Origins Thread

[Sound Man]

"Scientism" is just a made up word like "Materialism" for beliebers like you

When you have anything to say about science then get back to me..

But you won't, because you're an ignoramus and proud of it, you're all the same, really

If it wasn't for. Sham you would have swallowed all the scientism coming from big pharma five years ago.

 

[AN2]

Ask Dawkins where the first panspermists came from (if you'll pardon the pun.)

Dawkins answered that question

Read what he wrote about it in Post #1,300 .. If you want to get beyond Tiger-tier obtuseness, or just listen to the clip that you posted yourself (for comprehension). That's a big thing with Dawkins haters like you, you don't understand what he's saying

Dawkins is a fucken dinosaur, and dinosaurs are another colossal load of dung made up by the insane maniacs who fry our minds.

I'm really not interested in Candace Owens levels of stupidity (dinosaurs are fake and gay) but why is Dawkins a "dinosaur"?

 

[AN2]

If it wasn't for. Sham you would have swallowed all the scientism coming from big pharma five years ago.

That's not true. But I do credit you with being straight out of the trap. You and @Declan actually, I've said before that both of you were

 

[Tiger]

If it wasn't for. Sham you would have swallowed all the scientism coming from big pharma five years ago.

See Sham, James doesn’t understand that all words were made up at some point. Even the word - science. Perhaps he thinks that Aliens gave us the English language in addition to creating our universe?

It’s difficult to converse with Jimmy because he doesn’t read books, so he prefers to make up his own understanding of things on a whim.

He’s clearly unaware that the word ‘scientism’ is not a fringe invention, but a well-established term in philosophy referring to the belief that science is the only path to knowledge. This term is used and respected by philosophers like Karl Popper, Michael Polanyi, Edmund Husserl, Hilary Putnam and Richard Feynman.

The usage of the word - materialism goes back to ancient philosophers Democritus, Epicurus and Lucretius.

Like I said, debating James can be frustrating due to his innate ignorance.

 

[Tiger]

The Tumbleweeders

To a man, a moron and a coward:

Tiger
Scolairebocht
Mad as a Fish

Don't get on the list

The problem you have now James is that I’ve exposed you as a spoofer time and time again.

I’ve also exposed your tired schtick of endless, relentless gormless questioning to deflect from having any serious debate.

So, people will naturally start to ignore you as some sort of online troll. Precisely because you behave and communicate exactly like an online troll.

 

[clarke-connolly]

Why does God hide God so well ? !

 

[Tiger]

Why does God hide God so well ? !

See, Clarke, now you're doing a 'James'. Lazily throwing out a trite question, making no qualified statement of your own. Tell us what your expectation of proof of God would be. A king type person sitting on throne of gold in a big castle? What?

Firstly; your question assumes that God is an object among other objects, in other words - something you could locate under a microscope if He were “real enough.” But if God exists as the ground of being itself , the source of existence rather than one existent within it; then He doesn’t “hide,” because He’s not that kind of thing. Asking why God hides is like asking why logic can’t be seen through a telescope.

Secondly; God doesn’t hide; he’s written into everything. The order of the cosmos, the fine-tuned precision of its laws, and the mathematical coherence behind reality all scream of design, not accident. So, much so, that idiots have to invent fairy tales about aliens 'seeding' the universe to try and explain it.

God went further: He entered history, in flesh and blood, performed public miracles, was crucified under Rome, and rose from the dead before witnesses who died proclaiming it. That’s not hidden; that’s recorded history.

And now even modern medicine echoes the same truth: thousands clinically dead have reported a consciousness more vivid than life itself. The evidence of God is overwhelming.

 

[clarke-connolly]

See, Clarke, now you're doing a 'James'. Lazily throwing out a trite question, making no qualified statement of your own. Tell us what your expectation of proof of God would be. A king type person sitting on throne of gold in a big castle? What?

Firstly; your question assumes that God is an object among other objects, in other words - something you could locate under a microscope if He were “real enough.” But if God exists as the ground of being itself , the source of existence rather than one existent within it; then He doesn’t “hide,” because He’s not that kind of thing. Asking why God hides is like asking why logic can’t be seen through a telescope.

Secondly; God doesn’t hide; he’s written into everything. The order of the cosmos, the fine-tuned precision of its laws, and the mathematical coherence behind reality all scream of design, not accident. So, much so, that idiots have to invent fairy tales about aliens 'seeding' the universe to try and explain it.

God went further: He entered history, in flesh and blood, performed public miracles, was crucified under Rome, and rose from the dead before witnesses who died proclaiming it. That’s not hidden; that’s recorded history.

And now even modern medicine echoes the same truth: thousands clinically dead have reported a consciousness more vivid than life itself. The evidence of God is overwhelming.

So, God could make everything good, but God can't really be bothered doing that, because God is too busy watching day-time TV ? !

If your God exists then that God must be a lazy God !

If your God exists, why is it a lazy God ? A half-arsed God ?

Is your God smoking too much pot to motivate itself ?

Is it time for this God to get off it's back-side to Fight Islam ? !

 

[AN2]

The problem you have now James is that I’ve exposed you as a spoofer time and time again.

You're deluded

I’ve also exposed your tired schtick of endless, relentless gormless questioning to deflect from having any serious debate.

So, people will naturally start to ignore you as some sort of online troll. Precisely because you behave and communicate exactly like an online troll.

They've always been like that

 

[AN2]

See Sham, James doesn’t understand that all words were made up at some point. Even the word - science. Perhaps he thinks that Aliens gave us the English language in addition to creating our universe?

It’s difficult to converse with Jimmy because he doesn’t read books, so he prefers to make up his own understanding of things on a whim.

He’s clearly unaware that the word ‘scientism’ is not a fringe invention, but a well-established term in philosophy referring to the belief that science is the only path to knowledge. This term is used and respected by philosophers like Karl Popper, Michael Polanyi, Edmund Husserl, Hilary Putnam and Richard Feynman.

The usage of the word - materialism goes back to ancient philosophers Democritus, Epicurus and Lucretius.

Like I said, debating James can be frustrating due to his innate ignorance.

The "all words are made up" argument, how original

Of course, as always you ignore context, I said that those words are popular with beliebers. The top comment on the video I posted yesterday of Professor Dave exposing Stephen Meyer is -

Calling science "Materialist Science" is like calling maths "Calculational Mathematics"

 

[AN2]

Perhaps he thinks that Aliens gave us the English language in addition to creating our universe?

There are a couple of things to say about this

First of all, no one said that, not I and not Dawkins. In fact, Dawkins said that that couldn't have happened, life in the universe couldn't have been originated by aliens. Geez Louise

Secondly, you have this habit of just because someone talks about something, assigning that belief to them. A previous example was when we were talking about Penrose's CCC theory, I think both myself and Haven trying to explain to you that it isn't a multiverse theory (to no avail of course) and then, just because we talked about it, it was what we believed to be true

It’s difficult to converse with Jimmy because he doesn’t read books, so he prefers to make up his own understanding of things on a whim.

He’s clearly unaware that the word ‘scientism’ is not a fringe invention, but a well-established term in philosophy referring to the belief that science is the only path to knowledge. This term is used and respected by philosophers like Karl Popper, Michael Polanyi, Edmund Husserl, Hilary Putnam and Richard Feynman.

The usage of the word - materialism goes back to ancient philosophers Democritus, Epicurus and Lucretius.

Like I said, debating James can be frustrating due to his innate ignorance.

 

[AN2]

So, God could make everything good, but God can't really be bothered doing that, because God is too busy watching day-time TV ? !

If your God exists then that God must be a lazy God !

If your God exists, why is it a lazy God ? A half-arsed God ?

Is your God smoking too much pot to motivate itself ?

Is it time for this God to get off it's back-side to Fight Islam ? !

You're wasting your time.. Tiger never answers a question

 

[clarke-connolly]

You're wasting your time.. Tiger never answers a question

God might step in.

 

[Tiger]

You're wasting your time.. Tiger never answers a question

Tbh James, I thought that post was so ludicrously child like and retarded that I didn’t genuinely think anyone was expecting a reply.

This is supposed to be a discussion forum for adults, not special needs children.

Statements like “God must be too busy watching daytime TV” and wondering why God isn’t busy fighting Muslims seemed not to be genuine attempts at an adult conversation.

It’s doubly hilarious that you think his post is a serious attempt at adult discussion

Maybe Clark can elaborate on his cartooning of God as an anti-Muslim warrior. Would He rock up to the Middle East on a horse or in a tank? How are you picturing this scenario CC?

 

[AN2]

Tbh James, I thought that post was so ludicrously child like and retarded that I didn’t genuinely think anyone was expecting a reply.

This is supposed to be a discussion forum for adults, not special needs children.

Statements like “God must be too busy watching daytime TV” and wondering why God isn’t busy fighting Muslims seemed not to be genuine attempts at an adult conversation.

It’s doubly hilarious that you think his post is a serious attempt at adult discussion

Maybe Clark can elaborate on his cartooning of God as an anti-Muslim warrior. Would He rock up to the Middle East on a horse or in a tank? How are you picturing this scenario CC?

You never answer any question, is what I said

 

[clarke-connolly]

Tbh James, I thought that post was so ludicrously child like and retarded that I didn’t genuinely think anyone was expecting a reply.

This is supposed to be a discussion forum for adults, not special needs children.

Statements like “God must be too busy watching daytime TV” and wondering why God isn’t busy fighting Muslims seemed not to be genuine attempts at an adult conversation.

It’s doubly hilarious that you think his post is a serious attempt at adult discussion

Maybe Clark can elaborate on his cartooning of God as an anti-Muslim warrior. Would He rock up to the Middle East on a horse or in a tank? How are you picturing this scenario CC?

Well the Christians with God as their God did at one time give the Islamists plenty of hammerings down the years ~ ~ Back when Christianity and the Christian God had Balls ! !