The Climate Change scam

True enough.👍

Word of caution on the farm machinery front though. According to the industry the savings will not be great as the costs of developing the new engines to reduce emissions are already embedded into production costs, and they are a small part of the overall cost anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpc
This lad should stick to igniting race wars with his tranny husband, Michael.👍

Obama says Trump climate move leaves US 'less safe'
https://www.rte.ie/news/us/2026/0212/1558193-us-climate-rules/
Reading that RTE report a little more thoroughly it does help explain the left's fall into totally detached idiocy and how they have reached the point at which they are today.

To believe, as Obama obviously does, that CO2 is directly harmful to our health shows a magnificent detachment from all that is good and sensible about science which has firmly established that a few extra PPM is of no consequence whatsoever.

Quack science, however, has pushed the idea that CO2 is the most wicked stuff ever, even though NASA has clearly shown that nature is lapping it up with enthusiasm. But that is ignored, it is the idea that is important, not the reality, the left has somehow decided that it knows better than God and so tries to play God, but it really hasn't a clue.

This is the very same concept that we find carried forward to wokeism and especially transgenderism. The left knows better than nature which has, for the past few billion years, been labouring under the impression that two distinct and different sexes is the best way to carry life forward. Thankfully the left is now here to point out the error of its ways and life on planet earth should bloody well be thankful that men in dresses are here to sort such nonsense out!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jpc
Word of caution on the farm machinery front though. According to the industry the savings will not be great as the costs of developing the new engines to reduce emissions are already embedded into production costs, and they are a small part of the overall cost anyway.
People miss that bit

"the costs of developing the new engines to reduce emissions are already embedded into production costs, "
 
In further reference to Trump pulling the Endangerment Finding of 2009 which underpins the whole toxic CO2 nonsense, one particular American energy commentator (David Blackmon) notes with obvious satisfaction -

Boost for Energy Industry: By removing artificial constraints on CO2 emissions, it paves the way for American energy dominance, efficient permitting, and investments in critical sectors like data centers and minerals—without apologies or lectures to allies. (My bold).

It is this line which clearly sets out the desire of the Trump administration to whip Europe's ass, amongst others, one of which is the UK where gormless Miliband's latest wheeze is to deploy solar panels in space, at an unspecified cost, in a bid to achieve net zero by 2050.

There will only be the one winner here.....
 
Interesting item from a Substack pointing out that one reason climate alarmist journos get so hysterical is that they are all fighting for space to be heard -

The Climate Media Retreat

Last week, The Washington Post laid off roughly one-third of its newsroom staff, including at least 13 reporters and editors covering climate and environmental issues.

The Post had more than thirteen (13) reporters who covered climate. Excessive but it explains how the quality of climate coverage was such a race to the bottom. Thirteen (13) reporters fighting for column space each week. No wonder the hysteria got louder and the logical stretches got longer over time ending up in headlines like: “Deadly Rivers in the Sky” dealing with atmospheric rivers, or “Facing unbearable heat, Qatar has begun to air-condition the outdoors”, concluding with if it’s hot, it’s because of climate change. If it’s cold, it’s because of climate change….
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom