Origins Thread

Do you believe in evolution?


  • Total voters
    13

Hermit

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2023
Messages
932
Reaction score
809
Chess Monday

Ha.. Well I don't I'll make it a feature (of the thread) but how about some chess to get the neurons firing this Monday morning.

It's a wee bit tricky, so take your time @Tiger

Clue available upon request (and it's a good one) to anyone who wants it, just reply to this post:

Clue (or Clue, please if you're feeling polite :))

View attachment 6755
Queen to C6
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
Queen to C6
.. is the correct answer 👏

Why?

Don't get me wrong here Hermit, I trust you :) but I've been in this situation before and it's how I found out that Doggy couldn't play chess (literally tried to blag it like @Mods vs Roc_ers did). The same moron who claimed that he was in MENSA (<- that's how he spelled it) but apparently was the only member of Mensa who didn't know that it isn't an acronym
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
Why are you asking why???
Why???

Because it's mate in two and he only gave the first move, dumbass

Even someone like myself who has only ever played in a situation where utter boredom needs to be alleviated, say stuck in a waiting room, can see it, it is quite obvious, no? I don't see why it is tricky? Now I don't know why I even paused to look at this, I must be looking for stupid distractions today - but the only two moves black can physically make is either take the white queen with the pawn, which leaves the white rook free to go up beside the white king for mate. Or else move the black King's pawn one or else two spaces forward. In both situations the white rook then moves out into the left lane and the black king can't move to the space covered by the knight, can't take the rook with the pawn because that means his king is dead, and can't move forward either because the rook can still get him?
You know what, that's a sloppy fucken answer, and it's indicative of how you think generally, wing and a prayer, you think I would answer like that???

I'll get back to this later..

Right now I'm about to have a bowl of soup (oxtail) and a roll with it..
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
Right now I'm about to have a bowl of soup (oxtail) and a roll with it..
Oh yes. Just the thing to have at tea time for a British nationalist. Very traditional. I suppose you going to watch that British chap you like Marc Kollet on the telly while you have it? Or would that be contrary to the proper British table manners you were brought up with?


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sj5o1czFM4U


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DrARl0dzd-0
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
Why are you asking why??? Even someone like myself who has only ever played in a situation where utter boredom needs to be alleviated, say stuck in a waiting room, can see it, it is quite obvious, no? I don't see why it is tricky?
Who said it was tricky after you were given the first move, shithead?

k1b5pppN41RQ588884K3-a4c6.png


Now I don't know why I even paused to look at this, I must be looking for stupid distractions today - but the only two moves black can physically make is either take the white queen with the pawn, which leaves the white rook free to go up beside the white king for mate. Or else move the black King's pawn one or else two spaces forward. In both situations the white rook then moves out into the left lane and the black king can't move to the space covered by the knight, can't take the rook with the pawn because that means his king is dead, and can't move forward either because the rook can still get him?
Bzzt.. Wrong!

I'll forgive you for saying that moving the a-pawn either one or two squares is one move and pawn capturing queen is another for a total of two but black has actually SIX physical legal moves and you must account for all of them..

a6, Rxa6#
a5, Ra6#
bxc6, Rb8#
cxb6, Qxc8#
Bxd7, Qxb7#
axb6, Qa4# (she's coming home)

k1b51ppN41p68Q7884K3-a4c6.png


Every legal move black can make leads to checkmate in 1. After Qc6, black is in zugzwang
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
Jambo, I don't know wtf this computer speak is.
It's chess notation, not very complicated

But this actually relates to what concerned people have been trying to explain to you. There is a lesson here.

I.e. Your sorry rudimentary grasp of the expression of human language is why so much goes over your head, as we were saying yesterday.

And why for example you are reduced to such fundamental distinctions as evident in your childish will to classify human life into "white", and "non-white" classifications (never mind classifying as "anti-white" anyone who tries to act against this childish will).

Now maybe it is more "efficient" to speak in computer language in a machine sense. But I suggest you try and practice and stretch your own human language and capabilities of expression (in the mould that you often find on Isle for example).

That doesn't mean of course that when any subject other than chess arises you simply copy the language expression of morons like Marc Kollett or Derek Woods.

You have to try yourself. In other words, look out into the world, using your own eyes, engaging your own faculties, to observe the nuanced distinctions out in the world.

And with this, the distinctions you discern inside yourself. And you could even try to discern them inside your compadres on here - you may look for help from the Isle in this element, it provides a fantastic resource in this sense.

In other words engage with reality in its fullest sense yourself. Lose your terrible habit of reducing reality to what can be expressed by a small collection of "nouns", and a simplistic morphology.

E.g. This black and white nonsense, or copied and pasted memes which express such a limited set of concepts and percepts, or the above type of "computer speak".
To start, why don't you describe the possible moves on the chess board in the way I did, so that people who don't understand "chess speak" can actually understand you, and most of all for your own practice, and your own self development? Forego the efficient bits and bytes so that you can practice what we're talking about?
Why don't I use chess baby talk like you, is that what you're asking?
 

Hermit

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2023
Messages
932
Reaction score
809
.. is the correct answer 👏

Why?

