The fact that queen bees are queen bees because of what they consume is news to.. absolutely fucking nobody (I can post a video of Dawkins (who's a biologist) saying this)
Can you please expand on how this expounds your
intelligent design thesis?
Jambo. Why is it that nuance seems to escape you like a well-hidden Easter egg? Not everything needs to come with a step-by-step manual.
The point isn’t just that food can change how bees grow, but that this shows how carefully their bodies are made to work.
Of course the development of queen bees through their consumption of royal jelly is well-established and widely understood, I’m not claiming otherwise.
However, the point I’m making in relation to Intelligent Design (ID) is not about the fact of the queen bee's development, but rather what this kind of precise, programmed response suggests about the underlying biological systems. The question isn't whether environmental factors influence development, but whether the intricacy of these mechanisms, like epigenetic switches and highly coordinated gene expression, could plausibly arise from random evolutionary processes alone (they can't), or whether they point to a pre-installed, purposeful design. Such highly specific and finely tuned biological systems — where a single environmental input can dramatically alter an organism's development — suggests strongly a guiding intelligence behind life's architecture. The fact that this process works so seamlessly and reliably is what expands the discussion beyond known biology into questions about the origins of such complexity.
The concept of epigenetics, wherein gene expression is dynamically regulated by external factors, aligns with ID claims of "directed adaptability." Instead of emerging through random evolutionary processes, such complex and highly coordinated regulatory networks are viewed as exhibiting characteristics of irreducible complexity, with multiple interacting components working seamlessly to produce a coherent biological response. This adaptability, framed within the larger context of fine-tuning, supports the argument that life is the product of intentional design, as the intricate balance between organism and environment is far too precise and specific to have arisen purely by chance. Thus, the capacity for diet and other environmental factors to reprogram genetic expression strengthens the ID argument for a purposive, intelligent origin of life systems.