- Joined
- Feb 3, 2022
- Messages
- 5,191
- Reaction score
- 3,927
How old do you think the earth is Plunkett?
How does a vertical tree trunk manage to fossilize itself through multiple strata of rock, when the official narrative is that said strata take eons to be laid down on top of one another?
Is the official geologic timeline Bollox?
The issue is that on many examples of polystrate tree fossils, there is no evidence of tectonic activity or a mudslide action in the strata surrounding the tree fossil.Oh that's an easy one. Just picture what you remember from watching earth quakes & landslides combined?
The earths shakes quakes and cracks open,Ok? then the landslide where the edge of a forest slides down into the deep dark coal seam - 100 million years after the coal had been forming . . . See?
View attachment 5022
Violent shaking triggers massive landslides in Sapporo Japan earthquake - Temblor.net
The magnitude 6.6 Sapporo earthquake occurred along the southern part of Hokkaido, Japantemblor.net
What could be the cause of such?The issue is that on many examples of polystrate tree fossils, there is no evidence of tectonic activity or a mudslide action in the strata surrounding the tree fossil.
There are examples which don’t make sense in the context of standard geological understanding.
Which underlines how little we poor humans know about the working of nature, preferring to bundle all our ignorance up into one big ball and call it God.The Vacuous Rhetoric of Evolution - Vox Popoli
This is a quote from the 1966 Philadelphia symposium, but it is precisely the same sort of argument that any substantive critic of Neo-Darwinism keeps running into from the Neo-Darwinians: Combinations of different genes occur such that every individual is a unique combination, and the selective...voxday.net
The Vacuous Rhetoric of Evolution
This is a quote from the 1966 Philadelphia symposium, but it is precisely the same sort of argument that any substantive critic of Neo-Darwinism keeps running into from the Neo-Darwinians:
Combinations of different genes occur such that every individual is a unique combination, and the selective assay of the value of each random mutation is performed simultaneously in this framework for thousands of mutations at a time. The acceptance of the neo-Darwinian concept of evolution appears to be eminently valid on this basis. However, a critical feature is the occurrence of mechanisms for genetic combination and recombination, and a major criticism of the neo-Darwinian concept which has been raised at this meeting is premised on the lack of such a mechanism in the initial steps of the evolution of a “sense” sequence of a polypeptide or polynucleotide from an initially “nonsense” sequence. It does not, however, seem an extreme extrapolation from the known facts of nucleic acid replication and transcription to envisage that combination and recombination are inherent features of polynucleotides, and the evolution of “sense” sequences then becomes a process of reasonable probability.
– Dr. Alex Fraser, Professor of Genetics, University of California Davis, California
Let’s break the argument down into its component parts:
1. There is no mechanism. This is readily admitted.
2. This lack of a mechanism renders the hypothesis impossible.
3. But it doesn’t strike the Neo-Darwinian true believer to be an extreme extrapolation to imagine what this nonexistent, never-observed mechanism could be if it existed, which it doesn’t.
4. And if we simply imagine that this nonexistent mechanism existed, then the proposed process that requires it in order to function becomes theoretically possible.
5. Therefore, the process works as imagined
Nice straw man you've constructed there.Which underlines how little we poor humans know about the working of nature, preferring to bundle all our ignorance up into one big ball and call it God.
Regardless, it's still poor design. Certainly not intelligent. No explanation for it other than the one given by Biologists holds any water.As would be expected, an evolutionist responds to a 54 minute video 20 minutes after its posted.
No surprise there. It’s incredible how Dawkins can entertain the stupid masses.
Despite its circuitous route, the recurrent laryngeal nerve still serves its function adequately. It innerveates the larynx and fascilitates essential physiological processes like breathing, swallowing and vocalisation. Its structures function well enough to ensure survival and reproduction.