"Tommy Robinson" arrested at "March Against Antisemitism" Rally.

For starters, the people of the same occupation you think murdered career criminal, Fentanyl Floyd
Looks like a serious issue that is going to be dealt with.


I assume you will be equally appalled the next time apparent police negligence results in a death, whatever the persons color or background.

Anyone else?
 
Last edited:
Looks like a serious issue that is going to be dealt with.

I assume you will be equally appalled the next time apparent police negligence results in a death, whatever the persons color or background.
^ That was an edit by Haven, so I didn't notice it the first time..

Can we just laugh at how ridiculous these anti-white people are.. @Haven, was Fentanyl Floyd killed by police negligence?

Anyone else?
 
^ That was an edit by Haven, so I didn't notice it the first time..

Can we just laugh at how ridiculous these anti-white people are.. @Haven, was Fentanyl Floyd killed by police negligence?
That would be a kind way to describe what happened to Floyd.
 
Antiwhiteism is systemic, it will take a lot to fix that..
Now we may be getting somewhere.

Let us accept that the morons recruited to the police in the UK were indeed imbued with the idea of a racial hierarchy of victimhood.

(And keeping in mind that police and gardai usually target the “less academically inclined” in their recruitment).

In this case a racial hierarchy of victimhood characterised by what your white supremacist jargon terms “anti whiteism” etc.

But isn’t there another group of morons in this “system” also imbued with the same idea of a racial hierarchy of victimhood?

Ring any bells Jambo? 💩

You see how your dogma is actually the same in systemic terms, only in this case inverted?

Now in this ”system” where we have two implementations of this idea of a racial hierarchy of victimhood, which side of the coin came first?

I.e. Racism, or the reaction to it, anti-racism, or the reaction to that, i.e. a recasting of the original racism as per your own proclaimed dogma and creed etc?

And around it goes. That is the “system” we’re talking about, isn’t it Jambo?

So now tell me how we fix it?
 
Floyd happened to Floyd.

Low IQ Black doing Low IQ Black Stuff i.e. Crime and Drugs.

Floyd put Floyd out of his misery.
Anyone with a brain and who isn't a supporter of the Degenerate Pedophile Party knows that Chicken George Floyd died from a full blown drug overdose.
All ya have to do is read the filthy thieving nig ger's autopsy report.
Pervert, as usual is being the contrarian arsehole he's paid to be.
Ya gotta laugh.😂
 
Anyone with a brain and who isn't a supporter of the Degenerate Pedophile Party knows that Chicken George Floyd died from a full blown drug overdose.
All ya have to do is read the filthy thieving nig ger's autopsy report.
Pervert, as usual is being the contrarian arsehole he's paid to be.
Ya gotta laugh.😂
Wrong again: CARDIOPULMONARY ARREST COMPLICATING LAW ENFORCEMENTSUBDUAL, RESTRAINT, AND NECK COMPRESSION

 
The British police have to carry out their functions in accordance with an “anti-racism commitment” (see below), no doubt a proposal thought up by some activist prick to blur the lines and make effective policing of minority crime almost impossible.

It’s not difficult to see why people are so angry. They’ve watched their country being reduced to a third world dump against their wishes, while the institutions of the State have been weaponised by a progressive cult to designate minority groups as beyond reproach, while another group (white people) are “gammon” and worthless in the eyes of the law (see countless grooming gang cases).


 
The British police have to carry out their functions in accordance with an “anti-racism commitment” (see below), no doubt a proposal thought up by some activist prick to blur the lines and make effective policing of minority crime almost impossible.

It’s not difficult to see why people are so angry. They’ve watched their country being reduced to a third world dump against their wishes, while the institutions of the State have been weaponised by a progressive cult to designate minority groups as beyond reproach, while another group (white people) are “gammon” and worthless in the eyes of the law (see countless grooming gang cases).


And ~ Now The Irish Gimp Politicians are doing exactly the same thing in the 26 County Banana state-let :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
 
Now we may be getting somewhere.
Nope, that never happens with you, you're an inane idiot

Let us accept that the morons recruited to the police in the UK were indeed imbued with the idea of a racial hierarchy of victimhood.

(And keeping in mind that police and gardai usually target the “less academically inclined” in their recruitment).

In this case a racial hierarchy of victimhood characterised by what your white supremacist jargon terms “anti whiteism” etc.
But isn’t there another group of morons in this “system” also imbued with the same idea of a racial hierarchy of victimhood?
They all are, perhaps none more so than your tribespeople ✡️

None of it's real though. The only systemic discrimination is antiwhiteism

Ring any bells Jambo? 💩
Your tribe even invented a genocide around the 1970s and have never shut up about it since i.e. the Holohoax

You see how your dogma is actually the same in systemic terms, only in this case inverted?

Now in this ”system” where we have two implementations of this idea of a racial hierarchy of victimhood, which side of the coin came first?

I.e. Racism, or the reaction to it, anti-racism, or the reaction to that, i.e. a recasting of the original racism as per your own proclaimed dogma and creed etc?

And around it goes. That is the “system” we’re talking about, isn’t it Jambo?

So now tell me how we fix it?
 
Last edited:
IMG_20260603_135848_578.jpg
 
As good an illustration as any of a great number of individuals formed into a single mass, and possessed by the madness of a crowd.

Like you they have been told by their pied pipers that they are the oppressed. That they are the victims. That they are the powerless. Like you that message has done something to them.
Why all the carryon from the right?
George Floyd riots.png
 
What comes first?

The evidence or the narrative?

I.e. , you deliberately ignore wider context or contradictory evidence that goes against your desired narrative. Instead cherry-picking events, anecdotes, data points, and specific subsets of data - to support your narrative.

So we have another tragedy. And predictably we witness a certain reaction to it from certain quarters.

And it is not the first time, for sure. For instance, read this bit from the manifesto of the chap with the gun, Dylann Roofe, above. He wrote:

"... More importantly this prompted me to type in the words“black on White crime” into Google, and I have never been the same since that day. The first website I came to was the Council of Conservative Citizens. There were pages upon pages of these brutal black on White murders. I was in disbelief.

At this moment I realized that something was very wrong. How could the news be blowing up the Trayvon Martin case while hundreds of these black on White murders got ignored?

From this point I researched deeper and found out what was happening in Europe. I saw that the same things were happening in England and France, and in all the other Western European countries.Again I found myself in disbelief.

As an American we are taught to accept living in the melting pot, and black and other minorities have just as much right to be here as we do, since we are all immigrants. But Europe is the homeland of White people, and in many ways the situation is even worse there.

From here I found out about the Jewishproblem and other issues facing our race, and I can say today that I am completely racially aware.

I think it is is fitting to start off with the group I have themost real life experience with, and the group that is the biggest problem for Americans. Niggers are stupid and violent..."


Sound familiar?

The point of having intelligence is being capable of making an accurate representation of the whole.

But what these white supremacist recruiters excel at doing to people like you, not too bright - is taking some snapshot, or series of snapshots, and making you believe their snapshots representative of the whole, that is of the picture or narrative they have painted for you.

Don't be another Roofe or Jambo.
 
Poor Jambo, radicalised online, and turned into "The Equaliser". :rolleyes:

roof-011_3348332b.jpg
What comes first?

The evidence or the narrative?

I.e. , you deliberately ignore wider context or contradictory evidence that goes against your desired narrative. Instead cherry-picking events, anecdotes, data points, and specific subsets of data - to support your narrative.

So we have another tragedy. And predictably we witness a certain reaction to it from certain quarters.
And it is not the first time, for sure. For instance, read this bit from the manifesto of the chap with the gun, Dylann Roofe, above. He wrote:
"... More importantly this prompted me to type in the words“black on White crime” into Google, and I have never been the same since that day. The first website I came to was the Council of Conservative Citizens. There were pages upon pages of these brutal black on White murders. I was in disbelief.

At this moment I realized that something was very wrong. How could the news be blowing up the Trayvon Martin case while hundreds of these black on White murders got ignored?

From this point I researched deeper and found out what was happening in Europe. I saw that the same things were happening in England and France, and in all the other Western European countries.Again I found myself in disbelief.

As an American we are taught to accept living in the melting pot, and black and other minorities have just as much right to be here as we do, since we are all immigrants. But Europe is the homeland of White people, and in many ways the situation is even worse there.

From here I found out about the Jewishproblem and other issues facing our race, and I can say today that I am completely racially aware.

I think it is is fitting to start off with the group I have themost real life experience with, and the group that is the biggest problem for Americans. Niggers are stupid and violent..."
Sound familiar?
Yeah

I think this is a teachable momement about Jewish people, like roc..

They have absolutely no compunction about telling the truth - so long as they think that they've poisoned the well enough.

Take this Hollywood movie, American History X -


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zuDkv4JYxOE

This is who made it -


The point of having intelligence is being capable of making an accurate representation of the whole.

But what these white supremacist recruiters excel at doing to people like you, not too bright - is taking some snapshot, or series of snapshots, and making you believe their snapshots representative of the whole, that is of the picture or narrative they have painted for you.

Don't be another Roofe or Jambo.
 
Last edited:
I'm not Jewish.

But I'm not sure the po9int you're trying to make here, Jambo?

The video you posted is of a Neo-Nazi airing his viewpoints at the dinner table.

This is a film about his coming to a final realisation at the end of the film, no?

So why would these Neo Nazi viewpoints not be shown?

You have to bring them to the surface so you can examine them.

Actually this is why your sect so often uses an "in-language" and memes to talk about these ideas among yourselves.

I.e. You want to be incomprehensible to outsiders so your ideas can't be examined under a normal light.

But basically the film above is depicting the kind of conversion as undergone say by the likes of Derek Black, no?


So then what point are you trying to make by posting it?

I'm afraid this meme or reference you're attempting is going over my head?

Let me ask you then, what you think it would mean to other white supremacists/nationalists?
 
Yeah

I think this is a teachable momement about Jewish people, like roc..

They have absolutely no compunction about telling the truth - so long as they think that they've poisoned the well enough.

Take this Hollywood movie, American History X -


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zuDkv4JYxOE

This is who made it -


You spell checked me, with 100% blind, pure, unwavering confidence, with an entirely different word that actually means a carcass.

You are, quite literally, an idiot.

Whatever cause you support, you actually damage it. You are an awful advocate, and for that, I'm thankful.
 
Poor Pervert, still swallowing the Degenerate Pedophile Party lies about the dead criminal nig ger Chicken George.
Bless.

Anyway, here's Chicken's state of health and the amount of drugs the knacker had in him.
Nice 'cause of death' if yer looking to start a race war ok but look at part 2, part 3, part 4, part 5 and especially part 6.......
Filthy skank junkie and the planet is better off with him dead.
Only sick lonely Perverts/Nonces could look up to that nig ger.


Tell ya what, it doesn't take much to kill a nig ger.:)
 
Last edited:
I'm not Jewish.

But I'm not sure the po9int you're trying to make here, Jambo?

The video you posted is of a Neo-Nazi airing his viewpoints at the dinner table.

This is a film about his coming to a final realisation at the end of the film, no?

So why would these Neo Nazi viewpoints not be shown?

You have to bring them to the surface so you can examine them.

Actually this is why your sect so often uses an "in-language" and memes to talk about these ideas among yourselves.

I.e. You want to be incomprehensible to outsiders so your ideas can't be examined under a normal light.

But basically the film above is depicting the kind of conversion as undergone say by the likes of Derek Black, no?


So then what point are you trying to make by posting it?

I'm afraid this meme or reference you're attempting is going over my head?

Let me ask you then, what you think it would mean to other white supremacists/nationalists?
lol This is kinda funny because what I said did, indeed, go a hundred miles over your Jewish head.

What did Dylann Roof say in his manifesto that you posted that's wrong, hm? What did (the fictional character) Derek say in the scene (and others) from the movie that I posted is wrong, well?

That's my point. Jews don't mind telling the truth so long as they've poisoned the well. In other words, the person telling the truth is a bad person, especially an anti-semite
 
You spell checked me, with 100% blind, pure, unwavering confidence, with an entirely different word that actually means a carcass.

You are, quite literally, an idiot.

Whatever cause you support, you actually damage it. You are an awful advocate, and for that, I'm thankful.
Wot you on about m8? 🤔
 
What did Dylann Roof say in his manifesto that you posted that's wrong, hm?
What did (the fictional character) Derek say in the scene (and others) from the movie that I posted is wrong, well?
In other words, the person telling the truth is a bad person, especially an anti-semite.
"Scorn not his simplicity".

You know that just because someone says something in a manifesto or on TV or in a film that does mean it must be the "truth"?

Actually it brings to mind your misunderstanding of Richard Dawkin's scientific representations.

I.e. Dawkins on TV/internet acknowledged a between-race genetic variation.

Jambo took this to mean his sect slogan "race is real" therefore must therefore be "the truth".

But he cognitively failed to hear Dawkins continue to paint the whole picture of reality that he is trying to paint.

Well because Jambo doesn't want him to finish his picture.

I.e. The picture emphasising that while there are indeed small, racial differences at the DNA level, the genetic evidence also shows, that all appearances to the contrary (i.e. the strong visual differences which are ultimately misleading) we are an exceptionally uniform species.

Poor Jambo cognitively fails to hear Dawkins talk about the conflict between appearance and measured reality. He fails to hear him talk about how if you measure the total variation in the human species and then partition it into a between-race component and a within-race component, the between-race component is a very small fraction of the total.

But since Dawkins said one thing on his TV set, or his internet, Jambo's simplicity takes only the one thing he needs to hear, out of context, and takes it only in the manner he needs to hear it!

So he completely fails on a cognitive level to understand Dawkin's explanation that the visual perception of relatively large differences between human races and subgroups, as compared to the variation within these groups, is a biased perception. And that, based on randomly chosen genetic differences, human races and populations are remarkably similar to each other, with the largest part by far of human variation being accounted for by the differences between individuals.

So point being, I think something similar is happening here again.

I.e. Jambo heard a fellow say something on his TV. Or read it in some shooter';s manifesto.

And he was able to grasp no other context, or nuance, or movie theme, that might help him to understand the whole picture.

Because Jambo already had his picture.

You see pretty much, Jambo's whole life seems to be basically dedicated to going around finding "bits" on the internet and on his TV that he can use to corroborate this "picture", that paints his white supremacist/nationalist creed.

Scorn not Jambo's simplicity we are admonished in song. Well perhaps he has well earned it.
 
"... More importantly this prompted me to type in the words“black on White crime” into Google, and I have never been the same since that day. The first website I came to was the Council of Conservative Citizens. There were pages upon pages of these brutal black on White murders. I was in disbelief.

At this moment I realized that something was very wrong. How could the news be blowing up the Trayvon Martin case while hundreds of these black on White murders got ignored?

From this point I researched deeper and found out what was happening in Europe. I saw that the same things were happening in England and France, and in all the other Western European countries.Again I found myself in disbelief.

As an American we are taught to accept living in the melting pot, and black and other minorities have just as much right to be here as we do, since we are all immigrants. But Europe is the homeland of White people, and in many ways the situation is even worse there.

From here I found out about the Jewishproblem and other issues facing our race, and I can say today that I am completely racially aware.

I think it is is fitting to start off with the group I have themost real life experience with, and the group that is the biggest problem for Americans. Niggers are stupid and violent..."
If there's anything that you disagree with there please feel free to give us your detailed rebuttal..
 
"Scorn not his simplicity".

You know that just because someone says something in a manifesto or on TV or in a film that does mean it must be the "truth"?

Actually it brings to mind your misunderstanding of Richard Dawkin's scientific representations.

I.e. Dawkins on TV/internet acknowledged a between-race genetic variation.

Jambo took this to mean his sect slogan "race is real" therefore must therefore be "the truth".

But he cognitively failed to hear Dawkins continue to paint the whole picture of reality that he is trying to paint.

Well because Jambo doesn't want him to finish his picture.

I.e. The picture emphasising that while there are indeed small, racial differences at the DNA level, the genetic evidence also shows, that all appearances to the contrary (i.e. the strong visual differences which are ultimately misleading) we are an exceptionally uniform species.

Poor Jambo cognitively fails to hear Dawkins talk about the conflict between appearance and measured reality. He fails to hear him talk about how if you measure the total variation in the human species and then partition it into a between-race component and a within-race component, the between-race component is a very small fraction of the total.

But since Dawkins said one thing on his TV set, or his internet, Jambo's simplicity takes only the one thing he needs to hear, out of context, and takes it only in the manner he needs to hear it!

So he completely fails on a cognitive level to understand Dawkin's explanation that the visual perception of relatively large differences between human races and subgroups, as compared to the variation within these groups, is a biased perception. And that, based on randomly chosen genetic differences, human races and populations are remarkably similar to each other, with the largest part by far of human variation being accounted for by the differences between individuals.

So point being, I think something similar is happening here again.

I.e. Jambo heard a fellow say something on his TV. Or read it in some shooter';s manifesto.

And he was able to grasp no other context, or nuance, or movie theme, that might help him to understand the whole picture.

Because Jambo already had his picture.

You see pretty much, Jambo's whole life seems to be basically dedicated to going around finding "bits" on the internet and on his TV that he can use to corroborate this "picture", that paints his white supremacist/nationalist creed.

Scorn not Jambo's simplicity we are admonished in song. Well perhaps he has well earned it.
I think this is for another thread..

But yes, I can certainly slap you around again on race realism (probably will)
 
No injuries, no marks, no foul play.
Just stolen goods on another drugged up homeless nig ger caught in the act.....again.👏

Fact is, if he was white Irish the Pervert who posts here would be mocking and belittling him.😎

 
There’s nothing of substance to “disagree” with.

You have a white supremacist website that your fellow cult member found on the internet - that actively filters national crime data to only spotlight violent incidents involving Black offenders and white victims, deliberately ignoring the hundreds of thousands of crimes where the races and demographics differ.

Which of course is the exact same modus operandi you operate when trying to find corroborating evidence for your mantra.

This website and their organisation that provided Dylan Roof witha “reason” for his shooting spree, ignore population proportions, ignore that the vast majority of violent crime is intra-racial (white-on-white, black-on-black), ignore that BlackAmericans are statistically much more likely to be victims of violent crime than White Americans.

And more.

But they set about purposely only digging out the crimes and the pictures they know is going to make such damaged utter simpletons as you and Dylan Roof cast aside your scepticism and doubt, and fervently BELIEVE.
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom