To The Moon

What progress. If you believe the official story, then man has not gone beyond LEO since doing so in 1968, 55 years ago.

I believe they NEVER got beyond Low Earth Orbit.

'And if ever the question of "Is NASA worth it?" should cross your mind, it's about as much of a slam dunk investment as you'll find. Various economic analyses on NASA funding over the years, like this 2020 economic impact study, consistently find that for every dollar of NASA funding, the direct and indirect economic gain is between $7 to $14.'

16 NASA Inventions We Use Every Day - How To Geek


List of NASA spinoffs in Massachusetts

https://spinoff.nasa.gov/map?state=MA


'One of the largest hazards for astronauts traveling to Mars will be overcoming exposure to high energy radiation from the solar wind, solar storms, and galactic cosmic rays that originate outside of our solar system. This radiation is more damaging to humans than medical X-rays used to see broken bones or treat cancer.

The Earth’s magnetosphere traps the high energy radiation particles and shields the Earth from the solar storms and the constantly streaming solar wind that can damage technology as well as people living on Earth.

These trapped particles form two belts of radiation, known as the Van Allen Belts, that surround the Earth like enormous donuts. The outer belt is made up of billions of high-energy particles that originate from the Sun and the inner belt results from interactions of cosmic rays with Earth’s atmosphere.

Astronauts must fly though the Van Allen Belts to reach outer space, so it is important to fly through this region quickly to limit their exposure to radiation. Sensitive electronics on satellites and space craft traveling through the Van Allen Belts also need to be protected from the radiation.'

https://science.nasa.gov/biological-physical/stories/van-allen-belts/


Once NASA demonstrated the ability to travel to, land, and return from the moon they were confronted with the fact that they did not have the technology to do so safely and effectively. They turned instead to developing their capacity in Low Earth Orbit.

By having access to microgravity for experimentation, and the challenge of developing technology to establish a permanent presence in space, they were laying the foundations for future manned missions outside the protection of the magnetosphere.

That's basically why the Apollo missions were stopped and there's been none since. A cost-benefit analysis was done. Our technology has had a Cambrian-like explosion since.


iu
 
But it was supposed to be flawless 65 years ago
Triple redundancies built in through the systems.
And lots of launches beforehand.
The US produced outstanding engineering at that particular moment in time.
 
Space cultists need to prepare for more bad CGI and inexplicable mechanical failures. Not to mention the typical and total lack of cameras mounted anywhere useful on the 'moon-landers' .

Pretty obvious that 'space' programs are just money laundering operations.
 

Blast off at just after midnight Into Monday morning. Not getting to the moon til late February. There will be so.ething going on all the time with different missions this year and the big one is the manned fly by in November.
 
Well it got off the ground and we are told it was a tremendous success.
 
This is such an incredibly thick thing to say that.. where does one even begin? You are an utter cretin, there's just no escaping it.
more empty suitery from you. Your comments are fact free zones, by and large.

Why do you keep promoting an American fed btw?

rofl
 
Why would anyone do that, you want a selfie stick on a rocket, why?
Yeah! Why would anyone want actual real footage of an historic rocket launch! Or updated/live views of the earth in hi-def!? Mad stuff, for sure! :LOL:

NASA and the rest of us are laughing at you James.
 
We understand you have an ideological and psychological need for this to be true James. We get it.

Imagine thinking, in 2024, that you can't mount a hi-def camera or 2 to a rocket!

rofl
SpaceX do.
 
SpaceX do.
They never leave orbit. But yes, it is possible to film launches and presumably what happens later, despite James' nonsense to the contrary .

He is a bitter clinger to the space-is-real cult.
 
This is of course from the same goofball who thinks that you should be able to take a photo of the Moon buggy from Earth 🤪 🤣
The amount of mental gymnastics you need to pull to support your floundering belief in a 'space' program is impressive. You should sign up for the special Olympics with those skills.
 
Space cultists need to prepare for more bad CGI and inexplicable mechanical failures. Not to mention the typical and total lack of cameras mounted anywhere useful on the 'moon-landers' .

Pretty obvious that 'space' programs are just money laundering operations.
I said this on Saturday
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom