Diversity, what does it give us?

[Anderson]

Diversity, the buzzword so often used by our political elites often hails it as some sort of utopia, progress, and harmony. However, a closer examination reveals that the reality of diversity is far more nuanced, and its purported benefits may not always materialize as expected.

Russia for example has a severe lack of diversity, there Putin ensures that traditional values are front and centre and the liberalism that has infected the West does not spread across the proud nation. Ask any British person today if their capital city is better now than it was 100 years ago, many people will undoubtedly say no, as London today is so diverse the native population of white Londoners are now a minority in their capital city.

Whilst a subway is not a measure of success on any front, I do believe it highlights a point in time in the values and standards of a nation.

Take a look at this short video from Tucker Carlson and compare a US Subway to a Russian subway, then ask yourself, is a country better for diversity or better without?


View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1757901280830505037

 

[Anderson]

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1619435335834013696

 

[Wolf]

Diversity, the buzzword so often used by our political elites often hails it as some sort of utopia, progress, and harmony. However, a closer examination reveals that the reality of diversity is far more nuanced, and its purported benefits may not always materialize as expected.

Russia for example has a severe lack of diversity, there Putin ensures that traditional values are front and centre and the liberalism that has infected the West does not spread across the proud nation. Ask any British person today if their capital city is better now than it was 100 years ago, many people will undoubtedly say no, as London today is so diverse the native population of white Londoners are now a minority in their capital city.

Whilst a subway is not a measure of success on any front, I do believe it highlights a point in time in the values and standards of a nation.

Take a look at this short video from Tucker Carlson and compare a US Subway to a Russian subway, then ask yourself, is a country better for diversity or better without?


View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1757901280830505037

It will turn Ireland into the pox that is America.
Gang warfare, rapes, mass shootings, fixed elections, normalising child rape and tranny freaks, the breeding out of white people and the total destruction of the reasonably civilised society we've known.
The relentless attack on whites and Christians is gaining speed and being replaced with a godless warped and dangerous society.
FFG/SF and the communists in Dail Eireann hate themselves and hate us even more.

 

[Declan]

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1619435335834013696

Note the Ukrainian colored tent.

 

[Fishalt]

It gives us different many different varieties of lentilslop and rape epidemics.

 

[Mods vs Roc_ers]

I wouldn't conflate the problematic strain within Islamism with "diversity" in general, boys.

Consider a rich biodiverse ecosystem versus a manicured monoculture. Sure, to a certain mindset, a tended lawn is preferable to a wilderness.

But that is an abject, unlearned mindset. The same mindset that those who romanticise those old images of London, or Russia today, would tend to have, eh, boys.

Blind to the fact of the totalitarian social mores not far under the surface necessary to "keep the weeds down", if we may put it like that.

It is no coincidence either that so many of the greatest and most successful cities in history were multicultural and cosmpolitan. It was not only cities like Tel Aviv, New York, Rome, Berlin, Sydney, and others found success through heaving with many different coloured skins and cultures.

In times past recall cities like Alexandria, Smyrna (Izmir), Beirut, Selanik (Thessaloniki) and Constantinople (Istanbul) were massively multicultural and cosmopolitan, and it was exactly that that made them so successful.

So London's current problems are nothing to do with white British being a minority among other minorities, with no one group having a majority. But you already knew that.

And those videos of London and ideas about Russia you guys are masturbating over of course only show a portion of the picture.

Consider in Russia today, and in London in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, the squalid quarters of the cities, teeming with the miserable hordes, many of whom just like yourselves have no real learning or dignity or humanity towards their fellow man, their brothers and sisters.

Back then in London, I would say that the inequality sustaining the wretched and criminal classes probably lay in the distribution of wealth, and inequality in the ownership of land.

Certainly it had nothing to do with "de blacks", because there weren't any, you utter mongs.

So try again, losers. Try and tell me what is the one great fundamental fact which ultimately determines the social, the political, and consequently the intellectual and moral condition of the inhabitants of a city like London?

Answers on a postcard.

 

[Mods vs Roc_ers]

Russia today in reality is quite similar to late nineteen century England in that half of the population earn less than USD 1,130 a month. (This lower 50% say in polls that their wages do not cover basic expenses.)

While an elite earn multiples of that amount.

What side of the equation do you think you losers would end up on, if you lived in those times or places?

Oh yeah, the idea is you just need to buy some gold or silver coins and wait for Putin to fuck everything up, so you can make out like bandits in the apocalypse?

Brings "young Dan" to mind:

"... Zoom! What was that? That was your life, Mate! Oh, that was quick. Do I get another? Sorry, Mate. That's your lot...".

The fucking stupidity is painful.

 

[Declan]

I wouldn't conflate the problematic strain within Islamism with "diversity" in general, boys.



It is no coincidence either that so many of the greatest and most successful cities in history were multicultural and cosmpolitan. It was not only cities like Tel Aviv, New York, Rome, Berlin, Sydney, and others found success through heaving with many different coloured skins and cultures.

I lived in NYC in the early 80s and it likely was the most dangerous place on Earth. The only reason more were not killed is the fact that even dingbats knew enough to never go into places like Bedford Stuy or Harlem.

The subways very nasty. Then Bernie Guetz pluged 4 of De Blacks.

He was the greatest hero of the 80s




View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omns8Ihw4W0&t=1s

 

[Declan]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbViU73txB0


Check out the subway system and train. It is impossible to describe what these were like even in daytime, forget about at night. Contrast it to the system in Moscow.

 

[Mods vs Roc_ers]

Well New York is still diverse, in the best sense of diversity.

Ethnic neighborhoods of New York - L'Idea Magazine

Lidea magazine è il nuovo periodico on line per gli italiani residenti in USA. Economia, Politica, Cultura, Eventi, Sport, Arte tra Italia e gli Stati Uniti

lideamagazine.com

So the lawlessness that prevailed there in the eighties couldn't have been down to that.

Perhaps consider though what preceded that lawlessness, e.g. landlords inducing fast tenant turnover, failing to pay their taxes, cutting down on maintenance, renting to welfare and problem families, and when they had sweated the asset as much as they could, either walking away, giving the keys back to the bank, or selling the building on for another round of slum clearance which aggravated the cycle of displacement and decay etc.

Anyway, what came out of that metaphorical wild and teeming and unconstrained "jungle", the exact opposite to safe and bland monoculture, was pretty unbelievable. It laid down the creative foundations for all of our multi trillion dollar creative industries today, and absolutely makes the case for "diversity" does it not.


View: https://youtu.be/kuiK0wEexR4?si=x094JVpCydBP8mRW

 

[Mods vs Roc_ers]

Contrast it to the system in Moscow.

A few weeds appearing on that nice manicured monoculture lawn, not needed by the "system":

Over 100 people detained in Russia at memorials for deceased opposition leader Alexei Navalny

‘More than 101 people’ have already been detained in 10 cities, according to human rights defence group OVD-Info.

www.thejournal.ie

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

You don't half talk shite mate

He's using AI

 

[free and clean]

I wouldn't conflate the problematic strain within Islamism with "diversity" in general, boys.

Consider a rich biodiverse ecosystem versus a manicured monoculture. Sure, to a certain mindset, a tended lawn is preferable to a wilderness.

But that is an abject, unlearned mindset. The same mindset that those who romanticise those old images of London, or Russia today, would tend to have, eh, boys.

Blind to the fact of the totalitarian social mores not far under the surface necessary to "keep the weeds down", if we may put it like that.

It is no coincidence either that so many of the greatest and most successful cities in history were multicultural and cosmpolitan. It was not only cities like Tel Aviv, New York, Rome, Berlin, Sydney, and others found success through heaving with many different coloured skins and cultures.

In times past recall cities like Alexandria, Smyrna (Izmir), Beirut, Selanik (Thessaloniki) and Constantinople (Istanbul) were massively multicultural and cosmopolitan, and it was exactly that that made them so successful.

