- Joined
- Mar 13, 2023
- Messages
- 2,419
- Reaction score
- 2,692
By being you, Jerry. Because you did.How could anyone suggest whale beachings are caused by windmills in fields?
By being you, Jerry. Because you did.How could anyone suggest whale beachings are caused by windmills in fields?
The US has tried it since SDI.Do you accept that energy beam weapons exist.
Noone would possibly believe whales are in fields. Only an idiot would openly suggest that this was a possibility.By being you, Jerry. Because you did.
And yet this is exactly what you believed. This is apparent because you didn't mention that the 'windmills' were actually wind turbines located in the sea. You believed Trump was referring to land-based windmills. Sorry champ, it's in the books. You just really are that low-rent.Noone would possibly believe whales are in fields. Only an idiot would openly suggest that this was a possibility.
But I never suggested this one way or the other. Because noone sane would talk about whales in fields. It doesn't need to be said.And yet this is exactly what you believed. This is apparent because you didn't mention that the 'windmills' were actually wind turbines located in the sea. You believed Trump was referring to land-based windmills. Sorry champ, it's in the books. You just really are that low-rent.
Trump never said that Windmills in fields are causing the whales to go crazy or to beach themselves. He also didn't say that whales live in fields. You read the headline and assumed he said both, which he did not, because you are very, very stupid Jerry. Fairly corny, too. The reason you think that media clip is funny and intriguing is that you're both.But I never suggested this one way or the other.
You the one still talking about whales in fields.![]()
You still talking about this?Trump never said that Windmills in fields are causing the whales
So you admit that energy weapons exist.The US has tried it since SDI.
Later they tried airborne platforms.
![]()
How the Boeing YAL-1 Airborne Laser Works: A Technical Overview | Defensebridge
Discover the technology behind the Boeing YAL-1 Airborne Laser, a powerful weapon system designed to shoot down ballistic missiles. Read on for a technical overview.defensebridge.com
I think it's still more efficient to use kinetic weapons.
I once again humbly request you publish how many times Jerry/ M1A2 has reported posts on this site. I think this ought to be public knowledge. It's only fair.Or failing that an explanation of why it shouldn't be.So you admit that energy weapons exist.
It's not a secret that the US has tried it, I showed an example.So you admit that energy weapons exist.
All reports should be public knowledge, not just one poster.I think this ought to be public knowledge.
Oh, I concur!All reports should be public knowledge, not just one poster.
Let's make a wager.All reports should be public knowledge, not just one poster.
How about the poster with the most reports on the forum leave? That's fair.Let's make a wager.
Whoever has reported the most posts leaves the site. That is, if you have more than me you leave. I have more than you, I leave.
Sound fair?
Why should we drag others into it? It's a two-way bet.How about the poster with the most reports on the forum leave? That's fair.
You already have.Why should we drag others into it?
Oh, I concur!
Let's roll Declan.
Looks like you're having another reading comprehension fail. I concur that all report stats should be published. That wasn't a tacit agreement to your terms, and occurred before the wager was even offered. The terms are whoever has the most reports leaves the site, and the pool is composed of myself and yourself.You already have.
Let's see who is on top then. I doubt they will leave the site though.I concur that all report stats should be published.
Do we have a bet or don't we? This isn't a hard question to answer, Jerry. Not sure what the problem is. It's almost like you're afraid of the wager.Let's see who is on top then.
I don't bet, Fishalt.Do we have a bet or don't we? This isn't a hard question to answer, Jerry. Not sure what the problem is. It's almost like you're afraid of the wager.
Noone should get upset over small typos.Can I ask you a question?
How the fuck have you managed to live your entire life not realising that noone isn't a word in the English language (other than a surname)?![]()
Interesting take, here's mine:I don't bet, Fishalt.
Fishalt this was just another pathetic attempt to have me kicked out or banned because you can't win an argument with me. It's your default reaction when you're in a corner. The amount of time you have spent on this is concerning. Please seek counselling.Interesting take,
Corrected that for you.lol How does one make a "small typo" (what's a big typo) consistently
I was being dead serious, you're what, in your thirties and you still haven't figured out that no one isn't a word![]()
We both know that's a lie.And there are no whales in fields.
We both know that's a lie.
You've seen your mother at the family picnic.
Hardly.We both know that's a lie.
You've seen your mother at the family picnic.
Get your coat and leave.Joe Biden is pretty wooden alright !
That's so Joe!I can't remember where I left it ! !![]()
![]()
You need to include all his previous accounts and usernames in this, not just the current one he registered after being sitebanned recently.Do we have a bet or don't we? This isn't a hard question to answer, Jerry. Not sure what the problem is. It's almost like you're afraid of the wager.
Putting a guy in a mask that's seemingly in the identical state of geriatric decrepitude as the man he's meant to be playing seems like a dog-headed play to me.Many think that Biden is dead and a lad in a mask is playing him.
I hope not because dementia Joe is much more entertaining.
the only possible purpose would be to slowly exit him out and he to serve out his term, rather than have cackler be installed.Putting a guy in a mask that's seemingly in the identical state of geriatric decrepitude as the man he's meant to be playing seems like a dog-headed play to me.