Z
Zipporah's Flint
Guest
In a vacuum, certainly.
But it certainly raised quite a lot of dust on ignition.
If it could be proven to you 100 per cent that the Earth is flat would that force you to give up atheism?
In a vacuum, certainly.
But it certainly raised quite a lot of dust on ignition.
Are you saying that it is not possible to have a gas pressure gradient in a container?
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXnaVvgaYY8
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNYCdbDKOhA
Gas pressure formulas, e.g. PV = nRT, include V for volume, i.e. the volume of a container. How can you have volume without a container?
View attachment 5716
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ir64EcRkf5Q
Pressure Gradients in Natural Gas Reservoirs:
![]()
Pressure Gradients in Natural Gas Reservoirs
Abstract. Procedures for computing turbulent flow of gas in steady state near the well bore and a graphical method for predicting unsteady state laminar flow at distances from the well have been combined to compute pressure gradients in gas reservoirs.Methods are discussed for predicting single...onepetro.org
View attachment 5717
Even FlatEarth.ws says you can have a gradient in a container:
![]()
pressure-gradient – FlatEarth.ws
flatearth.ws
SInce the Earth is round, thats a bit of a silly question.If it could be proven to you 100 per cent that the Earth is flat would that force you to give up atheism?
You simply measure volume. If I go outside, and mark out 1m by 1m by 1m with tape and sticks, I know thats 1 cubic metre of volume. I don't need a fully enclosed container.How can you have volume without a container?
That would be gas.In my places right now, there is 2 cylinders of oxygen, 2 of Propane, One of Acetylene another was stolen. 5 cylinders of domestic butane. One large air compressor and 2 mini compressors.
Dan should ban Hermit and Kangal from this thread and set up a gas thread for them.
SInce the Earth is round, thats a bit of a silly question.
Pity we could not have a sensible discussion here but that's life. It will hardly be proved in out lifetime and I reckon no one cares a damn. The young of to day don't know men claimed they were on the moon and therefore don't care if that is true or false.Sept of 2025. They are scheduled to do a flyby, dont hold your breath
Well yes. It would mean all geodesy, geology (including plate tectonics), cartography, astronomy and and number of other sciences and disciplines would be destroyed.I accept that it is very probably round however it is a thought experiment.
IF it was flat would that actually change anything for you do you think?
But I'm not sure why I'd jump from there to belief in a supernatural entity. And from there to a specific Catholic version.
I think for those of us who are "militantly opposed" it's less about gods or not and more about challenging magical thinking.a lot of the people who are militantly opposed to the flat earth model are so as part of their internal struggle to deny God's Existence at all costs.
"Pressure gradients in the atmosphere are typically caused by air of different temperatures"Gravity is the reason why we have a gradient.
You claimed gas pressure is constant in a container and asked me to show proof of gas pressure gradient in a container, which I did. You were wrong, even FlatEarth.ws disagreed with your claim. Concede you were wrong."In reality, the gas inside the container is also affected by gravity and will also have a pressure gradient, just like the gas outside."
Thank you.
"Pressure is caused by gas molecules hitting the walls of the container."If we have gravity, why is a container necessary?
The molecules are in constant, random motion and frequently collide with each other and with the walls of a container. Because the molecules are in motion, a gas will expand to fill the container. Since density is defined to be the mass divided by the volume, density depends directly on the size of the container in which a fixed mass of gas is confined.
Okay, go outside with your tape and sticks and measure a cubic metre of air, without a container, and measure the pressure of that cubic metre of air.You simply measure volume. If I go outside, and mark out 1m by 1m by 1m with tape and sticks, I know thats 1 cubic metre of volume. I don't need a fully enclosed container.
It is.You claimed gas pressure is constant in a container
At sea level it's 1013.25 millibars or 14.7 pounds per square inch.Okay, go outside with your tape and sticks and measure a cubic metre of air, without a container, and measure the pressure of that cubic metre of air.
So you are now mixing up the concept of high and low weather systems, with the fact that air pressure decreases the higher one ascends in the atmosphere.
Val, I am trying to give you and others a better argument against the moon landing. I'm citing gas pressure physics, not my opinions. But instead of considering and evaluating what I've presented, and presenting your counter arguments if you disagree, you say I'm off my rocker, you try to backseat moderate the thread and appeal to daddy to get me thread banned.In my places right now, there is 2 cylinders of oxygen, 2 of Propane, One of Acetylene another was stolen. 5 cylinders of domestic butane. One large air compressor and 2 mini compressors.
Dan should ban Hermit and Kangal from this thread and set up a gas thread for them.
So you can have a gas pressure gradient in a container?It is.
Unless an external force is applied. Like gravity.
I never said you could not.So you can have a gas pressure gradient in a container?
Thanks for this and the other definitions of pressure.