Don't get me wrong here Hermit, I trust you :) but I've been in this situation before and it's how I found out that Doggy couldn't play chess (literally tried to blag it like @Mods vs Roc_ers did). The same moron who claimed that he was in MENSA (<- that's how he spelled it) but apparently was the only member of Mensa who didn't know that it isn't an acronym
Knowing the solution is mate in 2 limits the possible moves.
Black king cannot move; black can only move pawns or bishop. White also needs to be careful not to stalemate.
Qc6 forces black to either take the queen or rook, or push pawn to a6.
If black takes rook with either pawn, then queen mates.
If black takes queen, then rook to b8 for the mate.
If black pushes pawn to a6 then rook takes a6; b7 pawn cannot capture rook because it is pinned by the queen.
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
Observe that all James is doing is repeating this phrase "race realism" in the hope it will stick. His only rhetorical device.

Note in this respect even wiki defines "race realism" as: "... the pseudoscientific belief that empirical evidence exists to support or justify racism (racial discrimination), racial inferiority, or racial superiority..."

Why? As per my earlier posts, they are pointing out it is pseudoscientific because of the fact that the genetic differences between various individuals in the species Homo sapiens are so small that they cannot be considered to represent differing races within the species.

I.e. The tiny now measurable genetic variation that racists claim describe “racial differences” are, in fact, no more than normal genetic variations expected within a species that appear when various breeding groups are isolated for the most part over many generations.

Recalling that before the advent of the likes of Ryanair, we lived in a world that tended to isolate various groups of our "species", which resulted in various superficial differences based on what might be considered the “mild” inbreeding that results from limited genetic pools.

Since Ryanair, the interbreeding of these groups has begun to reduce this variation leading to a more homogenous population.

I discern though that most of Jambo's confusion around the slogan “race realism” stems from his conflating the concept of culture with these tiny genetic variations that have arisen over generations.

You know, I think it would be a good idea if this forum banned slogans like "race realism" - so contributors can actually engage their minds and build their concepts from first principles, independently.
Race denialism is political/ideological, it's not science

Even Dawkins knows that
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
Dawkins does not agree that these tiny genetic differences found between human groups that lived for periods in isolation, that modern science is now able to measure represent anything that could be construed to support the theories of scientific racism.

"... if you measure the total variation in the human species and then partition it into a between-race component and a within-race component, the between-race component is a very small fraction of the total. Most of the variation among humans can be found within races as well as between them. Only a small admixture of extra variation distinguishes races from each other...".

Refer to his "Africa" presentation again, you great clot.
FFS 🙄

Listen for a minute -

Post in thread 'Nationalism according to "Sword" and "Jambo" (and an ungodly number of other fuckin' eejits around here).' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.co...er-fuckin-eejits-around-here.1037/post-121135

I don't mean you by the way, I mean the reader

You are The Soapbox Dunce
 

SwordOfStZip

Moderator
Staff member
Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2024
Messages
1,580
Reaction score
871
You moron.

Yes, new measurement techniques can detect at the gene level these differences between "races".

These same techniques can also detect at the gene level why you're still erupting in pimples at almost fifty years of age.

As I tried to explain to you, just because you can detect a variation operating at the level of gene, the larger question is, what conclusion can you draw from it?

So Dawkins acknowledges these measurements can be taken. But he does not draw the same conclusions or implications from it, understanding deeply the entities he is measuring - and he has been at pains to try and explain that to idiots like you.

Differences between racial groups can have medical consequences (look into sickle cell disease)- that is a big enough deal. However Caucasian a category wider than "White" is a biological category and not "White".
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
Imagine @Mods vs Roc_ers waking up this early to take a thrashing..

Then again, it's not that early in Tel Aviv 🤣
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
Is Anti-White "Science" & Christianity the Same 🤔

Regarding race realism.

I've said it before, race realism must be very difficult to accept for a Christian


View: https://m.youtube.com/shorts/YUou4vMjgiE

Again, sorry for the rocspam today folks but I would like to hear what the religious have to say about this 🤔

I mean, races could still work for you guys, right, in the Adam and Eve model?

Although @Tiger says that he doesn't believe in evolution I think that his movement does accept some degree of what they dub - micro evolution.

That could even fit in with the 'Out of Africa' theory, that says that homo sapiens (modern humans) originated in Africa and then spread, separated geographically to evolve into.. not new species, but subspecies (what we call race)
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
Is Anti-White "Science" & Christianity the Same 🤔

Regarding race realism.

I've said it before, race realism must be very difficult to accept for a Christian


View: https://m.youtube.com/shorts/YUou4vMjgiE

Although @Mods vs Roc_ers doesn't know this, please bear in mind that evolution does not say that we are descended from apes -


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wh0F4FBLJRE

So if we begin at the same point - Homo sapiens, whether evolved from a common ancestor or Adam and Eve, can we, the religious and/or those who believe in evolution not agree on the reality of race, especially if you encompass "microevolution"? 🤔
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
A new angle from Jambo with this new framing of the question, and new term "microevolution", meaning for a moment I wasn't quite sure where he was intending to go with this.

But sure all you have to do is refer to Stormfront, the opus of "Jambo logic", and all is made clear. 🙄

"... I believe in the theory of evolution, and this is just another piece of evidence why *racism* is right. The white and possibly the east asian race are just more evolved than the negro, gypsy, indian or aboriginal race...".

