K
Kangal
Guest
How Putin Cannibalizes Russian Economy to Survive Personally
Putin’s financial lifeline has his merciless cannibalization of Russian economic productivity. It's unsustainable
Ukraine.
- Thread starter Declan
- Start date
Z
Zipporah's Flint
Guest
Do you remember the below?
Leo Varadkar branded 'autistic' by Fine Gael senator | The Irish Post
LEO VARADKAR has been described as "autistic" by a Fine Gael senator running in the election.Cat...
www.irishpost.com
Far be it from me to defend someone from Fine Gael but I knew exactly what she was trying to get at and Trudeau comes across the same way to me.
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2023
- Messages
- 4,618
- Reaction score
- 6,320
BTW, is this your latest pretty boy, the latest MILF (Males I'd like to feck) that NATO thinks will be a game changer in winning the hearts of bimbos and gayboys worldwide?
Another distracting smear based on al'lied transient cartoon economics to obfuscate the hard facts that Nato is sucking the blood-money from the taxes, resources of Americans, Europeans and UkrainiansHow Putin Cannibalizes Russian Economy to Survive Personally
Putin’s financial lifeline has his merciless cannibalization of Russian economic productivity. It's unsustainabletime.com
That's a major lousy achievement in producing debt, death, misery, war without gain, much pain, policy insane.
How Putin Cannibalizes Russian Economy to Survive Personally
Putin’s financial lifeline has his merciless cannibalization of Russian economic productivity. It's unsustainable
FTA . . . But energy prices across both oil and natural gas are now cheaper today than before the invasion, as are grain, wheat, lumber, metals, and practically every commodity that Russia produces. Amidst lower commodity prices across the board, thanks in part to the effective G7 oil price cap, Russia is now barely breaking even on oil sales with unwanted Russian Urals oil trading at a persistent discount but continuing to flow in ample volumes – exactly as it was designed. In short, the world has now largely replaced Russian supplies so commodity exports are no boon to a desperate Russia right now.
Where does the magic oil come from?? Stolen by Time's heroes as expected.
Syria condemns in strongest terms agreement signed between Qasad militia and U.S. oil company to steal Syrian oil - Syrian Arab News Agency
Damascus, SANA- Syria has condemned in the strongest terms the agreement signed between Qasad militi
www.sana.sy
In a statement to SANA on Sunday, a Foreign and Expatriates Ministry official source said that the Syrian Arab Republic condemns in the strongest terms the agreement signed between Qasad “SDF” militia and a U.S. oil company to steal the Syrian oil under the sponsorship and support of the U.S. administration.
The source affirmed that this agreement is considered as an integrated and aggravated theft and it can be only described as a deal between thieves who are stealing and thieves who are buying, and it constitutes an assault against Syria’s sovereignty, and a continuation of the U.S. hostile approach towards Syria which is represented in stealing the resources of the Syrian people and hindering the efforts exerted by the Syrian state for rebuilding what has been destroyed by terrorism which is mostly backed by the U.S. administration itself.
Last edited:
"The enemy's losses in this [Donetsk] direction over the past 24 hours amounted to 430 Ukrainian servicepeople killed and wounded, four armored combat vehicles and two cars. In the course of counter-battery fighting, a US-made M777 howitzer, a Polish-made Krab self-propelled howitzer and a Gvozdika self-propelled howitzer were hit," the ministry said.
Meanwhile, in the South Donetsk direction, Russian forces repelled two attacks by Ukrainian forces, destroying 120 servicepeople, two pick-up trucks, a US-made M777 howitzer and a Polish-made self-propelled gun-howitzer Krab, the ministry said.
In the Zaporozhye direction, Kiev lost up to 30 servicepeople, the ministry said, adding that a US-made M119 howitzer, a UK-made FH70 howitzer, as well as two D-30 howitzers and one Msta-B howitzer had been hit.
sputnikglobe.com
“Now more than 10,000 Ukrainian servicemen have already chosen life and used the 149.200 ‘Volga’ frequency to surrender. The captives are well-fed and provided with all necessary medical care,” the source said.
According to the insider, the process of UAF soldiers laying down their arms has recently accelerated as Ukrainian troops have begun surrendering in groups rather than individually, particularly around the village of Rabotino, one of the main flashpoints of the Ukraine conflict.
After the start of Kiev's counteroffensive in early June, Governor Yevgeny Balitsky of the Zaporozhye region confirmed that a large number of Ukrainian Armed Forces servicemen began surrendering in great numbers.
“Unlike in spring when one or two Ukrainian soldiers surrendered, now whole UAF units are laying down the arms; surrendering, there were no company [units]; we even witnessed platoon surrenders,” Balitsky pointed out.
sputnikglobe.com
Meanwhile, in the South Donetsk direction, Russian forces repelled two attacks by Ukrainian forces, destroying 120 servicepeople, two pick-up trucks, a US-made M777 howitzer and a Polish-made self-propelled gun-howitzer Krab, the ministry said.
In the Zaporozhye direction, Kiev lost up to 30 servicepeople, the ministry said, adding that a US-made M119 howitzer, a UK-made FH70 howitzer, as well as two D-30 howitzers and one Msta-B howitzer had been hit.
Ukraine Loses Up to 690 Soldiers Over Past 24 Hours
Ukraine has lost up to 690 soldiers both killed and wounded in six directions over the past 24 hours, the Russian Defense Ministry said on Saturday.
sputnikglobe.com
“Now more than 10,000 Ukrainian servicemen have already chosen life and used the 149.200 ‘Volga’ frequency to surrender. The captives are well-fed and provided with all necessary medical care,” the source said.
According to the insider, the process of UAF soldiers laying down their arms has recently accelerated as Ukrainian troops have begun surrendering in groups rather than individually, particularly around the village of Rabotino, one of the main flashpoints of the Ukraine conflict.
After the start of Kiev's counteroffensive in early June, Governor Yevgeny Balitsky of the Zaporozhye region confirmed that a large number of Ukrainian Armed Forces servicemen began surrendering in great numbers.
“Unlike in spring when one or two Ukrainian soldiers surrendered, now whole UAF units are laying down the arms; surrendering, there were no company [units]; we even witnessed platoon surrenders,” Balitsky pointed out.
Thousands of Ukrainian Troops Surrender via Russian Radio Hotline
The process of more Ukrainian soldiers holding out a white flag comes against the backdrop of Kiev’s bungled counteroffensive, which shows no sign of progress since its start in early June.
sputnikglobe.com
More or less correct..
K
Kangal
Guest
Yes. NATO was never a threat to Russia. It's progress to see that finally acknowledged here.
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2023
- Messages
- 4,618
- Reaction score
- 6,320
God you are simpleton.
But then again, you haven't a care how stupid you look just so long as you think you might have score a point somehow.
The conflict in Ukraine is a NATO backed conflict, so Russia is indeed threatened by the west.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2023
- Messages
- 9,512
- Reaction score
- 8,372
Exactly - But make no mistake, the conflict is WW3 by design.
NATO publishes article on preparing for full-scale conflict with Russia
Former high-ranking Pentagon official Gregory Weaver is confident that traditional nuclear deterrence based on the principle of mutually assured destruction in the event of a full-scale conflict with the Russian Federation is not enoughBRUSSELS, September 30. /TASS/. NATO has published an article by ex-Pentagon high ranking official Gregory Weaver urging the alliance to actively prepare for a potential war against Russia with the use of tactical nuclear weapons.
Weaver is confident that the traditional nuclear containment approach is not sufficient in the event of a full-scale conflict with Russia. He thinks that "strategic nuclear forces alone are insufficiently flexible and timely to convince Russian leadership that NATO is fully prepared to counter limited nuclear first use with militarily effective nuclear responses of our own. Given Russian strategy, doctrine, and capabilities, and the potential for simultaneous theater conflicts with two nuclear peers, additional NATO theater nuclear capabilities are required."
According to him, "the US could preposition more heavy ground force equipment and provide more deep precision strike capabilities in Europe."
"The bottom line is that European Allies will have to provide more conventional capability more efficiently, without perceiving the US request to do so as signaling a reduced US commitment to the defense of NATO. And the US needs to provide additional theater nuclear capability.
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2023
- Messages
- 4,618
- Reaction score
- 6,320
Nutters! Effin nutters, every man jack of them.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2023
- Messages
- 9,512
- Reaction score
- 8,372
Wank material for perverts.
They're itching to take over other peoples countries and the whole world in it's entirety. The BRICS+ saw what's being going on in the M.E. & 911 and are now better prepared to resist and resist they must or else all will be ripped, raped & stolen guaranteed.
K
Kangal
Guest
Well MAF is right about NATO. (He's also talking about men he'd like to fuck.) I see increasing honesty and candour on his part. He's admitting to some big stuff.
Certainly NATO was never a threat to Russia, and the fact that Russia is drawing down troops on its NATO borders confirms that.
I'm glad to see he has come around to that now (though he will of course deny it just to spite me).
NATO is assisting Ukraine because Russia invaded Ukraine. China is assisting Russia of course.
Of course NATO has war plans for Russia. The alliance needs to agree on a plan to defend itself. That's hardly news.
Last edited by a moderator:
20 Euros says the Ukraine war will not escalate. The yanks are out of ammo.
"Are you 'avin a larf rodder's?" Sure "certainly" they've been at war for 100's of years on & off, H & C
Nato has used Ukraine to escalate war against Russia - Russia cried for peace, now Nato wants to use more & bigger nukes
Put the nukes away - Get back to the negotiating table. Nato blew it and is not to be trusted hence only a West/East shared responsibility will work.
Think of it as the nazi's have been defeated it's 1945 and splitting Berlin in half was the best plan to guarantee peace -And it worked!!
Same now for Ukraine, Right?
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2023
- Messages
- 2,409
- Reaction score
- 2,943
D
dropkickmejeebus
Guest
K
Kangal
Guest
The West is building up its artillery ammo capacity and and other areas as well.
K
Kangal
Guest
NATO never went to war with Russia. If Russia was really concerned with a NATO invasion now, they wouldn't be withdrawing their forces from NATO borders. NATO forces are still on those borders. And if they are not concerned with NATO invasion now, they never were....European NATO nations have even shrunk their forces since 1991.
I'm all up for negotiations. When will Russia withdraw and how much will it pay for the damage it was caused, are the key questions to be settled.
Last edited by a moderator:
K
Kangal
Guest
You're right.
Germany invaded Russia.
Now Russia has invaded Ukraine.
We should try to split Russia up. It should guarantee peace.
It's too late, "Ukraine" is gone, Russia knows Nato's intentions all too well and has a long experience of their invasions . . .
Allied intervention in the Russian Civil War - Wikipedia
and are certain to be planning accordingly now for that attempted "split" you mention.
Let Ukraine be split and make Peace - Nato/EU back up Wukraine ~ Russia back up Eukraine - Perfect win win! Say it's true!?
K
Kangal
Guest
It's never too late. The Russian army can yet be saved.
View: https://youtu.be/GzyzKKgpe7U?si=75vsi624gXTrqvqI
View: https://twitter.com/wartranslated/status/1708070951714197664?t=3lwYoNaE-1O1dWvkYo-4Aw&s=19
I'll refer my dishonourable friend to the reply I gave earlier"
The H&C stands for Hot & Cold "war" you mention above, yeah?
Sure Britain & France were poking around Crimea 200 years ago?
But in between there was this . . .
Allied intervention in the Russian Civil War - Wikipedia
Nato have always been at war with Russia.
Planning for it, preparing for it, threatening it, exercising for it and supplying arms and personnel direct to the front lines now today ffs 
K
Kangal
Guest
Man, that's fucking funny. Thanks. You must think Red Storm Rising and Team Yankee are war histories!
FFS since 1991, Russia has been left eitherly alone. Putin been left alone to run a number of his own wars.
Back to the real world, maybe the people of Donbass can be saved too.
View: https://twitter.com/wartranslated/status/1708081230120444122?t=ogTSfsJjx9Xzwys-f2e8bw&s=19
The sooner the AFU pushes to its borders, the more people will be saved.
Last edited by a moderator:
Boring hollywood really fake looking propaganda? A way with you perhaps, somebody has to watch it, why bother?
The Russians know they are Nato's target and have drawn a line in the sand away from their own borders.
They've seen the Nato war games at Russian borders and consequently understand the grave danger of fighting Nato were it to launch an invasion of Russia. They know what to do.
Meanwhile as troops become scarce we can surely expect an increase in the area of No-Mans land?
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2023
- Messages
- 4,618
- Reaction score
- 6,320
NATO hasn't all the techie toys it seems. According to TASS, Russia is equipping its front line with these tools of ground warfare -
The remote-controlled Sosna-N scans an area for optical devices such as sniper rifle scopes, binoculars, or anti-tank missile targeting systems. Upon detecting such a device, it generates an acoustic signal and releases a special laser beam to impair it. This sophisticated detection system can identify a sniper within a range of 3 kilometers while its laser countermeasure has an effective range of up to 2 kilometers.
Meanwhile, the killing goes on -
The Ukrainian armed forces lost more than two infantry platoons in the Kupyansk area over the past 24 hours, Sergey Zybinsky, the spokesman for the Russian battlegroup West, told TASS.
"The total losses of the enemy amounted to more than two platoons, two Kozak armored fighting vehicles," the spokesman said.
While in another sector -
"In the course of anti-tank warfare, the group's artillery destroyed a US-made AN/TPQ-7 anti-tank radar station, a 152-mm Msta-B howitzer and a mortar crew in the areas of Peschanoye, Krakhmalnoye, Kolodezi," he added.
The remote-controlled Sosna-N scans an area for optical devices such as sniper rifle scopes, binoculars, or anti-tank missile targeting systems. Upon detecting such a device, it generates an acoustic signal and releases a special laser beam to impair it. This sophisticated detection system can identify a sniper within a range of 3 kilometers while its laser countermeasure has an effective range of up to 2 kilometers.
Meanwhile, the killing goes on -
The Ukrainian armed forces lost more than two infantry platoons in the Kupyansk area over the past 24 hours, Sergey Zybinsky, the spokesman for the Russian battlegroup West, told TASS.
"The total losses of the enemy amounted to more than two platoons, two Kozak armored fighting vehicles," the spokesman said.
While in another sector -
"In the course of anti-tank warfare, the group's artillery destroyed a US-made AN/TPQ-7 anti-tank radar station, a 152-mm Msta-B howitzer and a mortar crew in the areas of Peschanoye, Krakhmalnoye, Kolodezi," he added.
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2023
- Messages
- 4,618
- Reaction score
- 6,320
Indeed. Russia was under the mistaken impression that it had negotiated itself a buffer zone through the Minsk agreements. As it became clear that it had not, as was later confirmed by Merkel, it decided to do it the hard way. Those defences it has installed are not there just to keep the counteroffensive at bay but to keep NATO out permanently.
Escalation is currently on a hair trigger due to Nato's involvment. Article5 suggests that an attack on one country will bring retaliation from 50+ countries. That attack is getting closer and can be announced at any time today , tomorrow, next week.
The yanks want the conflict to go nuclear - Then everybody gets a taste and the landscape changes dramatically.
But even if it's simply a Nato troop invasion, what should the Russians expect?
K
Kangal
Guest
...are all concerned with defense.
Indeed all previous plans to cope with Russian invasion always envisaged some kind of loss of ground, through the Poles could probably stop a Russian invasion dead on their border these days.
Poland’s ruling party publishes top secret war plan as a campaign stunt
The government is attacking its predecessors for a plan that would have halted a Russian attack in the center of the country.
www.politico.eu
K
Kangal
Guest
I doubt it. Russias armed forces are on the ropes just trying to take on the AFU.
Putin already made one terrible strategic mistake by invading Ukraine and I think he's smart enough not to make an even bigger one by directly attacking a NATO country.
If he did though, it would remove any doubt that still exists worldwide about Russian aggression.
Last edited by a moderator:
By countries that have actually invaded Russia in the past and constantly attacking massively through proxy while threatening more & heavier nukes tomorrow, although there's already more than enough to change Europe permanently but the group of 50+ countries still want more attacking power??
"...are all concerned with defense." . . . Except for Bombing Donbas for 8 years, Attacks instead of negotiations - Again, not defence.
K
Kangal
Guest
Of course they would bomb Russian invaders in Donbass. That's Ukrainian sovereign territory.
The only way to negotiate with invaders is to ask how their dead should be repatriated when they have been beaten.
K
Kangal
Guest
Since 1945, Russia has not been attacked by the West. Remember MAD?
Since 1991 Western armed forces have been massively reduced.
Again, I think you are reading some kind of technothriller to come out with this shite.
The invasion to secure Russian interests was no mistake but a duty to face up to Nato's aggression on Donbas, Putin had no choice but to act and put a stop to further attacks in the region.
Again in future he may have no choice in attacking Nato members directly, What's the worse that could happen then?
K
Kangal
Guest
NATO was not in Donbass. But the Russian military was. We know because Girkin told us.
Donbass is Ukrainian territory. Putin invaded Ukraine.
K
Kangal
Guest
He'd probably suffer the same fate as Hitler.
Hilter also felt he "had no choice". It's always the same from aggressors.
Latest Threads
-
-
Beautiful Sgt Mel, the three honest judges and the magic injunction – a review of Walsh v Keane (2024) Kerry
- Started by Diarmuid
- Replies: 19
-
FG Cavan Councillor McKiernan: Fraud, cocaine and male mulato whores from Brazil
- Started by Diarmuid
- Replies: 22
-
-
Popular Threads
-
-
-
-
-
C
-