can be flipped with a wee spring.

It would be handy if you could do that with your guitar playing ! !
 
Well that woman is not white. She's a third German and a fourth Irish and one-sixteenth Welsh and one-fortieth African.
 
Roc_ said:
Same old, old... just now spread to our own shores by means of d'internet... :rolleyes:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTT1qUswYL0
Click to expand...

Off in your own little fantasy world again, roc? Plus ca change.

Actually that twenty second clip I posted sums you up quite well..

The Jewish girl spends her life hating on white people - and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that, no one should even notice that there is - and then at the end cries about antisemitism 🤣
 
Roc_ said:
Same old, old... just now spread to our own shores by means of d'internet... :rolleyes:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTT1qUswYL0
Click to expand...


The organizer of the Skokie Affair which that scene was based on turned out to be from a Jewish background and to be involved in homosexuality.

en.wikipedia.org

Frank Collin - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

www.aclu.org

The Skokie Case: How I Came To Represent The Free Speech Rights Of Nazis | ACLU

In 1977, the ACLU of Illinois received a call from a Nazi leader complaining that his planned demonstration had been blocked. The ensuing legal battle, and the controversy around it, would test the organization’s commitment to the First Amendment.
www.aclu.org www.aclu.org

interactive.wbez.org

The Nazis' Neighborhood

For a decade, Chicago's Marquette Park neighborhood served as the headquarters for a local neo-Nazi group.
interactive.wbez.org interactive.wbez.org
 
Agobard Admirer said:
The organizer of the Skokie Affair which that scene was based on turned out to be from a Jewish background and to be involved in homosexuality.

en.wikipedia.org

Frank Collin - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

www.aclu.org

The Skokie Case: How I Came To Represent The Free Speech Rights Of Nazis | ACLU

In 1977, the ACLU of Illinois received a call from a Nazi leader complaining that his planned demonstration had been blocked. The ensuing legal battle, and the controversy around it, would test the organization’s commitment to the First Amendment.
www.aclu.org www.aclu.org

interactive.wbez.org

The Nazis' Neighborhood

For a decade, Chicago's Marquette Park neighborhood served as the headquarters for a local neo-Nazi group.
interactive.wbez.org interactive.wbez.org
Click to expand...
No need for an early life check on the director
 
Agobard Admirer said:
The organizer of the Skokie Affair which that scene was based on turned out to be from a Jewish background
Click to expand...
Interesting that the scene was based on real events, I never knew that.

So what if he had a Jewish background. There is nothing constitutionally innate in Jewish people that makes them also susceptible to hateful ideology.

"... Frank Collin went to Catholic elementary and high schools and attended Southern Illinois University before dropping out. Somewhere along the way, Frank Collin became infatuated with George Lincoln Rockwell, a white supremacist and self-proclaimed "commandant" of the American Nazi Party...".

Jambo's not Jewish and he had a similar trajectory.

And as you well know some of the worst and foremost antisemites today are also Jewish.

"It is a mystery," Collin's grandmother said of his rabid anti-Semitism. "We don't know how or when it started" she said.

I can assure you Jambo's mother would say the same.

Agobard Admirer said:
and to be involved in homosexuality.
Click to expand...
FFS. He was convicted of child molestation and sentenced to seven years in prison.

To describe that as "involved in homosexuality" is your usual sly, passive, aggressive, innuendo. As I said above being Jewish doesn't mean he is more or less inclined to white supremacism and sexual deviancy.

As this thread is testament we can find such like fucked up bunnies much closer to home.

Take a bow yourself, and then a double bow holding Jambo's hand.
 
Agobard Admirer said:
The organizer of the Skokie Affair which that scene was based on turned out to be from a Jewish background and to be involved in homosexuality.

en.wikipedia.org

Frank Collin - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

www.aclu.org

The Skokie Case: How I Came To Represent The Free Speech Rights Of Nazis | ACLU

In 1977, the ACLU of Illinois received a call from a Nazi leader complaining that his planned demonstration had been blocked. The ensuing legal battle, and the controversy around it, would test the organization’s commitment to the First Amendment.
www.aclu.org www.aclu.org

interactive.wbez.org

The Nazis' Neighborhood

For a decade, Chicago's Marquette Park neighborhood served as the headquarters for a local neo-Nazi group.
interactive.wbez.org interactive.wbez.org
Click to expand...
Wasn't it revealed recently that the SPLC were funnelling millions into neon Nazi groups?

They really do seem to invest quite a lot themselves to ensure that "rising antisemitism" never stops rising.
 
Eh, they are accused of fraudulently funneling money to pay informants and "field sources" who infiltrated these groups on the SPLC's behalf, by making false statements to banks in order to set up accounts used to funnel money to informants,

Their defense is that it was justified, saved many lives, helped in the fight against these groups and their activities. Also that the legal case is motivated by political smear tactics.

I'd say you just made an exhibit that these are indeed the tactics.
 
The Equalizer said:
Wasn't it revealed recently that the SPLC were funnelling millions into neon Nazi groups?

They really do seem to invest quite a lot themselves to ensure that "rising antisemitism" never stops rising.
Click to expand...

Yes. There was a conspiracy theory on the North American Right that Rockwell's American Nazi Party was funded in part by the ADL which I find believable but I have seen no convincing evidence of. These days I think a lot of the guff about "rising antisemitism" is designed to emotionally blackmail the Goyische Kops of of "Centre-Right" Rugby Dads, that and to justify the further erosion of civil liberty through out the West.

www.thecommonsense.co.za

Southern Poverty Law Centre: Fighting Racism or Funding It?

An American anti-racism organisation has been charged with fraud after allegedly funnelling millions to neo-Nazis while claiming to fight racism
www.thecommonsense.co.za www.thecommonsense.co.za
 
Roc_ said:
Eh, they are accused
Click to expand...
You spelled indicted wrong

Roc_ said:
of fraudulently funneling money to pay informants and "field sources" who infiltrated these groups on the SPLC's behalf, by making false statements to banks in order to set up accounts used to funnel money to informants,

Their defense is that it was justified, saved many lives, helped in the fight against these groups and their activities. Also that the legal case is motivated by political smear tactics.

I'd say you just made an exhibit that these are indeed the tactics.
Click to expand...
 
The Equalizer said:
Are we headed inexorably towards the 'Samson Option'? And is there anything that can be done to stop the Jews genociding all of humanity? 🤔


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TZrwStXQ5zs
Click to expand...

Plus ca change...

I don't think even you will dispute that the Nazis also frequently accused the Jewish people of plotting the destruction, ruin, elimination of nations, "races", and civilisation itself.

The only difference is the term "genocide" wasn't yet used, so they framed it in terms of total annihilation, subversion, and biological destruction, etc.

For instance there was the "Jewish War" accusation - that an international Jewish conspiracy intentionally orchestrated World War II to destroy Germany and the Aryan race.

There was the "Biological Threat" accusation - that the Jews were a dangerous "parasitic race" or "world plague" that actively infected and ruined healthy national bodies.

There was the "Global Plot" accusation - that Jews aimed for total world domination through a mixture of capitalism and Soviet bolshevism, which would result in the collapse of Western culture.

Etc, etc.

And they used these accusations to defend their intentions, and justify their bullshit about what they called "the Jewish Question", and culminating industrialised mass extermination machinery.

Of course these accusations were all a type of psychological reversal, the Nazis used these accusations to project their own intentions onto their victims.

They publicly argued that their violent measures and eventual mass extermination campaign were acts of preemptive self-defense to stop the alleged destruction of Germany and the "Aryan race" etc.

In a manner it was mass idiocy. A mass psychosis.

Only today we see the same thing rising up again, the same mass idiocy, and mass psychosis - granted we see it rising first up in the fringes, but evidently spreading.

The Equalizer said:
What's happened in the past, or how it's been propagandised since, is why we can't have "nationalism" today.
Everyone who further perpetuates the propaganda and calls themself a "nationalist" is a moron.
You wouldn't find me or @Hermit doing it.
Click to expand...

Is it surprising, or of note, to observe that you and @Hermit are also perhaps the two most socially isolated individuals on this forum (followed closely by your friend "Sword" who also appears to be house-bound.).

@Hermit out of choice is highly socially isolated. You yourself not out of choice but I surmise owing to your various neurodevelopmental disorders including autism.

In the same manner I would guess your "Richard the fourth" is also out in similar psycho-social regions (I haven't listened to him, but I would assume on the strength of your fervid re-posts, and the imagery in the video thumbnails, that he is similarly afflicted).

Your interpretation of "nationalism" is fucked up, Jambo
 
Last edited:
Roc_ said:
Plus ca change...

I don't think even you will dispute that the Nazis also frequently accused the Jewish people of plotting the destruction, ruin, elimination of nations, "races", and civilisation itself.

The only difference is the term "genocide" wasn't yet used, so they framed it in terms of total annihilation, subversion, and biological destruction, etc.

For instance there was the "Jewish War" accusation - that an international Jewish conspiracy intentionally orchestrated World War II to destroy Germany and the Aryan race.

There was the "Biological Threat" accusation - that the Jews were a dangerous "parasitic race" or "world plague" that actively infected and ruined healthy national bodies.

There was the "Global Plot" accusation - that Jews aimed for total world domination through a mixture of capitalism and Soviet bolshevism, which would result in the collapse of Western culture.

Etc, etc.

And they used these accusations to defend their intentions, and justify their bullshit about what they called "the Jewish Question", and culminating industrialised mass extermination machinery.

Of course these accusations were all a type of psychological reversal, the Nazis used these accusations to project their own intentions onto their victims.

They publicly argued that their violent measures and eventual mass extermination campaign were acts of preemptive self-defense to stop the alleged destruction of Germany and the "Aryan race" etc.

In a manner it was mass idiocy. A mass psychosis.

Only today we see the same thing rising up again, the same mass idiocy, and mass psychosis - granted we see it rising first up in the fringes, but evidently spreading.
Click to expand...
I'm simply hypothesising - What if the West withdrew all support for Israel and furthermore, told Israel's neighbouring countries to - have at it.

Surely then the Israelis would have no other choice than to deploy their 'Samson Option', no?

Roc_ said:
Is it surprising, or of note, to observe that you and @Hermit are also perhaps the two most socially isolated individuals on this forum (followed closely by your friend "Sword" who also appears to be house-bound.).

@Hermit out of choice is highly socially isolated. You yourself not out of choice but I surmise owing to your various neurodevelopmental disorders including autism.

In the same manner I would guess your "Richard the fourth" is also out in similar psycho-social regions (I haven't listened to him, but I would assume on the strength of your fervid re-posts, and the imagery in the video thumbnails, that he is similarly afflicted).

Your interpretation of "nationalism" is fucked up, Jambo
Click to expand...
 
The Equalizer said:
I'm simply hypothesising - What if the West withdrew all support for Israel and furthermore, told Israel's neighbouring countries to - have at it.

Surely then the Israelis would have no other choice than to deploy their 'Samson Option', no?
Click to expand...

Turkey and Saudi Arabia would come to the Zios rescue and impose the "Two State Solution". Hamas but not Palestinian Islamic Jihad would go along with this.

The "Two State Solution" has now become orthodoxy at least public orthodoxy among non-Muqawama Arab elites and most Western ones but actually it was something cooked up the Soviets (who Zionists increasingly blame anti-Zionism as on when they are not blaming the Muslim Brotherhood- the MB of course HATED the USSR and was firmly on the US side during the Cold War).

Personally I think the Zionists have proven that they cannot be trusted with a State.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom