- Joined
- Jan 13, 2023
- Messages
- 8,570
- Reaction score
- 7,736
He'll get them when he's told to get them.You got your Climate Change jabs yet Kangal?
He'll get them when he's told to get them.You got your Climate Change jabs yet Kangal?
Them were the days!Good collection of ridiculous climate doom predictions:
![]()
Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions - Competitive Enterprise Institute
Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s. They continue to do so today. None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true. What follows is a collection of notably wild predictions from notable people in government and...cei.org
![]()
This is amusing
This is amusing
The evidence is only 140 years old so in effect there is no evidence to corroborate or disclaim it.That's not what the evidence shows.
No but it would mean we can do nothing to change it.But let's assume for a moment you are right, that the climate is changing for non-human reasons. Does that make the impacts go away?
Duh! Well who’d have ever thunk it.Climate change impacts humans.
This is not true.
View: https://youtu.be/e-183_0Sr1c?si=BX_wos7ZChZsXe-B
This is not actually true either. There are ideas about scrubbing CO2 from the atmosphere but it would be incredibly expensive and risky.
But let's say we can't change the climate in any way. What do we do about the problems?
I noted the Roman warm period on another thread, all done without burning a drop of oil, clever buggers those Romans y’know.The evidence is only 140 years old so in effect there is no evidence to corroborate or disclaim it.
No but it would mean we can do nothing to change it.
There are establishment bootlickers who have the audacity to believe that humans can control the climate.I noted the Roman warm period on another thread, all done without burning a drop of oil, clever buggers those Romans y’know.
Probably ~ Just turned up their Thermostats ! ! !I noted the Roman warm period on another thread, all done without burning a drop of oil, clever buggers those Romans y’know.
There was a warm period about the time of Christ which is why he could sit out in the desert for 40 days. The Romans grew grapes in England about that time and St Patrick sat out on Crogh Patrick for 40 day too.I noted the Roman warm period on another thread, all done without burning a drop of oil, clever buggers those Romans y’know.
Tank, do yourself a favour and watch about the first 20 minutes or so of this documentary and stop all this childish worrying about mild weatherCopernicus: February 2024 was globally the warmest on record – Global Sea Surface Temperatures at record high | Copernicus
C3S routinely publishes monthly climate bulletins reporting on the changes observed in global surface air and sea temperatures, sea ice cover and hydrological variables.climate.copernicus.eu
Tank, do yourself a favour and watch about the first 20 minutes or so of this documentary and stop all this childish worrying about mild weather
So ~ St Patrick was just Sun-Bathing !There was a warm period about the time of Christ which is why he could sit out in the desert for 40 days. The Romans grew grapes in England about that time and St Patrick sat out on Crogh Patrick for 40 day too.
I grew colder until 536 AD when a volcano darkened the skys and led to famine. There appears to have been a cooling from then to about 750 AD when the Vikings set out to plunder. What is for sure is that it got warmer
from 850 AD until 1,250 when the monks occupied Skellig Michael. In 1250 it got cold again until people were
skating on the ice in London in the 1500s. There was a famine in Ireland in 1741 due to cold and wet.
From the early 1800s it got warmed as we exit the little ice age and we are still warming now.
You’re a gullible eejit Tank.What a pile of shit. Of course Ivor promotes it!
![]()
Climate - the Movie: a hot mess of (c)old myths!
The Desmog Climate Disinformation Database documents, 'individuals and organisations that have helped to delay and distract the public and our elected leaders from taking needed action to reduce greenhouse gas pollution and fight global warming.' It's a who's who of the organised climate change...skepticalscience.com
Does it really say "CO2 is plant food"? This is classic Dunning Kruger.
In order to grow, plants need light, heat, air, water and nutrients which called growth factors. Plant growth is limited by the factor in the least supply; growth cannot be greater than that allowed by the most limiting factor. Heat and water can severely limit plant growth no matter how much CO2 you have. Soil conditions can worsen too, so that Liebig’s law of the minimum comes into play.
While the idea that CO2 is good for plants or crops sounds like "common sense like most common sense it falls down when tested. Increased CO2 is shown to decrease the nutritional value of crops, like rice.
What should the average temperature be now, if there was no man-made climate change? Would the average temperature remain constant forever, or would it still change anyway as it always has, regardless of human activity?Copernicus: February 2024 was globally the warmest on record – Global Sea Surface Temperatures at record high | Copernicus
C3S routinely publishes monthly climate bulletins reporting on the changes observed in global surface air and sea temperatures, sea ice cover and hydrological variables.climate.copernicus.eu
So you didn't watch the documentary but you googled "Climate The Movie debunked" and posted the first link you found.Does it really say "CO2 is plant food"? This is classic Dunning Kruger.
"The idea"...plants need CO2, without it they cannot live.Moving on to CO2, the idea that CO2 is good for plants or crops sounds like "common sense".
The Uki's must be getting the shit knocked out of them so it's onto the next subject it's been told to push by its owners.You’re a gullible eejit Tank.
That’s not a neutral review, ya dishonest git.
That ‘skepticalscience’ website is run by a devoted climate activist - John Cook. A chap who literally makes a living from the scam.
.
Exactly. His response was lazy in the extreme.So you didn't watch the documentary but you googled "Climate The Movie debunked" and posted the first link you found.
What does that mean exactly? That claim cannot be verified or falsified in reality. Sounds like pseudoscience again. Climate models are not proof of anything in reality.Its should be 1.5C lower, based on all the other inputs with no changes.
So you drop an hour and a half video on me???This is not true.
Such as?But let's say we can't change the climate in any way. What do we do about the problems?
Yes they were, and today we have real really clever buggers who actually make both warm & cold periods at will.I noted the Roman warm period on another thread, all done without burning a drop of oil, clever buggers those Romans y’know.
Sigh....Copernicus: February 2024 was globally the warmest on record – Global Sea Surface Temperatures at record high | Copernicus
C3S routinely publishes monthly climate bulletins reporting on the changes observed in global surface air and sea temperatures, sea ice cover and hydrological variables.climate.copernicus.eu
Does it matter?Sigh....
And how long do these records extend in any form that can be trusted?