View: https://youtu.be/LM86OFYYWII?si=BRyTltxbpXnrgnw7
That is impressive to return that rocket stage in onr piece.
The scale of Australia in relation to the Globe looks off.Who can spot the obvious flaws in the photo apart from @Fishalt
Nearly everything told us on space exploration is true. Humans can do everything and will invent better equipment, rockets etc. All within LEO. They can go beyond low earth orbit but if they do they cannot return without serious health effects and early death.
NASA faked the Apollo mission in the belief they would eventually go to the moon and Mars when technology improved. There is no way to protect people above low earth orbit. It would take tons of lead and that would
retard acceleration and deceleration.
Apparently "Lead" isn't the best solution when compared with knowledge & experience, so suggests the vid . . .
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNiscigIgBc&t=383s
Yes, unfortunately the whole thing is politicised. If you say they did not go, they labelled you a denier.It is a hard truth to swallow for many, but nobody has gone to the moon and the Sept planned attempt is now postponed into 2025.
Probably. Just imagine now if the Ukraine war could be won by an elaborate hoax which would take 54 years to![]()
Astronauts won't walk on the moon until 2026 after NASA delays next 2 Artemis missions
'The crew is a constant reminder for us how important it is to remain focused on the work we need to do to ensure their safe return.'www.space.com
The lunar fly by is postponed til Sept 2025 now.
They may attempt this and who knows what will happen.
If they are successful, then they will be forced to admit that a landing is too dangerous.
I assume at that point, they will admit the moon landing hoax.
I was not suggesting lead was the only solution, I mentioned lead as one solution. In assessing them all
wight and volume have to be considered. I dont see how a giant magnetic field could be achieved.
There is an operation for Glaucoma. My cousin got it done. No drops needed, drainers are fitted.@Hermit . . . Yet high altitudes can still cause worsening glaucoma symptoms. These are usually caused by the dry recycled air in the cabin or dehydration on the flight. Therefore, it's important for anyone living with glaucoma to check in with their consultant before they fly so they can get individual advice. . .
. . . Keeping your glaucoma drops and any other medication in your hand luggage is essential to managing your symptoms effectively. The recycled air and pressures of high altitude can cause the eyes of people with glaucoma to become suddenly dry or for vision to be blurred.
Is flying with glaucoma safe?
Glaucoma is caused by high eye pressure. This can make flying a worry for those living with the condition. Get the advice you need in this Ocuplan article.ocuplan.co.uk
Best Medical Marijuana Strains to Treat Glaucoma %%sep%% %%sitename%%
www.marijuanadoctors.com
Any substance will stop radiation and particle impacts. The denser the better with a hi8gbh atomic number.Perhaps it's got something to do with the Earth spinning on a constant axis and due to the planets mineral composition - electro magnetism is produced which terminates at both poles.
It could be compared to a giant magnetic dynamo which gets its energy from the sun - we do get lights at the poles which we can see, no?
Earth's full of Iron - The Sun/Galaxy has charged it up, magnetized it, and keeps the energies flowing![]()
Yeah but, the astronaut pictured above is fine on the ground, it's just the high altitude pressurised environment of space travel that gives him occasional similar symptoms and so he follows best advice - Pack the Meds afore ye go.There is an operation for Glaucoma. My cousin got it done. No drops needed, drainers are fitted.
Eh, Professor, that image is not real. But I guess because it's about space then you automatically assume it's real. I only posted it because I found it funny and I thought you would too, being a weed smoker.Yeah but, the astronaut pictured above is fine on the ground, it's just the high altitude pressurised environment of space travel that gives him occasional similar symptoms and so he follows best advice - Pack the Meds afore ye go.![]()
Good on you for posting, yes indeed it is funny and then we find out that Chris not only is an astronaut but also a Space Cadet!!Eh, Professor, that image is not real. But I guess because it's about space then you automatically assume it's real. I only posted it because I found it funny and I thought you would too, being a weed smoker.
Until there is evidence of proof of "no ISS" we can rightfully accept that there is one, All due respect to you but as with science we must go with the evidence presented as is endorsed by all the international participants.There is no ISS in space but if there was they wouldn't be smoking weed on it - and they certainly wouldn't be sending up astronauts with glaucoma.
So you're asking me to prove that something doesn't exist, to prove a negative claim. Do unicorns exist?Until there is evidence of proof of "no ISS" we can rightfully accept that there is one,
Until there is evidence of proof of "no unicorns" we can rightfully accept that there are unicorns.
Good on you for posting, yes indeed it is funny and then we find out that Chris not only is an astronaut but also a Space Cadet!!
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaOC9danxNo
Until there is evidence of proof of "no ISS" we can rightfully accept that there is one, All due respect to you but as with science we must go with the evidence presented as is endorsed by all the international participants.
See, it's not one or the other, it's various - Of course they wouldn't be smoking weed, agreed, however they would safely grind it up and add to their yogurt or other oral solution.
Quite right they wouldn't send up astronauts with glaucoma but . . . If their astronauts were to develop such symptoms on-board then they would have appropriate medicine at hand in the first aid box.
Apparently the eyes suffer in space, but it also appears they're keeping an eye on it
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKVjUCN0YPw
![]()
Good on you for posting, yes indeed it is funny and then we find out that Chris not only is an astronaut but also a Space Cadet!!
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaOC9danxNo
Until there is evidence of proof of "no ISS" we can rightfully accept that there is one, All due respect to you but as with science we must go with the evidence presented as is endorsed by all the international participants.
See, it's not one or the other, it's various - Of course they wouldn't be smoking weed, agreed, however they would safely grind it up and add to their yogurt or other oral solution.
Quite right they wouldn't send up astronauts with glaucoma but . . . If their astronauts were to develop such symptoms on-board then they would have appropriate medicine at hand in the first aid box.
Apparently the eyes suffer in space, but it also appears they're keeping an eye on it
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKVjUCN0YPw
![]()
This type of man could not fake or lie.
You saw something in the sky, that's fine. But that is not proof that it is the ISS in orbit around a ball earth.I also saw the ISS pass over on clear nights at the farm.
If you believe they faked the moon landing, then why would you believe anything they claim?I believe everything published about space from all quarters is true except the manned moon landings.
In a film studio.How was that produced?
I don't know. How does your question relate to what you've quoted me?Why do things fall down, Hermit?
But I never said there is no ISS, I said there is no ISS in space.
I also saw the ISS pass over on clear nights at the farm.
That is because the vacuum of space next to earth without a physical barrier is a violation of the second law of thermodynamics, which can be demonstrated in a scientific experiment; therefore the ISS cannot be in a place that cannot exist according to laws of nature.
Space is claimed to be a vacuum, adjacent next to a gas pressure system, without a physical barrier or container. That's impossible according to the second law, so if you disagree then provide a scientific experiment which demonstrates a vacuum next to gas without a container.OK good, so we see along similar lines, perhaps we need to define 'Space'?
I specifically said to Val "You saw something in the sky, that's fine." So I'm not denying we can see something up there in the sky. I just don't believe that it's a vacuum orbiting a ball earth at 8 km per second (17,900 mph).There are many Home Telescope views of the ISS to be seen on Youtube, it's really up there, travelling in a fast moving orbit, no?
We don't know anything because it has not and cannot be proven. You take NASA's word for it that it's real.But what do we know about 'the vacuum of space' ???
I never said it's like a giant hoover. The second law states that gas moves from volumes of higher pressure to lower pressure. There is no sucking. The atmosphere would push into the lower pressure vacuum of space.Certainly it's not like a giant hoover hovering around the Earth trying to suck away the atmosphere, where would it get sucked to,
There's no place in the infinite vacuum of space?there's no place, is there?
So gravity contains gas? Okay, show me a demonstration of gas being contained by gravity.Besides the Earth has attractive power (gravity, if you like) which apparently overrides any potential "Vaccum", perhaps due to the planets massive integral size.