"... The biggest problem of the Darwinian theory is the idea that evolution can occur between species (macroevolution) as opposed to within species (microevolution).

Of course, no one doubts microevolution, which is factual and produces real value--one can breed, for example, race-horses, cats, dogs, plants, etc. and get expected results.

Macroevolution, however, is unverifiable and has no utility--no one can take one species into the laboratory and produce another...".

"... Darwinism is not atheistic -- it talks about how species begin, not how life began. You can believe in evolution and still believe that God created life on Earth...".


Stormfront | Do White nationalists Believe in Evolution?
lofl.. Is it possible to be a bigger fuck-up than roc 😆

I might say something about this later.. Right now I'm enjoying a cucumber and cheddar cheese sandwich on white bread (with the crusts cut off)
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
A new angle from Jambo with this new framing of the question, and new term "microevolution", meaning for a moment I wasn't quite sure where he was intending to go with this.
You're still quite unsure

But sure all you have to do is refer to Stormfront, the opus of "Jambo logic", and all is made clear. 🙄
Oh ffs

"... I believe in the theory of evolution, and this is just another piece of evidence why *racism* is right. The white and possibly the east asian race are just more evolved than the negro, gypsy, indian or aboriginal race...".

"... The biggest problem of the Darwinian theory is the idea that evolution can occur between species (macroevolution) as opposed to within species (microevolution).

Of course, no one doubts microevolution, which is factual and produces real value--one can breed, for example, race-horses, cats, dogs, plants, etc. and get expected results.

Macroevolution, however, is unverifiable and has no utility--no one can take one species into the laboratory and produce another...".
See, this is what happens when you don't read other people's posts i.e. you're The Soapbox Dunce

I've said before that I don't believe that it's correct to say that humans are more evolved than say, chimpanzees

And it is not me who makes the distinction between micro and macro evolution.. but I am aware of what (religious) people who do mean by it

I'm sure @Tiger will be glad to find out that you think he's a neon Nazi btw :)

"... Darwinism is not atheistic -- it talks about how species begin, not how life began.
A factual statement AFAIAC. It's origin of species not origin of life and it's theists who tend to think of beliefs divided as atheistic or theistic (most theists don't even know what atheism is)

You can believe in evolution and still believe that God created life on Earth...".
That would be a matter for the individual, although I can't imagine that there are (m)any creationists who believe in evolution

 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
"Race denialism". "Race realism". "Soapbox dunce" etc. Any inclination as to why no one else has picked up these slogans and monikers of yours except a ragtag bunch of US and UK based halfwit bigots?
Amyway what does any of this yankee white racialist shit have to do with Irish nationalism - keeping in mind with an eye to Dawkin's presentation that of course you only have to go back a tiny step relatively to find black skin evoloutionary precursors in the isolated groups that grew up on this island?

View: https://t.me/IrelandArchive/18691

So maybe you should go back and preach to your own kind in England, Dawson, you might find a more receptive audience, or at least a slightly better context to try and implant these yankee "white" racialist theories and "bugs scripts" of yours.
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364

Fishalt

Well-known member
New
Joined
Mar 13, 2023
Messages
2,419
Reaction score
2,692
You moron.

Yes, new measurement techniques can detect at the gene level these differences between "races".

These same techniques can also detect at the gene level why you're still erupting in pimples at almost fifty years of age.

As I tried to explain to you, just because you can detect a variation operating at the level of gene, the larger question is, what conclusion can you draw from it?

So Dawkins acknowledges these measurements can be taken. But he does not draw the same conclusions or implications from it, understanding deeply the entities he is measuring - and he has been at pains to try and explain that to idiots like you.
Now what, Faggot?

1733119266849.png
 

Myles O'Reilly

Well-known member
New
Joined
Feb 3, 2022
Messages
6,969
Reaction score
5,393
Oh yes. Just the thing to have at tea time for a British nationalist. Very traditional. I suppose you going to watch that British chap you like Marc Kollet on the telly while you have it? Or would that be contrary to the proper British table manners you were brought up with?
It seems a stretch for someone from middleclass Sandyford with a Jewish parent who looks east to diversity rich Britain as an inspiration, to slag off some as a West Brit.
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
You claim to be "scientifically trained" Jambo?
Another fake quote from an inveterate liar, you

And others on this thread have claimed the same?
Such as?

But still you all stand back and allow this fuckwitted racist Ozzie double fisting dingo "mixed" cunt broadcast his racist drivel to the susceptible, naive, ignorant, Irish morons who read this website?
What do you want me to do, go back to Australia and shoot him?

In this case fuckwittery lifted from 4chan?
The very first line you read, Jambo, there is a claim that the alleged gap in intelligence "is caused" partly by blah blah. Do you know anything about causality Jambo?
Then you look down at the reference this 4chan illliteracy is drawing on. What do you first see? They are actually talking about "educational attainment", not intelligence.
Educational attainment isn't linked to intelligence?

You know what roc, contrary to popular belief, I don't think that you're a middle class southsider who's educationally attained, not least because everything you've ever said related to science doesn't pass the laugh test

I think that you're actually an uneducated gurrier (and almost certainly a homosexual) like Gowl

So another assumed causal pathway between educational attainment and intelligence there. Even the likes of lobotomised fools like @clarke-connolly knows things like income, occupation, health, longevity, and so on are confounding factors there.

Then turn to the referred paper itself, and you find actually an "SNP" is not "a gene" as that infographic refers to it, rather it is a site in the genome where single DNA base pairs differ across individuals.

And you find that while there are tens of millions of sites where SNPs are located in the genome, only a small selection of them can actually be measured with accuracy.

You read further, and you find the variants they are measuring are often highly correlated with other ones they can't measure, nearby variants on the same chromosome, and that also these variants vary systematically across environments.

Again, yet another multitude of uncontrolled variables which confound predictions of causation.

The biggest lie of the infographic - you read in the paper that the "polygenic scores" with most predictive power are those created using all the millions genetic variants studied (this research in fact studied millions of them). But what did the racists do? They selected out a list of 15 SNP sites which they claimed have predictive power directly to intelligence!

I could go on. But I'm tired of listening to you dumb racist fuckwits, and your stupid memes and infographics from 4chan, which you uncritically imbibe, channeled through dopey Aussie cunts like this cunt, him with the genes of murderers and rapists, and as Mowl previously highlighted, interminably fucked up dealing with the guilt complex of their sins dealing with the Aboriginals.

And condemned for these sins to live in a red dust, cultural desert, their dumb criminal ancestors dumped there basically for having an irredeemable genetic make up. You couldn't make it up.
So my suggestion to you Jambo is why don't you tell these losers to go and "git facked", and engage your own circuits, for once. Your parents obviously pushed you as a child, made you join chess clubs, made you go to college, had high expectations of you.
No, that didn't happen. My parent was against me going to university - because she couldn't afford it and it would take too long.

She suggested borrowing money from the Credit Union so I could do a PLC like my sister did.

Long story short, I persuaded her to let me go to university. And I'm glad I did.

So are you going to continue pissing all over that sacrifice every day of you miserable life? Jambo, get your head out of your ass, you fucking idiot, cop on to yourself.
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
What is the nature of that link?

Answer: It has some associations with intelligence.


Either you're dishonest, or an under educated fool, to not carefully highlight the nature of those links, as above.

Which is it then?
I don't need to "carefully highlight the nature of the link" because it's obvious

What we see with affirmative action, DEI etc. is the breaking of that link

More race realism 4 u

Why?

This is going to be good. :rolleyes:
Why what? I persuaded my mother to let me to go to university because it was free (according to our means). I'm glad that I attained a degree (B.Sc) because degrees open doors
 

SwordOfStZip

Moderator
Staff member
Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2024
Messages
1,580
Reaction score
871
You know what roc, contrary to popular belief, I don't think that you're a middle class southsider who's educationally attained, not least because everything you've ever said related to science doesn't pass the laugh test

I think that you're actually an uneducated gurrier (and almost certainly a homosexual) like Gowl

The actual Nazis, including people in Hitler's inner circle, used to have somewhat of a slogan in the claim "National Socialism is applied Biology". This could cause certain people unease therefore around the subjects involved.
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
The actual Nazis, including people in Hitler's inner circle, used to have somewhat of a slogan in the claim "National Socialism is applied Biology". This could cause certain people unease therefore around the subjects involved.
Social Darwinism? 🤔

Race realism really has nothing to do with calipers or skin colour charts, it's just the truth

Btw, thanks be to @Fishalt for casting his vote in the poll, the evolution beliebers are starting to romp home 😁

Although I can't believe that he (Fishalt) allowed @Mods vs Roc_ers to call him a loser and a retard, unanswered. He's not the Fishalt of old
 

Fishalt

Well-known member
New
Joined
Mar 13, 2023
Messages
2,419
Reaction score
2,692
You claim to be "scientifically trained" Jambo?

And others on this thread have claimed the same? But still you all stand back and allow this fuckwitted racist Ozzie double fisting dingo "mixed" cunt broadcast his racist drivel to the susceptible, naive, ignorant, Irish morons who read this website?

In this case fuckwittery lifted from 4chan?
The very first line you read, Jambo, there is a claim that the alleged gap in intelligence "is caused" partly by blah blah. Do you know anything about causality Jambo?

Then you look down at the reference this 4chan illliteracy is drawing on. What do you first see? They are actually talking about "educational attainment", not intelligence.

So another assumed causal pathway between educational attainment and intelligence there. Even the likes of lobotomised fools like @clarke-connolly knows things like income, occupation, health, longevity, and so on are confounding factors there.

Then turn to the referred paper itself, and you find actually an "SNP" is not "a gene" as that infographic refers to it, rather it is a site in the genome where single DNA base pairs differ across individuals.

And you find that while there are tens of millions of sites where SNPs are located in the genome, only a small selection of them can actually be measured with accuracy.

You read further, and you find the variants they are measuring are often highly correlated with other ones they can't measure, nearby variants on the same chromosome, and that also these variants vary systematically across environments.

Again, yet another multitude of uncontrolled variables which confound predictions of causation.

The biggest lie of the infographic - you read in the paper that the "polygenic scores" with most predictive power are those created using all the millions genetic variants studied (this research in fact studied millions of them). But what did the racists do? They selected out a list of 15 SNP sites which they claimed have predictive power directly to intelligence!

I could go on. But I'm tired of listening to you dumb racist fuckwits, and your stupid memes and infographics from 4chan, which you uncritically imbibe, channeled through dopey Aussie cunts like this cunt, him with the genes of murderers and rapists, and as Mowl previously highlighted, interminably fucked up dealing with the guilt complex of their sins dealing with the Aboriginals.

And condemned for these sins to live in a red dust, cultural desert, their dumb criminal ancestors dumped there basically for having an irredeemable genetic make up. You couldn't make it up.

So my suggestion to you Jambo is why don't you tell these losers to go and "git facked", and engage your own circuits, for once. Your parents obviously pushed you as a child, made you join chess clubs, made you go to college, had high expectations of you.

So are you going to continue pissing all over that sacrifice every day of you miserable life? Jambo, get your head out of your ass, you fucking idiot, cop on to yourself.
Trolled into a writing a thesis with a screenshot and three words. This is why you always lose. FYI you didn't even manage to correctly debunk the paper. This is because you're incapable of entry-level grade 9 Mathematics. Instead of attacking the science, you should have attacked the percentage change increase, because even a substantial increase on fuck all is still fuck all which renders the findings ostensibly meaningless. The fact that it didn't even occur to you to attack the data along these lines is proof positive that you're exceptionally stupid. I'd be surprised if it turned out you even graduated from high school. This was in fact the entire point of the exercise. You're so predictable that I know exactly how to trigger you in the most efficient way possible.

Now let's talk about your homeboy Mowl, who claims to be "Embedded Deeply" on the site. That's possible. What's certain is that there's a holy-man's seed embedded deeply in his bowels--a consequence of his back being blown out by a blubbery Bishop's baby batter. Here it proverbially gestated and ate his soul like weevils on last month's sodden uncollected news, leaving only a sonorous, festering cavity of seethe slithered-over by a Troglafauna of empathic vileness, insecurities, dementedness, and malignity. Did he resist, I wonder? Or did he just take the musky stole's smegma-encrusted cheesewurst like a communion wafer out of obeisant reverence, feigning pleasure out of terror? It does seem improbable he fought back. Even if he had the inclination of spirit for a fight, he'd have lacked the tools for one. Currently, he's built like Kif Kroker (Premmy Baby brought on by alcohol abuse in the surrogate?) and I can't even imagine what he looked like as an adolescent, very much like Voldemort's final form in the Harry Potter series I suppose. A 40KG Golum with slightly better teeth and a pigeon chest. Father Mick likely picked him up bodily in one hairy fist and railed him like a fleshlight, belly-laughing and spluttering his Jameson's breath into his streaming face, groaned his load into him with a sea lion's baritone, filled him full as a twinkie and finally hurled the simpering wreckage like an empty beer can into a nearby wall where several of his birdbones broke, and he slithered under the duchess, black-eyed, trembling and heaving like a cat's rat-plaything that has briefly escaped the claws.

^ See that? Yes, Roc; I can indeed write better than Mowl. This isn't braggadocio, you understand. I am simply establishing that this isn't difficult. The reason I don't write this way more often is because quite frankly it's beneath my ability. Mowl's peak is that which I do not deign to do. Mowl isn't a creator. Mowl is an extremely demented, heavily-prescribed talentless manlet whose delusions of grandeur are sustained by the attentions of a sycophantic sperg who is, incredibly, an even bigger fucking life-failure than he is, on the least-trafficked Irish political discussion forum on the internet.

He has not produced, in I assume 40 plus years of strenuous effort and diligence, any Art of any kind that has any Commerical value whatsoever. The only time he gets play is if it's some bullshit event subsidized on the public tit. Welfare music. The kids don't know what his name is. Well, the ones at the park do, after being warned about him by their parents. But it's worse than that. Not only is he not a musician (can't write music anybody wants to listen to or buy) but he isn't even a player. What session work of any note can he list in his catalogue of musical achievements? Goose egg. The reason? He fucking sucks, brah. Can't play out of simple time/ out of impotent Tempos. To be fair, his brittlestar arms limit him to about 60BPM. He is literally a local-pub-tier drummer. Couldn't swing a bucket of shit.

Help me understand something; why, in the name of everliving fuck, do you and David (it's possible you are David) venerate this utterly useless, talentless, cringe, bony 80s throwback skeksis try-hard? This is an earnest question. I don't get it. What are you seeing that I'm not? I don't have to visit Islepoli now that I'm not a Mod (thank Jeebus) but when I did, I could not find a single example of any redeeming virtue or character in this person whatsoever. In not one post, anywhere, did I find him describe himself in the execution of any act that was good for the world, or any other human being or beings at the individual or collective levels. Indeed, I did not encounter any described performance of virtue, morality, or ethics, and seemingly everything he ever talked about was in service to his own onanistic, trivial pursuits of self-gratification. These invariably always related to the appeasement of his own ego. Getting laid (That gummy munter with the synth and self-harm scars he thinks is hot gave me a chuckle, thanks Mowley LOL) name-dropping celebrities who pity-replied to him on twitter seven years ago or whatever. It was just acre after acre of unhinged self-indulgence, selfishness, narcissism, validation-seeking. He has perhaps the worst case of main-character syndrome I have personally ever experienced-- his own hero in every dialogue, always exceptional, always the saviour, the victor, the wit, the Lothario, the victim. Of course, when you look at his life, it is apparent all this is rampant embroidery. Truly bananas. He'll write an extended post on how happy he is, and five minutes later completely lose the rag over some fairly innocuous statement posted on Sarsfield. Spoiler, bro: Genuinely happy people don't need to tell others how happy they are. Genuinely talented people don't need to try and convince others of how talented they are. Genuine chads don't talk about how much they get laid. You're none of those things, and none of those things are happening. This is obvious to literally everybody. You're just making a cunt of yourself.

1733186642810.png


Here's the rub; this person isn't going anywhere. Nowhere good, anyway. He's not even a has-been. He's a never-was. His life is over and time has passed him by. He's a middle-aged mental patient with a script as long as a large family's grocery receipt, living in a shitbox flat with a diseased pet plant, broke as fuck, spending his free time ranting at people on this board who he claims to not respect whilst concomitantly trying his very best to convince them he's better than them in every conceivable way. There will be no fame, no accolades, no fanfare, no celebrity, no public interest. He's already achieved peak-notoriety. And he got there by being raped by a priest. The epitaph of his existence will read: Rapelet.
 
Last edited:

Fishalt

Well-known member
New
Joined
Mar 13, 2023
Messages
2,419
Reaction score
2,692
What is the nature of that link?

Answer: It has some associations with intelligence.


Either you're dishonest, or an under educated fool, to not carefully highlight the nature of those links, as above.

Which is it then?


Why?

This is going to be good. :rolleyes:
1733192900275.png
 

Fishalt

Well-known member
New
Joined
Mar 13, 2023
Messages
2,419
Reaction score
2,692
You claim to be "scientifically trained" Jambo?

And others on this thread have claimed the same? But still you all stand back and allow this fuckwitted racist Ozzie double fisting dingo "mixed" cunt broadcast his racist drivel to the susceptible, naive, ignorant, Irish morons who read this website?

In this case fuckwittery lifted from 4chan?
The very first line you read, Jambo, there is a claim that the alleged gap in intelligence "is caused" partly by blah blah. Do you know anything about causality Jambo?

Then you look down at the reference this 4chan illliteracy is drawing on. What do you first see? They are actually talking about "educational attainment", not intelligence.

So another assumed causal pathway between educational attainment and intelligence there. Even the likes of lobotomised fools like @clarke-connolly knows things like income, occupation, health, longevity, and so on are confounding factors there.

Then turn to the referred paper itself, and you find actually an "SNP" is not "a gene" as that infographic refers to it, rather it is a site in the genome where single DNA base pairs differ across individuals.

And you find that while there are tens of millions of sites where SNPs are located in the genome, only a small selection of them can actually be measured with accuracy.

You read further, and you find the variants they are measuring are often highly correlated with other ones they can't measure, nearby variants on the same chromosome, and that also these variants vary systematically across environments.

Again, yet another multitude of uncontrolled variables which confound predictions of causation.

The biggest lie of the infographic - you read in the paper that the "polygenic scores" with most predictive power are those created using all the millions genetic variants studied (this research in fact studied millions of them). But what did the racists do? They selected out a list of 15 SNP sites which they claimed have predictive power directly to intelligence!

I could go on. But I'm tired of listening to you dumb racist fuckwits, and your stupid memes and infographics from 4chan, which you uncritically imbibe, channeled through dopey Aussie cunts like this cunt, him with the genes of murderers and rapists, and as Mowl previously highlighted, interminably fucked up dealing with the guilt complex of their sins dealing with the Aboriginals.

And condemned for these sins to live in a red dust, cultural desert, their dumb criminal ancestors dumped there basically for having an irredeemable genetic make up. You couldn't make it up.

So my suggestion to you Jambo is why don't you tell these losers to go and "git facked", and engage your own circuits, for once. Your parents obviously pushed you as a child, made you join chess clubs, made you go to college, had high expectations of you.

So are you going to continue pissing all over that sacrifice every day of you miserable life? Jambo, get your head out of your ass, you fucking idiot, cop on to yourself.
Oh--I don't care what you think about science. You're a mathematically illiterate brainlet living in a brainletted scientific backwater. Your country doesn't even have a top 100 ranked University. Even if you did have a background in STEM (which you clearly don't) I still wouldn't respect your opinion if you were educated at the University level in Ireland, in the same way I wouldn't send one of my kids to school in Botswana. That Degree wouldn't be worth the paper printed on. I imagine anyone with the capital to do so has their kids educated outside of Ireland at the tertiary level. I would. Regardless, I assure you that the level of scientific literacy in Australia far exceeds that of Ireland. Finland is likely higher due to their strong pre-university education system, but sadly, there are no respectable universities in Finland.

Let's break it down:
1733197457469.png



1733197509036.png


It's literally the case that even the mid and shit-tier Universities in Australia are better than literally the best Ireland has to offer. Maybe Finland has a better shot?
1733197629696.png


Nah.