So London's current problems are nothing to do with white British being a minority among other minorities, with no one group having a majority. But you already knew that.

And those videos of London and ideas about Russia you guys are masturbating over of course only show a portion of the picture.

Consider in Russia today, and in London in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, the squalid quarters of the cities, teeming with the miserable hordes, many of whom just like yourselves have no real learning or dignity or humanity towards their fellow man, their brothers and sisters.

Back then in London, I would say that the inequality sustaining the wretched and criminal classes probably lay in the distribution of wealth, and inequality in the ownership of land.

Certainly it had nothing to do with "de blacks", because there weren't any, you utter mongs.

So try again, losers. Try and tell me what is the one great fundamental fact which ultimately determines the social, the political, and consequently the intellectual and moral condition of the inhabitants of a city like London?

Answers on a postcard.

Are you saying that diverse Dublin with its gangs of Roma gypsies, African gangs dumped in poor suburbs, old working class areas overwhelmed by foreigners ,loudmouth Brazilians who don't know how to conduct themselves on public transport etc. is preferable to the Dublin even 20 years ago, when irish people made up the vast majority?

The problem with you people (I assume you're an academic or something) is you don't live in the real world.

 

[Declan]

The problem with you people (I assume you're an academic or something) is you don't live in the real world.

Correct, their cure is a few Roma moving in next door.
We saw this some months ago when the Dingbats on Martha's Vineyard had a plane load sent to them.


THEY WERE OFF THE ISLAND WITHIN 24 HOURS.

 

[Zipporah's Flint]

Russia for example has a severe lack of diversity, there Putin ensures that traditional values are front and centre and the liberalism that has infected the West does not spread across the proud nation. Ask any British person today if their capital city is better now than it was 100 years ago, many people will undoubtedly say no, as London today is so diverse the native population of white Londoners are now a minority in their capital city.

How do you make that out? The Russian Federation took in more refugees from Syria during the war there than the West did and besides that there is a ton of people from the Central Asian Republics as well people from the Russian Federation's own minorities.

Here is the thing- Lenin hated "Great Russian Chauvinism" and so the brought in a system of multiculturalism into Russia which the Russian Federation inherited from the Soviet Union. Putin is fully in line with Eurasian diversity as opposed the centralizing narrow Jacobin model of nationalism championed by the likes of Alexei Navalny.

The Muslim population of the Russian Federation is 18 per cent, in London it is 15 per cent- but also in the Russian Federation Muslims have real political power and influence which they do not have in the UK.

 

[Zipporah's Flint]

Anyway, what came out of that metaphorical wild and teeming and unconstrained "jungle", the exact opposite to safe and bland monoculture, was pretty unbelievable. It laid down the creative foundations for all of our multi trillion dollar creative industries today, and absolutely makes the case for "diversity" does it not.


View: https://youtu.be/kuiK0wEexR4?si=x094JVpCydBP8mRW

Really? The "culture" being celebrated in that documentry was mostly wiped out by AIDS or in other words the consequences of it's destructive to self and others covenant with death.

 

[Zipporah's Flint]

He's using AI

Could be, actually

It is really fascinating to see the militant Zionist wax lyrical about the major cities of the Ottomann decadence very similarly to how Rightist Islamists do- he could almost be from Hizb Ut Tahir when he gets going.

The thing is that in the contemporary West when people speak about "multiculturalism" generally they mean everybody else taking on the trashiest and most toxic elements of North American "Black culture". I think we can do without "Drill Crews".

 

[free and clean]

We've come a long way from Rosa Parks -


View: https://t.me/markacollett/12037

R0ry's job is getting harder by the day

Riots break out between rival Eritrean groups in the Netherlands

Violence erupted between those who remain support the east African nations government to the government and those who strongly oppose it.

www.google.com

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

R0ry McIlory?

 

[clarke-connolly]

R0ry McIlory?

What does this mean Myles Sir ? !