Trust the Science

[AN2]

Says 'top poster of month'

See?

 

[Wolf]

See?

'Top poster of month'
Your only achievement in life.

 

[AN2]

Either would be a step up from where you are.

'Top poster of month'
Your only achievement in life.

They just spit out random insults, context means nothing to them, they're like completely broken AI

 

[Mad as Fish]

Says 'top poster of month'

I wonder if scientists have discovered the universe he exists in yet?

 

[AN2]

I wonder if scientists have discovered the universe he exists in yet?

Do you have any idea what was being discussed yet?

 

[AN2]

Moron #1 on Moron #2 -

Post in thread 'World War Three Tracker Thread' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.com/threads/world-war-three-tracker-thread.241/post-137475

Thanks for reminding me of an old sig

 

[Mad as Fish]

Do you have any idea what was being discussed yet?

Yep, your rampant idiocy, no idea what you are on about though.

 

[AN2]

Yep, your rampant idiocy, no idea what you are on about though.

Unfrickenbelievable

I said that the last time we (you and I) spoke about science, you were calling out da scientists about a confirmed interstellar object travelling through our solar system as being "bullshit". Does this really not make any sense or recall to you, on any planet Earth? You're away with the fairies, son. Put Moron #2 on

 

[Mad as Fish]

Unfrickenbelievable

I said that the last time we (you and I) spoke about science, you were calling out da scientists about a confirmed interstellar object travelling through our solar system as being "bullshit". Does this really not make any sense or recall to you, on any planet Earth? You're away with fairies, son. Put Moron #2 on

Sir, as Myles would say, you are a total pillock, but happy in that state obviously.

I'm not going to till over old ground but your comprehension is woefully inadequate.

 

[AN2]

Sir, as Myles would say, you are a total pillock, but happy in that state obviously.

I'm not going to till over old ground but your comprehension is woefully inadequate.

How so, you nincompoop spammer?

 

[AN2]

"Should read -

Ordinary punters baffled by latest heap of crap from scientists."

Moron #1 speaking about discovered interstellar object 3I/ATLAS

 

[Mad as Fish]

How so, you nincompoop spammer?

My dear fellow, I am sitting in an airport waiting for a plane home having had a very intense couple of weeks doing reasonably useful stuff, it's called a job.

Have you done anything useful other than pick your nose, scratch your arse and generally polish your obnoxiousness?

 

[AN2]

My dear fellow, I am sitting in an airport waiting for a plane home having had a very intense couple of weeks doing reasonably useful stuff, it's called a job.

Have you done anything useful other than pick your nose, scratch your arse and generally polish your obnoxiousness?

It's intensely clear that what you perceive as "obnoxiousness" is a manifestation of your own insecurity, been saying it for ages, you're a textbook case

And rather than accept the fact that you're a dumbass (and try to improve yourself), you lash out. You, Moron #1 and Gowl have so much in common..

 

[Mad as Fish]

It's intensely clear that what you perceive as "obnoxiousness" is a manifestation of your own insecurity, being saying it for ages.

And rather than accept the fact that you're a dumbass (and try to improve yourself), you lash out. You, Moron #1 and Gowl have so much in common

Boarding soon, happy days! Why don’t you run along and make a pretend plane from the pizza boxes you have stacked about the Kip and then you could have great craic acting the in-flight bog cleaner!

 

[AN2]

You'd swear this guy was on a flight for the first time in his life

 

[Mad as Fish]

You'd swear this guy was on a flight for the first time in his life

First time today anyway.

 

[AN2]

Ah shure, it's a bit different from the tract-tor, Fish

 

[Mad as Fish]

Ah shure, it's a bit different from the tract-tor, Fish

Certainly is, the guy driving it is wearing a suit, but then again, so did Mr Ferguson.

 

[Hermit]

For @Hermit:

If space is bent and causes light to bend (P), we will observe a star near the sun during a solar eclipse (Q).
We observe a star near the sun during a solar eclipse (Q), therefore space is bent and causes light to bend (P).


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Qzm947lBqnE&t=22m10s

Do you get it now?!

I'm not asking you if you believe gravity exists (you don't because you're a goofball), I'm asking you if you understand the experiment?

From the video:

"His theory won't be accepted until he can demonstrate this radical concept. Suddenly, he is struck by an idea: If he can shine a beam of light through an area where space is curved, then according to his theory the beam of light will actually appear to bend."

"If he can shine a beam of light through an area where space is curved" - this is already assuming that space is curved (the conclusion, thing you're trying to prove, included in the premise), which is begging the question.

If he can shine a beam of light through an area where space is curved (P), then according to his theory the beam of light will actually appear to bend (Q).
Light from star appears to bend during solar eclipse (Q), therefore space is curved (P).

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Hermit what are you talking about?

 

[Wolf]

You'd swear this guy was on a flight for the first time in his life

From the fool who's never left his mammy's apron strings and who's only achievement in life is to be 'top poster of month' on a small Irish political website.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

It's intensely clear that what you perceive as "obnoxiousness" is a manifestation of your own insecurity, been saying it for ages, you're a textbook case And rather than accept the fact that you're a dumbass (and try to improve yourself), you lash out. You, Moron #1 and Gowl have so much in common..

Sparky why do you fight with every single poster on this Site?

 

[Hermit]

Hermit what are you talking about?

We're talking about the claim that "space" i.e. an area without physical matter, is curved! It's total nonsense because a non-physical concept such as space cannot be curved.

I am also pointing out a logical fallacy in the claim that a solar eclipse proves that space is curved. The fallacy is like this:

If you drank a bottle of vodka, you would be drunk.
I observe that you are drunk, therefore you must have drank a bottle of vodka.

This is fallacious because of course you could have drank something other than vodka to get drunk.

 

[AN2]

From the video:

"His theory won't be accepted until he can demonstrate this radical concept. Suddenly, he is struck by an idea: If he can shine a beam of light through an area where space is curved, then according to his theory the beam of light will actually appear to bend."

"If he can shine a beam of light through an area where space is curved" - this is already assuming that space is curved (the conclusion, thing you're trying to prove, included in the premise), which is begging the question.

If he can shine a beam of light through an area where space is curved (P), then according to his theory the beam of light will actually appear to bend (Q).
Light from star appears to bend during solar eclipse (Q), therefore space is curved (P).

I suppose that'll have to do

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Of course you could have drank something other than vodka to get drunk.

I understand Sir

 

[AN2]

We're talking about the claim that "space" i.e. an area without physical matter, is curved! It's total nonsense because a non-physical concept such as space cannot be curved.

I am also pointing out a logical fallacy in the claim that a solar eclipse proves that space is curved.

A solar eclipse does not prove that space is curved, good grief

The fallacy is like this:

If you drank a bottle of vodka, you would be drunk.
I observe that you are drunk, therefore you must have drank a bottle of vodka.

This is fallacious because of course you could have drank something other than vodka to get drunk.

 

[Hermit]

A solar eclipse does not prove that space is curved, good grief

Yeah, I know it doesn't, that's my whole point, but you and they are claiming that a solar eclipse does prove it.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vF4DENWd_ts

Solar eclipse of May 29, 1919 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

This specific total solar eclipse was significant because it helped prove Einstein's theory of relativity.[3]

 

[AN2]

Yeah, I know it doesn't, that's my whole point, but you and they are claiming that a solar eclipse does prove it.

Nope, it's only you saying that and you've finally reached MaF levels of incomprehension. And I was right about that all along, from the Moon thread to the UFO Hoax thread to here

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vF4DENWd_ts

Solar eclipse of May 29, 1919 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The objects of interest were the Sun and the stars. The Sun curving spacetime (gravity) and the starlight from the distant stars proving it. Making Einstein a household name

 

[Hermit]

Nope, it's only you saying that

The Solar Eclipse That Made Albert Einstein a Science Celebrity | Britannica

In February 1919 two teams of astronomers from the Greenwich and Cambridge observatories set out for Sobral, Brazil, and Príncipe (an island off the coast of Africa), respectively, with sophisticated equipment that would allow them to photograph a solar eclipse as it cut across South America...

www.britannica.com

How Australia's 1922 solar eclipse proved Einstein right

A total eclipse that travelled the full width of Australia in 1922 offered astronomers the chance to confirm Einstein’s theory of general relativity - and for the community to enjoy a rare spectacle.

www.astronomy.com

| EarthSky

May 29, 2019, is the 100th anniversary of a total solar eclipse, during which Sir Arthur Eddington observed the bending of light around the sun, thereby proving Einstein's general relativity theory and catapulting Einstein into rock star fame.

earthsky.org

A solar eclipse helped prove Einstein’s theory of general relativity

“Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning.” -Albert Einstein From HistoryFacts.com | Decades before Albert Einstein became a pop culture phenomenon by sticking out his tongue on his 72nd birthday, he was an emerging theoretical...

www.oklahomaminerals.com

This Is How, 100 Years Ago, A Solar Eclipse Proved Einstein Right And Newton Wrong

The solar eclipse of May 29, 1919, was the nail in the coffin of a Newtonian Universe.

www.forbes.com

The eclipse that proved Einstein right and changed our understanding of the universe

When the moon blotted out the sun on May 29, 1919, scientists were able to confirm the physicist's theory of relativity.

www.nbcnews.com

The objects of interest were the Sun and the stars.

...during a solar eclipse.

 

[AN2]

The Solar Eclipse That Made Albert Einstein a Science Celebrity | Britannica

In February 1919 two teams of astronomers from the Greenwich and Cambridge observatories set out for Sobral, Brazil, and Príncipe (an island off the coast of Africa), respectively, with sophisticated equipment that would allow them to photograph a solar eclipse as it cut across South America...

www.britannica.com

How Australia's 1922 solar eclipse proved Einstein right

A total eclipse that travelled the full width of Australia in 1922 offered astronomers the chance to confirm Einstein’s theory of general relativity - and for the community to enjoy a rare spectacle.

www.astronomy.com

| EarthSky

May 29, 2019, is the 100th anniversary of a total solar eclipse, during which Sir Arthur Eddington observed the bending of light around the sun, thereby proving Einstein's general relativity theory and catapulting Einstein into rock star fame.

earthsky.org

A solar eclipse helped prove Einstein’s theory of general relativity

“Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning.” -Albert Einstein From HistoryFacts.com | Decades before Albert Einstein became a pop culture phenomenon by sticking out his tongue on his 72nd birthday, he was an emerging theoretical...

www.oklahomaminerals.com

This Is How, 100 Years Ago, A Solar Eclipse Proved Einstein Right And Newton Wrong

The solar eclipse of May 29, 1919, was the nail in the coffin of a Newtonian Universe.

www.forbes.com

The eclipse that proved Einstein right and changed our understanding of the universe

When the moon blotted out the sun on May 29, 1919, scientists were able to confirm the physicist's theory of relativity.

www.nbcnews.com

...during a solar eclipse.

But it's like I first asked you:

Post in thread 'To The Moon' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.com/threads/to-the-moon.162/post-120133

Do you think that something different happens during a solar eclipse, something that isn't happening all the time?

The Sun is "bending" the starlight from distant stars positioned around it always, duh

 

[Hermit]

But it's like I first asked you:

Post in thread 'To The Moon' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.com/threads/to-the-moon.162/post-120133

Do you think that something different happens during a solar eclipse, something that isn't happening all the time?

The Sun is "bending" the starlight from distant stars positioned around it always, duh

Under normal conditions, Einstein’s prediction was impossible to test, for the simple reason that sunlight drowns out the light from nearby stars, making them invisible to observers on Earth. The darkness of an eclipse, though, would allow the astronomers to observe and photograph the field of stars around the Sun.

The Solar Eclipse That Made Albert Einstein a Science Celebrity | Britannica

In February 1919 two teams of astronomers from the Greenwich and Cambridge observatories set out for Sobral, Brazil, and Príncipe (an island off the coast of Africa), respectively, with sophisticated equipment that would allow them to photograph a solar eclipse as it cut across South America...

www.britannica.com

 

[AN2]

The Solar Eclipse That Made Albert Einstein a Science Celebrity | Britannica

In February 1919 two teams of astronomers from the Greenwich and Cambridge observatories set out for Sobral, Brazil, and Príncipe (an island off the coast of Africa), respectively, with sophisticated equipment that would allow them to photograph a solar eclipse as it cut across South America...

www.britannica.com

lol And?

You can't see the stars during the day, that's when the Sun's out, Hermit.. Except, during a solar eclipse

 

[AN2]

I see that @PlunkettsGhost is smashing that Like button on @Hermit's posts. It's fascinating, isn't it. Anything to say, Plunker?

 

[Hermit]

Except, during a solar eclipse

So are you saying a solar eclipse did prove space is curved? Or do you disagree with all those links I posted that say the eclipse did prove it?

 

[AN2]

So are you saying a solar eclipse did prove space is curved? Or do you disagree with all those links I posted that say the eclipse did prove it?

Are you saying that, according to general relativity, space is only curved during a solar eclipse? I first asked you that question ages ago, I think it's about time that you answered it

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

I see that @PlunkettsGhost is smashing that Like button on @Hermit's posts. It's fascinating, isn't it. Anything to say, Plunker?

Must be great having all this time James!

 

[AN2]

Must be great having all this time James!

They don't even have their own original ad homs

 

[AN2]

But it's like I first asked you:

Post in thread 'To The Moon' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.com/threads/to-the-moon.162/post-120133

Do you think that something different happens during a solar eclipse, something that isn't happening all the time?

The Sun is "bending" the starlight from distant stars positioned around it always, duh

@PlunkettsGhost offered this gem in the Moon thread shortly before:

Post in thread 'To The Moon' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.com/threads/to-the-moon.162/post-119731

Gravity (if operational) should always pull a solid through a liquid, as an outside, secondary force acting on these substances.

 

[AN2]

And this is of course sort of ridiculous because of the assumption that gravity isn't at play when of course it is, just like it is when a solid exerts an upward force on another solid (with fluids we call it buoyancy)

It's funny to look back on this thread and see the same old shit from the usual (anti-science) suspects

 

[Wolf]

Things are bad when the chap only has his own accounts (AN2/Haven) to converse with.