D
dropkickmejeebus
Guest
Never considered it, but she could be admiring her own work.Is she a, Hit-Woman ? !
Never considered it, but she could be admiring her own work.Is she a, Hit-Woman ? !
Nothing substantial in it about closing the US border.The Senate has passed a Bill with 60 billion for Ukraine and about 16 for Israel and about 16 for humanitarian stuff.
It now goes to The House. It will likely pass there as well.
But it will not change the outcome.
We are waiting for the Russians to finally clear the stronghold and see what happens then.
Isn't there some catch in it about tying a Trump presidency to coughing up the money until 2026, meaning that he cannot negotiate with the Russians as they will insist the US stop funding Ukraine, which he won't be able to promise.?The Senate has passed a Bill with 60 billion for Ukraine and about 16 for Israel and about 16 for humanitarian stuff.
It now goes to The House. It will likely pass there as well.
But it will not change the outcome.
We are waiting for the Russians to finally clear the stronghold and see what happens then.
I don't think soThe Senate has passed a Bill with 60 billion for Ukraine and about 16 for Israel and about 16 for humanitarian stuff.
It now goes to The House. It will likely pass there as well.
Yes the people don’t know what’s going on and just as well as none of it is to benefit them!It does not matter what Americans think and most dont think at all, we are talking about the half time show with Usher. It will be passed in no time
Russia just hit a Ukrainian training camp at Selydov with an Iskander. It's estimated around 500 troops, including trainers, were obliterated. This likely represents the largest and most rapid destruction of forces with a single strike in Ukraine since the beginning of the SMO.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UIAugZvZfA
Most of that cash will go on equipment/be embezzled/funneled into the brass's back pockets. Most of the mercs have already left. Your earning power doesn't help you if you're dead.50000 mercs on $3000 say a day is 150 million a day, who knows how long 60 billion will last
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7bVqiyfoBM
This guy is one of my favorites. He says it will pass the House no bother at all
Larry Fink, president Nudelman and Co don’t care. Their war must go on.if this is accurate, then ukraine must call it a day
True, but how many times has that been said?if this is accurate, then ukraine must call it a day
Russia just hit a Ukrainian training camp at Selydov with an Iskander. It's estimated around 500 troops, including trainers, were obliterated. This likely represents the largest and most rapid destruction of forces with a single strike in Ukraine since the beginning of the SMO.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UIAugZvZfA
Ukrainians are just cheap cannon fodder
View: https://twitter.com/occultni/status/1757743449657197034
Ukrainians are just cheap cannon fodder
View: https://twitter.com/occultni/status/1757743449657197034
Ukrainians are just cheap cannon fodder
View: https://twitter.com/occultni/status/1757743449657197034
Ukrainians are just cheap cannon fodder
View: https://twitter.com/occultni/status/1757743449657197034
Fortification doesn't always mean defense. Very often it means the opposite.
Protect weak directions to have fewer troops defending them and move the remaining troops for attack in other directions
But in this case, it is obvious that in 5 years' time, NATO is going to provoke Russia into war by setting a blockade against Kaliningrad
They aren't fencing the Russians in.My view is that it sets a demarcation line. Thus far and no more.
The sort of equipment that is deployed to fortifications are different to those deployed in active defensive lines (which are very similar to offensive components). This would mean that they would not have the excuse for large war games in these areas that could be a pretext for an invasion. This should reassure Russia that NATO was not going to encroach any further and at least give a warning if such preparations were being made. The Belorussian carry on was the straw that broke the camel's back when it came to Russian trust in diplomatic processes and somehow that will have to be rebuilt.
From the Baltics' perspective, this permits a strategy more satisfactory than the trip-wire one where they would be sacrificed similar to Poland at the beginning of WWII. Fortifications are credible deterrents, as is evidenced by their use in Ukraine. It would also conserve their forces in the scenario of an invasion and allow for a reaction time for civilians. Better to do it well in advance of anything happening.
It is not unreasonable for the Baltics to be concerned (given their past) and this defensive line should shunt pressures between Russia and NATO to other theatres. There is a considerable on-going investment in these countries that is long term in nature and very impressive, we don't need it wrecked by an exchange of fire (as well as these works being a nice bit of work for the lads).
Let's not go into a long lecture on the history of Kaliningrad unless we want an argument to break out between Germany and Poland - aren't medium range nuclear missiles stationed there? The fact is that this line stabilises the region around St Petersburg - it makes things predictable and makes it difficult for hawks on either side to advocate extraordinary measures. The big strategic change is the entry of Finland and Sweden into NATO which is not a win for Russia.
It's best for all of us that this region is frozen into an armed peace than subject to the schemes of volatile contingency.
They aren't fencing the Russians in.
They're cutting themselves off!
Energy and resources and so much more!
Stupidity,arrogance and hubris.
Realpolitik isn't a feature or European countries anymore.
The war is now turning into the most humongous tragedy, and yet the Yank's rage for blood remains unsated.
When will we ever learn? We won't, not until there is no money to be made from such inhumane violence.
A shame that very good observation has never been accepted as a necessity by the western world leaders.When things settle down trade can start up again. This is an important region and we don't need it incinerated.
A shame that very good observation has never been accepted as a necessity by the western world leaders.
And that it should be recognised as an equal.
Not as a region.
Makes it sound like something to be exploited.
There shouldn’t be any question which side is on the side of the angels and which is most definitely not in what purports to be a war between Russia and Ukraine. One side is openly Christian and is fighting on their own land. The other side is led by an avowedly anti-Christian regime that is funded by Clown World and is literally persecuting priests and closing down churches.
Just a few facts that this defense line is actually to make war inevitableMy view is that it sets a demarcation line. Thus far and no more.
The sort of equipment that is deployed to fortifications are different to those deployed in active defensive lines (which are very similar to offensive components). This would mean that they would not have the excuse for large war games in these areas that could be a pretext for an invasion. This should reassure Russia that NATO was not going to encroach any further and at least give a warning if such preparations were being made. The Belorussian carry on was the straw that broke the camel's back when it came to Russian trust in diplomatic processes and somehow that will have to be rebuilt.
From the Baltics' perspective, this permits a strategy more satisfactory than the trip-wire one where they would be sacrificed similar to Poland at the beginning of WWII. Fortifications are credible deterrents, as is evidenced by their use in Ukraine. It would also conserve their forces in the scenario of an invasion and allow for a reaction time for civilians. Better to do it well in advance of anything happening.
It is not unreasonable for the Baltics to be concerned (given their past) and this defensive line should shunt pressures between Russia and NATO to other theatres. There is a considerable on-going investment in these countries that is long term in nature and very impressive, we don't need it wrecked by an exchange of fire (as well as these works being a nice bit of work for the lads).
Let's not go into a long lecture on the history of Kaliningrad unless we want an argument to break out between Germany and Poland - aren't medium range nuclear missiles stationed there? The fact is that this line stabilises the region around St Petersburg - it makes things predictable and makes it difficult for hawks on either side to advocate extraordinary measures. The big strategic change is the entry of Finland and Sweden into NATO which is not a win for Russia.
It's best for all of us that this region is frozen into an armed peace than subject to the schemes of volatile contingency.