Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe

[SwordOfStZip]

You're just a Tommytard tier counter-Jihadist gobshite

You have to remember that being your type of Nationalist can come with consequences that don't come necessarily at all with being a Tommytard. This is one of the reasons why I regard Keith Woods as a lot more manly than Tommy.

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

View: https://x.com/info_maiden/status/1845477933277696337

 

[Tiger]

View: https://x.com/info_maiden/status/1845477933277696337

If it hadn’t mentioned France, I would have presumed that scene was in North Africa somewhere

 

[Declan]

I have to agree with the above post. If a person starts off with, I am not a racist but, then I feel I am dealing with a person who needs to grasp reality

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

You have to remember that being your type of Nationalist can come with consequences that don't come necessarily at all with being a Tommytard. This is one of the reasons why I regard Keith Woods as a lot more manly than Tommy.

Exactly what consequences has Keith Woods had to deal with compared to Tommy?

Tommy has been jailed multiple times by the State, had his family torn apart, has been beat to a pulp, amongst many other things.

Meanwhile your "manly" nerd has posted things on Twitter...

 

[Declan]

He could only be beaten to a noodle perhaps

 

[Tiger]

Here's the thing, Scholairebocht: Nobody looking to join the site is going to know what that symbol even is. No normal person, anyway. It's a very, very out-of-the-way thing. It is not common knowledge, not instantly recognizable as say, something like the Swastika or the Nike swoosh, and frankly one would need to be at least slightly batshit to even be in possession of the requisite knowledge or familiarity with occultism to even be capable of identifying it at all. I wasn't familiar with it and the fact that you, Zip and Plunkett were is telling: You all know far more about the occult than I do. Or ever will.

The reason for this is that I'm not frittering away the hours of my life marinating in superstitious hocus-pocus. I'm not adrift on the transom of baseless absurdity; tumbling down some utterly insane rabbit-hole of spiritual pariedolia on a flat earth that is infested with billionaire witch-covens and demons where pixelated sigils hold mystical power, meaning. I see no magic in the world. Nobody is morphing into a goblinishly-dentitioned werebeasts rippling with string warts and oozing yellow drool at midnight. Nobody is being turned into a frog by a spell cast by a lazy-eyed two-toothed crone with a nose like a dill pickle over a cauldron of newt's eyes simmering in the woods.

It's all bullshit.

I will persist with my AV until either Declan or Anderson tells me to desist, or simply expresses an opinion that the forum is not well-served by it. I will do this because, again, zip and yourself cannot seem to grasp that is not a religious forum, and it is not within yours, zips, or my purvey to legislate content on those grounds. We are janitors. That's all.

You are free to be religious here, as is any other member, and discuss your faith in all its particularities, and at no point will I interfere with that on any level or in any way. The same can be said for Hermit or Plunkett or whatever one of them is the flat-earther, and Tiger with his faith-based origins stuff and James with his J-pilled nonsense. I don't like any of the aforementioned. I consider it all to be absolutely fucking mental if you must know. But you, and zip and everybody else mentioned will always be free to express and engage in their opinions, beliefs, and world-views without interference or censorship by myself. That's what freedom is; the right to say and think what you want whether other people agree with it or not, or whether it makes sense or not. Obviously there has to be some kind of rubicon, or line, because a total free-for-all would result in the destruction of the forum. I've said many times before, it is hard to know where the line is. For me, it's anything that puts the perpetuity of the site at risk.

Regardless, what would be far worse, to me, than a world with flat-earthers and various religious kooks, would be a world where those people were no longer allowed to exist. That would be a living death.

The symbol of Azoroth is offensive to you precisely because of your religious predilections. It is not to someone else that doesn't hold them. You are like the feminist heckler at the comedy show who rants at the comedian who tells a misogynistic joke, having laughed five minutes earlier at a fat joke, because she is not fat.

If you're so dainty that you truly can't handle an AV, petition Declan or Anderson to ask me to take it down. If they consent to your request, I will do this without any hard feelings, because the exercise has served its purpose and I simply do not care. And it's their site. Not mine.

But I won't be doing that because you or Zip wants me to.

Enjoy your day.

Personally I don't give a toss about your avatar. However the rest of your diatribe deserves a response.

Overall, your assertions are trapped in a manufactured matrix of "normalcy" that you think sets you apart, yet binds you to the herd of your generation. You imagine your rejection of the occult or any notion of the supernatural as some bold stance, an act of rebellion against hocus-pocus. But, in truth, it’s not rebellion at all. It’s simply the default position of a mind steeped in the intellectual confines of the late 20th century—skepticism without depth, cynicism without inquiry, a conditioned response of the modern “Normie.”

You say you see no magic in the world. No wonder. Your worldview was handed to you, like fast food in the drive-thru, by the very culture that thrives on commodification and conformity. You’re not an original thinker, though you flatter yourself with that idea. You’ve merely inherited the beliefs of the secular materialists, the bureaucrats of reason, the generation spoon-fed by technocracy and entertained into submission. The “rationalist” in your skin is no more unique than the religious fundamentalist you deride. Both are products of their environment, both engineered by forces far beyond their awareness.

While you pride yourself on not falling down a rabbit hole of “superstitious hocus-pocus,” the irony is that your certainty itself is a rabbit hole, a narrow trench in which you find comfort and shelter. You don’t see any “magic” in the world, but that doesn’t make you clear-sighted; it makes you a casualty of the nihilism bred in the echo chambers of the 1970s, '80s, and '90s.

Your real misunderstanding is in believing that your set of opinions, so commonly held and so easily arrived at, make you unique. They don’t. You’re not a rebel, you're the product of a culture that manufactured millions just like you—disenchanted, dismissive, and cut off from deeper layers of human experience.

In a word, you're the very definition of the "Normie." While you cling to the belief that you’re safeguarding reason and progress, you're really just playing your part in a predetermined script, mistaking it for autonomy.

 

[Tiger]

I'm wary of dogpiling on Fishalt here but regarding the avatar, I couldn't give a crap either, didn't know what it is. But I believe that it does bother others.

I've had avatars before but it's always been something that I've identified with, not to "troll" others. That's a kinda dickless move if you ask me.

Now resisting the urge to troll Myles with a Tommeh avatar

Is that a real photograph or is it doctored?

 

[SwordOfStZip]

Is that a real photograph or is it doctored?

He has worn a t shirt with Mossad on it.

 

[SwordOfStZip]

Well I suppose there isn't really the equivalent of a wigger for Muslim culture

A large amount of animosity towards Black people is caused by "Wiggers". I know when I was younger I felt quite a bit at times of animosity towards Blacks as such even though there were no around me because "Wiggers" who I did come into contact with creeped me out.

 

[SwordOfStZip]

Tis real

I think he puts it down as a joke himself, or eh, trolling

This would be more of an indictment -

https://www.timesofisrael.com/why-are-us-pro-israel-groups-boosting-a-far-right-anti-muslim-uk-extremist/

Douglas Murray is more "Far Right" than the Tommeh but people from Zionist groups to Piers Morgan find the former acceptable but not the latter. I find that interesting- basically putting aesthetics before substance.

 

[Hermit]

Man jailed for slapping woman in face outside Busáras in central Dublin

A man has been jailed for slapping a woman in the face when she asked him to stop annoying her as she waited outside a bus station.

m.independent.ie

Paywalled article: "Man" = Xamse Jamac (35)

I searched his name and found this from 2023 - he robbed an umbrella and frightened women in a beauty salon:

Man ‘forcibly’ robbed woman of her umbrella near Luas stop, court is told

A man robbed a woman of her umbrella “by force” as she was walking home in Dublin, a court heard.

www.independent.ie

 

[Professor]

Man jailed for slapping woman in face outside Busáras in central Dublin

A man has been jailed for slapping a woman in the face when she asked him to stop annoying her as she waited outside a bus station.

m.independent.ie

Paywalled article: "Man" = Xamse Jamac (35)

I searched his name and found this from 2023 - he robbed an umbrella and frightened women in a beauty salon:

Man ‘forcibly’ robbed woman of her umbrella near Luas stop, court is told

A man robbed a woman of her umbrella “by force” as she was walking home in Dublin, a court heard.

www.independent.ie

Better have a high profile deportion (shown on RTE) back to Africa immediately upon release. Start setting a proper example.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Douglas Murray is more "Far Right" than the Tommeh

You're showing your middleclass snobbery there Miss.

And you told me you were from workingclass east Belfast.

 

[SwordOfStZip]

You're showing your middleclass snobbery there Miss.

And you told me you were from workingclass east Belfast.

Not all working class people are savages (though plenty of them are in East Belfast admittedly).

Also Tommy is middle class, he was a small capitalist before becoming a professional anti-Muslim.

 

[SwordOfStZip]

Secondly, why am I hostile towards Tommy Robinson? Mostly because he's hostile towards nationalism (for white people). Although it could hardly be any other way considering whose payroll he's on.

Leaving aside that the Gefilte fish consuming adjacent issues there is a contradiction between anyways between Imperialism and ethno-nationalism/tribalism as Empire building tends to dilute genetic purity, especially over time, for one (there are other issues here). There is something of the old clash between the British Imperialists and the Little Englanders in the conflicts and tensions between the likes of Douglas Murray and Tommy on one side and Patriotic Alternative even if it may not be completely analogous.

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

View: https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/1846138851485479063

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

I once spoke with a former US soldier who was a K9 handler on the Korean Border. He said the North had almost no military presence there, and ordinary N-Koreans lived in the border zone, unfazed by the location, just going about daily life. Nobody really payed attention in the North, he claimed.

 

[Wolf]

Eh...NO!!!!!

Human rights groups urge Polish PM to shelve plan to suspend right to asylum

More than 60 NGOs including Holocaust memorial group tell Donald Tusk region’s volatility ‘doesn’t exempt us from humanity’

www.theguardian.com

 

[SwordOfStZip]

Personally I don't give a toss about your avatar.

If his avatar has meant the loss of @scolairebocht to his site which I suspect that it has than I do think you and others should give a toss.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

If Bocht left the Site because of an Avatar then he's an idiot.

It is however a pity as he was a very good contributor.

 

[Fishalt]

Personally I don't give a toss about your avatar. However the rest of your diatribe deserves a response.

Overall, your assertions are trapped in a manufactured matrix of "normalcy" that you think sets you apart, yet binds you to the herd of your generation. You imagine your rejection of the occult or any notion of the supernatural as some bold stance, an act of rebellion against hocus-pocus. But, in truth, it’s not rebellion at all. It’s simply the default position of a mind steeped in the intellectual confines of the late 20th century—skepticism without depth, cynicism without inquiry, a conditioned response of the modern “Normie.”

You say you see no magic in the world. No wonder. Your worldview was handed to you, like fast food in the drive-thru, by the very culture that thrives on commodification and conformity. You’re not an original thinker, though you flatter yourself with that idea. You’ve merely inherited the beliefs of the secular materialists, the bureaucrats of reason, the generation spoon-fed by technocracy and entertained into submission. The “rationalist” in your skin is no more unique than the religious fundamentalist you deride. Both are products of their environment, both engineered by forces far beyond their awareness.

While you pride yourself on not falling down a rabbit hole of “superstitious hocus-pocus,” the irony is that your certainty itself is a rabbit hole, a narrow trench in which you find comfort and shelter. You don’t see any “magic” in the world, but that doesn’t make you clear-sighted; it makes you a casualty of the nihilism bred in the echo chambers of the 1970s, '80s, and '90s.

Your real misunderstanding is in believing that your set of opinions, so commonly held and so easily arrived at, make you unique. They don’t. You’re not a rebel, you're the product of a culture that manufactured millions just like you—disenchanted, dismissive, and cut off from deeper layers of human experience.

In a word, you're the very definition of the "Normie." While you cling to the belief that you’re safeguarding reason and progress, you're really just playing your part in a predetermined script, mistaking it for autonomy.

I could equally say all this of yourself, Tiger. We're all products of our life and time, embedded in it like a bug in amber. This process is inescapable. You are a Catholic because you were born in Ireland in the 20th Century. You did not reason your way into that particular ideology. It was handed to you, already fully-formed, complete with culture and doctrines, and you simply osmosed it. It was the default of the time. For the greater part of your life, it was the dominant religious institution, and believing in it was in fact what defined you as a Normie. Tell me; in what way are you not a product of your environment? To employ your own language--which you have used to verbalize me because I never used it to describe myself mind you--is the outcome of your life and mind Unique, rebellious, or the result of original thought? Your identity is constructed around the works of bronze-age sand people who introduced into your homeland in the 5th century. The mistake you made is not understanding that change is the only constant. You have become acculturated, and bitter. Hateful.

I don't consider myself unique, rebellious, or an original thinker--at least none of those things in the context of this discussion. Those are your words, not mine. I'm not rejecting the supernatural and the occult as an act of rebellion. Why would I? If we're to go by your own reasoning, what would be the point? By your own reasoning and assertion, such a rejection could not equal or be seen as rebellion by anybody because said rejection thereof would already be mainstream--the current dominant ideological position, no more rebellious than wearing a suit and tie to an office job. Therefore, it could not be rebellion, merely conformity.

I reject the aforementioned things because there's no evidence for them. What magic? Where? Evil is not done by people chanting canticles and waving incense, and neither is good. It is done by action, in the material, with the material, by good and evil people. Wish in one hand and shit in the other, Tiger. Let me know which one fills first.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Fishalt perhaps as an act of conciliation to Bocht you could change your Avatar to summat else.

Sometimes a man in a position of authority has to go above and beyond in order to keep the peace.

 

[Fishalt]

Fishalt perhaps as an act of conciliation to Bocht you could change your Avatar to summat else.

Sometimes a man in a position of authority has to go above and beyond in order to keep the peace.

Is that what it's come to, Myles? I have to change my avatar because I have offended the Christian sensibilities of another member? Charlie Hebdo? It would be no different from appeasing the Trannies and Gender stasi, forcing people to use pronouns and refer to men in dresses as women. In what way would that be conducive to the mission of the site--freedom of speech, and expression?

"Anything that is in lockstep with what I believe is good. Anything that isn't or is an affront to what I believe is bad".

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

I think you're digging your heels in over a nothing issue to be honest. Yes Bocht's beliefs are ridiculous but he's a valuable asset given his travel around the Country for patriot protests.

All I ask for you, as a Moderator, is to show a little magnanimity.

How about this: If you change your Avatar to summat else, I'll change mine from the Rolla to anything you please, even if you want to troll me.

Deal?

 

[Fishalt]

I think you're digging your heels in over a nothing issue to be honest. Yes Bocht's beliefs are ridiculous but he's a valuable asset given his travel around the Country for patriot protests.

All I ask for you, as a Moderator, is to show a little magnanimity.

How about this: If you change your Avatar to summat else, I'll change mine from the Rolla to anything you please, even if you want to troll me.

Deal?

"Bocht" has thrown a tantrum and left the site because he can't handle an AV. Who's digging their heels in, again? I'm the one being deprived of liberty here. Not Bocht. Should we just skip through the middle and turn the site into Www.Christianreform.com?

And why should you have to be punished? You didn't do anything.

 

[Fishalt]

You recently commandeered Hitchens no less, Christopher, that is

I don't know why you snivel under the label 'agnostic'

I like the other one too.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Fishalt is a hardliner. With blokes like him there would never have been a Belfast Agreement or any other Treaty for that matter, just more bloodshed.

I made him a very fair deal which would've saved face for all concerned but he rejected it outright.

That is not Mod-like behaviour.

 

[Fishalt]

Because he's an asshole?

It surely can't be because he's a Christian

He's got some very good takes, really.

The fact he's Christian is just incidental. I have no issue with anyone being Christian.

 

[Fishalt]

Fishalt is a hardliner. With blokes like him there would never have been a Belfast Agreement or any other Treaty for that matter, just more bloodshed.

I made him a very fair deal which would've saved face for all concerned but he rejected it outright.

That is not Mod-like behaviour.

To be fair Myles, it was always going to be an impossible task to live up to the insurmountable benchmark that is Broch the Greater, who hijacked a thread to talk about how offended they were by an AV, demanded I change it, then quit the site when I refused to do so.

Exemplary!

 

[Fishalt]

None of this is especially clever, BTW. You really don't need a conspiracy to oust me from the mod position. I really don't care that much about it. I'm happy to put it to a plebiscite if it makes you happy. I actually suggested this when offered the role originally.

Did I not, Zip? Come on now. Tell the truth and shame the devil.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Sometimes certain people are excitable Sir. Bocht is one of those as you can tell by his videos when he struggles to speak to people on camera because of that exciting nature.

So at times, if you have anything in the way of diplomacy, you must handle them in a certain way.

I feel you could've handled Bocht much better.

 

[Fishalt]

I tried this with you before re: 'agnosticism'. Of course you did your - "I'm not discussing this with you, James." routine.

I think you're coming across as very much an atheist to the believers. I think atheists who call themselves 'agnostic' are cowards

Well, as long as I'm disappointing both of you, I feel as though I'm on the right path.

 

[Fishalt]

Sometimes certain people are excitable Sir. Bocht is one of those as you can tell by his videos when he struggles to speak to people on camera because of that exciting nature.

So at times, if you have anything in the way of diplomacy, you must handle them in a certain way.

I feel you could've handled Bocht much better.

I didn't handle him at all. He was a mod.

He handled himself.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

None of this is especially clever, BTW. You really don't need a conspiracy to oust me from the mod position. I really don't care that much about it. I'm happy to put it to a plebiscite if it makes you happy. I actually suggested this when offered the role originally. Did I not, Zip? Come on now. Tell the truth and shame the devil.

I don't want you to leave the position Sir.

But as Moderator who represents the interests of the Site membership I feel you should offer Bocht an Olive branch.

 

[Fishalt]

Sometimes certain people are excitable Sir. Bocht is one of those as you can tell by his videos when he struggles to speak to people on camera because of that exciting nature.

So at times, if you have anything in the way of diplomacy, you must handle them in a certain way.

I feel you could've handled Bocht much better.

Name one demand, condition, or request I made to Bocht. Name one time I issued him an order or a directive. Name one time I censored him. Name one thing I took away from him.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Let me offer you another deal.

You change your Avatar to summat else and I'll use your current one as my own. That way Bocht won't think you're trolling him as a fellow Mod and he won't be too bothered by me using it because he knows I don't believe in Freemasonry.

I'm trying my best to come up with solutions to break this impasse. Please meet me half way?

 

[Fishalt]

I don't want you to leave the position Sir.

But as Moderator who represents the interests of the Site membership I feel you should offer Bocht an Olive branch.

My liberty and the liberty of members on this site doesn't begin where Bocht's fragility ends.

 

[Fishalt]

Let me offer you another deal.

You change your Avatar to summat else and I'll use your current one as my own. That way Bocht won't think you're trolling him as a fellow Mod and he won't be too bothered by me using it because he knows I don't believe in Freemasonry.

I'm trying my best to come up with solutions to break this impasse. Please meet me half way?

I'll see that and raise you:

I will hand back my mod keys, and change my avatar. If only to prove that, as I have explicitly stated many times before, I don't especially mind. I do not desire dominion or authority over others. Virtually or otherwise.

But I do not think, Myles, that's going to be the win that you, James, and Zip an even Bocht think it's going to be. The reason for this is that I am ostensibly the only member here who does have interpersonal biases, water-under-the-bridge, and/or real-world preferences and enmity. I am neutral.

There is nothing in the rules so to speak that my AV couldn't be some occult bullshit, and I was under the impression that site was about freedom of speech and expression. The fact that yourself, zip, and bocht (two of which are mods) have reacted to it, and the fallout thereof, is all the information I need, really.

Good luck with it all, Myles.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

I'm not trying to instigate a coup, get you to give your mod badge

Nor am I and I hope you don't Fishalt.

I am ostensibly the only member here who does have interpersonal biases, water-under-the-bridge, and/or real-world preferences and enmity.

Not true. We all have those.

I see you have made a very noble and sacrificing gesture regarding your Avatar. Now Bocht should re-emerge with a thank you and a handshake for you going the extra mile.

And as per what I promised above, I will put a Freemason/Occult image in my Avatar for your satisfaction.

Thank you Sir