Indeed not, and my fear is that those who do ask the basic and most important questions are increasingly denied an audience because there are too many vested interests wishing to see the status quo continue indefinitely.
Normally this is explained away as being a result of tectonic activity, however there are clearly examples where this is a poor explanation.
A mudslide would be one explanation if the rock strata was the same age throughout.
His influence is mainly over the Novus Ordo church of paganism.
All of the priests formed since the 1960’s have been taught based on his ideas.
The concept of witches and witchcraft is very modern. Historically, most women who were considered witches were simply isolated poor women living in the outskirts of poverty because their husbands died early in the game. Often times they would take small mammals etc as pets, for company, which is where the concept of familiars comes from.
This is nonsense, I'm afraid. The vast majority of women executed for witchcraft were decidedly not upper class. In fact, the vast majority of witch hunts happened in poor rural areas. They tended to be peasant wives, often widowed. Keep in mind this was occurring at the burgeoning of industrialization, and many of these women were likely economic refugees in their own host nations:Nearly all the people executed in Ireland for Witchcraft came from the Upper Classes.
Alice Kyteler - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
And it was not only in Ireland that things were similar most of the time-
La Voisin - Wikipedia
Spot on.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinio...w-he-still-doesnt-get-it/?utm_source=telegram
Atheist Richard Dawkins’s latest ‘culturally Christian’ comments show he still doesn’t get it
Liberalism is the attempt to continue Christianity without Christ. Like Matthew Arnold before him, Dawkins sees in Christianity a poetic beauty having no essential truth.
Richard DawkinsAl Teich/Shutterstock
Frank Wright
Comments
12
Wed Apr 3, 2024 - 5:02 pm EDT
(LifeSiteNews) — British biologist and militant atheist Richard Dawkins has once again professed the value of Christianity – minus Christ, of course.
He chose the Easter Triduum, the pinnacle of the liturgical year which commemorates the central mystery of the Catholic faith, to remind the world that he thinks of himself as a “Cultural Christian.”
What this means to him is simply that Christianity, as he misunderstands it, is now liberal, and therefore pleasing to him.
“I like to live in a culturally Christian country, though I do not believe a single word of the Christian faith,” said Dawkins.
He says that by contrast, the doctrine of Islam is “fundamentally hostile to women, hostile to gays.”
The culture that Dawkins is defending here is that of the rights-based religion of reason. This is nothing new, as the tradition to which he belongs is an attempt to replace the divine with itself.
Christianity is a communal affair that imposes group ethics, social standards of behavior and cultural norms. Totally antithetical to the Libertarian mindset.
extendedsynthesis.blogspot.com
temblor.net
The issue is that on many examples of polystrate tree fossils, there is no evidence of tectonic activity or a mudslide action in the strata surrounding the tree fossil.Oh that's an easy one. Just picture what you remember from watching earth quakes & landslides combined?
The earths shakes quakes and cracks open,Ok? then the landslide where the edge of a forest slides down into the deep dark coal seam - 100 million years after the coal had been forming . . . See?
View attachment 5022
Violent shaking triggers massive landslides in Sapporo Japan earthquake - Temblor.net
The magnitude 6.6 Sapporo earthquake occurred along the southern part of Hokkaido, Japan
What could be the cause of such?
voxday.net
Which underlines how little we poor humans know about the working of nature, preferring to bundle all our ignorance up into one big ball and call it God.The Vacuous Rhetoric of Evolution - Vox Popoli
This is a quote from the 1966 Philadelphia symposium, but it is precisely the same sort of argument that any substantive critic of Neo-Darwinism keeps running into from the Neo-Darwinians: Combinations of different genes occur such that every individual is a unique combination, and the selective...
The Vacuous Rhetoric of Evolution
This is a quote from the 1966 Philadelphia symposium, but it is precisely the same sort of argument that any substantive critic of Neo-Darwinism keeps running into from the Neo-Darwinians:
Combinations of different genes occur such that every individual is a unique combination, and the selective assay of the value of each random mutation is performed simultaneously in this framework for thousands of mutations at a time. The acceptance of the neo-Darwinian concept of evolution appears to be eminently valid on this basis. However, a critical feature is the occurrence of mechanisms for genetic combination and recombination, and a major criticism of the neo-Darwinian concept which has been raised at this meeting is premised on the lack of such a mechanism in the initial steps of the evolution of a “sense” sequence of a polypeptide or polynucleotide from an initially “nonsense” sequence. It does not, however, seem an extreme extrapolation from the known facts of nucleic acid replication and transcription to envisage that combination and recombination are inherent features of polynucleotides, and the evolution of “sense” sequences then becomes a process of reasonable probability.
– Dr. Alex Fraser, Professor of Genetics, University of California Davis, California
Let’s break the argument down into its component parts:
1. There is no mechanism. This is readily admitted.
2. This lack of a mechanism renders the hypothesis impossible.
3. But it doesn’t strike the Neo-Darwinian true believer to be an extreme extrapolation to imagine what this nonexistent, never-observed mechanism could be if it existed, which it doesn’t.
4. And if we simply imagine that this nonexistent mechanism existed, then the proposed process that requires it in order to function becomes theoretically possible.
5. Therefore, the process works as imagined
Nice straw man you've constructed there.
