The moon landing? What convinces you it did happen?
The moon landing? What convinces you it did happen?
I can give you one reason why it didn't. The vacuum of space cannot exist next to earth, if the earth is an open system as claimed. It is impossible due to the 2nd law of thermodynamics (entropy) and the necessity for gas pressure (such as we have on earth) to be contained, i.e. physically separated from a vacuum.
Gravity prevents this from happening, obviously.The moon landing? What convinces you it did happen?
I can give you one reason why it didn't. The vacuum of space cannot exist next to earth, if the earth is an open system as claimed. It is impossible due to the 2nd law of thermodynamics (entropy) and the necessity for gas pressure (such as we have on earth) to be contained, i.e. physically separated from a vacuum.
I'd like some empirical evidence myself. There is nothing obvious about it, in fact it seems something of a cosmic miracle, that one of the weakest forces known in nature can keep a thin veneer of atmosphere around a rock hurtling through the void at 66,000 miles per second (so we're told anyway)
We're never going to agree that the Earth is flat, but I'm generally on board with the idea that sugar, not fat, is responsible for heart disease. We're made of fat if you really think about it. Probably the only exception are trans fats, which do not occur in nature. All these hydrogenated vegetable spreads are IMO far worse for health than butter ever could be.
That's not what I need. I want people to meet me half way. Science has proven what happens when a pressurized environment meets a vacuum. The result is explosive. I have yet to see empirical evidence that the weak force of gravity is powerful enough to create a sealed pressure environment that stops our thin atmosphere being sucked into the void of space.
Interesting. But not what is under discussion. We are talking about what occurs when a non sealed environment with positive pressure (our atmosphere) comes up against a vacuum, ie, a non pressurized environment . Scientific experiments indicate the result us typically explosive
The problem is that you have no other model of explanation, and the theory of gravity works when we test it. We can calculate gravitational force. This is done every time any kind of rocket is launched into orbit.
I see. So what is your model of explanation for the observable phenomenon of throwing something in the air and its falling back down?
Simple resistance based on mass, or lack thereof, actually does a good job of it, as an alternate hypothesis. A form of material buoyancy , if you will
That's the claim, but is unproven. Do you know of any scientific experiment in which gravity contains gas? In order to prove gravity as the cause of an effect, you would need to manipulate gravity (the independent variable). No such experiment exists.
Again, not what is under discussion.
www.toppr.com
It's not easily demonstrated nor explained. Gravity even affects time.
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MbucRPiL92Q
If you want to measure it with finer granularity in a lab setting there are all manner of kits available. I.E.
Cavendish Gravitational Balance
With the Hooke's Law Apparatus for physical science and physics, measure and prove that the stretch of a spring is proportional to its load.www.flinnsci.com
www.livemint.com
Anyone want to take bets on whether we get a solar powered HD camera left on the 'Moon', to take 24/7 images of the Earth?Chandrayaan-3: ISRO successfully performs second orbit-raising manoeuvre
ISRO created history with the launch of Chandrayaan-3, its third lunar exploration mission at 2:35 pm on Friday from the Satish Dhawan Space Center in Sriharikota, Andhra Pradesh, India
The Indian craft has successfully lifted off and live updates are above.
Another craft sets off on August 10th from China. And it is followed by another later.
So we could see interesting news in the immediate future.
www.setra.com
You're a prize idiot. What differences are being measured against? That's right, pressure vs no pressure.
Was it a Twatter faggot link perchance?
Just the usual attempt to lower the the room IQ with utter twaddle
I'll go out on a short limb here and say one of 2 things will occur, once they figure the CGI they created for this event is not up to par:
To be fair, India has a pretty decent CGI industry these days. All the major studios have offices there.
I hear no denial ?