Let's specify by science:
1733197690954.png


1733197717512.png


1733197742259.png


Nope, not there either. Reality is, both Finland and Ireland are so shit for science especially at the HiEds level that you literally could not get the same level of education from an institution in either country that you could from even a shitty Australian university. I had to scroll down the list to even fucking find either country in the rankings.


Will there be anything else?
 
Last edited:

Myles O'Reilly

Well-known member
New
Joined
Feb 3, 2022
Messages
6,969
Reaction score
5,393
Skippy, focusing on University education as a barometer of intelligence is half-baked considering Uni's are where all the morons in charge now were indoctrinated.

You're far more likely to get sense out of people who were never exposed to such brainwashing.
 

Fishalt

Well-known member
New
Joined
Mar 13, 2023
Messages
2,419
Reaction score
2,692
Skippy, focusing on University education as a barometer of intelligence is half-baked considering Uni's are where all the morons in charge now were indoctrinated.

You're far more likely to get sense out of people who were never exposed to such brainwashing.
Depends. If you mean the humanities, then absolutely. If we're talking STEM, then no. Regardless, I'm not going to be lectured on what constitutes good and bad science from a dipshit like Roc.
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
Trolled into a writing a thesis with a screenshot and three words. This is why you always lose. FYI you didn't even manage to correctly debunk the paper. This is because you're incapable of entry-level grade 9 Mathematics. Instead of attacking the science, you should have attacked the percentage change increase, because even a substantial increase on fuck all is still fuck all which renders the findings ostensibly meaningless. The fact that it didn't even occur to you to attack the data along these lines is proof positive that you're exceptionally stupid. I'd be surprised if it turned out you even graduated from high school. This was in fact the entire point of the exercise. You're so predictable that I know exactly how to trigger you in the most efficient way possible.

Now let's talk about your homeboy Mowl, who claims to be "Embedded Deeply" on the site. That's possible. What's certain is that there's a holy-man's seed embedded deeply in his bowels--a consequence of his back being blown out by a blubbery Bishop's baby batter. Here it proverbially gestated and ate his soul like weevils on last month's sodden uncollected news, leaving only a sonorous, festering cavity of seethe slithered-over by a Troglafauna of empathic vileness, insecurities, dementedness, and malignity. Did he resist, I wonder? Or did he just take the musky stole's smegma-encrusted cheesewurst like a communion wafer out of obeisant reverence, feigning pleasure out of terror? It does seem improbable he fought back. Even if he had the inclination of spirit for a fight, he'd have lacked the tools for one. Currently, he's built like Kif Kroker (Premmy Baby brought on by alcohol abuse in the surrogate?) and I can't even imagine what he looked like as an adolescent, very much like Voldemort's final form in the Harry Potter series I suppose. A 40KG Golum with slightly better teeth and a pigeon chest. Father Mick likely picked him up bodily in one hairy fist and railed him like a fleshlight, belly-laughing and spluttering his Jameson's breath into his streaming face, groaned his load into him with a sea lion's baritone, filled him full as a twinkie and finally hurled the simpering wreckage like an empty beer can into a nearby wall where several of his birdbones broke, and he slithered under the duchess, black-eyed, trembling and heaving like a cat's rat-plaything that has briefly escaped the claws.

^ See that? Yes, Roc; I can indeed write better than Mowl. This isn't braggadocio, you understand. I am simply establishing that this isn't difficult. The reason I don't write this way more often is because quite frankly it's beneath my ability. Mowl's peak is that which I do not deign to do. Mowl isn't a creator. Mowl is an extremely demented, heavily-prescribed talentless manlet whose delusions of grandeur are sustained by the attentions of a sycophantic sperg who is, incredibly, an even bigger fucking life-failure than he is, on the least-trafficked Irish political discussion forum on the internet.

He has not produced, in I assume 40 plus years of strenuous effort and diligence, any Art of any kind that has any Commerical value whatsoever. The only time he gets play is if it's some bullshit event subsidized on the public tit. Welfare music. The kids don't know what his name is. Well, the ones at the park do, after being warned about him by their parents. But it's worse than that. Not only is he not a musician (can't write music anybody wants to listen to or buy) but he isn't even a player. What session work of any note can he list in his catalogue of musical achievements? Goose egg. The reason? He fucking sucks, brah. Can't play out of simple time/ out of impotent Tempos. To be fair, his brittlestar arms limit him to about 60BPM. He is literally a local-pub-tier drummer. Couldn't swing a bucket of shit.

Help me understand something; why, in the name of everliving fuck, do you and David (it's possible you are David) venerate this utterly useless, talentless, cringe, bony 80s throwback skeksis try-hard? This is an earnest question. I don't get it. What are you seeing that I'm not? I don't have to visit Islepoli now that I'm not a Mod (thank Jeebus) but when I did, I could not find a single example of any redeeming virtue or character in this person whatsoever. In not one post, anywhere, did I find him describe himself in the execution of any act that was good for the world, or any other human being or beings at the individual or collective levels. Indeed, I did not encounter any described performance of virtue, morality, or ethics, and seemingly everything he ever talked about was in service to his own onanistic, trivial pursuits of self-gratification. These invariably always related to the appeasement of his own ego. Getting laid (That gummy munter with the synth and self-harm scars he thinks is hot gave me a chuckle, thanks Mowley LOL) name-dropping celebrities who pity-replied to him on twitter seven years ago or whatever. It was just acre after acre of unhinged self-indulgence, selfishness, narcissism, validation-seeking. He has perhaps the worst case of main-character syndrome I have personally ever experienced-- his own hero in every dialogue, always exceptional, always the saviour, the victor, the wit, the Lothario, the victim. Of course, when you look at his life, it is apparent all this is rampant embroidery. Truly bananas. He'll write an extended post on how happy he is, and five minutes later completely lose the rag over some fairly innocuous statement posted on Sarsfield. Spoiler, bro: Genuinely happy people don't need to tell others how happy they are. Genuinely talented people don't need to try and convince others of how talented they are. Genuine chads don't talk about how much they get laid. You're none of those things, and none of those things are happening. This is obvious to literally everybody. You're just making a cunt of yourself.

View attachment 6806

Here's the rub; this person isn't going anywhere. Nowhere good, anyway. He's not even a has-been. He's a never-was. His life is over and time has passed him by. He's a middle-aged mental patient with a script as long as a large family's grocery receipt, living in a shitbox flat with a diseased pet plant, broke as fuck, spending his free time ranting at people on this board who he claims to not respect whilst concomitantly trying his very best to convince them he's better than them in every conceivable way. There will be no fame, no accolades, no fanfare, no celebrity, no public interest. He's already achieved peak-notoriety. And he got there by being raped by a priest. The epitaph of his existence will read: Rapelet.
I doubt Gowl will ever recover from you nailing him to a cross there Fishalt but wait, what..

I don't have to visit Islepoli now that I'm not a Mod (thank Jeebus)
Mods have to read Fagpoli?!
flat,750x,075,f-pad,750x1000,f8f8f8.jpg
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
Jaze but.. I just had a looksee myself at Fagpoli there.. the state of it. Gowl blabbering about the Stardust tragedy and Tayto crisps i.e. stories from the last time he was in Ireland - the 1980s. Dull Dave posting self-hating negrophilia videos, @Mods vs Roc_ers back to Gaychat with his Hasbara script, Lumpy not even arsed anymore with his once-a-month appearance to tell Gowl that he's still on Team Gowl..

What a sad site
 

Fishalt

Well-known member
New
Joined
Mar 13, 2023
Messages
2,419
Reaction score
2,692
I doubt Gowl will ever recover from you nailing him to a cross there Fishalt but wait, what..


Mods have to read Fagpoli?!
View attachment 6820
No, they don't have to. I did to keep the peace.

Mowl is simply turds the whole way down. Just dogshit, everywhere you look. A classic case of the closed-loop-cycle of the abused becoming the abuser. Everybody's pain is his pleasure, he makes sport of it. He probably visits the oncology ward at the local children's hospital and hides behind the aspidistra in the corner, jerking off. An ugly, narcissistic, sociopathic, sadistic little manlet. I visited Islepoli after the news of CPG's passing and sure enough, there's Mowl in his usual deranged masturbatory glee, celebrating it, defaming the dead and his family. If not for that, I might have spared him. To his credit, David did not engage in this. So props to him for having some standards. And when you do read this David, please, for the love of God, if you're going to hero-worship somebody (but don't, you're not in high school any more, and it's really sad and pathetic) let it be somebody worthy of that. Not some talentless, broke, mean-spirited dork who has played an instrument for 30 plus years and still can't get a real gig for love nor money. I am literally better at my instrument (guitar) by quite a margin and for me, it's just a hobby. That's how shit this guy is.
 
Last edited:

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
4,099
Reaction score
1,364
No, they don't have to. I did to keep the peace.

Mowl is simply turds the whole way down. Just dogshit, everywhere you look. A classic case of the closed-loop-cycle of the abused becoming the abuser. Everybody's pain is his pleasure, he makes sport of it. He probably visits the oncology ward at the local children's hospital and hides behind the aspidistra in the corner, jerking off. An ugly, narcissistic, sociopathic, sadistic little manlet. I visited Islepoli after the news of CPG's passing and sure enough, there's Mowl in his usual deranged masturbatory glee, celebrating it, defaming the dead and his family. If not for that, I might have spared him. To his credit, David did not engage in this. So props to him for having some standards. And when you do read this David, please, for the love of God, if you're going to hero-worship somebody (but don't, you're not in high school any more, and it's really sad and pathetic) let it be somebody worthy of that. Not some talentless, broke, mean-spirited dork who has played an instrument for 30 plus years and still can't get a real gig for love nor money. I am literally better at my instrument (guitar) by quite a margin and for me, it's just a hobby. That's how shit this guy is.
I see Gowl is imagining that all of the aborigines he's ever met* are sound, clued-in chaps.. and the white man a crass idiot in comparison.

People like Gowl and Dull Dave, the dullest man (if you could call him that) on planet Earth simply have no awareness of their conditioning, and no self-respect. A pair of dumb negrophiles and oikophobes

*Who he's only ever "met" in pictures, he's never left the continent of Europe
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Top Bottom