Diversity, what does it give us?

Anderson

Anderson

🇮🇪 ☘️ 🇮🇪
Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2022
Messages
2,378
Reaction score
1,865
Diversity, the buzzword so often used by our political elites often hails it as some sort of utopia, progress, and harmony. However, a closer examination reveals that the reality of diversity is far more nuanced, and its purported benefits may not always materialize as expected.

Russia for example has a severe lack of diversity, there Putin ensures that traditional values are front and centre and the liberalism that has infected the West does not spread across the proud nation. Ask any British person today if their capital city is better now than it was 100 years ago, many people will undoubtedly say no, as London today is so diverse the native population of white Londoners are now a minority in their capital city.

Whilst a subway is not a measure of success on any front, I do believe it highlights a point in time in the values and standards of a nation.

Take a look at this short video from Tucker Carlson and compare a US Subway to a Russian subway, then ask yourself, is a country better for diversity or better without?


View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1757901280830505037
 
Anderson said:
Diversity, the buzzword so often used by our political elites often hails it as some sort of utopia, progress, and harmony. However, a closer examination reveals that the reality of diversity is far more nuanced, and its purported benefits may not always materialize as expected.

Russia for example has a severe lack of diversity, there Putin ensures that traditional values are front and centre and the liberalism that has infected the West does not spread across the proud nation. Ask any British person today if their capital city is better now than it was 100 years ago, many people will undoubtedly say no, as London today is so diverse the native population of white Londoners are now a minority in their capital city.

Whilst a subway is not a measure of success on any front, I do believe it highlights a point in time in the values and standards of a nation.

Take a look at this short video from Tucker Carlson and compare a US Subway to a Russian subway, then ask yourself, is a country better for diversity or better without?


View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1757901280830505037
Click to expand...

It will turn Ireland into the pox that is America.
Gang warfare, rapes, mass shootings, fixed elections, normalising child rape and tranny freaks, the breeding out of white people and the total destruction of the reasonably civilised society we've known.
The relentless attack on whites and Christians is gaining speed and being replaced with a godless warped and dangerous society.
FFG/SF and the communists in Dail Eireann hate themselves and hate us even more.
 
It gives us different many different varieties of lentilslop and rape epidemics.
 
Mods vs Roc_ers said:
I wouldn't conflate the problematic strain within Islamism with "diversity" in general, boys.



It is no coincidence either that so many of the greatest and most successful cities in history were multicultural and cosmpolitan. It was not only cities like Tel Aviv, New York, Rome, Berlin, Sydney, and others found success through heaving with many different coloured skins and cultures.
Click to expand...
I lived in NYC in the early 80s and it likely was the most dangerous place on Earth. The only reason more were not killed is the fact that even dingbats knew enough to never go into places like Bedford Stuy or Harlem.

The subways very nasty. Then Bernie Guetz pluged 4 of De Blacks.

He was the greatest hero of the 80s




View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omns8Ihw4W0&t=1s
 
free and clean said:
The problem with you people (I assume you're an academic or something) is you don't live in the real world.
Click to expand...
Correct, their cure is a few Roma moving in next door.
We saw this some months ago when the Dingbats on Martha's Vineyard had a plane load sent to them.


THEY WERE OFF THE ISLAND WITHIN 24 HOURS.
 
Anderson said:
Russia for example has a severe lack of diversity, there Putin ensures that traditional values are front and centre and the liberalism that has infected the West does not spread across the proud nation. Ask any British person today if their capital city is better now than it was 100 years ago, many people will undoubtedly say no, as London today is so diverse the native population of white Londoners are now a minority in their capital city.
Click to expand...

How do you make that out? The Russian Federation took in more refugees from Syria during the war there than the West did and besides that there is a ton of people from the Central Asian Republics as well people from the Russian Federation's own minorities.

Here is the thing- Lenin hated "Great Russian Chauvinism" and so the brought in a system of multiculturalism into Russia which the Russian Federation inherited from the Soviet Union. Putin is fully in line with Eurasian diversity as opposed the centralizing narrow Jacobin model of nationalism championed by the likes of Alexei Navalny.

The Muslim population of the Russian Federation is 18 per cent, in London it is 15 per cent- but also in the Russian Federation Muslims have real political power and influence which they do not have in the UK.
 
Mods vs Roc_ers said:
Anyway, what came out of that metaphorical wild and teeming and unconstrained "jungle", the exact opposite to safe and bland monoculture, was pretty unbelievable. It laid down the creative foundations for all of our multi trillion dollar creative industries today, and absolutely makes the case for "diversity" does it not.


View: https://youtu.be/kuiK0wEexR4?si=x094JVpCydBP8mRW
Click to expand...


Really? The "culture" being celebrated in that documentry was mostly wiped out by AIDS or in other words the consequences of it's destructive to self and others covenant with death.
 
Myles O'Reilly said:
He's using AI
Click to expand...
David has been banned said:
Could be, actually 🤣
Click to expand...

It is really fascinating to see the militant Zionist wax lyrical about the major cities of the Ottomann decadence very similarly to how Rightist Islamists do- he could almost be from Hizb Ut Tahir when he gets going.

The thing is that in the contemporary West when people speak about "multiculturalism" generally they mean everybody else taking on the trashiest and most toxic elements of North American "Black culture". I think we can do without "Drill Crews".
 
Mods vs Roc_ers said:
Look for example at the most undiverse, monocultured, intolerant societies on earth, like in the Arab countries, and they still have such problems a thousand times worse than what we have.
Click to expand...

No Arab country I know of undiverse- not even Saudi Arabia. Why do you think the Zionists can advocate for smashing up the Middle East outside of Jewish Palestine into hundreds of splinters?
 
Mods vs Roc_ers said:
Your Sunni and Shia is pretty much the same thing as Mods and Rockers. I don't think that's quite what the subject is here, even put through the highly distorted and jaundiced lens of such a warped and twisted doctrinaire and zealot as you are.
Click to expand...

Oh grow up- the Sunni and Shia have their own vast spectrums. Salafis and Sufis- both Sunni- are radically different from each other and often clash. Than there different ethnicities within their nations. Again the fact that the Zionists can contemplate shattering the Middle East into a hundred fragments just proves the diversity of Arab countries.

You could not have had the Yinon Plan if they were not diverse-

en.wikipedia.org

Yinon Plan - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
 
Mods vs Roc_ers said:
Neither do the tribal divisions in the Arab countries run down the same lines as what the goons on this thread are talking about. They are not talking about for example the differences between the Palestinian tribes that populate Hebron, Jericho, Ramallah, Nablus, Tulkarem, Qalqilyah and Jenin who are all are very different from each other, as you know.
Click to expand...

They are not very different from each other at all.
 
Mods vs Roc_ers said:
Anyway, this is a tangent. So back on topic, and last word on the "Arab" thing I mentioned in my post solely as brief illustration, let's recall that Nationalism, the nation state, and Arabism destroyed the best, most sophisticated, most learned, most open-minded city in the Mediterranean, Alexandria - that I mentioned in the thread earlier, holding that city up as an example of how multiculturalism and diversity in history more often meant great success and a thriving of culture, and economy, rather than what you guys are trying to hypothesise through these "ironic" slogans you have...
Click to expand...

Sounding just like the most reactionary right wing Islamist.
 
Mods vs Roc_ers said:
Your Sunni and Shia is pretty much the same thing as Mods and Rockers. I don't think that's quite what the subject is here, even put through the highly distorted and jaundiced lens of such a warped and twisted doctrinaire and zealot as you are.
Click to expand...

You like @Myles O'Reilly were a fan of "Imam" Tawhidi who was a Shia fundamentalist of the very worst sort- he hated Khomienists and "Khomienists", was close to seeing them as worse even than Sunnis, and the issues between them you saw as real enough to love one and hate the other.
 
@Mods vs Roc_ers look behave as you would on P.ie and don't push your luck.

I have talked to actual right wing reactionary Islamists and they come out with similar guff to yourself as regards Alexandria, etc.

Herzl believed that diverse societies were bad for everyone involved hence his Zionism. Greg Johnson by the way has spoken about his admiration for Herzl and he is not the only of his ilk.
 
Mods vs Roc_ers said:
Jeez, I wonder why.

The Little Green Book | Fatawah And Sayings of The Ayatollah Mosavi Khomeini

Not exactly a fellow who promoted "diversity" now was he. Worth a read for all that, to see who are your fellow travellers. I.e. Haters of diversity. Intolerant. Authoritarian. Fascist. Etc.
Click to expand...

Yeah a Far Right Zionist site will give you accurate translations and the low down on someone like Khomeini- just like the Goyim Defense League will give you the low down on Jews.

Khomeini as traditionalist and hard line as he was in some ways hated anti-Sunni sectarianism and anti-Arab racism and put his foot firmly down as regards making Jews as such guilty of Zionism. He enjoyed a close relationship with Ruth Blau who was one of the most fascinating people in 20 th century Jewish history.
 
Mods vs Roc_ers said:
I responded to your stupidity, showed it up, and you think you can just delete it?

Don't fucking talk to me about pushing my luck. I can tell you you're pushing yours you fucking arsehole.
Click to expand...
Don't you have an 'origins' blog to add some real content to? We're all waiting for some meat on that bone
 
@Mods vs Roc_ers you would not come out with such vileness on Politics.ie, so why spew it here?

Anyway your carry on shows a massive sense of entitlement which proves as much as anything that the claims that the Southern Irish as a group are infected by anti-Jewish anti-Semitism are risible.
 
David has been banned said:
Is roc upset? 🤔
Click to expand...

Yes. He does not understand that the majority of the biological spine of the historic Irish Nation or myself do not recognize insults as arguments. His misogyny is also un-Gaelic. On these topics from an actual Jewish intellectual-

"......What is an “anti-Semite,” anyway? We can begin with two cogent definitions: personal and political anti-Semitism. A personal anti-Semite is one who hates all Jews and refuses to associate with them. Yet, everyone who knows Pat Buchanan at all, Jew and non-Jew alike, and regardless of political beliefs, attests to his complete lack of personal prejudice.

Then, on what basis might we call someone a “political” anti-Semite? The only persuasive definition is someone who advocates placing some form of legal or political disability upon Jews: depriving Jews of the vote; kicking Jews out of various professions, such as law, journalism or medicine, where they exceed their numerical “quota” in the population; forcing Jews to wear special armbands; or, in the extreme case, rounding them up in concentration camps or killing them outright. Does Buchanan advocate any such measures? To ask is to see the absurdity of attempting to pin the “anti-Semite” label on Buchanan...."

www.latimes.com

COLUMN RIGHT/ MURRAY N. ROTHBARD : Buchanan an Anti-Semite? It's a Smear : His enemies labored hard, and brought forth a pitiful mouse.

In this day and age, the charge of "anti-Semitism" is a grave one, placing a weighty burden of moral responsibility on anyone making such an accusation.
www.latimes.com www.latimes.com

By those definitions I am neither a personal or political anti-Jewish anti-Semite. I do though find roc's sense of entitlement annoying at times and I think it is understandable to see him as hostile to the indigenous Christian population of Ireland.
 
Myles O'Reilly said:
I don't know Clarke (although you Roc should mind yizer manners!)

Yer man 'Free and Clean' said summat about a lad called R0ry and like you I hit the 'confused' button.

I still don't know what R0ry he's talking about Sir!
Click to expand...
Free and Clean has some Explaining to do ? !
 
Videos from the Devenish Bar in Belfast shows that Irish mothers, wives and daughters are well up for big black cock. And here you are worrying about immigration and your women all slappers?
 
428433299_10161108097302464_42292452461004325_n.jpg
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom