There is no God

[Kangal]

I’m not talking about what Wolf said, I remember vividly what YOU said.

I’ll ask again. Are you the poster known as Tank from PISH? If you are, then you’re rumbled.

Thats the same vivid imagination you use for your sky fairy.

 

[Tiger]

Thats the same vivid imagination you use for your sky fairy.

Ok

@Declan

We all remember Tank and what he said. He’s clearly here as a disingenuous poster. Not to be trusted.

Can we just get rid of this Irish hating twat once and for all?

 

[Wolf]

No.

Wolf repeatedly said this on PISH.

LOL.
Outed itself.
Thick as shite but doesn't know it.

 

[Tiger]

LOL.
Outed itself.
Thick as shite but doesn't know it.

The various contributors to this 24 hour a day account should have at least exchanged information to get their story straight.

 

[Wolf]

Ok

@Declan

We all remember Tank and what he said. He’s clearly here as a disingenuous poster. Not to be trusted.

Can we just get rid of this Irish hating twat once and for all?

FFS, when it joined here it's first username was M1A2......

 

[Anderson]

God is all around us, we just have to take notice.

 

[Kangal]

The various contributors to this 24 hour a day account should have at least exchanged information to get their story straight.

I'm constantly surprised at the gullibility. I love it!

 

[scolairebocht]

If anybody wants to study the Proofs of God's Existence there might be a few chapters here that might help you: http://www.orwellianireland.com/proofs.pdf .

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

If anybody wants to study the Proofs of God's Existence there might be a few chapters here that might help you: http://www.orwellianireland.com/proofs.pdf .

Could you summarise please Sir?

 

[scolairebocht]

Its a nearly 300 page book?!!! But look you might
find some chapters easy enough to read?

 

[scolairebocht]

David if you look at the kind of FAQ Appendix you will see that was one of the atheist questions that was answered.

 

[Tuco Salamanca]

If anybody wants to study the Proofs of God's Existence there might be a few chapters here that might help you: http://www.orwellianireland.com/proofs.pdf .

Are they intended to prove the existence of God in a deistic sense, or a specifically Christian Deity?

And do they tackle the problem of infinite regression?

 

[scolairebocht]

Its a Catholic Christian Deity, and whats wrong with a pdf? Its only a small size, easy to download and you can find what you want easily via the table of contents and index.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Its a nearly 300 page book?!!! But look you might find some chapters easy enough to read?

I would find it hard to read a single page Sir.

Is there an Audio book?

 

[Tuco Salamanca]

Its a Catholic Christian Deity, and whats wrong with a pdf? Its only a small size, easy to download and you can find what you want easily via the table of contents and index.

I've encountered these quasi Aristotelian type arguments before. They failed to convince me of a first "uncaused cause" deistic type God, never mind a deity with particular attributes.

But lets focus on the deistic aspect of the argument first. If it's possible for an uncaused cause to exist, this can also be used to argue for pantheism/monism.

In fact, this would be the more parsimonious conclusion.

 

[scolairebocht]

So have you read the chapter on the Thomist proofs? Yes its true that Aquinas draws on Aristotle a lot, but no harm in that and he was generous in acknowledging his debt to the great philosopher.

 

[Tuco Salamanca]

So have you read the chapter on the Thomist proofs? Yes its true that Aquinas draws on Aristotle a lot, but no harm in that and he was generous in acknowledging his debt to the great philosopher.

I'm actually glad that I took an interest in these sort of arguments and invested my time studying them a few years back.

In an oblique, unintentional way they played a part in my arriving at a monist, panentheist cosmology.

 

[Hermit]

Scientific PROOFS of The Creator - The Globe Terminator

SCIENTIFIC PROOFS OF THE CREATOR There are ONLY Two Possible Worldviews (*Ontological Primitives*) that can be held to account for how we (Universe/Us) are here; . Nature (Matter) or Intelligent Agency (God)

globeterminator.com

1. Information
2. Quantum Mechanics
3. Laws of Thermodynamics
4. Functional Sequence/Specified Complexity

 

[Zipporah's Flint]

So have you read the chapter on the Thomist proofs? Yes its true that Aquinas draws on Aristotle a lot, but no harm in that and he was generous in acknowledging his debt to the great philosopher.

The problem is that the core reason for people rejecting the existence of God in the contemporary once you scratch even a bit is the so-called problem of evil.

 

[AUL LAD]

The problem is that the core reason for people rejecting the existence of God in the contemporary once you scratch even a bit is the so-called problem