🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉

[Wolf]

OT - 5 Types of Virus.

View attachment 2095View attachment 2096

Parrotvirus....
Only affects the braindead.
Love it!

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

If the difference is so great and obvious why was it that the diagnostic tool used could not reliably distinguish between the two?

Remember when the flu disappeared for a whole winter?

 

[Mad as Fish]

Wolf, your simple childlessness is almost endearing at times.

Whereas yours is not.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Tank, why did you flounce only to sign in with a new account a day later?

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Mysterious new long Covid symptom identified by scientists​

The 33-year-old patient experienced “rapid purple discolouration” on his legs (The Lancet/Manoj Sivan)


Published in The Lancet medical journal, the research detailed a new symptom of the condition after a 33-year-old man was referred to the specialists’ clinic.

The patient had a six-month history of what the authors describe as a “rapid purple discolouration” on his legs. When standing, he remarked that they would feel progressively heavier and become “tingly, itchy and dusky” in colour.

Mysterious new long Covid symptom identified by scientists

The research detailed a new symptom of long Covid after a 33-year-old man was referred to a specialist clinic

uk.yahoo.com

He added that a rash would occasionally appear on his feet, but that the mysterious symptoms would disappear when laying down.

 

[Coal Gas and peat]

Is wank even vaccinated himself

 

[Mad as Fish]

She was proven right about the transmission vector.

‘It’s aerosol, stupid’: the professor who challenged medical chiefs

Mary-Louise McLaws, who passed away at the weekend, stood firm against Australia’s conservative medical profession, arguing the official COVID-19 pandemic response was missing the key driver of infection.

www.afr.com

But it's all BS because the diagnostic tool was totally unreliable, so all this 'science' about transmission and infection rates blah blah blah, is totally baseless. In fact, it's not science at all, just long winded puffery by egotistical bandwagon jumpers.

 

[Coal Gas and peat]

I didn't do either.

Running second profiles is considered to be the act of a scoundrel , you should count your blessings that you are permitted to post here

 

[Zipporah's Flint]

Mod action; I deleted one post on this thread. Please try to keep things civil.

 

[Wolf]

Wolf, your simple childishness is almost endearing at times.

Always with the child references.
There's something wrong with you, pal.

 

[Wolf]

Tank, why did you flounce only to sign in with a new account a day later?

It flounced last weekend for about 15 hours then came back and changed it's name for some bizarre reason.
Strange individual.

 

[Zipporah's Flint]

Always with the child references.
There's something wrong with you, pal.

Mod action: Seriously just leave it.

 

[Wolf]

Mod action: Seriously just leave it.

Are you protecting Wankstain?
Or can you not just ignore the cut and thrust of a discussion site.

The chap referred to me as a child which seems to be a common theme with his posts.
Why would anyone continue to refer to children in that way all the time?

 

[Mad as Fish]

Yes. There are side effects such as Myocarditis, but these are also the issues that someone with covid would have, except far, far worse. If you suffer Myocarditis from the shot, then you were very probably going to experience significant cardiac issues from a full blown covid infection.

On the one hand, it stopped a huge viral outbreak on the original variant. We already know (and there is no point in dismissing) that long Covid is a problem. These numbers would have been far higher if the virus was allowed to freely circulate with no mitigation. We would face significant population health, social and financial issues now and the numbers would totally overwhelm the HSE (who can't cope with the current workload right now).

On the other hand, there is an health impact from cancelled OP visits, cancelled screening, and social impacts from school closures.

The latter however, we know how to tackle, even if the resources may be lacking The former....its scary to see how little is still know about Long Covid and some of these peoples lives are ruined. Crank the numbers up and it becomes terrifying. These people can't work, and are a burden on the healthcare system.

On balance then, the right decision was made, especially early on when we knew nothing about the short, medium and long term impacts of covid.


Yes. There are numerous studies on this, both at a population effect level, and at a basic level in measuring droplet counts expelled using a mask and without.

Yabba yabba yabba! It's all makey uppy self justification for the most horrendous hoax that has killed and maimed millions worldwide.

 

[Wolf]

Yabba yabba yabba! It's all makey uppy self justification for the most horrendous hoax that has killed and maimed millions worldwide.

Crazy how a couple of mentions of a 'variant' in the MSM that nobody is concerned about sends these CoVidiots right back to their hysteria from March 2020.

They are definitely, and beyond any doubt, mentally damaged individuals.

They should be in padded cells for their own safety.

 

[Mad as Fish]

Crazy how a couple of mentions of a 'variant' in the MSM that nobody is concerned about sends these CoVidiots right back to their hysteria from March 2020.

They are definitely, and beyond any doubt, mentally damaged individuals.

They should be in padded cells for their own safety.

...and ours.

 

[Professor]

Yabba yabba yabba! It's all makey uppy self justification for the most horrendous hoax that has killed and maimed millions worldwide.

Crazy how a couple of mentions of a 'variant' in the MSM that nobody is concerned about sends these CoVidiots right back to their hysteria from March 2020.

Why misinterpretation of electron micrographs in SARS-CoV-2-infected tissue goes viral​

. . . ultrastructural details in autopsy tissues have been misinterpreted as coronavirus particles in recent papers. Bradley and colleagues described “coronavirus-like particles” in autopsy specimens of the “respiratory system, kidney, and gastrointestinal tract”, and in a case report Dolhnikoff and colleagues described “viral particles” in “different cell types of cardiac tissue” of a deceased child. However, the images in these publications show putative virus particles that lack sufficient ultrastructure for an unambiguous identification as virus. - Hoax, they're not viruses at all

. . . findings, described by Tavazzi and colleagues,of “viral particles” in interstitial cells, which are clearly non-viral structures, such as coated vesicles. Furthermore, Bradley and colleagues quoted publications as a reference for their virus particle identification, which, in our opinion, both identified non-coronavirus structures as coronavirus particles,

With interest we follow the publications that show the presence of putative severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by electron microscopy (EM) in patient tissues and the debate about these results, - Good, let's see . . .

Now, the following is the kicker in regard to the blinding science sourced by twits as evidence . . .

. . . As diagnostic EM requires both specialised staff and expensive equipment, and has been replaced by other methods (eg, immunohistochemistry) in several fields of application, its use has been in decline in the past decades, resulting in irreversible loss of expertise that now becomes dramatically overt during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. This dilemma of diagnostic EM should alarm us all, as misleading information on the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in tissue has already made its way into the scientific literature and seems to be perpetuated.
We declare no competing interests.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32079-1/fulltext

 

[Mad as Fish]

And then only used in the handful of papers here.

Largely replaced by fluorescence microscopy now.

Try not to be a complete

So which papers should be ignored, and have you used them in the past to support your claims?

 

[Professor]

And then only used in the handful of papers here.

Largely replaced by fluorescence microscopy now.

Try not to be a complete

Go on then, keep on a flogging your Busted Flush science

You might check your sources again - Any proof for us today?

 

[Mad as Fish]

All my posted sources are still good. Got plenty more too.

How's your crash course in virology going?

Ready to back up your big claim?

How's your deep and meaningful consideration of the questions posed on the reliability of the CPR test going?

 

[Tiger]

Yes. There are side effects such as Myocarditis, but these are also the issues that someone with covid would have, except far, far worse. If you suffer Myocarditis from the shot, then you were very probably going to experience significant cardiac issues from a full blown covid infection.

On the one hand, it stopped a huge viral outbreak on the original variant. We already know (and there is no point in dismissing) that long Covid is a problem. These numbers would have been far higher if the virus was allowed to freely circulate with no mitigation. We would face significant population health, social and financial issues now and the numbers would totally overwhelm the HSE (who can't cope with the current workload right now).

On the other hand, there is an health impact from cancelled OP visits, cancelled screening, and social impacts from school closures.

The latter however, we know how to tackle, even if the resources may be lacking The former....its scary to see how little is still know about Long Covid and some of these peoples lives are ruined. Crank the numbers up and it becomes terrifying. These people can't work, and are a burden on the healthcare system.

On balance then, the right decision was made, especially early on when we knew nothing about the short, medium and long term impacts of covid.


Yes. There are numerous studies on this, both at a population effect level, and at a basic level in measuring droplet counts expelled using a mask and without.

I see you couldn’t simply answer Yes or No and felt compelled to qualify your reply. Presumably because the raw replies look kind of stupid dangling there on their own.

You have shown over the past 3 years that you are addicted to carefully choosing studies to knowingly make a false argument. You’ve consistently displayed a pattern of disinformation and manipulation of data to protect the crumbling mainstream narrative.

 

[Tiger]

All my posted sources are still good. Got plenty more too.

They’re not. You cherry pick studies which don’t stand up to scrutiny to purposefully misdirect.

The overall body of evidence is that Covid vaccines are not safe or effective and did not pass the risk reward parameters for 99.9% of the perfectly healthy people who took them

 

[Wolf]

They’re not. You cherry pick studies which don’t stand up to scrutiny to purposefully misdirect.

The overall body of evidence is that Covid vaccines are not safe or effective and did not pass the risk reward parameters for 99.9% of the perfectly healthy people who took them

Leave Wankstain and his fellow CoVidiots take the experimental jabs all they like.
Hopefully it ends their lives sooner rather than later.

 

[Wolf]

Dear Charlotte.........

What a sad fucking cunt.

 

[Tiger]

So...no actual rebuttal. Just the usual whining.

Haha rebuttal to what?

Some outdated garbage that even Joe Normie doesn’t believe anymore.

You may be stuck in a time warp, but most people have moved on.

 

[Wolf]

Haha rebuttal to what?

Some outdated garbage that even Joe Normie doesn’t believe anymore.

You may be stuck in a time warp, but most people have moved on.

It's ok.
In about 10 minutes it'll be off to the Ukraine thread to post 24 hours worth of Twatter scutter from parrots/cats and a bit more about his child sex abuse obsession.

 

[Wolf]

Reverse psychology is a great thing.
Checkmate!

 

[Wolf]

As long as you don't shitpost to the Ukraine thread, I'm all good.

Drop dead, Wankstain.

 

[Professor]

it's now 2023. The evidence is already in. The vaccines worked with remarkably few side effects.

Really, what do you know? Tell us how do the covid vaccines work?
What's remarkable is apparently there was little or no benefit from them at all, but a dose of side effects - Yes!

 

[Professor]

Do you know how vaccines work in general? - it's now 2023. The evidence is already in. The vaccines worked

Yes, in general. - What evidence have you got that The Vaccines worked? Which Vaccines/shots? Worked how? For how long, for how many?
What evidence in general taken from which specifics?? if you please, to make a convincing point.

 

[Wolf]

Yes, in general. - What evidence have you got that The Vaccines worked? Which Vaccines/shots? Worked how? For how long, for how many?
What evidence in general taken from which specifics?? if you please, to make a convincing point.

There was a flu virus strain that the WHO failed to spot and it finished off a few thousand auld lads and auld ones in nursing homes.
It ran it's course and was over within about 8 weeks.
There hasn't been a single autopsy carried out in Ireland on any 'victim of the pandemic'.
There's a reason for that.
Also, the average age of death in Ireland was just under 82, the average age of 'covid victims' was 84.....people with on average three comorbidities.

ConVid was and is the greatest scam ever carried out and it's fanboys need to be executed.

 

[Wolf]

getting sicker? https://www.telegraph.co.uk/busines...ness-26m-people-out-of-work-nhs-waiting-list/

Long ConVid?
Funny how that appeared just as the poison was been injected....

 

[Wolf]

Autopsy findings in COVID-19 infection-related death: a systematic review - PMC

Coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19) has been declared as pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) in March 2020. As of 28 November 2021, there were more than 260 million cases and nearly 5.2 million deaths caused by COVID-19. The most affected ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

You need to learn how to read, Wankstain.

 

[Professor]

I just looked at the Lancet. A synthesis study by 's for 's Sorry for you Twitz, Your evidence is incomplete and lacking, known control groups, detailed historic status and follow-on testing is absent in any detail. I and others are wholey unconvinced by synthesized Blinding Science as you presented.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(23)00015-2/fulltext

 

[Wolf]

Go on?

I'll let you read my post again and we'll see if you can work it out yourself you stupid cunt.

 

[Wolf]

Charlottesweb is back doing its thing shilling for the CoVidian Cultists, strange new gimpname though.
But we knew the scummy bastard never really left and as winter approached it'd be back spinning its lies.
The poor braindead old cunt.

 

[Mad as Fish]

Do you know how vaccines work in general?

Vaccines yes, but the covid jab isn't a vaccine.

 

[Wolf]

Vaccines yes, but the covid jab isn't a vaccine.

Indeed, it's experimental gene therapy.
Didn't the medical Nazis change the definition of the word vaccine to suit their new poison?

 

[Tiger]

More whining.

More trolling

 

[Tiger]

Vaccines yes, but the covid jab isn't a vaccine.

The site bot doesn’t understand that. It’s not programmed that way.