Andrew Gold Tackles The Taboo Topic Of Race Realism


125? I had mine done and its 127.

I agree with Roc. IQ is a measure of a certain kind of intelligence, or more accurately a certain kind of raw ability. Thats it though. You need to pair it with other tests like EQ, CAS, etc....and none of them can cope well with off-the-walls genius like Feynman. Feynman's IQ score would be like taking a photo of Michaelangelo's David and saying the photo is definitive.
 
125? I had mine done and its 127.
lol So what would that make you what, like the 95th percentile, you, a sheeple?

I'll tell you what, if you say that you were trolling yesterday (re: racial realism) I'll tell you what I think of what you've alleged your IQ to be.

I agree with Roc. IQ is a measure of a certain kind of intelligence, or more accurately a certain kind of raw ability. Thats it though. You need to pair it with other tests like EQ, CAS, etc....and none of them can cope well with off-the-walls genius like Feynman. Feynman's IQ score would be like taking a photo of Michaelangelo's David and saying the photo is definitive.
 
lol So what would that make you what, like the 95th percentile, you, a sheeple?

I'll tell you what, if you say that you were trolling yesterday (re: racial realism) I'll tell you what I think of what you've alleged your IQ to be.

You just can't get over being so easily caught out by posting only the the first part of your AI answer, can you?

Because what you did was absolutely 100% dishonest trolling. You tried (and still try) to pass off AI as some kind of independent, unbiased answers, but have to resort to these cheap tricks when it doesnt give you what you want.

Then your head falls off when thats pointed out to you.
 
You just can't get over being so easily caught out by posting only the the first part of your AI answer, can you?

Because what you did was absolutely 100% dishonest trolling. You tried (and still try) to pass off AI as some kind of independent, unbiased answers, but have to resort to these cheap tricks when it doesnt give you what you want.

Then your head falls off when thats pointed out to you.
Okay. Confirmed retard 😆

I did not do anything dishonest, this thread is a about race realism.
 
125? I had mine done and its 127.
I agree with Roc. IQ is a measure of a certain kind of intelligence, or more accurately a certain kind of raw ability. Thats it though. You need to pair it with other tests like EQ, CAS, etc....and none of them can cope well with off-the-walls genius like Feynman. Feynman's IQ score would be like taking a photo of Michaelangelo's David and saying the photo is definitive.
Btw, that ^ is also retarded.

People with a high IQ don't tend to miss the point.

I've explicitly said what the point is - Feynman had a higher IQ than his reported 125.
 
At this stage I can only confirm that @Haven is mentally retarded.

I had never heard of "racial realism" but it took less than a minute to know that it's some CRT bullshine about (anti-black) racism.

That's not what this thread is about, duh 🤣
 
TWO DISTINCT CONTEXTS

Screenshot_20260720_161817.jpg


He can't get his head wrapped around that 🤣

Even @Roc_ wouldn't embarrass himself along these lines..
 
At this stage I can only confirm that @Haven is mentally retarded.

I had never heard of "racial realism" but it took less than a minute to know that it's some CRT bullshine about (anti-black) racism.

That's not what this thread is about, duh 🤣
But AI says only one is pseudoscience. 🤣
 
But AI says only one is pseudoscience. 🤣
Do you understand that they're two different things, one being the subject matter of the thread and the other not? A yes or no will suffice.

Btw Haven, you've been displaying quite a lot recently your inability to grasp context. I think of that as a low IQ trait myself although after googling it, it is associated with other things such as autism.
 
Btw, that ^ is also retarded.

People with a high IQ don't tend to miss the point.

I've explicitly said what the point is - Feynman had a higher IQ than his reported 125.
No one gives a shit what you say, Jambo. Can you please drive this into your thick skull?
 
Do you understand that they're two different things, one being the subject matter of the thread and the other not? A yes or no will suffice.

Btw Haven, you've been displaying quite a lot recently your inability to grasp context. I think of that as a low IQ trait myself although after googling it, it is associated with other things such as autism.
I'm not interested in pseudoscience and would rather discuss something of merit on this thread.
 
Well then discuss what it's about.. As @Roc_ labels in his cult jargon - Scientific racism
Its pseudoscience.

If races were a "real" biological thing, you'd expect them to work kind of like animal breeds.....clear categories where members of one group share a specific set of traits that clearly separate them from another group. Like how a Chihuahua and a Great Dane are pretty obviously different "types" of dog. Remember your German Shepard AI post?

When human DNA is examined however they see no clear lines. If you traveled slowly from, say, Nigeria to Egypt to Turkey to Germany, the DNA of people along that path changes little by little the whole way. There's no spot where you can say "okay, HERE is where one race stops and the next one starts." It's all one long gradual blend, not separate chunks.

Even then, people in the same "race" can be more different from each other than people in different "races." Two people who'd both get called "White" could actually have more genetic differences between them than one of them has compared to someone called "Asian." That breaks the whole idea of race being a tight genetic package.

Specific big boxes labeled "race" don't match how genes are actually organized. It's more like humanity is one long, blended spectrum, and race is a label people put on top of it — not something built into the DNA itself.

Lets discuss something real instead.

Derrick Bell is a great place to restart the thread.
 
Its pseudoscience.
Why do they call it scientific then? 🤔

If races were a "real" biological thing, you'd expect them to work kind of like animal breeds.....clear categories where members of one group share a specific set of traits that clearly separate them from another group. Like how a Chihuahua and a Great Dane are pretty obviously different "types" of dog.
Remember your German Shepard AI post?
You're showing your low IQ (or severe autism) again. That was a meme, along the lines of - being born in a stable doesn't make you a horse.

When human DNA is examined however they see no clear lines. If you traveled slowly from, say, Nigeria to Egypt to Turkey to Germany, the DNA of people along that path changes little by little the whole way. There's no spot where you can say "okay, HERE is where one race stops and the next one starts." It's all one long gradual blend, not separate chunks.

Even then, people in the same "race" can be more different from each other than people in different "races." Two people who'd both get called "White" could actually have more genetic differences between them than one of them has compared to someone called "Asian." That breaks the whole idea of race being a tight genetic package.

Specific big boxes labeled "race" don't match how genes are actually organized. It's more like humanity is one long, blended spectrum, and race is a label people put on top of it — not something built into the DNA itself.

Lets discuss something real instead.

Derrick Bell is a great place to restart the thread.
 
It's just fucking farcical. Jambo you deranged cult groupie - scientific racism refers to the co-opting of "science" to try and justify racism during the 19th and early twentieth century through since thoroughly discredited pseudoscientific methods. While race realism is a white supremacist nonsense jargon term. You can't be this thick, no one can believe you actually believe what you're saying, and can't grasp these etymologies.
 
It's just fucking farcical. Jambo you deranged cult groupie - scientific racism refers to the co-opting of "science" to try and justify racism during the 19th and early twentieth century through since thoroughly discredited pseudoscientific methods. While race realism is a white supremacist nonsense jargon term. You can't be this thick, no one can believe you actually believe what you're saying, and can't grasp these etymologies.
You're beyond idiotic

Race realism is what your cult calls scientific racism
 
List of discarded scientific theories (list includes scientific racism)

But sure let's just put the label "realism" after each of them and do a little rephrasing.

And if anyone says anything against you, pointing out the fact it was discarded, or the reasons it was discarded, sure let's just label that "<discarded theory> denialism".

Fucking hell this is really bottom of the barrel stuff, Jambo, you are a moron and turd of gargantuan proportions.
 
Origin of the Phrase
The phrase "race realism" (or "racial realism") emerged as a strategic rebranding effort by white nationalists and segregationists. By framing their prejudiced beliefs as objective "science" and "common sense," promoters of the phrase sought to distance themselves from stigmatized, overt labels like "white supremacist" or "neo-Nazi". The underlying pseudoscientific concepts date back to 19th-century race science, but the modern term was popularized in the early 1990s through publications like American Renaissance, founded by white supremacist Jared Taylor.

Connection to the White Supremacist Movement
Within the broader white supremacist movement, "race realism" serves as the ideological and intellectual justification for several core beliefs:
Racial Separatism: The argument that races are naturally incompatible and therefore must live in geographically separated societies.
Genetic Determinism: The belief that a person's intelligence, morality, and worth are dictated entirely by their race, echoing theories of eugenics.
Justifying Discrimination: The "science" is used to rationalize opposition to integration, promote anti-miscegenation (opposition to race-mixing), and fuel fears of demographic change.

Of course, the above shouldn't even need pointing out. Anyone feigning difficulty of comprehension like Jambo is likely beyond help.
 
List of discarded scientific theories (list includes scientific racism)

But sure let's just put the label "realism" after each of them and do a little rephrasing.
Again, utter idiocy.

Scientific racism refers to the same thing as race realism.

Your cult has simply labelled it differently. Racism itself is if course "jargon"..


View: https://t.me/TraditionalBritainGroup/40605

And if anyone says anything against you, pointing out the fact it was discarded, or the reasons it was discarded, sure let's just label that "<discarded theory> denialism".

Fucking hell this is really bottom of the barrel stuff, Jambo, you are a moron and turd of gargantuan proportions.
 
I think if you wanted to introduce an actual dose of "realism" to Jambo's white supremacist cronies you might hand out some GATs at their next rally and see how many Craig Cobbs there really are.
 
I think if you wanted to introduce an actual dose of "realism" to Jambo's white supremacist
White supremacy has a definition, I've told you what that is a thousand times (and anyone can look it up)

Your (anti-white) (((cult))) co-adopted it to mean what it wants it to mean, which includes believing the truth about race.

cronies you might hand out some GATs at their next rally and see how many Craig Cobbs there really are.
 
White supremacy is the idea that the white race is superior to all others and should therefore have dominion over them.

Submorons like @Roc_ and Doggy have translated that into - believing the truth about race.

The submoron Doggy literally used to call me a "white supremacist" for that very reason.

For many reasons, and as I've said before, Doggy was no more a member of MENSA (<- that's how he used to spell it) than @Haven is. They're both complete idiots 🤣
 
Oh ffs, Jambo off again on his whole "oh, we're not white supremacists" shtick again.
Correct. I'm not a white supremacist

This is just another one of your idiotic tropes.

Your "etymology" is that white supremacists rebranded themselves as white nationalists. I know everything about your (rather limited) repertoire. You're a clown.
 
That bus has probably never been safer.
There's nothing in it.

@Roc_ is simply terrified of Whites collectivising, it's in his Jewish nature.

And if it's about them wearing masks.. that's because Whites taking their own side has been made illegal.
 
That bus has probably never been safer.
"Safer".

An argument that has great appeal to little old ladies and essentially cowardly and small visioned men.

One that historically has been a favourite rationale for making masked militarised police battalions ubiquitous, like the "order police" of Hitler's Germany.

But what I really struggle to understand is how people on here who talk of Irish nationalism don't seem to object too much to Jambo's version of "nationalism".

- A version of "nationalism" so profoundly discarded by history, rightly packed so deep down in the dustbin of history by most people, that it today only ever recruits the most profoundly damaged of human beings, a tiny minority consisting of the most sheer idiotic.

Barrett%20at%20the%20Michael%20Collins%20ambush%20site%20at%20Bal%20na%20Blth%20in%20west%20Cork
 
... And if it's about them wearing masks.. that's because Whites taking their own side has been made illegal.
No, it's much less about the masks and much more about just how fucking stupid they are, these actually low intelligence morons, the herd instinct, and the base mentality behind it.

3682207_15_articleinlinemobile_LR_20JUSTIN_20BARRETT_2037EA31AE.jpg
 
"Safer".

An argument that has great appeal to little old ladies and essentially cowardly and small visioned men.
Lol wut.

I'll tell you a quick story. Many moons ago, I spent a summer working in a pub in the States. The city we stayed in was a kind of resort, mini Las Vegas, on the East Coast that swelled in population during the summer and was dead during the winter.

The city consisted of a very long strip of streets and avenues. The pub I worked in was on something like 145th Street, and my accommodation was on 4th Street. Usually I'd walk everywhere (even now) but that wasn't possible, so I had to take the bus.

On one of my first days working in the pub I got talking to the chef, Danny, a funny character. He was from Baltimore, a morbidly obese black fellow who used to waddle through the kitchen and shout "behind you" in case his arse would wallop into you as he was walking past.

Anyway, we got quite friendly and during a conversation he asked how I was commuting to work. I told him I was getting the bus. I can still remember the look of concern on his face. He looked me straight in the eye and told me: "brother, do not take the bus after dark. It's not safe for a white person."

Now, being naive I didn't pay much attention. So, in the first few weeks I used to take the bus home at night, and Danny was right. It was bedlam. I was nearly always the only white person, and every night there was an incident with passengers fighting, flashing guns, intimidating other passengers.

Well, it all culminated in one evening where I was travelling home and three young black lads sat beside me and started asking me questions. I was doing my best to ignore them when one of them told me to give him my wallet. I refused and then they launched into a trade of abuse (lots of stuff about me being a "white boy"). Another passenger, an elderly fellow, intervened and I got off at the next stop and never took the bus again.

When I told Danny about my experience, he shook his head and scolded me for not listening to him. He said there was no city in the States where it was safe for a white person to travel alone on public transport.

I was being slightly tongue in cheek in my response to your single transferrable post above, but there's an element of truth to it that even a black person like Danny could acknowledge.

Not that that matters to a virtue signalling, white knight geebag like yourself.
 
Great detail Aldo, GRMA. You were lucky to survive! You coulda been just a blip in the black on white murder stats. You owe your life to the old black dude who intervened. Any detail on what he said, his attitude? How did he tame the three youngsters?
 
lol Your fantasy aside, can you tell me one thing. Why did you a post a video of Richard Dawkins disagreeing with what you just said? 😆

You continue to have a huge problem dealing with verified and proved facts.

The tell is always obvious, you try to avoid the issue and distract with other bullshit.

It never works here Jambo. We all know you too well.
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom