The Climate Change scam

Steady on there, chum.
Didnt you start this all off with a meme where Curry is appartently calling it a hoax?
Something we found out isnt even her triue position.
I think you've basically ignored that meme. But okay, you can read a (AI) response to - Judith Curry & hoax by clicking here. Although again, I'm not sure what point you're making?
 
I think you've basically ignored that meme. But okay, you can read a (AI) response to - Judith Curry & hoax by clicking here. Although again, I'm not sure what point you're making?
Nor does he, he simply gets AI to dig up what it thinks might be relevant crap from the interwebby thingie.
 
I think you've basically ignored that meme. But okay, you can read a (AI) response to - Judith Curry & hoax by clicking here. Although again, I'm not sure what point you're making?
Ignored the meme? I literally replied to your post where you posted the meme.
 
Ignored the meme? I literally replied to your post where you posted the meme.
Ah, this is now why I regret not including in my previous post - "and by ignoring, I don't mean that you didn't reply to the post in which the meme was made" :)
 
Ah, this is now why I regret not including in my previous post - "and by ignoring, I don't mean that you didn't reply to the post in which the meme was made" :)

Its strange you say I've ignored it when its been the sole focus of our conversation.

Thats why I say coherence is not your strong point.
 
Its strange you say I've ignored it when its been the sole focus of our conversation.

Thats why I say coherence is not your strong point.
Okay, ask AI what the meme says and then see how your reply (a Wiki blurb about Judith Curry) stands up
 
Okay, ask AI what the meme says and then see how your reply (a Wiki blurb about Judith Curry) stands up
The meme states that Curry thinks its a hoax.

We have already established thats an incorrect take on her position.
 
The meme states that Curry thinks its a hoax.

We have already established thats an incorrect take on her position.
There doesn't seem to be much depth to your conclusions.

In the AI link I provided, it says -

"Judith Curry, a former climatologist, has not called climate change itself a "hoax," but she has stated that the UN's definition of man-made climate change "qualifies as a hoax"."

Secondly, the meme compares and contrasts two people, one a scientist and the other not, and then a third party - the media, or the manipulation thereof.

I really don't know why any of that is difficult for you.
 
There doesn't seem to be much depth to your conclusions.

In the AI link I provided, it says -

"Judith Curry, a former climatologist, has not called climate change itself a "hoax," but she has stated that the UN's definition of man-made climate change "qualifies as a hoax"."

Secondly, the meme compares and contrasts two people, one a scientist and the other not, and then a third party - the media, or the manipulation thereof.

I really don't know why any of that is difficult for you.
Lets not rely on AI.


"As for Curry’s position on climate change — she doesn’t deny that it’s happening. Or that humans have contributed. She argues that natural climate variability is also a major contributing factor and that measures to stanch climate change are likely to be ineffective, which is where she falls out of line with most other scientists.

“I have never said that climate change is a hoax,” Curry told us in an email. “The earth’s climate has been changing for the past 4.6 billion years.”

“Climate change is a geological fact. What is causing the change for the past century is a different issue. Humans are contributing to the recent climate change, but there has also been natural climate variability/change,” Curry said."
 
Lets not rely on AI.


"As for Curry’s position on climate change — she doesn’t deny that it’s happening. Or that humans have contributed. She argues that natural climate variability is also a major contributing factor and that measures to stanch climate change are likely to be ineffective, which is where she falls out of line with most other scientists.

“I have never said that climate change is a hoax,” Curry told us in an email. “The earth’s climate has been changing for the past 4.6 billion years.”

“Climate change is a geological fact. What is causing the change for the past century is a different issue. Humans are contributing to the recent climate change, but there has also been natural climate variability/change,” Curry said."


Okay? Do you want to talk about anything else?
 


Okay? Do you want to talk about anything else?
I'm not going down the rabbithole of responding to AI content.

“Climate change is a geological fact. What is causing the change for the past century is a different issue. Humans are contributing to the recent climate change, but there has also been natural climate variability/change,” Curry said."

Humans are contributing to recent climate change.

I think you are done here.
 
I'm not going down the rabbithole of responding to AI content.

“Climate change is a geological fact. What is causing the change for the past century is a different issue. Humans are contributing to the recent climate change, but there has also been natural climate variability/change,” Curry said."

Humans are contributing to recent climate change.

I think you are done here.
I'm nowhere near done but you seem to be and I'll give you a couple of reasons why:

1) You haven't said to what level human activity is "contributing".

2) What can or should be, reasonably or realistically, done about it.
 
I'm nowhere near done but you seem to be and I'll give you a couple of reasons why:

1) You haven't said to what level human activity is "contributing".

2) What can or should be, reasonably or realistically, done about it.
I was commenting on the meme, which does not represents Curry's position.

The level that human activity is contributing is extremely well documented. You can ask Google AI as you place so much faith in it.

As to what can be done?

What is already in the atmosphere will cumulatively trap energy for decades even if we stopped burning hydrocarbons tomorrow. Its baked in and theres nothing we can do there.

I do support renewables but only as a means for better energy security and not sending petrodollars to OPEC etc. Ireland is well placed here.

The other thing is beef up our security and think about formally abandoning neutrality and getting into defense partnerships. There will be social upheaval in other parts of the world as time goes on.
 
I was commenting on the meme, which does not represents Curry's position.
Why not?

Regurgitating what a "fact checking" article says is not an answer.

The level that human activity is contributing is extremely well documented. You can as Google AI as you place so much faith in it.
Nope. I have no faith in AI when it comes to science denial, e.g. climate science (and I can think of quite a few other examples)

As to what can be done?

What is already in the atmosphere will cumulatively trap energy for decades even if we stopped burning hydrocarbons tomorrow. Its baked in and theres nothing we can dohere.

I do support renewables but only as a means for better energy security and not sending petrodollars to OPEC etc. Ireland is well placed here.

The other thing is beef up our security and think about formally abandoning neutrality and getting into defense partnerships. There will be social upheaval in other parts of the world as time goes on.
lol

Okay, do you want to have a stab at answering a related but different question? What could, realistically or reasonably, be done by a country like Ireland?
 
Why not?

Regurgitating what a "fact checking" article says is not an answer.


Nope. I have no faith in AI when it comes to science denial, e.g. climate science (and I can think of quite a few other examples)


lol

Okay, do you want to have a stab at answering a related but different question? What could, realistically or reasonably, be done by a country like Ireland?
Curry stated her position in that article: humans are contributing to recent climate change.

As regards Ireland, I just gave you those answers.
 
I don't think that she had anything to do with the article


Even in your wildest, climate change alarmist dreams, Ireland has negligible contribution
You can choose what to believe about what Curry said but what she said still stands.

I wasnt talking about Irelands contribution to climate change. I was talking about how Ireland should respond.
 
You can choose what to believe about what Curry said but what she said still stands.
Sure, I already said that I thought the Wiki blurb you posted about her all sounded quite reasonable.

But again, we're back to the depth of your conclusions.. Of course climate change isn't a hoax, I agree with that. Curry said that man-made climate change, as presented, is a hoax. I agree with that, too.

I wasnt talking about Irelands contribution to climate change. I was talking about how Ireland should respond.
Why should Ireland "respond" to something that it has no effect on? Particularly if the response is deleterious
 
I don't think that she had anything to do with the article


Even in your wildest, climate change alarmist dreams, Ireland has negligible contribution
You will come to learn that you are engaging with a vile troll, I tend to ignore it especially after the gross inhumanity it displayed during covid. My suspicion is that he's proud to call his activities here a job.
 
Sure, I already said that I thought the Wiki blurb you posted about her all sounded quite reasonable.

But again, we're back to the depth of your conclusions.. Of course climate change isn't a hoax, I agree with that. Curry said that man-made climate change, as presented, is a hoax. I agree with that, too.


Why should Ireland "respond" to something that it has no effect on? Particularly if the response is deleterious
If you want to rely on AI content to make your case, good luck to you.

As for your question, I think recent events demonstrate yet again that Ireland is not immune from events elsewhere in the world. I think taking reasonable steps in energy security and military preparation is wise.
 
Last edited:
You will come to learn that you are engaging with a vile troll, I tend to ignore it especially after the gross inhumanity it displayed during covid. My suspicion is that he's proud to call his activities here a job.
It does spend most of its life on the auld computer watching all kinds of deviant and Perverted things alright.
I log in every couple of days just for a laugh now.
It has destroyed this site as was its mission from day one.
Thankfully the kiddy fiddler will never find where I post now.
10 years the freak has been stalking me at this point...😂
If the site owner does the moral and decent thing and gets rid of the rat for good I'll consider contributing more.
 
Sure, I already said that I thought the Wiki blurb you posted about her all sounded quite reasonable.

But again, we're back to the depth of your conclusions.. Of course climate change isn't a hoax, I agree with that. Curry said that man-made climate change, as presented, is a hoax. I agree with that, too.


Why should Ireland "respond" to something that it has no effect on? Particularly if the response is deleterious
The climate changes, it's what it does, screwing us over on the back of natural events by pretending its all our fault is most definitly a manmade catastrophe, for the 99% that is.
 
Well, you don't have much of one yourself :)

Mine certainly wasn't a nitpick about the word hoax, especially when a quick Google search reveals that Curry did use that word, to some controversy.
A quick Google AI search.
 
Haven will be soon be getting the Heave-Ho on his Climate Change Scamming ! ! !

:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:


View: https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/2055770869847281967

RCP8.5 is the worst case scenario where nothing at all was done on emissions.
But we all know that theres a big emphasis on CO2 emissions now. So it makes sense this would be taken in account.

This is a bit like saying the danger of not wearing seatbeats is overblown because people starting wearing seatbelts.

Another clanger by Trump. He got nothing from China so here we are.
 
Hopefully the Climate Change, Scammers / Con-Merchants / Frauds, will = = Burn In Hell ;) :ROFLMAO:

That's the Climate Change they deserve ! ! !

It would be just deserts, if that was their fate ! ! !
 
Hopefully the Climate Change, Scammers / Con-Merchants / Frauds, will = = Burn In Hell ;) :ROFLMAO:

That's the Climate Change they deserve ! ! !

It would be just deserts, if that was their fate ! ! !
Talking of heading into the underworld it turns out that not all scientific evidence supports the alarmists mad theories after all.

A Greenland ice core appears not to go with the flow so it is happily ignored with the excuse being that the trapped air bubbles could potentially have been altered by in situ chemical reactions. Something that doesn't apply to the Antarctica ice cores for some reason best known to the alarmists. But anyway, here's a fellow who feels that the Greenland investigation should be taken a little more seriously, but he's only a retired Petrophysicist with a huge experience in analyzing core samples so what would he know?

His belief is that -

The Greenland CO2 responses appear to reflect short-term centennial fluctuations whereas the Antarctic CO2 fluctuations appear to be responding to longer term millennial changes. These differences may be the result of enhanced terrestrial carbon influences in combination with oceanic releases in the Northern Hemisphere whereas the Antarctic low amplitude CO2 responses are dominated by global and Southern oceanic processes. Or simply that Antarctic ice core record has insufficient data resolution.

Which is a polite way of saying the Antarctica analysis may be little more than a hyped up conclusion based on insufficient evidence.

 
The lengths to which some people here will go to avoid being challenged is hilarious. The excuses!
I must say that Fish did take a hiding there with regard to his and Haven's interatcion.

Obviously given Haven's madness I was rooting for Fish but in Soccer terms it was at least a 4-0 drubbing.

Anyone who won't respond to a well thought out post is on the end of a hammering.

However! There have been reports of cheating and AI being used on Haven's behalf.

A Declan Kelly investigation is required.
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom