To The Moon

AUL LAD said:
what do you make of the casmir effect which gravity does not effect .
there are recorded events where humans have suspended themselves above ground for periods of time -- what do you think.
Click to expand...
I don't know anything about the Casimir Effect, but it's not the only thing that "gravity" doesn't affect.

Gravity.jpg

8kssftqog7g91.jpg

Gravity Equation.png


r14q0ygb41111.gif
 
Why is Dan allowing flat earth posts to be placed on this serious thread about the moon landings.?

The fuckin dirty hoors bastards on here have the flat earth thread, but it is not enough, they want two flat earth threads. Dan is some arshe hole to allow this
 
valamhic said:
Why is Dan allowing flat earth posts to be placed on this serious thread about the moon landings.?

The fuckin dirty hoors bastards on here have the flat earth thread, but it is not enough, they want two flat earth threads. Dan is some arshe hole to allow this
Click to expand...
Two Flat Earths are better than One Flat Earth ! ! ;) ;)
 
valamhic said:
Why is Dan allowing flat earth posts to be placed on this serious thread about the moon landings.?

The fuckin dirty hoors bastards on here have the flat earth thread, but it is not enough, they want two flat earth threads. Dan is some arshe hole to allow this
Click to expand...
You're not a mod anymore, Val, get over it. I know it's hard for your ego to accept that you lost the last bit of authority you had left in life, but you just need to take it like a man and move on.

The ability to land on the moon requires the moon to be a physical object, in a vacuum, which requires the concept of gravity and a spaceball universe to be true. They are not true so any moon landing is impossible. If you disagree, then stop whining like a little bitch, and present your evidence and arguments like a man.
 
Hermit said:
You're not a mod anymore, Val, get over it. I know it's hard for your ego to accept that you lost the last bit of authority you had left in life, but you just need to take it like a man and move on.

The ability to land on the moon requires the moon to be a physical object, in a vacuum, which requires the concept of gravity and a spaceball universe to be true. They are not true so any moon landing is impossible. If you disagree, then stop whining like a little bitch, and present your evidence and arguments like a man.
Click to expand...
Fuck off you simpleton. Dan is not a moderator either. As bad as Mowl was he kept to the threads. You idiots are not capable of doing that
 
Declan said:
I could open a section here called the Luner Lounge and Val could be the bartender
Click to expand...
Ya didn't make as good a job at being a bartender in Boston as Val makes at being a farmer in Ireland.
 
Last edited:
clarke-connolly said:
I'd say that Val got a Flake-ing down the Pub but is Pretending he was Dancing with the Sheep-Shearer ! 😲 😲
Click to expand...
The last fight was in the chipper, I posted that. A few years ago. The hair cut itself is lovely,
its the skin incisions that were a problem. I hate the way my hairdresser has a swankie word for
cutting the face of me = a skin incision. I would sack him except I am related = 3nd cousin.
 
valamhic said:
The last fight was in the chipper, I posted that. A few years ago. The hair cut itself is lovely,
its the skin incisions that were a problem. I hate the way my hairdresser has a swankie word for
cutting the face of me = a skin incision. I would sack him except I am related = 3nd cousin.
Click to expand...
I thought ye might be married !
 
clarke-connolly said:
Good Man = = Ya want to Avoid than Islamic Type Shite ! !
Click to expand...
The Islamics will own his 10 acres soon enough.....
If the 'farmer' thought he could make enough money out of it he'd have 500 portacabins full of 'refugees' on his smallholding in the arshe of nowhere in the morning.
Bent coppers, retired or not, are always on the make.
 
David has been banned said:
So tell us Hermes, how does the ISS stay up there, is it held up by string, constant rocket propulsion? Why doesn't it crash into the firmament dome?
Click to expand...
Probably the same way they keep up satellites, with balloons.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hK_kWN0BsKs


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URNu7Ez9h4U

satelloons.png

google_satelloons.png

spy-balloon-main.jpg

www.express.co.uk

Loon Project: How Google is trying to control Earth's LEOs

LOON PROJECT, Google’s ambitious attempt to introduce the internet around the world, is embarking on a new chapter with low Earth orbit technology. So what exactly is Google Loon?
www.express.co.uk www.express.co.uk

CN108349581B - Geostationary high-altitude platform - Google Patents

The geostationary platform is kept floating by a super-pressure balloon. A suitable height is 25 km. The aircraft carries electrohydrodynamic thrusters held within a cradle to overcome the wind. The sensors determine position, velocity, acceleration, and vectors. The CPU executes instructions...
patents.google.com
www.gasworld.com

Air Products inks potential $1bn helium deal with NASA

Air Products has signed a helium supply deal with NASA that could result in approximately $1.07bn of business.
www.gasworld.com www.gasworld.com
 
The third stacked Starship and Booster launch happened today. We await Scott Manley's verdict but:

a) Clean from launch to booster separation to entry into space;
b) First boost back burn on Booster was okay but seemed to have control and had engine issues during second burn ending in a plummet;
c) Coast phase and engine shut down clean during Starship orbit; tiles looked largely intact - much better than last time, and looked to be working well during re-entry although they appeared to be coming off in a shower while the angle of attack was being found;
d) Starship appeared to be rotating and didn't seem to be fully under control during re-entry;
e) It lasted a very long time during this burn - is this the first time the plasma flow has been transmitted live? It's a wonder it didn't RUD sooner given non-shielded portions of the ship were being exposed to the heat during the roll. Great advertisement for Starlink. They must have gotten a lot of data from it.
f) The cargo bay door jammed during testing and may have complicated things
g) Wonder what the pad looked like after this second launch post-improvement.
h) They've a bunch of these in stock, what will the FAA say? Can we have another go in a fortnight?

Isn't it amazing that a 119m (36 storey) launch system has put a 50m (15 storey) tall and 9m wide vehicle into space? The Capital Dock in Dublin is Ireland's tallest building. It's a 22 storey, 79m building - just for scale. It's no wonder that there are new dynamic pressures on the control surfaces at supersonic speeds. CNN are trying to talk it down but it's an astonishing feat.

Here's a video of the launch. SpaceX is making inexorable progress.


​
 
This is the real stage of space exploration.

It is very difficult.
 
clarke-connolly said:
I thought ye might be married !
Click to expand...
Very good point, I am married. I did fight for equality but I lost. We need an amendment to the constitution to stop wives and partners bossing men. They have control of everything that we want. Even what is for the dinner.

I can do what I like at the farm but I cannot buy a tin of paint for the main house without her approval. It is not fair.
I always won in the short term but in the long term she forces me to surrender.
 
David has been banned said:
So tell us Hermes, how does the ISS stay up there, is it held up by string, constant rocket propulsion? Why doesn't it crash into the firmament dome?
Click to expand...
Its two forces, one is centripetal and the other is centrifugal. They work in apposite directions. Get a small bucket and put a pint of water in it and swing it over your head. The water will stay in the bottom of the bucket. With the ISS and satellites they use the word Geeostationary orbit. The thing can be fixed over one point on the earth or it can move like the ISS. I presume you all understand what gravity is.
 
NASA does three things, 1) It lies 2) it tells the truth and 3) It it hides the truth.

They only told one lie which was the moon landings. They are hiding the truth about the Artemis mission.

In that recent mission they found it is very dangerous to send people into space and that it is impossible to
bring them back safely.
 
Kangal said:
Despite evidence and an experimental setup that even you Val could set up in your kitchen, Hermit conrinues to be ignorant of this force that dominates our daily existence.
Click to expand...
'To be honest who actually cares here about Wolf?'

Gimps like you, Wank.

#RentFree

😎
 
Kangal said:
Despite evidence and an experimental setup that even you Val could set up in your kitchen, Hermit conrinues to be ignorant of this force that dominates our daily existence.
Click to expand...
What's your experiment? Define gravity. Describe the natural observed phenomenon, state the hypothesis for the cause of that phenomenon, and describe the experiment to test that hypothesis. Name the independent and dependent variables in your experiment.
 
David has been banned said:
Nothing much until about 1.08pm and then it would get very dark and the planet would continue its motion in a straight line into outer space (where we'd all like to send Wolf)
Click to expand...
Ahem....where you and your two accounts would like to send me.
You're hated here, Kiddo, despised by everyone.👍

#RentFree
 
I agree on light
David has been banned said:
Nothing much until about 1.08pm and then it would get very dark and the planet would continue its motion in a straight line into outer space (where we'd all like to send Wolf)
Click to expand...
I agree about the light turning dark. But what about gravity. Is the effect of gravity limited by the speed of light?

Surely is the sun suddenly ceased to exist, there would be nothing holding the earth in its orbit and it would go off in a straight line at 1 pm. We would still have light until 1.08 pm so we would notice very little for 8 minutes.
 
David has been banned said:
You asked all this before. I posted the responses before that conclusively answer your questions. Use the search function.
Click to expand...
I refuted Cavendish and you avoided answering certain parts of my questions. Now you're obfuscating again when I challenge you to provide the experiment after you had a snipe at me to Val.

Cavendish is not a scientific experiment, and even the original paper describes the "experiment" as an attempt to calculate the density of earth, not prove the existence of gravity, because it already assumes gravity is true. Mass attracting mass is a theory that even Newton himself disowned. Gravity is no longer defined as mass attracts mass.
 
David has been banned said:
Yes (in the Newtonian model it was thought to be instantaneous) but nothing propagates faster than light. Which of course puts some of the spooky into 'spooky action at a distance' :) Wendy is your expert on quantum entanglement


If gravity was instantaneous, you're a few hundred years out of date Val :)
Click to expand...
electromagnetic radiation is attracted my gravity. The gravity can be from a mass or from other magnetic radiation.

So radio waves are attracted to light.
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom